On the front lines of the U.S. meltdown

SPECIAL REPORT: A road trip in California, the state hit hardest by the recession

by Jason Kirby on Wednesday, April 15, 2009 11:20am - 31 Comments

090413_caliIt’s just before 11 a.m., and a small group of men in scuffed sneakers and blue jeans have assembled on the courthouse steps in Stockton, Calif. They’re here for what’s become a familiar ritual in U.S. cities hit hard by falling house prices: the foreclosure auction. At the peak of the housing bubble, Stockton was one of the most frenzied real estate markets in the country. Now, with many of those homes in foreclosure, the bidding wars have turned surreal.

An auctioneer steps out of the courthouse, and with little fanfare starts to read out the details of several foreclosed homes. For a while there are no takers. Then he gets to a house in the nearby town of Manteca—opening price: $99,870.08. “Two more pennies,” says one bidder in a muscle shirt. Another man steps forward: “Plus a penny.” It goes on like this, the two bidders anteing up copper Lincolns for a home that, four years ago, might easily have fetched $40,000 above the asking price. “Going once, twice, third and final time. Property is sold at $99,870 and 13 cents.”

ALSO AT MACLEANS.CA: Photo Gallery—What a recession looks like

In a country that’s always done things bigger—bigger booms, bigger bubbles, bigger busts—California stands apart. Few other places saw real estate mania reach such feverish heights. Fewer still have seen their fortunes plunge to such abject lows that the decision over whether to buy a house comes down to five cents. With the world’s eighth-largest economy brought to its knees, Maclean’s took a road trip through one of the hardest-hit parts of California: the region encircling the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s a ring of misery, where unemployment is nearing 20 per cent in some counties. In cities like Stockton, one in 60 houses are in some state of foreclosure. With shopaholic Californians hunkering down, retailers are shutting their doors, from exclusive boutiques to outlet malls in soccer mom enclaves like Elk Grove. One city, Vallejo, unable to pay its bills, has given up and declared bankruptcy. More are expected to follow. Even Silicon Valley, California’s most resilient region and its best hope to lead a recovery, is struggling.

California has always been a barometer for the rest of the country. As the Golden State goes, so goes the United States. Now everyone is waiting to see whether the California dream can be resurrected. “People are watching California closely because what happens here is seen as an indicator of what will happen elsewhere,” says Alex Whalley, an economist who teaches at the University of California-Merced. “California is the leading edge of what’s to come.”

The city of Merced sits some 200 km southeast of San Francisco, and a lifetime away from the glitter and restlessness of coastal California. But those two worlds have come together in this dusty corner of a farmer’s fleld in mid-March. The Governator is here, and he’s brought cash to upgrade a nearby freeway overpass. It’s been six years since Arnold Schwarzenegger gave up acting to take top billing in the state legislature. And as he speaks, a trucker passing by on the highway spots him and honks. “We will be pumping in as much money and pumping out as much money as we can,” he says, punching the air with his giant fist and sounding not unlike Hans and Franz from that old Saturday Night Live sketch. “We will rebuild this area and create as many infrastructure projects as possible.” That’s because, like everywhere else in this recession, “infrastructure” is a code word for jobs, and jobs are something Merced desperately needs.

The latest figures released last week are startling. In February, unemployment in Merced (pop. 80,000) hit 19.9 per cent, double the national average and well above California’s already high rate of 10.5 per cent (only Michigan has been harder hit). During the housing boom, half of all new jobs in California were tied to real estate, and Merced was no different. With the housing collapse, thousands of construction jobs have dried up. The region relies heavily on agriculture, but a three-year drought has crippled the sector—in February, Schwarzenegger declared a state of emergency because of the water shortage. Several retailers in the city, such as Linens N’ Things and Circuit City, but also local building supply stores, have closed. Quebecor World, the Montreal-based printing company that sought bankruptcy protection last year, operates a plant here that has laid off staff. Ellie Wooten, the 75-year-old mayor of Merced, recently warned it might close altogether. “Merced was a sleepy little town that nobody had ever heard of,” says Whalley, a Canadian from London, Ont., who moved to Merced at the peak of the boom to work at the university. “Now everybody knows it as the centre of the bust.”

The first thing that’s striking upon arriving is that this doesn’t look like a city in the grips of a crisis. You expect to see rows of boarded-up stores and despondent souls roaming the streets. Instead, downtown Merced is quite charming. There’s a lineup at the Starbucks on Main Street. And the streets are full of cars. But head north of Yosemite Avenue, which once served as the outer limits for the town, and the full scale of America’s woes hits you head-on.

