Coyne v. Wells in a post-Obama Ottawa

Their weekly video podcast

by macleans.ca on Friday, February 20, 2009 8:05pm - 3 Comments

Bookmark and Share
  • J@ck M!tchell

    Great vlog.

    On NAFTA, it strikes me that Obama and Harper both played it right. Obama must, as the vloggers say, appease rustbelt protectionists rhetorically, so he says “open it up”; we wouldn’t mind incorporating the side-agreements — but only the side-agreements — into the treaty, but we fear opening up the whole thing. So Harper, quite rightly, says we have to be careful about starting from Square One. Prediction: Obama makes protectionist noises, passes some token legislation that doesn’t affect us, and either we do get American agreement on incorporating only the side-agreements, or we don’t and nothing happens. Bottom line: as Mr. Coyne says, Obama is not a protectionist (nobody is) and we can all cool off a bit on that score.

    Technical note: would it be possible in post-production to even out the sound levels? Mr. Wells was rather louder than Mr. Coyne and my neighbours now think I’m a loud, canny man.

    • http://myblahg.com Robert McClelland

      Appeasing rustbelt protectionists is nothing new for the past few presidents. Early in his first term Bush slapped tariffs on Chinese steel that remained in place for a year.

  • http://geocities.com/spacetimeexercises David

    I like the format.
    Webmaster, I suggest you let people know that they can maximize the video to full screen. It makes for a much better viewing experience and many people don’t know about it.

From Macleans