On NAFTA, it strikes me that Obama and Harper both played it right. Obama must, as the vloggers say, appease rustbelt protectionists rhetorically, so he says “open it up”; we wouldn’t mind incorporating the side-agreements — but only the side-agreements — into the treaty, but we fear opening up the whole thing. So Harper, quite rightly, says we have to be careful about starting from Square One. Prediction: Obama makes protectionist noises, passes some token legislation that doesn’t affect us, and either we do get American agreement on incorporating only the side-agreements, or we don’t and nothing happens. Bottom line: as Mr. Coyne says, Obama is not a protectionist (nobody is) and we can all cool off a bit on that score.
Technical note: would it be possible in post-production to even out the sound levels? Mr. Wells was rather louder than Mr. Coyne and my neighbours now think I’m a loud, canny man.
http://myblahg.com Robert McClelland
Appeasing rustbelt protectionists is nothing new for the past few presidents. Early in his first term Bush slapped tariffs on Chinese steel that remained in place for a year.
http://geocities.com/spacetimeexercises David
I like the format.
Webmaster, I suggest you let people know that they can maximize the video to full screen. It makes for a much better viewing experience and many people don’t know about it.