Large signs that advertise housing developments with names like Windsong and Riverstone point instead to overgrown grassy fields. Roads have been built and light standards put in place, but most of the lots are empty. Where you’d expect to see rows of cookie-cutter homes, there are just small clusters of houses scattered awkwardly across the landscape. Sometimes work crews simply put down their hammers and walked away, leaving behind wood-frame skeletons to bleach in the sun. In the evening you can stand on the divider of a freshly paved four-lane road for 15 minutes and not see a soul. When a woman finally does come along with her dog, she says that some people have walked away from their homes and left town. She and her husband are still holding on, but “it’s scary.” They owe $135,000 more than their house is worth.

Every mania has a foundation, and in Merced it was anticipation over the new university, which opened its doors in 2005. While crews worked on the campus eight kilometres north of town, developers scrambled to fill in the cow pastures in between with homes. Many believed that overnight, Merced would be transformed into a thriving university town. The city was also touted as an emerging commuter city for the Bay Area. Speculators, mostly from San Francisco, snapped up the new homes, driving prices up 50 per cent between 2002 and 2004. But eventually, reality set in, even as new developments were being mapped out. With just 2,500 students, the university is not much larger than a high school at this point, though it’s expected to grow. What’s more, it’s a daunting three-hour drive past grain elevators to get to San Fran. Whalley recalls the mood as the bubble began to burst. “Sales started to slow down but the line was, ‘It’s only temporary, there won’t be a decline, at worst prices will just flat-line,’ ” he says. “It’s kind of what you hear in Canada right now.” At the peak in 2005 the median house price in Merced was $382,000. Today it’s just $105,500.

Bookmark and Share
  • Aaron

    Your article is a little selective with the facts!!!.Let’s put it in language your readers in Canada will understand—California is run like Canada under the crack -head TRUDEAU…When the good times roll Trudeaumania in California will buy stuff they can’t afford, invest in nonsense…and pay their bills tomorrow…WELL its tomorrow now and its time for HANGOVER!!!!!!!..Just likeCanada in the late eighties and early nineties…ITS TIME TO PAY THE PRICE of telling yourselves how great you are all day and more specifically denying the law of economics!!!!!!

    • wayne moores

      Hmm, where to start. Trudeau wasn’t in power in the late eighties and nineties. He never was in power in California, I doubt many there would know who he was even when he was PM in Canada. Weather you agree with his policies I don’t think anyone could say the path followed by California policy makers was remotely like Trudeau’s concerning fiscal and taxation policies. Trudeau(and for that matter even conservative PM’s) have always followed a political philosophy of higher rates of taxation and a larger role for government. Thus Canadians have universal health care which they do not lose even if they have the misfortune of losing their job. Americans do not. Canadians, like everyone, bitch about taxes but have no desire to remotely follow the American path. Sorry if that annoys you Aaron, but it is our country and for the most part are happy the way it is. For most of the last 25 years Americans voted for right wing governments who wanted government to virtually disappear so taxes could be lowered(especially for the wealthy). It seemed the only thing taxes were to be spent on was conducting foreign wars of dubious merit. Exactely how police and firemen were to be payed for was never explained.(Privitize them too, I guess) The neocons wanted everything deregulated(especially the banks and Wall St). Congratulations Ronald Ragen, mission accomplished. However the 25 year experiment seems to have ended in a very bad result for many Americans. Aaron, blaming Trudeau is, origional however. It was getting boring listening to Limbaugh blame everything on Clinton almost a decade after he left the White House(with the economy doing well and the federal government in surplus by the way). Now the economy is in tatters and the neocons are still spewing venom and hatred at any loyal American who happens to disagree with them. Thank you Carl Rove and Co. for turning Americans on each other. Having been run out of Washington on a rail via the election some ultra right wing kooks(including samefully the governor of Texas) are threatening rebellion, succession(remember the Civil War, wasn’t that a fun time for Americans). Sarah Palin held campaign rallies where talk of killing Obama was not exactly discouraged. Now Obama is spending money in America, on American’s, trying to rebuild an economy that the right has left on life support. I don’t know if this will work but at least he’s trying to do something for the average joe out there just trying to put food on the table and a roof over the head of his family. The neocons are now denoucing him as a trailor and a socialist for doing this. Oh, and for changing the tax rate on mutimillionaires. In closing I noticed you spoke of people buying things they could not afford, investing in nonsense and paying the bills tomorrow. Seems to me you have just described the freeforall on Wall St. and the subprime morgage shenanigans that were promoted whole hog by the neocons. Cheers.

