<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A running diary of TV coverage of the Obama visit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86324</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86324</guid>
		<description>Wow, no offense Scott, but I do not usually consider you a vocabulary building resource - unless &quot;vocabulary&quot; is narrowly defined as words for boobs.  But &quot;deiced&quot; was new to me.  I don&#039;t even know how to pronounce it.  Was it deest?  Diced?  Dee-sed?  So I typed it into Google, and those smug bastards tried to convince me that I meant &quot;decided&quot;.  And I said to them &quot;No!  No google!  Deiced, dammit!&quot;.  Apparently it has to do with ice melting.

Oh this is embarrassing, but just before I submitted this comment, I realised that it probably has something to do with combining the word &quot;ice&quot; and the prefix &quot;de&quot;.  God help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, no offense Scott, but I do not usually consider you a vocabulary building resource &#8211; unless &#8220;vocabulary&#8221; is narrowly defined as words for boobs.  But &#8220;deiced&#8221; was new to me.  I don&#8217;t even know how to pronounce it.  Was it deest?  Diced?  Dee-sed?  So I typed it into Google, and those smug bastards tried to convince me that I meant &#8220;decided&#8221;.  And I said to them &#8220;No!  No google!  Deiced, dammit!&#8221;.  Apparently it has to do with ice melting.</p>
<p>Oh this is embarrassing, but just before I submitted this comment, I realised that it probably has something to do with combining the word &#8220;ice&#8221; and the prefix &#8220;de&#8221;.  God help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. Beal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86323</link>
		<dc:creator>V. Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86323</guid>
		<description>The best coverage I have read so far today. I kid you not. After a day full of total PR bull crap and seeing journalists I once respected report on total stupid &#039;who really gives a crap?&#039; things today, what a refreshing read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best coverage I have read so far today. I kid you not. After a day full of total PR bull crap and seeing journalists I once respected report on total stupid &#8216;who really gives a crap?&#8217; things today, what a refreshing read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john g</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86322</link>
		<dc:creator>john g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86322</guid>
		<description>Total props Scott, you are damn funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total props Scott, you are damn funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcanada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86321</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86321</guid>
		<description>Harper, our poor sad monkey. If he said &#039;I love this country&#039; nobody would believe him.

Also would it hurt so much to practice that genuine smile look a bit in the mirror. Perhaps hire a &#039;smile coach&#039;...

Last thing...How much hairspray does Harper use? Not a hair out of place...it don&#039;t seem natural somehow... Just sayin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper, our poor sad monkey. If he said &#8216;I love this country&#8217; nobody would believe him.</p>
<p>Also would it hurt so much to practice that genuine smile look a bit in the mirror. Perhaps hire a &#8216;smile coach&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>Last thing&#8230;How much hairspray does Harper use? Not a hair out of place&#8230;it don&#8217;t seem natural somehow&#8230; Just sayin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86320</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86320</guid>
		<description>Harper must be so jealous of all the love Obama is receiving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper must be so jealous of all the love Obama is receiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86319</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86319</guid>
		<description>I think the picture currently at the top of this post deserves a caption contest, especially since Mr Harper&#039;s hair looks like he just stood in a wind tunnel (by comparison to his usual style).  Do you see that bit over his left eye - completely out of place.

For example: &quot;The president and prime minister look to the audience for votes on who has the best pursed lips&quot;

or
&quot;While Obama gazes over the crowd of attendees, Mr Harper looks to his handlers to see if he can leave now.&quot;

I&#039;ve had an very enjoyable day monitoing this post to keep track of the most memorable and important moments of &quot;the Visit&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the picture currently at the top of this post deserves a caption contest, especially since Mr Harper&#8217;s hair looks like he just stood in a wind tunnel (by comparison to his usual style).  Do you see that bit over his left eye &#8211; completely out of place.</p>
<p>For example: &#8220;The president and prime minister look to the audience for votes on who has the best pursed lips&#8221;</p>
<p>or<br />
&#8220;While Obama gazes over the crowd of attendees, Mr Harper looks to his handlers to see if he can leave now.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had an very enjoyable day monitoing this post to keep track of the most memorable and important moments of &#8220;the Visit&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billg</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86318</link>
		<dc:creator>billg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86318</guid>
		<description>You had me at ...&#039;this is scott feschuk&#039;
The Bob Fife line about the plane coming out of the blue was mucho funny....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had me at &#8230;&#8217;this is scott feschuk&#8217;<br />
The Bob Fife line about the plane coming out of the blue was mucho funny&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedmison</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86317</link>
		<dc:creator>jedmison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86317</guid>
		<description>ahahaha. They are back to talking about the shoe thrower on CNN. And on CBC they are talking about what Harper was saying to an American audience. Newsflash: the American audience doesn&#039;t care.

