Michelle Obama’s real agenda

The first lady is a woman of ideas, and some of those ideas may turn out to be pretty radical

by Luiza Ch. Savage on Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:00pm - 20 Comments

Sherk also says the Family Medical Leave Act has led to abuses and has constrained employers’ ability to discipline or fire employees who are habitually late or absent and can produce a doctor’s note for chronic headaches or back pain. “Employers want to be reasonable, but it’s not just the mom taking care of the sick kids, it’s also the guy who calls in with a sprained shoulder but shows up in the newspaper the next day for bowling a 300 game in a tournament,” says Sherk, referring to an incident reported at a Delaware casino resort, one of many examples of abuse Sherk has catalogued. As for paid leave, he asks, “Where are you going to get the money for this? You are already running horrendous budget deficits. What’s a payroll tax? It’s a tax on new jobs. Is this really a time we want to put a new tax on jobs?”

Carrie Lukas, head of policy for a Washington-based conservative women’s group, the Independent Women’s Forum, warns that the ideas would be a radical departure for American labour policy. “Depending on what is passed, it would be a considerable step toward government micromanaging employment contracts—and that is a step toward European-style socialism and away from the belief that free markets and free labour laws are best for employers and employees,” she says. Lukas adds that expressing opposition to paid leave “makes you sound like a jerk,” but government should not dictate the terms of employment to employers and job seekers.

But Stern says that, given the current economic climate, labour reform—especially the institution of unpaid sick leave—cannot wait. “We see this standard as necessary now more than ever before,” she says. “A lot of the most important social policies of the last century—Social Security, fair labour standards, child labour laws—were enacted during the Great Depression.”

Work-life balance isn’t Michelle Obama’s only policy interest. She has also identified “national service” as a top issue. The Obamas have shown up at soup kitchens and urged Americans to volunteer. But the policy changes Michelle Obama supports go beyond rallying volunteers to do good. They include a massive expansion of federal spending on public service programs that critics say are sometimes ideologically motivated.

Once again, her interest in this area comes from personal experience. After leaving her job as a corporate lawyer in the spring of 1993, Obama became the founding executive director of the Chicago chapter of Public Allies, a non-partisan public service program that trains young people as community organizers and leaders. It is mainly funded by tax dollars through AmeriCorps, another Clinton-initiated program that allows young people to earn tuition assistance and living stipends in exchange for participating in community service projects. Republican critics say that AmeriCorps has funded some activities that cross the line between providing direct services and political advocacy. But Michelle Obama says such efforts are crucial to building stronger communities.

On March 17, she appeared at an event celebrating the 30th anniversary of YouthBuild, an AmeriCorps-funded program that trains troubled young people in the construction trades and builds homes for low-income families. There, she made her case on national television for proposed legislation known as the “Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act,” which will expand the number of AmeriCorps slots from 75,000 to 250,000 by 2017 at a cost of US$6 billion over five years. The legislation was controversial among some Republicans who worried that it would be used to subsidize left-wing advocacy groups, and create competition for volunteers that could put other non-profits out of business. One Republican congresswoman, Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, has gone so far as to say the White House was trying to put in place “re-education camps for young people, where young people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the government puts forward.”

For its anniversary celebration, the YouthBuild organization showed off several dozen of its young participants in white tents on the National Mall. In past years, they’d made the same lobbying trek to Congress to ask for more funding for AmeriCorps, and said they’d never seen so much media interest. Three rows of TV cameras competed for shots; a travelling pool of reporters and a clutch of photographers arrived with the first lady’s caravan. Antonio Almeida, a clean-cut 20-year-old former homeless drug user from Fall River, Mass., who credited the organization for turning his life around, was awed. “The minute Michelle Obama shows up, everybody realizes how serious this is,” he said.