      • Richard Ure

        Canadians don’t have a monopoly on these views. It’s the same here in Oz. First the unimaginable greed of the Wall Streeters and now the private health insurers are displaying the same type of thinking. My favourite saying: “Americans always make the right decisions…after they have tried everything else.” (Churchill)

        • wayne moores

          Greeting Richard, ya I understand that for sure. After all, you did elect Obama. Finally an election the neocons didn’t steal. I wish your great country all the luck in the world. I fear however things will get worse before they get better. But get better they will. As Ross Perot was fond of saying, “time to shovel out the barn”. It seems you know a little history. Did you notice the latest frothing at the mouth insanity of the neocons is to rewrite history. They now are trying to claim Roosevelt’s New Deal prolonged the great depression. It was really WWII that revived the economy. Well at least they are consistant. As usual massive deficits and vast amounts of money can only be spent to bomb foreigners into the stone age. Any money spent on the poor or for healthcare or infrastructure is socialism if not high treason. Take care.

    • Rob

      Please do not take my fellow American colleuge Aaron too seriously, we have a lot of loud ignorant people in the U S of A. I live in Michigan so Canadians are sort of like second cousins and _THANKFULLY_ I get to listen to the CBC, especially during the last eigth Bush years, to get a bit more rational and objective view of what was happening in our country. As for Aaron, as my uncle used to say, “an empty can makes a lot of noise”.

  • russ

    Merced was a beautiful little place in the Gold Rush country, the gate way to Yosemite Valley and the Sierra Nevada mountains. I hope the townspeople can make it once again a sleepy village where a slower paced life can be enjoyed.

  • Rick LaBOnte

    Rubbish. California is barely affected. The “poorest” Californian is richer by far than 90% of the world’s population, thanks to liberal-nazi confiscation of every extra dime that hard-working Californians manage to put aside for themselves – only to have freeloading government rats steal it away. Gradually, however, the productive citizens are realizing just how much the government and the freeloaders hate them and how thoroughly these psychotic parasites have made it impossible for then to succeed. They are voting with their feet. If it was not for hardworking illegal Mexican invaders, the whole state would collapse into a marxist shithole like Britain. The Mexicans are enabling this farce to continue, although they are at the same time trashing the state. It’s not theier fault, tehre is no such thing as garbage pickyup in Mexico, so they just throw their trash in the street ewerywhere they go. San Fransicko used to be a beautiful city, now it’s just a dump, like NYC before Giuliani cleaned it up. CaLifornia still attracts bums fromall over the world, so it obviously is doing much better than say the Rust Belt.

    • Anders

      Rick LaBOnte is either a fine satirist, or the saddest example of a brainwashed human I’ve seen in a while. Then again, I haven’t turned on fox news in a couple weeks.

      • wayne moores

        Well, I am not sure about the satire but I expect to see him on Fox at Eleven, hole up in a tower somewhere with a sniper rifle and thousands of rounds of ammo. Cheers.

  • Pingback: On the front lines of the U.S. meltdown

    • Paul Langner

      I’m a Canadian living in Fremont, CA (East Bay) in an apartment. We are still waiting for housing prices here to drop. Last year a 50 year old 1400 sq ft. house, with no A/C, no upgrades, and a dirt back-yard in a dubious neigbouhood cost around $650K. Today things aren’t significantly different.

      • FishCake

        New isn’t news if writers don’t focus on the extremes. It’s really boring and difficult for the writer to write about cities/towns where nothing much has been affected or changed.

  • Shane Cunningham

    Hello Canadian friends: I was raised in Alaska, and have traversed your beautiful country many times! Regarding the “failure of Capitalism, Free Markets”, etc., the markets did not fail! They were trying to work with an innumerable host of government interventions (Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie, VA, FHA, Glass-Spegal……). What, in fact, has happened is that the Government has continued to distort markets by manipulating and clouding the market signals so that markets did not function as “free markets”. Wall Street’s purported free-for-all was actually the reaction of investors to the idea that, in the end, the Government would ‘back-stop’ everything and everyone. The reason that housing over-inflated was a combination of unrealistic market behavior coupled with government guarantees. In the end, the Government cannot afford to do everything. I love the Republican (as in representative government) form of government, but the weakness is that those in political power will have every incentive to promise that which they may or MAY NOT be able to afford or provide. In my opinion, our (the USA’s) current recession/depression is a reality check for politicos; it has not run its course yet. But by the time this current economic cycle is over (maybe the next 5-10 years), most politicians will be “humbled” and realize that Governments do not create wealth. They can, at best, ‘grease the wheels’, but more often than not, they get in the way of wealth creation and prosperity.