ps. Scott, you&#039;re freakin&#039; hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahahaha. They are back to talking about the shoe thrower on CNN. And on CBC they are talking about what Harper was saying to an American audience. Newsflash: the American audience doesn&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>ps. Scott, you&#8217;re freakin&#8217; hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew H</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86316</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86316</guid>
		<description>Priceless ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priceless ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86315</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86315</guid>
		<description>Scott
i just read AC piece. I think you should get over there. He may be getting ready to break out the flame thrower - Pacino style1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott<br />
i just read AC piece. I think you should get over there. He may be getting ready to break out the flame thrower &#8211; Pacino style1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86314</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86314</guid>
		<description>I just found a new favourite liveblog to read. Thanks - you rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found a new favourite liveblog to read. Thanks &#8211; you rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron White, Calgary</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron White, Calgary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86313</guid>
		<description>Dog gone funny Scott. Since I have to work and can&#039;t watch TV I am sooooo glad that you can give me all the scoop...Can&#039;t wait for the &quot;Pres. meets Iggy&#039; commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dog gone funny Scott. Since I have to work and can&#8217;t watch TV I am sooooo glad that you can give me all the scoop&#8230;Can&#8217;t wait for the &#8220;Pres. meets Iggy&#8217; commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john g</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86312</link>
		<dc:creator>john g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86312</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The reporter is wearing a headset and, judging from the picture quality, is transmitting her report using the Internet circa 1982. Congratulations, blurry bus reporter we can barely hear! You’re the early frontrunner for Worst Reportorial Assignment of Obama Day.&lt;/i&gt;

Well I guess I can cancel the APB that was out for Stephane Dion&#039;s videographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The reporter is wearing a headset and, judging from the picture quality, is transmitting her report using the Internet circa 1982. Congratulations, blurry bus reporter we can barely hear! You’re the early frontrunner for Worst Reportorial Assignment of Obama Day.</i></p>
<p>Well I guess I can cancel the APB that was out for Stephane Dion&#8217;s videographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86311</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86311</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding Scott? nice try but one look at the smile shows plainly and for all to see that Stevie fell all over himself when Obama suggested a prime time photo op like the soon to be famous wave from the hill - ROFL LMAO - I think this is one of the best ever just to see Stevie getting all the love from Obama makes frustrated left wing nuts drool with envy. You simply have gotta love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding Scott? nice try but one look at the smile shows plainly and for all to see that Stevie fell all over himself when Obama suggested a prime time photo op like the soon to be famous wave from the hill &#8211; ROFL LMAO &#8211; I think this is one of the best ever just to see Stevie getting all the love from Obama makes frustrated left wing nuts drool with envy. You simply have gotta love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86310</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86310</guid>
		<description>Comparing the astrological signs of Harper and Obama.  The cult of personality is alive and well. I think it&#039;s time to just admit we&#039;ve never moved on psychologically from the era of kings and queens.

&quot;He&#039;s an Aries, so we can probably expect a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan. Back to you Tom...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing the astrological signs of Harper and Obama.  The cult of personality is alive and well. I think it&#8217;s time to just admit we&#8217;ve never moved on psychologically from the era of kings and queens.</p>
<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s an Aries, so we can probably expect a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan. Back to you Tom&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley Hennessey</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86309</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley Hennessey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86309</guid>
		<description>Honestly I challenge anyone to find a funnier blogger than Feschuk.

This is dynamite writing. I love the cuts to CNN footage reaction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I challenge anyone to find a funnier blogger than Feschuk.</p>
<p>This is dynamite writing. I love the cuts to CNN footage reaction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/19/a-running-diary-of-tv-coverage-of-the-obama-visit/comment-page-1/#comment-86308</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=36855#comment-86308</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Out there? But there are PEOPLE out there!!&lt;/i&gt;

Awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Out there? But there are PEOPLE out there!!</i></p>
<p>Awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

