How to fight the gangs

Gang-related crime is rising, overwhelming authorities. Something can be done.

by Ken MacQueen on Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:50am - 14 Comments

How to fight the gangs“A crisis is a terrible thing to waste,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper said last Thursday, as he stood in a Burnaby, B.C., maintenance shed to announce $350 million in federal support for a suburban extension to the Lower Mainland’s rapid transit system. While the morning’s theme was economic stimulus, he confronted a different crisis that afternoon: a plague of gang war and youth crime waged on the streets of Metro Vancouver, the Fraser Valley—and in communities across the country.

In February alone, there were some 19 shootings in the Lower Mainland, eight deaths and a mounting fear that authorities were powerless to stop the anarchy. And with good reason. In 1997 there were 28 gang-related murders in Canada. By 2007 that climbed to 117. One of every five people killed in Canada is now the victim of a gang hit. While B.C. has the current political spotlight, it accounted for just 20 per cent of gang murders in 2007. One of every four gang killings, in fact, happened in Ontario. Where there is progress, even that is a mixed blessing. Twelve years ago, Quebec accounted for a staggering 61 per cent of the nation’s gang murders. By 2007 its share was down to 19 per cent, not because Quebec is more peaceful, but because gangs in other provinces are more violent.

The impact of gang warfare is shot through the statistics in this, the second annual national crime rankings, as compiled by Maclean’s with Statistics Canada’s data (see page 22). StatsCan reports the crime rate hit its lowest point in 30 years in 2007. That good news is tempered by the intractable problem of violent youth crime—on the rise since the mid-1980s, and a troubling entry point into gang life. Although the level is unchanged from 2006, it is double the rate of 20 years ago. The homicide rate by minors dropped, but it remains the second-highest since 1961.

On the day his justice minister, Rob Nicholson, tabled in Ottawa the first of a series of proposed laws to hike penalties and impose mandatory minimum sentences for gun, gang and drug crimes, Harper convened in Vancouver a closed-door meeting of regional police chiefs, and the families of the victims of gang mayhem. To his left sat Vancouver police Chief Jim Chu and to his right was Eileen Mohan, whose 22-year-old son Chris was one of two innocent witnesses killed in a gang massacre that claimed six lives in a suburban Surrey apartment block during a previous wave of violence in 2007. Harper looked around the table at the 15 or so in attendance. I’ll give you each four minutes, he said, tell me one thing the government can do to help.

Also at Macleans.ca: Q &A with Michael Chettleburgh, the author of ‘Young Thugs,’ on suburbanization of gangsters

There were calls for more resources, for tougher sentences for prolific offenders and programs to keep vulnerable youth out of the clutches of gangs. But all of Harper’s measures so far, which he concedes are a first step, are predicated on punishing those who get caught—an all too infrequent occurrence. Solving the crisis will take more than adding a few pages to a bloated Criminal Code, and firing off drive-by comments on the “soft-on-crime policies” of his political opponents. It’s not just bleeding hearts who say that, but overwhelmed local politicians, crime analysts and street-hardened cops.

Gangsters across the country are getting away with murder. Three men, two with gang ties, were killed by gunmen who burst into a Calgary Vietnamese restaurant on New Year’s Day. No arrests. The six killed 17 months ago were in a neighbouring apartment to the Mohans. No arrests. And just last week, murder charges were withdrawn against two Toronto men accused of a gun slaying last March, after fearful witnesses were unwilling to testify. Abdikarim Abdikarim, 18, was killed and five others were wounded as gunmen opened ?re in an apartment lobby. The murder was caught on grainy closed-circuit surveillance tape, later posted by police on YouTube. Without witnesses, even that was deemed insufficient evidence to convict.

Are shooters fixated on sentencing provisions and parole eligibility as they blaze away? Unlikely. More probably they gamble on the slim odds of capture by overworked murder squads, drowning in paperwork and shackled by legal precedents.

Where there is success, the resources required are staggering. Last month, 60 arrests were made as police targeted the middle and upper echelons of a drug distribution ring in Montreal and parts of Ontario. Project Axe was 2½ years in the making and involved 700 police officers from six police forces in Quebec and Ontario. The resulting arrests highlight the frustrating realities of modern-day gangsterism, says Charles Mailloux, a Montreal police inspector with the special investigations unit. The current ring replaced a drug network run by biker gangs until it was blown apart in an earlier police sweep in 2001. “That created a void that was filled by the street gangs,” he says.

Bookmark and Share
  • Bill Simpson

    One…easy…solution: legalize hash, cocaine, and ecstasy. This is a manufactured problem, just as prohibition was.

    • Gordeaux

      Agreed. You can’t protect people from themselves and attempting to do so takes all the negative effects of drug addiction and externalizes them, making them public, rather than private, costs.

      Organized crime may not have disappeared following the repeal of prohibition, but it certainly was dramatically undercut. Let’s do it again.

      • Vince

        By that logic, you’re also OK with paying for smokers’ health care costs.

        • LeenieJ (imho)

          we already do.

  • Derek

    Bill?Gordeaux:

    Yeah sure. The same guys who kill each other on the street with no regard for the law or for other people are suddenly going to become upright taxpaying citizens just bcause we make drugs legal. Talk about fantasies .