    The market need to clear. Banks need to fail. Houses need to be foreclosed on. Prices need to fall. Deflation has to run its course. Governments and households need to begin to live within their means, again. The savings rates v.s. consumption rates need to find a more historic equilibrium. Then the economy will recover.

    • Wayne

      some very good points Shane : it is so easy to make blanket statements that at heart are either trite, over-simplified or just out and out non sense and all 3 are in healthy supply of late. If anyone contributed to this mess it was the Dem’s and Bill Clinton who and get this forced money lenders to roll out the sub prime dough as their platform at the time was based upon every one owning a home .. good grief .. imagine encouraging people to invest in a real estate bubble. Apparently as well this whole de-regulation idea didn’t start with Bush no matter how much you want to lay the blame on him for everything. PS: wealth is not created – it is just moved around from one pile to another – economic professor told me that once it’s an interesting point.

    • Richard Ure

      Shane,

      Are you saying the free enterprise, competing ratings agencies had no role in this little debacle? The fact these unprincipled, greedy folk betrayed their trust with impact on the rest of the world has tended to put your simple view of the world under increased scrutiny. And we are not particularly impressed or persuaded.

    • FishCake

      Your a good candidate to follow the Peter Schiff economics.

      http://www.schiff2010.com/peters-solutions

      I’m a big fan of his ..

      cheers.

  • Tom Bailey

    To Rick LaBOnte

    I deeply resent your comment that Britain is ‘a Marxist shithole’

    We are not the least bit Marxist

    • Derek

      Not marxist, but a shithole never the less…

  • Chris

    Excellent summary by Shane! I don’t want to sound as an alarmist against big government, but I do think the citizenry needs to become very aware of the kinds of salaries and benefits enjoyed by many in the ranks of local, state, and federal government…at the expense of taxpayers in the private sector! From the article above: “According to Gomes, a leader in the fight to fix Vallejo’s financial mess, 26 employees each earned more than US$250,000 last year, most of them firefighters.” That’s insanity for a public position! And in a town the size of Vallejo? Try finding the benefits and pay, in the private sector, to match those in the government!

    Having held a position for the Federal Government as an Aerospace Engineer for two years, next as a serviceman in the military for 13 years, and then finally as an entreprenuer in three different endeavors – real estate development, a franchise for a web based service in three cities, and co owner with my spouse, a dentist, of a dental practice with 10 employees – I can tell you that the public sector has no clue about the complexity and difficulties of buiding businesses, and yes, “creating wealth”, through initiative, risk taking, and responsibility for paying others when your not even sure you can pay yourself! And contrary to Wayne’s comment that wealth is moved from one pile to another, wealth is created almost entirely by the private sector, with the government mostly transferring it, but somtimes incubating it. No thoughtful intellectual or economist today would pretend that a centralized or government planned economy could produce anything like the miracle of a market based or free economy. While government has a role, we need to be very careful in checking governments growth and influence lest it chokes us all in a sespool of socialism as witnessed in the Easter Bloc of past decades, devoid of the initiative and creativity of a market system as seen in the last century in the U.S. or Hong Kong, or Japan.

  • Tony

    As a Canadian, the one thing I worry most is our complacency. Case in point: I have practiced medicine in both the US and Canada. While our system is equitable, the level of care in a lot of communities, including even bigger cities, is only mediocre when measured by the standards of modern medicine. However, because of the lack of private options, even people who are willing to pay for premium service (i.e. no cost to his fellow taxpayers) cannot choose to do so unless they go outside the country. In the name of equality, we have stifled improvement in quality of care by preserving a rigid and mediocre system which continues to deteriorate as the population ages and as funding dwindles. Yet we are so blinded by our pride and complacency that we are oblivious to the need for reform to improve the system. Outside of health care, we are slipping in other areas like education and community safety. Witness the recent gang war madness in Vancouver that the police seem to be totally powerless to stop. As a nation, our spirit and lifestyle have become too comfortable and lazy and we are losing our vitality.

  • Richard Ure

    Tony,

    At least you, like us in Oz, have a single payer system which eliminates the buck-passing of the much ballyhooed “choice” system. Americans seems to approach every issue, be it guns, banking regulation etc, with a religious simplicity which prevents rational debate and results in the country falling further behind by the day.

  • Able

    Ever notice that the articles about California’s real estate melt down always concern inland locations that were for the most part, johnny-come-lately to the appreciation boom. More relevant, it concerns places where those at the lower rungs on the economy bought houses (that sounds cruel, be advised I didn’t mean to be condescending in stating this)

    I don’t see news pieces about La Jolla, Malibu, Santa Barbara or Pacific Grove in dire straits.

