Attack of the condo craters

If projects fail, will our cities be left with huge holes to fill?

by Jason Kirby on Wednesday, March 4, 2009 5:30pm - 17 Comments

Hopefully things won’t get as bad here as they already are in the U.S., where the image of stalled condo craters is nothing new. Some two dozen Seattle condo construction projects are now on hold. Last fall, in Chicago, work screeched to a halt on the Spire, billed as the world’s tallest residential tower. The move left a perfectly round, eight-storey-deep hole near the city’s lakefront. In some U.S. cities, officials have even ordered developers to fill holes back in. In cases where developers go bankrupt and no other companies step in to take over, the fear is local taxpayers could be on the hook to plug the holes.

The image of those gaping pits is starting to worry city planners here at home, who are starting to rethink their approach to major condo projects with an eye to more failures. After all, a lot can go wrong when you have a giant hole in the middle of a city. If the pit fills with water it could erode the walls and threaten surrounding buildings, not to mention providing mosquitoes with an urban swamp in which to breed. And if left too long, the walls will eventually begin to decay.

As it is in Vancouver, a developer can halt construction for six months before the city threatens to withdraw the building permit. Sometimes projects do come back to life. For example, earlier this month, workers returned to a gaping hole in Vancouver dug for the glitzy The Residences at the Ritz-Carlton, four months after the project was put on hold pending “design changes.” Still, if a hole remains dormant for long enough, officials will step in to make sure it is properly secured and monitored, says Will Johnston, Vancouver’s chief building official. That’s already happened in Calgary, where last November city planning officials took responsibility for safeguarding a hole dug for the Manchester Station condo project. The tougher question of what happens if big projects are indefinitely put on hold is one Vancouver and Calgary are only now just starting to consider. “We don’t know if we’re going to see more of this or not,” says Johnston. “But my worry is: what if this goes on for three years, and we have 20- to 30-m holes dug and left sitting there?”

Abandoned condos don’t just cause problems for cities—the buyers who had hoped to live there will end up with huge headaches, as well. Before the first pile of dirt is moved, developers typically pre-sell 60 to 80 per cent of a project’s units, collecting deposits of up to 20 per cent of the sale price in the process. The money gets put into a third-party trust. If a project is cancelled, buyers get their deposits back. But the fact is, a developer can delay a project for months before having to return the money, leaving buyers stranded while they wait for a refund.

The fear is, if condo prices fall far enough, it will make more economic sense for buyers to walk away from their pre-sale agreements and risk being sued rather than complete the deal. After all, if you made a $50,000 down payment on a pre-sale agreement to buy a $900,000 condo, but your condo is only worth $700,000 now, you’ll only lose $50,000 by walking away, but you’ll overpay by $200,000 if you go through with the deal. If enough people walk, more projects might be put on ice. And just the sight of condo craters sitting empty threatens to further drive down consumer confidence. “When you see a project where nothing is happening, it becomes a symbol of what’s happening in the economy,” says CIBC’s Tal. “It impacts the psyche of potential investors and consumers.”

Even some realtors are starting to express concern. “There are still cranes building condos downtown so somebody is getting financing, but let’s face it, most people in Canada don’t have any idea how bad the world economy is,” says real estate agent Jim Sparrow. “I think you’re going to see a lot more pain before it gets better.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Pingback: Attack of the condo craters · Real-Estate.ExplainedOnline.Net

  • Pingback: Attack of the condo craters · Real-Estate-Investing.ExplainedOnline.Net

  • Pingback: Attack of the condo craters « Vicky Chou

  • Pingback: Attack of the condo craters · Invest-In-Real-Estate.ExplainedOnline.Net

  • Pingback: The shocking truth about the value of your home - Business - Macleans.ca

  • Pingback: Attack of the condo craters · Real-Estate.ExplainedHere.Com

  • john

    A lot of speculation with the Toronto examples. The only concrete example was Pinnacle and the small development on King. This article doesn’t mention the plethora of projects currently still moving ahead. Toronto has a slew buildings which will continue to rise in the next few years which should soften the blow. Besides, all of those people who purchased pre-built condos are likely looking to move somewhere. As soon as they get their money back I am sure they will be looking for units somewhere in the core.

    Smart investors, the ones who have built this city so far and weathered the 90′s recession, will know the cycles by now. Only the weak condo builders will fall in this environment due to their greed.

    • wayne moores

      Keep the rose colored glasses on bub. Me thinks you are either a real estate agent or someone who just speculated a “condo too far” and are on the hook for a big loss. Cheers.

  • http://abbottclassiccycles.com/cart/index.html MIcarGI

    brilliant article. it’s true, cities will be left with these craters, and the developers couldn’t care less, it’s just something to note on their taxes.

  • Chilled

    Vancouver can use the holes to bury dead gangsters. Now Toronto, that’s another story.

  • capital

    You don’t see the any holes in Ottawa’s market. All projects are still moving forward and sales are stable. An O-Train subway tunel to be built over the next few years will also boost downtown development.

  • Pingback: Brell~Brenda Ellis : Who's Saying What About Real Estate and the Ecomony - March 9, 2009

  • Tracy Johnson

    Hopefully if city has to fill the holes they will bill the companies DOBULE the same as they would bill a regular resident for not shovelling his sidewalk or cutting his lawn. They would have more than double the reason as well, since they take the risk of being sued by damage when these holes fill with water.

    Hopefully I would never hear anything so foolish as the mention that taxpayers should pick up the tab to fill these holes, even if it means it will force companies experiencing hardship into bankruptcy. After all, there is no hardship consideration given to residents.

  • LM

    Interesting article. A good read. I found the risk to pre-sale buyers to be somewhat understated. It is my understanding that if they walk away from a $900,000 contract to buy a condo, the developer can sell the pre-sale buyer’s condo to another buyer for whatever the developer can get, and then sue the pre-sale buyer for the amount over and above the sale amount up to $900,000 (or $850,000 given that the developer holds the $50,000 deposit). The pre-sale buyer has no control over the selling price to the new buyer.

  • club105

    My cousin’s $450,000 condo at Front and Spadina in Toronto has just been completed. I wonder what it’ll be worth in a year?

  • Pingback: Economic News March 13, 2009 » Harry Tran’s Daily 101 » Blog Archive

  • http://www.realestatevalley.ca/ Vancouver Condos

    Ultimately this comes down to not enough rules in place for developers. Companies take a risk by being in business and the expense needs to come out of their pocket.

From Macleans