GiornoWatch: Meet Paul Wilson, who, as it turns out, may actually be nonpartisan — or at least markedly less partisan — after all.

by kadyomalley on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:45am - 9 Comments

Okay, so it’s possible that ITQ may have been a wee bit too quick to arch her delicately sceptical brow at the notion that the Prime Minister’s newly appointed policy director – who, as of yesterday, is on the job, according to the PMO staff list – could possibly exemplify a new spirit of not-quite-as-zealously-partisanship at Langevin.

Paul Wilson may have spent years on the Hill working for three of the four incarnations of the modern Conservative Party, but this Ottawa Citizen article on the increasing presence of Evangelical Christian lobby and advocacy groups in Ottawa – first published in 2006, and reprinted by the Rockefeller Institute’s Roundtable on Religion and Social Welfare Policy – suggests that he made a conscious effort to avoid the big-C Conservative label when he left politics to take up a post with Trinity Western University:

Paul Wilson, director of Trinity’s Ottawa campus, is quick to point out the university’s presence has more to do with its educational mission — to groom active citizens guided by their faith — than with an overtly political agenda.

He bristles at comparisons between Trinity and Patrick Henry College near Washington, which has been described as a Christian college that trains young Republicans to become politicians.

“This is not a political training program. It’s about understanding citizenship and faith,” says Mr. Wilson. “Patrick Henry and the people who go there are Republicans. There is no sense of them being politically neutral or disinterested.” [...]

Mr. Wilson describes his students as having diverse political views. During their time in Ottawa, the students meet MPs of all stripes, including the Conservatives’ Stockwell Day, the NDP’s Bill Blaikie and former Liberal Dennis Mills. Former Reform MP Deborah Grey and Conservative MP Chuck Strahl — both Trinity alumni — have also been guest speakers.

“The students are not here to proselytize, they’re not here to be advocates, they’re here to learn,” says Mr. Wilson, a former research director for the Reform Party.

In addition to teaching, Mr. Wilson is organizing a national faith and politics conference sponsored by Trinity and the Manning Centre. The conference, to be held in Ottawa in February, grew out of a desire to promote the kind of sober-minded activism encouraged by Mr. Manning.

During his terms as Reform and Canadian Alliance leader, Mr. Manning took pains to draw a line between faith and politics. He shied away from directly targeting Christian voters, and rarely spoke at churches on political themes.

“It’s about encouraging Christians to be involved in politics, but it’s also about cautioning them,” Mr. Wilson says of the upcoming conference. “Our message (to Christians) is you need to be engaged properly, carefully and wisely because if you don’t, you’re going to blow up whatever cause or issue you’re working on. And you’re going to discredit your faith in the public eye.”

Mr. Wilson points to the conservative Christian community’s failed attempt to block same-sex marriage legislation as a cautionary tale. Though he won’t give examples, he criticizes the bitter, at times confrontational, tactics used during the campaign.

“We need to be temperate, we need to be restrained, we need to be respectful. Maybe the debate sometimes wasn’t held with that tone. And in a sense, we not only lost the particular legislative battle, we lost the broader battle by effectively being marginalized and just basically discredited.” [...]


Bookmark and Share
  • DianeG

    “We need to be temperate, we need to be restrained, we need to be respectful”

    Perhaps Mr. Wilson has the wrong job. We should advocate for a new post – EOMP (Educator of MP’s.) He could then show our MP’s (government and opposition parties included) how to reach this lofty goal.

    • serendipitty

      “We need to be temperate, we need to be restrained, we need to be respectful”

      For Pariah** Poi-Poi Boticelli Boy Poilievre that should become a life mission.

      ** Has never … Will never … impress me with his hypocrisy.

  • Ti-Guy

    Maybe the debate sometimes wasn’t held with that tone. And in a sense, we not only lost the particular legislative battle, we lost the broader battle by effectively being marginalized and just basically discredited.”

    God works in mysterious ways. Maybe the fundamentalists will figure that out one of these days.

  • steveh

    I kind of agree with your line of thinking. Certainly more than Kady’s, “they should learn to be better lobbyests” argument…

    http://blog.macleans.ca/2009/01/29/a-glaring-hole-in-the-fiscal-genome-map/

  • http://www.canadianrosebud.blogspot.com burlivespipe

    Kady, don’t lose that soft-and-cuddly cynical edge. I can’t see someone who takes this job as anything but slick and concealing something…

  • Ted

    Interesting Giorno moves.

    Darrel Reid, former head of the Canadian branch of the US evangelical group Focus on the Family, arch-social conservative, former Conservative Director of Policy, gets promoted to replace Muttart, certainly a conservative but a pragmatist and strategist through and through.

    Paul Wilson, former head of Canadian evangelical Trinity Western University, arch-social conservative, gets promoted to replace Reid as Director of Policy.

    Among others.

    Seems the social conservatives are taking up higher ranks.

    Early days in this revolution yet, but it seems apparent to me that Harper – having realized he has lost all of his credentials as an economic conservative, as an economic stable hand, as a senate Reformer, as a promise keeper, as an accountable and transparent leader, as a woo-er of Quebec – is falling back on a more, shall we say, devout “base”.

    Harper has always been touted as an economic conservative but not a social/religious conservative, at least in terms of what drives him politically, but the uber-poller, micro-marketer must be seeing that his base is crumbling everywhere and the most vocal and active and ready to give money are the social conservatives within his midst.

    Watch for some new signs of non-economic arch conservative policy to start popping up here and there testing the waters of public opinion (both generally and to see how excited the base will get). Who knows where, but, oh I don’t know, off the top of my head, just guessing, perhaps another run at the gun registry, perhaps another run at the Canadian Human Rights Commission, perhaps another dance along the edges of the abortion debate. But I could be wrong. It has been known to happen on occasion.

  • Will

    Only under Harper could a “non-partisan” figure have a background of organzing for expliticly conservative groups such as the Manning Centre, and inviting socially conservative MP’s to talk to future Conservative militants, and have worked as a hardcore Reform Party hack.

    If/When the Liberals get back into power, can we expect such “non-partisan” figures as Shelia Copps and Carolyn Parrish to have leading roles?

    • Ted

      Harper has bent the rules of partisanship so far that even the Kady O’Malley’s of the media world consider someone who is an arch-conservative a “non-partisan” if they can also demonstrate on occasion that they can have other objectives and priorities in non-political circumstances.

  • Will

    In defense though, really, the PMO is pretty much an entirely political/partisan body (under both Liberal and Conservative governments) so I really dont know how anyone who is on the payroll is supposed to be actually non-partisan in the sense of not putting politics first. Yes, Wilson may turn out to be less of an attack dog, but a less combative style does not mean he is any less partisan.

From Macleans