To China for a cure

For $30,000, clinics offer stem cell therapies unavailable here. Do they deliver?

by Alex Shimo on Monday, March 9, 2009 12:25pm - 5 Comments

Missouri resident Jeff Carneal, 38, doesn’t feel like a failure, but having spent so much money, he is frustrated and disappointed. He lost the use of his legs when he fell off a stepladder while fixing his father’s barn. He has spent the past six years working with different doctors trying to learn to walk again, even flying to Quito, Ecuador, for an experimental operation (nerves were removed from his legs and grafted onto his spinal cord, which cost a lot, but didn’t really help). When a Maclean’s reporter first met Carneal at the Beijing Xishan Hospital after stem cell treatment, he was enthusiastic and believed the operation he’d had a couple of weeks earlier had alleviated some of the shearing leg pain he’d felt ever since his accident. But when contacted a few weeks after he returned to the United States, he was more downbeat, and said the operation hadn’t really made any difference.

Negative outcomes aren’t widely reported, but they are more common than the Chinese hospitals would have you think, says James Guest, a professor of neurological surgery at the University of Miami. He visited Huang in Beijing in the summer of 2004 to sample and test the fluid being injected into foreign patients. The results were inconclusive, he says. Following this, he went a step further, and examined spinal cord injury patients pre- and post-treatment in China. The results, published in 2006 in the journal Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, make clear the difference between what the doctors see and what patients want to believe. Of the seven, six thought they recovered some limb movement, although in most cases the physicians measured very little difference.

A few had concrete gains: a 19-year-old had chronic, burning back pain that eased enough for the patient to stop taking painkillers. Another patient had fewer muscle spasms after the procedure and could angle his left hand a little more, although he phoned Guest six months later to say the surgery had not made any permanent difference. On the downside, there were also post-treatment complications: a 22-year-old contracted meningitis, pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding, which were managed with heavy medications, and another had a fever and confusion along with a drug rash. Guest is critical of the Chinese stem cell treatments: he believes some doctors are “motivated by profits” and “they place patients at risk for therapies which have minimal effect.”

Eight months after travelling to China, Haas was struggling with the symptoms of Machado-Joseph disease. He was having problems walking and was falling again. The family still had some money left over from their fundraisers, so they decided to make another trip to China, and took out a small loan. In March 2008, he and his wife went to China, this time to Qingdao in eastern China—the first hospital wouldn’t accept them since it was now prioritizing Chinese nationals over foreigners, explains Cherie. After four weeks of treatment, Haas had more energy and there were slight improvements in his balance and speech, he says. However, the gains lasted all of two months and today he’s just as bad as before the first trip. Nevertheless, despite the costs, and the dubious rates of success, the family would like to return again if they could afford it. “I would go tomorrow if we could,” Cherie says. “It gave people hope.”

Bookmark and Share
  • lethe

    totally biased…so the $30,000 is pointless to spend even if it could save your life? china doesnt have free health care, neither does many other countries(i.e. the States) canada doesnt have ‘free’ health care, either. it seems to be free, but in fact it is paid through our taxes.
    my grandmother(in china) used to have breast cancer,which was cured years ago, and she’s doing pretty well right now even at the age of 84. so based on your thoery my grandma’s duped then? funny how some people interpret things. breast cancer is absolutely curable in china as long as you haven’t reached the advanced stage, however women in some parts of canada(i.e. Newfoundland and Labrador) dont even receive the right treatment even they have the access. i just wanna say that even a great country like canada has its minors, so dont try to make others look bad as long as they’re doing a good thing.

  • T. Thwim

    Discussions of the “placebo effect” always amuse me. They come off like “Well, this treatment didn’t really work,” but the truth of the matter is that if the patient has his/her symptoms reduced/removed, why then yes it did. Just because it can’t be explained by science doesn’t make it false.

    The sad fact of the matter is that no treatment works 100% on 100% of individuals. “Real” treatments may have a higher rate of success, but even they don’t work at times. And when it comes to the placebo effect, it’s well understood that a strong belief in the success of the treatment adds to the likelihood of the success.

    So is it real? Who knows. If it works, who cares?

  • Terry

    T.Thwim> It matters quite a bit if it diverting time and resources away from a particular patient’s treatment, and if it channels research money away from valid science. So a study that shows that acupuncture works, but it doesn’t matter where you stick the needles (ie. it is all placebo) then that’s something that is good to know.

    Otherwise, we might as well try to placebo the hell out of all our patients, and hold faith healing revivals in all our hospitals.

  • Francis

    Experiments, only dangerous experiments. They are criminals, to steal money at desperates. For medicine today is not considered a cure, the risk is to generate tumors. Not be told this to the people

  • wayne

    Recall acupuncture was decried as ineffective, only recently was it accepted in Canada.

From Macleans