Hosted by terrorists?

An organization in Ottawa’s bad books wined and dined Canadian politicians

by Michael Petrou on Monday, March 23, 2009 12:01am - 8 Comments

The Canadian delegates to Paris appear to have been aware that they would be attending NCRI events. Wappel described the purpose of his trip to the ethics commissioner as “to meet with representatives of the National Council of Resistance of Iran.” He told Maclean’s that he supports the removal of the People’s Mujahedeen from Canada’s list of banned terrorist groups. According to a press release from the NCRI’s foreign affairs committee, Wappel, Folco, and Ratansi all attended a meeting hosted by Rajavi, where they also pledged to work at getting the People’s Mujahedeen removed from Canada’s list of terrorist groups.

Tavakoli, the University of Toronto professor, says he can understand why Western politicians might want to support the National Council of Resistance of Iran. The current regime in Tehran is illiberal and often brutal. And supporters of the NCRI present themselves as the only viable alternative. “I beg to differ,” Tavakoli says. “They present themselves as a democratic alternative to the Islamic Republic, with the hope of overthrowing the regime. But democratic involvement is really being involved in building grassroots organizations, and they are not interested in that. They view themselves as a vanguard political organization, and vanguards do not have patience for doing the dirty work of democracy. I don’t think the National Council of Resistance, with any kind of stretch of imagination, represents the Iranian diaspora community and their democratic aspects.”

Bennett, Wappel and Telegdi told the ethics commissioner their expenses were covered by the “Iran Democratic Association.” Reza, a spokesperson for the group who asked that his last name not be printed to protect relatives in Iran, describes the association’s members as “supporters and sympathizers” of the NCRI but not formally part of the organization. “As far as I’m concerned and my colleagues are concerned, we believe that this group can realize what our goals are—a nuclear-free, secular Iran,” he said in an interview with Maclean’s. “There is no other alternative that stands against the barbarity of the Iranian regime.”

Carolyn Bennett, in an interview with Maclean’s, acknowledged the People’s Mujahedeen’s violent history but says it has evolved. “Obviously, some people who were involved in it in the past have been accused of, you know, acts we wouldn’t want,” she said. “But like so many of these resistance movements, whether you’re in Northern Ireland or South Africa, there are people who are victimized and who are now fighting for democracy.” David Smith, the senator, also described the People’s Mujahedeen’s terrorist designation as “a complete and utter bum rap.” Yasmin Ratansi incorrectly claimed that the People’s Mujahedeen has not been armed for more than 20 years. In fact, when Camp Ashraf was disarmed in 2003, the People’s Mujahedeen relinquished more than 2,000 tanks, armoured personnel carriers, and heavy artillery pieces.

Although no Conservative MPs attended the NCRI’s rally and meetings in Paris last summer, the group has drawn Conservative support in the past. Paul Forseth, a Conservative MP until his defeat in the 2006 election, has previously attended an NCRI rally in Paris and remains a strong supporter of the group. And in April 2006, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, then the parliamentary secretary to the Prime Minister for multiculturalism, spoke at a small rally on Parliament Hill held by apparent supporters of the People’s Mujahedeen. A photo of Kenney addressing the group appeared on the website of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. Kenney later claimed he had been invited to give a speech by a group calling itself the Committee for Human Rights in Iran and said he had no idea the group was linked to the People’s Mujahedeen.

Denis Coderre, the Liberal defence critic, didn’t accept this explanation and called on Kenney to apologize and denounce the People’s Mujahedeen: “A terrorist group is a terrorist group,” said Coderre. “Jason Kenney, who likes to play politics and who’s as subtle as Barney Rubble in politics, he should do better than that.” Maclean’s called Coderre’s office to find out how he felt about his Liberal colleagues attending a People’s Mujahedeen rally and taking money from supporters of the group, but he did not respond to a request for an interview.

Bookmark and Share
  • wml

    So what exactly is the point in all of this?

  • Paul Forseth

    The article is basically a smear, and does not appear to have any other enlightening purpose. The subversive agents that operate out of the Iranian Embassy in Ottawa must be smiling. MacLeans is doing their work for them, to undermine the international efforts of ex-pate Iranians from around the world, who organize and strive for human rights within Iran. There is no other international group of Iranians who are effectively standing up for the plight of Iranian citizens. That is why the PMOI is the one political organization that receives the most disinformation from the regime, as the PMOI are the most feared politically because of their influence. The PMOI strives to encourage the citizens within Iran, so they can develop confidence that they someday they can democratically take charge of their own national destiny, and that citizens are worthy of basic freedoms. The message is that the west has not forgotten them. The MacLeans article could have been written by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad himself. The rogue regime is very inventive in Canada to undermine, while at the same time using its agent clients such as Hamas to do their dirty work. The is no restraining ideology within the Iranian government leadership, not to use the bomb when they get it. It is sad to see a cynical MacLeans is doing its part to help that horror become reality.

    • stvhues

      I agree with Forseth. This is an ammateur work, much less standard than the Intelligence articles defacing the Iranian dissidents opposing Tehran, but the same outfit. It all goes to prove that we should be serious in doubting accusations and more assured of the Court judgements of the CFI outruling any terrorism for this movement.

    • Stephen

      Would this be former Conservative MP Paul Forseth?

      http://www.english.mojahedin.org/pagesEn/detailsNews.aspx?newsid=3801

  • Pingback: Stephen HARPER and MEK « Immortalguard’s Blog

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Well, that was a wasted read…..moving on….

  • Dieter Sprockets

    This Town Ain’t Big Enough for the Two of Us

    The Liberals use to brag about the size of their tent just as xxx actor John Holmes bragged about the size of his member. Well, the big tent Liberals have been learning for sometime that the tent isn’t big enough to keep opposing members far enough away from one another to prevent injury to one another’s face.

    During the Israeli /Hezbollah war, some Liberal M.P.’s joined the Hezbollah “so called” peace march in Montreal. This involvement, among other things, forced many Liberal Jews out of the party. And during the Dion leadership race, a few folks were giving warning to stay clear of Rae, because his wife is Jewish.

    The Toronto Star is a liberal rag and it has numerous reporters such as Haroon Siddiqui, Linda McQuaig, and Thomas Wakom who are only too eager to rally support for Hezbollah, Hamas, or any organization, which is anti-Israeli. This is fair enough but let’s not fall for any Star propaganda that it is in any way shape or form impartial when it comes to the middle east.

    Catholics were once solid liberal supporters while protestants were and still are supporters of the conservative party. Well, the pro abortion pro same sex marriage liberals have force the Catholics from the party.

    The information in this article isn’t the least bit surprising.

  • Matt

    I was very disappointed to read this article on PMOI. I expected alot more from Macleans. If you are going to write such an article you better do your own reserch and get all the facts on the issue. What Michael Petrou has done is to recycle all the lies from Iranian regime against their biggest, strongest opposition. The strength of PMOI is from the populist support it enjoys amongst all Iranian. By writing such a one sided article all he is done is to help Iranian regime in their oppression against Iranian public. Michael Petrou should be ashamed of himself to act as an Iranian agent.

From Macleans