    The reality is that the economy along the coast (while certainly not exempt from the current situation) is certainly different that what the Main Stream Media reports about California. Keep in mind that by saying “along the coast”, I mean in general, a 10 mile wide belt. Certainly it encompasses a lot more than multi-million dollar properties on the beach.

    So people, get your facts right before making any evaluations about the state of California.

  • Tom Washington

    California has always been a liberal bastion in the United States and believed in spending, spending, spending. What is Congressman Pelosi going to do for her people now. Maybe she will park her private Air Force jet and spend the savings on California’s poor. I think not.

    The bills have come due and it’s not pretty. Now we have a President in the White House taking the California approach nationwide.

    • Jay

      Hmm, I thought it was George W. who managed to transform the US from a healthy surplus budget when he took office, to a huge deficit by the time he left in 8 years.
      He must have spent all that money on his friend Dick Cheney’s Halliburton outfit perhaps? Neo-CONS indeed…! They managed to con the public for so long, while chanting the free market mantra all the time.

      • sf

        Obama’s defecit for this year outstrips the deficits of the Bush years combined. And your repetition of the same old ridiculous talking points shows your lack of original thought.

  • Max

    They tried to renegotiate, but were told that until they defaulted, the bank couldn’t help. When they did stop making payments, they learned that the bank they’d been speaking with no longer owned their mortgage. (Their daughter, Gail Sullivan, later learned the Martins’ mortgage had been sold and resold five times.) In February, the Martins received a “notice to quit.” The sheriff’s office posted it to their front door. But by then they’d already moved out. “We left a lot of love in that house,” she says.

    Folks, a word to the wise. Many banks resold the mortgage debts but there’s something they don’t tell you. If they’re going to foreclose on you you have a LEGAL right to demand to see the original mortgage document with your signature on it. If they cannot produce this, because they sold it on, they have no LEGAL right to foreclose because they can’t prove that you are indebted to them. I live in the UK but I knowthat quite a number of people in the US have used this legal challenge and have WON in court. Best of luck to all of the good people in Stockton. Remember, if your bank wants to foreclose on you challenge them to show you the document that proves you owe them money. Under contract law, without that original document, they ain’t got a legal leg to stand on.

    • sf

      Puhleaze. So you are saying that people have the right to live in a house they cannot pay for simply because of a missing piece of paper. Your glorification of theft is not impressive.

      • Max

        If the bank cannot prove they own the debt against the house then under contract law they have no legal right to foreclose on that property. They also have no ethical right as in such cases where they sold the debt on it is no longer theirs to pursue. That should be down to whichever bank eventually ended up with your mortgage and title deeds which, under law, would be the only bank actually permitted to seize the property in the event of default. Like it or not, it’s as simple as that. But please don’t take my word for it’; check it out for yourself.

  • http://www.iloveclosing.com The Closer

    We all need a little help in these tough economic times… touching coverage:

    http://iloveclosing.com/2009/04/20/selling-secrets-from-talk-radio/

    Cheers
    The Closr

  • Les Ismore

    All this partisan back and forth. Wake up. The Democrats and Republicans are BOTH corrupt. They both take millions from lobyists and screw the citizens. Americans need to start electing people not endorsed by the overlords and stop putting the same jerks back in time after time. How can the polls show a approval rating of Congress that is 10-20% but then the politicians have a 98% retention rate?? Stop electing lawyers and put regular citizens in. People that work for a living. Career politicians are criminals that pass laws that make what they do legal. We need to start at the local and state level and put in people not backed by big money. The left likes to make it look like only the right is rich. What about Soros, and all the Hollywierd millionaires?? The two party system is corrupt, and the voters can’t win. The Dems and Repubs make it impossible to get a third party on the ballot. I wonder why. You people here are doing what they want, arguing with each other trying to point out why the other’s party or politician is bad and yours is good. Keep fighting and you won’t notice the crooks in Washington stealing your money and country. Think—why would someone spend millions of dollars to get a job that pays $175000? Would you spend $500000 to get a job that paid $50-60K? Educate yourself to the corruption, stop watching TV and read. Read more than one opinion and viewpoint. Try Orwell, he was a prophet. He showed where the corruption would lead.

    • Richard Ure

      Do you see any irony in the fact the US seeks to impose democracy on a sceptical world (sometimes by force) yet its own citizens have so little faith in the concept themselves?

      Compulsory voting in the US and adequately resourcing the actual election process might help encourage more to take an interest and have a greater say in how it works for them.

From Macleans