<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So long Chrysler?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/17/so-long-chrysler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/17/so-long-chrysler/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/17/so-long-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-97851</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=44074#comment-97851</guid>
		<description>Wonder how that&#039;s going to impact their sales in Canada - 222,996 units in 2008.  Can&#039;t imagine even &#039;loyal&#039; Chrysler buyers being particularly impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder how that&#8217;s going to impact their sales in Canada &#8211; 222,996 units in 2008.  Can&#8217;t imagine even &#8216;loyal&#8217; Chrysler buyers being particularly impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeyoulook</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/17/so-long-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-97850</link>
		<dc:creator>madeyoulook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=44074#comment-97850</guid>
		<description>So long?  Why not Good riddance?
Here I am hoping the union does tomorrow&#039;s taxpayer a favour by rejecting the concession demand, and Cerebrus lives up to its threat to up and leave.  Say hello to the horse and buggy and manual typewriter industry when you get to where you&#039;re going, Chrysler!
Then maybe thousands of pampered &quot;good jobs&quot; people can rejoin the rest of us in the real world and look for an &quot;honest job.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So long?  Why not Good riddance?<br />
Here I am hoping the union does tomorrow&#8217;s taxpayer a favour by rejecting the concession demand, and Cerebrus lives up to its threat to up and leave.  Say hello to the horse and buggy and manual typewriter industry when you get to where you&#8217;re going, Chrysler!<br />
Then maybe thousands of pampered &#8220;good jobs&#8221; people can rejoin the rest of us in the real world and look for an &#8220;honest job.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/17/so-long-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-97849</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=44074#comment-97849</guid>
		<description>Well...maybe we should all start working for a living.     jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;maybe we should all start working for a living.     jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