As Obama arrived, a wave of murmurs washed through the crowd, which then fell solemnly silent. She first watched a YouthBuild member in goggles demonstrate green construction technique and materials. She smiled, nodded and cameras flashed. The audiences began to clap, hoot, and shout “Michelle!” After inspecting energy-efficient windows and a sample of eco-friendly insulation, she finally took to a podium and began a speech that was frequently interrupted by exuberant shouts of “Yes ma’am!” “Participating in national and community service is not just an escape for the wealthy or for those students who can afford it—which is something that I couldn’t do growing up,” she said. And, she added: “Barack Obama gets it. He gets it because he’s lived it. He started his career as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. I was impressed with that.”

So far, Michelle Obama’s record as policy advocate is 1-0. The Serve America Act passed both houses of Congress this month with bipartisan support, and the President said he plans to sign it upon his return from Europe and the Middle East. As for his wife’s next political move, the nation is watching and waiting. Carl Sferrazza Anthony, the historian at the National First Ladies’ Library in Canton, Ohio, says Obama can’t help but be aware that the clock is ticking on her influence—a message that may have been emphasized when she first met with her predecessor for a private chat in the White House. “Laura Bush recently admitted that she didn’t realize early enough the power she had to change people’s lives,” he noted. “I would not be surprised that she mentioned that to Michelle.” M

Bookmark and Share
  • leaf

    An admirable lady and a role model for women of any colour. I wish her well.

    Please do not give too much “air time” to the view of the Neocons and their remaining misguided and deluded supporters. They will do everything in their power to undermine President and Mrs Obama and thwart them in their efforts to undo the damage wrought by Bush. They will do so even when it is against the long-term interests of the United States and its people.

    Some of their criticisms of European “socialist” features that are so enthusiastically parroted in the article above can be found in Canada as well – thankfully!

    Canadians should be hoping for and looking forward to the day when they have their own First Lady of the stature of Michelle Obama.

  • leaf

    Ugh: carelessly formulated sentence:

    “Some of their criticisms of European “socialist” features that are so enthusiastically parroted in the article above can be found in Canada as well – thankfully!”

    It was meant to read like this.

    Some of the European “socialist” features that are the target of American right-wing criticism – so enthusiastically parroted in the article above – can be found in Canada as well – thankfully!

    My apologies

    • Maureen

      Thankfully in Canada? Clearly you do not run a business and try to juggle the ‘mandated’ premiums with paying a workforce and keeping the doors open. Typical socialist crap tarted up as social policy. At some point, there will be no businesses earning income to pay taxes etc. and then what? Oh I know, the government can provide all services because they do such a good job of providing services now. Thankfully I will probably be dead by then and will not care (I hardly care now – except that we keep getting these whack jobs who think they have the perfect solution to all problems which usually result in governments getting bigger, more expensive and with more busybodies trying ti dictate how people should or should not live). Leaf – GO AWAY!

      • leaf

        Oh come now, Maureen, no need to get your knickers in a twist just because someone appreciates the Canadian social welfare system, which sets the country apart from the Big Neighbour to the South and the massive inequalities there. Countries like Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, to mention but a few, go even further and their societies don’t look to be in danger of collapse. Your Queen even lives under such a regime, and she seems happy enough.

        If you want unbridled capitalism and no social responsibility, with some getting very rich indeed as long as they keep their noses clean and do not tread on the toes of the bigger fish at the same time as the majority languish in squalor and hopelessness, you ought to try living in Russia.

        Who knows, you might like it – it’s even cold like Canada and they’re reasonably good at hockey.

        • Elizabeth Montgomery

          “knickers in a twist” is an English expression, and an affectation on anyone who isn’t English.

  • Mike M

    Between Luiza and Wells and the team, Macleans is well worth reading. Thanks Luiza for this appropriate and informative article, I was just commenting to someone the other day that I was unsure of where Mrs. Obama was going to take her political clout. Now I have a much better idea. Until next time…

  • tigoradventure

    hmmmm ……

  • ironsword

    Perhaps, she like he is part of the New World Order or perhaps, as some of us believe, part of the Antichrist (who is likely now on earth) who will take over much of the world. Just look at EVERYTHING that is going on in the world before you dismiss this as crazy. In the US, Obama wants a civilian military-like force as big as its army. Obama is distributing the wealth, perhaps a move to control the entire population. Censorship is getting beginning (they want to censure AM talk radio which is mostly opposed to these things.) Look at who is beginning to control the world (Muslims) and Obama was basically raised as one. Homosexuality is taught to very young children. TV is basically riddled with pornography. The world’s weather is getting near appoculiptic. There are many other things. Only a fool would dismiss this. Read the Last Book in the New Testiment, a chapture at a time.

