PBOWatch: Okay, the Parliamentary Budget Office has now officially put more thought into those quarterly budget reports …

by kadyomalley on Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:46pm - 12 Comments

… than the party that came up with the idea to have the government provide them in the first place. Or so it seems from the latest briefing note, released earlier today:

• The PBO recommends that Parliament establish an appropriate provisional reporting framework prior to the release of the Government’s reports to ensure the appropriate information is being collected up-front — on the understanding that these reports can be improved over time as information accumulates and the situation evolves.

• This note provides the PBO’s view on some key information requirements for the content of these reports — the central goal of which should be to provide Parliament with accurate, timely, and easily understood information that details: recent economic and fiscal developments and prospects; the implementation and effectiveness of budget measures; and the budget results in light of its guiding principles.

• The specific contents of future progress reports to Parliament may include:

o An evaluation of economic developments relative to Budget 2009 assumptions, and an assessment of economic risks that uses an updated survey of private sector forecasters and, if applicable, the Government’s own forecast.

o A summary of recent fiscal results and analysis of fiscal risks, as well as an estimate of the Government’s structural budget balance and statement of its fiscal targets.

o A clear implementation and oversight framework that describes for each budget measure: the spending authority and delivery mechanism; implementation indicators and progress benchmarks; and expected output and/or outcome indicators. This note provides specific examples to illustrate these concepts.

o A discussion of progress relative to the three guiding principles that Budget 2009 be: timely; targeted; and temporary.

And that’s just from the summary — the full report runs fifteen pages, and includes a very helpful backgrounder on parliamentary oversight, and extensive analysis – with tables, even -  of the sort of information that will be useful in determining exactly whether the money is being spent in accordance with the stated goals of the budget. They’ve even provided a sample spreadsheet!

Now, it’s possible – although somewhat unlikely – that the Liberals have released a similarly detailed outline and ITQ missed it – or, alternately, that they specifically requested that the PBO put together this report, in which case I will cheerfully update this post. But at the moment, it looks like the parliamentary budget officer is putting more effort into making sure that these reports – the first of which, incidentally, is theoretically due by the end of March – hold the government accountable than the Official Opposition.

Bookmark and Share
  • KevinPageFan

    On a semi-related note, perhaps Mr. Page and Peter MacKay could be persuaded to explain why their respective estimates on the cost of the Afghan War diverge by many billions of dollars.

  • Paul Wells

    I greatly fear that’s because what the Opposition wanted was confidence votes in March, June and December. They could be votes on whether it was Ginger or Mary Ann who was cuter on Gilligan’s Island, for all the Opposition cares; when they’re ready, the Liberals will vote against the Conservatives, who will of course be voting for Mary Ann.

    • http://www.macleans.ca Kady O’Malley

      But look! A spreadsheet!

      • Paul Wells

        It is indeed a nifty spreadsheet.

      • archangel

        What’s the FV of E, since there are no Ts?

    • mecheng

      Not only do I fear that PW is correct, I also fear that with the government required to be in “constant reporting mode”, more bureaucrats will be required to support this effort. And once in place, I fear that this will become a permanent part of the government.

      Let me say…I like the “spirit” of the quarterly updates, I’m just not so sure about the execution and the implications. I don’t have a lot of confidence in this government (or any government for that matter) to be able to implement this without wasting a lot of money.

      Oh well…I guess we can count new salaries for new government workers as “stimulus”.

    • RyanD

      You really figure the Cons would go with Mary Ann? That is truely disturbing to me…it means I would agree with Harper on something…ICK!!!

  • http://ontario-geofish.blogspot.com/ Harold Asmis

    We were discussing over in my blog that you must be the fastest thumb-typist in Canada! How many words per minute? You’ve got to join my campaign to make the world’s children all Kady-thumbers, and get Blackberry to come up with ‘One Blackberry Per Child’.

    http://ontario-geofish.blogspot.com/2009/02/one-blackberry-per-child.html

    • archangel

      You’re stirring a Storm in a teacup. Such a Bold idea. Someone’s bound to Flip when they find out. Threw them a Curve you did.

  • TobyornotToby

    Can I vote for the PBO party next election?

  • Wascally Wabbit

    Heck – with all this progress – the PBO will be asked to write a State of the Union message for SHPM to deliver.
    Oh wait a mo – that was the Throne Speech – wasn’t it – and heck – he can have one of those any time he wants to prorogue!

From Macleans