Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

The Commons: A morality play

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:57pm - 16 Comments

Eventually, the Speaker called on Bonnie Crombie, the rookie Liberal from Mississauga.

“Mr. Speaker, the numbers are staggering,” she observed. “Foreclosures. Bankruptcies. Job losses. Severances. Every day, we are seeing the painful human face of this recession. In my riding, Ted, a father of four with a wife on disability, is worried he is going to lose his home because he cannot get EI. He is 11 hours short of what the government demands. Eleven hours. Why are these Conservatives abandoning thousands of Ontarians like Ted, who worked hard, paid EI premiums, played by the rules and are now left to fend for themselves?”

It is tempting to dismiss such tales, at least when told by politicians, as cheap, patronizing populism—shameless manipulation of another’s problems to glorify your own engagement. But, whatever the motive, Ted’s tale is probably no less relevant. No less, as Jack Layton might say, real.

“Mr. Speaker, our heart goes out to the Teds of the world right across this country,” Finley responded. “There is no question about that. That is why we took the actions we did in our economic action plan: to help people like that. Even when they are not eligible for EI, there are programs there to help them get the skills they will need for the jobs of the future. There are other programs there to preserve jobs so that people do not get into that position.”

Crombie was not impressed. “Mr. Speaker, this is no time for empty, cold-hearted Conservative rhetoric,” she ventured. “EI claims are skyrocketing in Ontario. Bankruptcies are up 21 per cent with Ontario facing the biggest impact. In Mississauga, auto workers with 20 to 30 years seniority have simply been dropped by their companies. The Conservatives told investors not to invest in Ontario and now they have abandoned Ontario themselves.”

From a couple seats over, Jason Kenney leaned towards Finley and offered a few words of advice.

“Mr. Speaker, let us be honest here,” Finley said when Crombie was finished. “The Liberals brought in the new system for EI. It was a Liberal program that set up the criteria for eligibility. We are continuing with that program, but we are adding to it. We are adding to it so that we can help workers, especially long-tenured workers, those who have been in a job in the auto sector for many years and have lost their job. They are too young to retire. We are providing them with up to two years of EI support while they invest in new training to keep the jobs of the future so they can transition and look after their families in the long term, even under the rules the Liberals created.”

No doubt Finley and Kenney thought this a fine answer.

The Stats. Employment, 10 questions. CBC and crime, six questions each. Forestry, Afghanistan, trade, bilingualism, agriculture, taxes and election financing, two questions each. Flooding in Manitoba and medical marijuana, one question each.

Diane Finley, nine answers. Stephen Harper and James Moore, four answers each. Rob Nicholson, three answers. Stockwell Day, three answers. Lawrence Cannon, Jason Kenney, Gerry Ritz, Jim Flaherty and Peter Van Loan, two answers each. Christian Paradis, Lisa Raitt, Pierre Poilievre, Jay Hill and Leona Aglukkaq, one answer each.

Bookmark and Share
  • Terren

    And at the same time Jason Kenney apparently twittered in favour of Diane Finley.

    Great coverage of QP again though!!

    • TJ Cook

      Agreed, love the QP coverage! Maybe if the daily papers had stuff like this… nah, they’d still suck :)

      Also: nobody should accept “advice” from Jason Kenney.

      • Terren

        Ha, “advice” meaning what?

        The only thing the daily papers would write about QP is how it’s “out of hand”, as per usual, according to them. If only they could look past that.

      • ripnrobert

        Good comment, but “us ‘ in the “know”, well we know who owns the main stream media, we have to take it for face value only. Thx

  • Just Visiting

    Strange that no politicians — not even the Opposition ones — want to say exactly what the unfairness is that they are complaining about. They are particularly reluctant to point out that the unfairness is geographically specific in in nature, and that who is getting the screwed, in fact, are unemployed people in Ontario. Why is that?

    • Terren

      They want to be politically correct
      It would be unbelievable if Canadians could hear what these politicians say behind closed doors, or even at bars.

  • Sophia Geffros

    “The Teds of the world right across this country”
    I hate to be a pedant, but that just doesn’t sound right.

  • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

    Diane Finley is awesome in QP. She’s substandard, on her brief, articulate in both languages.

  • http://coyne kc

    We can’t improve Ui because that’s the way the liberals set it up! How pathetic is that!

    • Sophia Geffros

      what, did you expect an answer?

      • http://coyne kc

        If we aren’t ever gong to get answers, just what is the pt of QP?

  • edeast

    brewhaha

  • Al Heck Brakes

    “It was Libby Davies who, filling in today for an absent Layton, dared to suggest there were morals to be found in all this.”

    There is no connection between people who live off taxpayers’ money and who sit around all day arguing for even more people like themselves to be allowed to live off taxpayers, and “morals”. Except in the negative sense.

  • Wascally Wabbit

    “There is no connection between people who live off taxpayers’ money and who sit around all day arguing for even more people like themselves to be allowed to live off taxpayers, and “morals”. Except in the negative sense.”

    Sounds like the PMO must be in recruiting mode!

    Funny – looking across the border – where – after – what – 65 days (?) – Obama is being criticized for repeatedly reminding Americans he “inherited” these problems he is trying to fix – and to focus on fixing it – here in Canada Finlay et al. – having held power for – what – 3 years + are using the same old lame excuse!

    Al Heck Brakes reflects the same ideological crap that Harper, Kenney and now Finlay babble all day long!

    Meanwhile, no-one is talking about the self employed (like myself) who do not have to pay into EI – while in that status – but paid for many years while salaried! Tough on us (especially when many of us are “self-employed” because of earlier layoffs) – no EI payments for us!

    • novagardener

      My sis paid into EI for 27+ years. Never collected one cheque. She doesn’t qualify as she’s 12 hours short. She 59 and has worked in one type of industry and her skills are not transferable. Her husband is lucky if he can get 1 day a week’s work. I paid into EI for 35+ years and rec’d one cheque. The whole EI program needs overhauling. But, in the meantime the govt. should lower the requirements during this massive recession. I don’t doubt there are lots of people in Ted’s and my sister’s situation.

  • Meany

    Can anyone please enlighten me on what the NDP is blathering on about?

    60% of people are ineligible for EI? I don’t get it? I figured if you lose your job, and you have worked x days, you get the dole. Nothing more to it? Right?

    If I’m wrong, I think I better start saving for the day when (unfortunately, based on my industry, probably not if) I get canned.

From Macleans