    • Chuck80

      Yes, ironsworld, the world is going to pot. Next thing you know, as Woody Allen warned, you won’t even be able to get a plumber at the weekend. Now have a nice cup of tea, do some breathing exercises and lie down for a while. LOL

    • Elizabeth Montgomery

      Oh right. I’ll get right on that.

  • evans07

    I can’t say to much cuz the world is gone crazy

  • fourthrow

    Hello! Unrelated, but I was hoping women over 40 would go here:

    http://fourthrow.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/women-over-40/

    It’s a homework assignment about the feminist movement! Thanks for your answers!!

  • http://pelangiku.com kellyamareta

    great article… very inspiring
    this kinda blogwalking or something with love
    nice to know you :)

  • Nearly septuagenerian in Palm Beach

    I’ve been warning about the evils of feminism for decades. How absurd that some women believe they can achieve the greatness of powerful men like some of those those I have married and accompanied to the most dizzying heights of power.

    I’m not at all impressed with the pushy Mrs. Obama. Her Harvard Degree and success in her legal career don’t impress me at all. She would sbe working at a supermarket checkout or as one of my housemaids if the Americans had pursued the policies that my husband and I advocate.

    And, if I may, I disagree with him that she’s callipygian as well. I believe I’m superior to her in that department, as in all others, and I’ll be having a word or two with him about it when he gets out.

    • thisnthatgirl

      It’s quite something to see the difference between a reasoned comment and an out of left field comment. The ‘evils of feminism’???? If not for ‘feminism’ nearly septuagenarian in Palm Beach wouldn’t be able to write her comment, let alone have an opinion of her own. She wouldn’t even be ‘working’ at a supermarket checkout, she’d be the chattel of her husband or father or other male relative. Mrs. Obama certainly didn’t earn her law degree or have a successful career just to impress. Like all women fortunate enough to live in a free country with equality of the sexes, she enjoys the freedom to pursue any education/career and use her intellect to better herself, her family, her community, etc. The rights of women is not evil — screw your head on straight, nearly septuagenarian in Palm Beach!

  • Bill Simpson

    I am baffled that Americans are ready to cede so much power and influence to their first lady. She is not elected in any sense, is accountable to no-one, and seems to have no strict limits on what she can and can’t do.

    I wonder how much of this would be tolerated if the genders were reversed.

    • ZeeBC

      Good point, but there’s nothing new about First Ladies playing a significant role in national life. Just look at Eleanor Roosevelt and Jackie Kennedy, for example. There’s no constitutional provision for it, but a well-established convention and tradition.

      How much would have been tolerated if the gender roles were reversed? Well, we came pretty close to finding out insofar as Hillary Clinton very nearly pipped Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination and, given the disastrous legacy of the Bush era and the pathetic inadequacy of the GOP candidates on offer, would almost certainly be the President today if Obama had not achieved his spectacular upset in Iowa.

      Would you rather have Michelle as First Lady or Bill as First Dude?

  • childpleazee1

    Well worth the read. Living in the U.S., we have not seen such a lady of statue since Jackie Kennedy, and Lady Bird Johnson. If she accomplishes anything, I hope she does something about health care and education-in particular urban cities an Appalachian Mountain areas.

  • JennyC

    I love this woman! Thanks for the excellent article, Luiza.

  • http://www.floridafencecompany.com Fence Manager

    Michelle Obama stands in an obvious stark contrast to Sarah Palin. And I am not just talking about a Harvard Law grad against Miss Wasilla, but someone who stands for something and works to get it done, while the other believes that she loves America and that is all that is needed to be and American and a great person.

From Macleans