UPDATED: GallowayWatch: The first of several moments of truth arrives … in Toronto.

by kadyomalley on Sunday, March 29, 2009 10:46am - 18 Comments

Oh, if only Team Galloway had picked an Ottawa courtroom for today’s emergency injunction-related festivities. ITQ would be there with liveblogging bells on. Fingers and toes, even, although the former would making typing a bit of a challenge. But alas, it is not.

Anyway, according to a media advisory put out by the Toronto Coalition to Stop the War, which has been acting as de facto media clearinghouse for the cottage industry that has sprung up around the government’s fateful decision to bar George Galloway from Canada, supporters of the I-bet-Jason-Kenney’s-office-wishes-he-really-was-infandous-at-this-point British MP are holding a rally as we speak outside the Toronto courthouse that will hear the injunction request. The motion, as well as the initial response from the government, which seeks to “strike out all applicants other than Galloway” as they are “not affected” by the decision, are available here.

It’s not clear how long we’ll have to wait for the judge’s ruling — it wouldn’t surprise me if it was delayed until tomorrow morning — but I’ll keep y’all posted. Feel free to use this as an open thread in the meantime.

Also, does anyone know if the other side – Team Kenney? Team Van Loan? Team CBSA? Team We Really Don’t Know Why Everyone Is Making Such A Fuss About This Galloway Cretin? – is organizing a similar pre-hearing demonstration?

UPDATE: According to CTV and Canadian Press, the decision will, indeed, be announced tomorrow. Hopefully we’ll get more details on what was said inside the courtroom soon. (And thanks to National Newswatch for so diligently scouring the wire on a Sunday afternoon in order to be able to post an update so swiftly. The price of satiated newsjunkiedom is eternal vigilance.)

Bookmark and Share
  • Drip

    Galloway is a cretin because he’s a peace activist! He also told us in advance that there were no WMDs in Iraq — what an idiot!!!

    Just think about it… if everyone, all of a sudden, became a peace activist then there’ll be no more war. Makes you shudder! (Scary stuff….)

    • sf

      Why would we think about it? Clearly you have no intention of thinking.

  • Drip

    john g: “I’ve made the same point on other threads that keeping Galloway out has nothing to do with freedom of speech.”

    Maybe just a little bit?

  • Drip

    “Maybe the US will not let him in any longer, now that the Canada has exposed him.”

    Oh, great!

    So now Canada can be the world leader in censorship!

    Loony Tunes are now here…

  • Wascally Wabbit

    Galloway said there were no WMDs in Iraq?
    Hm – does this that Mohamed al Baradei talks to terrorist lovers too?

    Er – Ms. O – wot you still doing here on Terra Canadiensis?
    Isn’t G-20 calling?

  • John.K

    “in any case it appears that the final decision was made in Tel Aviv, not Ottawa.”

    Oh those kooky Elders of Zion – they’re not at it again, are they?

    Idiot.

  • Dot

    That you yug-iT / ydok?

  • Euge1
  • Euge1
  • John.K

    Yup, Meir Weinstein’s an idiot too. There’s a lot of them out there….and in here today, too.

  • glak from planet zork

    Thanks for the clip. Notice Galloway didn’t deny any of the connections to the terrorist groups. He makes me sick.

  • john g

    True enough. But he’s not a conservative. So HIS free speech is worth the effort of an intensive media campaign/lobby to protect.

  • Drip

    If Galloway has any connections to the terrorist groups, why did the US let him in?

  • Drip

    Poor Kenney… His free speech is being denied! Weep… :(

  • sf

    John G: You are correct. But the free speech claim is simply a smoke screen. If you deal in drugs, and the US government is aware of it, they will not let you cross the border into the US, and no insane lunatic would claim that it’s a free speech issue.

    This has nothing to do with free speech, he was not barred from Canada because of what he had to say, he was barred due to his prior support of terrorism, specifically his financial support of terrorism.

    Drip: Maybe the US will not let him in any longer, now that the Canada has exposed him.

  • john g

    Agreed sf, I’ve made the same point on other threads that keeping Galloway out has nothing to do with freedom of speech.

    But the media have made it about freedom of speech now. That’s the hill they’ve chosen to die on to defend Galloway. So asking them where they’ve been when conservative free speech is under attack is fair game.

  • sf

    no, it’s not them, not even close.

  • Mikeee

    He was correctly banned by the government and he would have been banned also by the Liberals led by Cotler. The Border Services did the right thing!

    Keep the anti semitic supporter of terrorism out of Canada.

From Macleans