Environmentalists blamed for Australia's Bush Fires

The blame over the tragic bush fires in Australia has a new target: environmentalists…

by Alex Shimo on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:58pm - 3 Comments

The blame over the tragic bush fires in Australia has a new target: environmentalists and green policies. Some experts say more prohibitions on logging and burning worsened the fires that have claimed the lives of at least 200 people. Prescribed burning creates a natural break that stops the flames from spreading, yet in recent years, it has sharply decreased in favour of greening the natural urban environments. With the exception of Western Australia, all of the nation’s six state governments have reduced heir forest burning programs since the 1980s, according to Phil Cheney, a retired chief scientist from the Bushfire Research Unit of Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. In some areas, there are strict laws on cutting down trees around one’s property, and residents now say this put their houses at risk. In a heated exchange, a Victoria resident, Warwick Spooner, blamed local councilors for the deaths of his mother and brother, who had died in the home in the blaze.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://www.enviromon.net/ Jen

    Some fires are natural, you can't blame them all on developing activities.

  • Tokalosh

    Keeping things natural versus clearing away fire hazard vegetation near homes is a tough one. What a terrible experience, particularly as these people know what was needed to protect their loved ones.
    Pave paradise and put up a parking lot or have natural disasters wipe out your community. Humans have been clearing their habitats for centuries for this reason.
    Perhaps to be green means having less humans. Yet, here in Canada in the 70's we were warned about The Human Bomb of too much population and now, here we are, importing people because we are not reproducing fast enough.

    • Vatro

      It really isn't an "either, or " question, though it seems it's often framed that way. It would seem here that because it's framed as an all or none position that this preventable tragedy occurred however.

From Macleans