    Booze was legal before prohibition and remained so in most countries and that’s why he industry returned to ‘normal’ after prohibition. And even at the height of the mob wars in the US in the 30s there was some beleif in keeping violence off the streets. Compared to these guys the mob were boyscouts.

    Making drugs legal will only increase the carnage because there will be that much more business to fight and kill over. On the other hand it would give the Liberals yet another opportunity to avoid dealing yet another isue. Banning guns wont work either, the UK has a total handgun ban and gun violence there has never been higher.

    What is required is a long hard slog identifying the scumbags, arresting the scumbags, trying the scumbags and eventually imprisoning (or dare I say it, executing) the scumbags. Of course that will need Judges who aren’t afraid of doing any of the above.

    • Irvin

      Derek, please think about what you’re saying.

      First of all, there were gang wars during prohibition (Does the Valentine’s Day massacre ring a bell – to name a few?) During prohibition the criminals got very rich, and of course started turf wars in an effort to reduce competition and to carve out larger areas of control for themselves. This is what is happening today.

      Taking gang leaders off the streets will never have a good effect. It only opens up higher positions in the gangs for underlings to aspire to. This in turn, leads to internal conflicts within the gangs, and increased conflicts between them. Do you think that jailing (or even executing criminals) will stop others from entering the field? The profits are so large – that the lure is irrisistable. Mercenaries prove that people will do anything for enough money.

      One of two solutions would be to eliminate the desire of the public to use drugs, but this will never happen. The drug industry is fueled by demand – not supply.

      The only other solution is to take control of the product, by making it so cheap that there is no longer any incentive for the criminals to involve themselves with it, and this could be accomplished by legalizing drugs. However, if the government slaps prohibitive taxes on the drugs, then it will continue to encourage a black market – usually run by criminals.

      What I do seriously believe is that if drugs were legal and very cheap, that the amount of property crime in this country would virtually disappear. Breaking into houses and apartments and then trying to fence the loot is something that few addicts would continue to do – if they could just get the drugs they crave at a price they could afford, and when they are ready to go for treatment, our government will have a lot of money saved from the police and court budgets to help these people get the help they are now asking for.

  • greg

    Hey Vince, smokers save the health care system money. Studies conducted and published by real economists (and not the anti-smoking lobby) show that the early death of large numbers of smokers saves on future health care and retirement home costs. As an ex-smoker i agree that smoking is bad and should be discouraged, but you should get your facts straight before you voice your opinion. You’ll come out sounding more intelligent.

    • Vince

      I never mentioned whether or not it saved the health care system money. All I said was that you would be OK with paying for their health care costs. The power of assumption can do magical things when you’re pissed off.

  • Gordeaux

    Derek –

    I labour under no illusion that legalizing drugs will turn thugs into anything but poorer thugs. But cutting off their major source of income will deprive them of the funds to buy illegal weapons and the incentive to kill each other off (along with innocent bystanders) in shootouts.

    As for your assertion there wasn’t anything like it in the bad old days, I’m not sure the historical record backs you up. Take the St. Valentine Day Massacre — of the seven victims, at least one was simply a mechanic in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Also, when you say legalization will mean more business to fight over — that’s my whole point. Businesses in legal industries don’t shoot it out on street corners. When’s the last time you heard about a Seagram’s rep busting a cap in a Wiser’s rep’s @ss?

    Sure, prosecute the scumbags, by all means. But as long as there’s this vast, lucrative trade out there, they’ll simply be replaced by the next.

    Gord

  • Dane

    The gun lobby? When did this organization ever exist in Canada, I’ve seen legal gun owners in Canada being kicked in the ribs by the government for the past 30 years, and it hasn’t stopped crime. Its time to address the real issue which is poor government policy in punishment and enforcement, gun owners are not criminals so gun ownership is not a crime issue.

  • Mike Pawluk

    Businesses that can legally import guns also have a large number slip out the back door, either through theft or illegal sales, says a recent analysis of firearms movement in B.C.

    Source please.

    This is stupid. Yet again, responsible firearms owners and sellers are targeted as part of the problem.
    WE OBEY THE LAWS WHEREAS CRIMINALS DON’T. Banning and laws WILL NOT change this. Neither will fearmongering such as the above – NON ACCREDITED quote.
    Sloppy and irresponsible – I feel like I’m reading CNN. I expect more from Canadian journalism.

  • Chilled

    Ahhhhhhhhhh, the Constitution………….hasen’t it served us so well!!!!

  • Jim Powell

    The only way to fight this war and win is to end the “war on drugs”. As long as we have willing sellers in some of the poorest areas of the world like Afghanistan and Columbia, and willing buyers by the millions, whenever you put one group of wholesalers and retailers out of business at great cost another group will replace them (probably before the jail house doors close behind them). Since the business generates large amounts of money and has no legal protection for those funds, the dealers will use violence to enforce their “rights” and guard their profits.

  • Dan

    Do like they did in the wild west and whoever is caught selling drugs hang'em high! Just like they did to horse thieves. Justice served.

From Macleans