Book Review: Michael Ignatieff's 'True Patriot Love'

Iggy addresses the question that has puzzled so many

by John Geddes on Friday, April 17, 2009 11:31am - 34 Comments

The best fun in True Patriot Love comes in the book’s first third. George Munro Grant was a Nova Scotian Presbyterian clergyman, a terrific preacher, whose crowning achievement was to make Queen’s University a first-rank institution as its principal from 1877 until his death in 1902. Before then, though, his gift for expressing a compelling vision of Canada made him a useful friend of prime ministers, and of Sandford Fleming, the legendary engineer who oversaw the building of the transcontinental railway.

It was with Fleming that Grant crossed Canada in 1872, the trip Grant recounted in Ocean to Ocean. Ignatieff’s retells the tale with verve. He revels especially in imagining Grant and Fleming crossing the Prairies on horseback in the last days before the railroad. “It’s fair to say,” he writes, “that those long days on the trail, sometimes breaking into a gallop to run after birds, sometimes chasing each other, other times letting the reins free, so that they could daydream, were the happiest moments of my great-grandfather’s life.”

Although Grant is every inch the Victorian, Ignatieff finds much to admire from a twenty-first century progressive’s perspective. Grant sided with the French in the Manitoba schools crisis, and broadly held that “a people can be truly united only when great minorities do not feel themselves treated with injustice.” Arriving in frontier Kamloops in 1872, Grant noted with disapproval the bigotry against the Chinese, praising them as “cleanly, orderly, patient, industrious and above all cheap.”

When Ignatieff’s moves on to consider his maternal grandfather, William Grant, he lacks the compelling centerpiece of an epic journey. The defining event of this life, of this generation, was the First World War. A promising historian who had lectured at Oxford, Grant returned to Canada after the war to run UCC, and write a high school history textbook. Ignatieff uses his life mainly to meditate on the mindset of Canadians who believed their country had come of age on the Western Front.

By the time of George Grant, brother of Ignatieff’s mother Alison, the family had evidently internalized and even mythologized its sense of purpose. “He always said,” Ignatieff writes, “that it was his mother who turned the vice of family expectation, who imbued him with a sense that he had to measure up to ‘the ancestors.’”

But George Grant’s particular way of relieving the pressure of the vice—by becoming Canada’s most noted intellectual pessimist—hardly meets with his nephew’s approval. “He gave up on the country. He should not have done,” Ignatieff writes. “The country is not done. The story has only just begun. There is so much more to tell, so much more to do.”

A sound-bite cadence has seeped into Ignatieff’s prose here. Yet on the very same page his writer’s craft reasserts itself when he describes visiting his famous uncle in 1983, finding him a “great shambling patriarch with a straggly beard, a huge laugh that revealed a frightful set of crooked an stained teeth.”

Ignatieff is often at his best with physical description. But he’s not just a good set of eyes. Remembering how family demons plagued George Grant into old age, Ignateiff discovers that this pain binds him to his uncle in a “family tradition” that’s far from benign. “A tradition,” Ignatieff reflects, “is also a channel of memory through which fierce and unrequited longings surge that define and shape a whole life, his and mine.”

He doesn’t let us in on exactly what “fierce and unrequited longings” shape his own life. Maybe they have something to do with his bid to become prime minister. One can only imagine the agonies Liberal party operatives would now be suffering if their leader had unguardedly followed this line of thought.

Those party pros will undoubtedly be hoping readers skip ahead to his final chapter, in which Ignatieff recounts how, with his wife Zsuszanna, he retraced the Western portion of his great-grandfather’s cross-Canada journey. In this travelogue, their rental car takes the place of the horses and canoes of the original.

Behind the wheel, Ignatieff adopts the requisite sunny outlook of era when the word “hope” is synonymous with successful politicking. Even seeing the slow death of Prairie whistle-stop towns—the culture created by the railway Grant and Fleming championed—doesn’t get him down. “The Canada George Munro Grant had dreamed of was passing away,” he admits, “but a new economy was taking shape in the downtown universities and research institutes, the law firms and the business parks.”

Later he rides the West Edmonton Mall’s water slides!

By this time, Michael and Zsusanna have set themselves the jolly task of finding the best pie to be had at the highway eateries. Any further musing on the problematic nature of patriotism seems pretty much out of the question. The writing has turned too slight to lug around the burden of the Grant legacy.

Bookmark and Share
  • hosertohoosier

    Finally a leader who combines an old stock Canadian aristocratic bearing with Tsarist Russian aristocratic bearing.

    • DisplacedCanadian

      Wow. I really feel bad for you. I don’t read enough books — I read lots of papers, online articles, etc – but this book sounds like a lot of fun. Remove your political blinders just for a moment. It’s people like you who make me ashamed to be a Canadian. He’s a Canadian, just like you and me! Let go of your hate.

    • Bocanut

      Yep,another upper class twit pretending to care.

  • DR

    I think George Grant would have really liked “Gran Torino”

  • Mike G

    Thanks for this. I’ve finally gotten around to reading “Blood and Belonging”, and it makes an interesting comparison. He seems to have written a lot of books about basically the same thing, i.e., who am I, who are we, and what exactly are these concepts we identify ourselves by? It seems to me these are very poignant questions for the “cosmopolitan”, modern world, especially in Canada where nearly all of us originally came from somewhere else and are only here for the donuts and democracy, yet find ourselves lumped together and having to make collective decisions to improve and maintain our society.

    It seems like Ignatieff, in all his many writings about this question, still hasn’t figured out the answers, but perhaps the mere fact that he is on an endless search for understanding national identity makes him more Canadian than the content of his books.

    I’m not sold on him as a politician yet, but I do intend to read more of his writing.

    • http://www.savedarfur.org Sophia Geffros

      I am we as you are me as you are he and we are all together!

  • John

    Interesting article, and seems like an interesting book.

  • http://MySpace.com/ElectroPig1 ElectroPig™ Von FökkenGrüüven

    We need to have a truly representative government in Canada again. I’lll call it…hmmm…the “Canadian People’s Republic”…let’s face it folks, with everything that’s going on today, Canada definitely needs some serious C.P.R.!

  • Lucas R

    Voilà qui donne sérieusement envie de lire le dernier Ignatieff. « I grew up in a Canadian household where my parents did think that life was elsewhere » est un état d’esprit largement répandu parmi les Canadiens, spécialement dans la part croissante des immigrants. Beaucoup ne ressentent leur attachement patriotique qu’après avoir vécu l’ailleurs. Selon moi, le rapport qu’ont les Canadiens avec leur pays est très malléable en dépit de racines profondes: je considère cela comme étant un patriotisme particulièrement sain.

  • George

    If Ignatieff becomes Prime Minister, one could really say “only in Canada”. A guy who spends some 30 years outside the country, then comes back and is appointed by a bunch of Liberal hacks to the leadership of the party, in my view cannot and should not be elected Prime Minister of Canada. If he is, I will indeed be ashamed to call myself a “Canadian”.

    • DisplacedCanadian

      And this has nothing to do with the crux of the article – nice going George!

      • kc

        Tall poppy syndrome. I wonder if Canadians will outgrow this childish reflexive behaviour in my life-time?

    • Brian

      Actually George, if he becomes PM it will be because he has been elected by Canadians – why would you be ashamed of democracy?

      • George

        Ignatieff is a kind of Frankenstein, part Russian, part Anglo, part American and finally probably the smallest part Canadian. Actually physically he resembles the Frankenstein as was played by another Russian actor, Boris Karloff. He spent most of his life outside Canada teaching at universities and writing books and articles. In the U.S., he even wrote something like this “We Americans should support the war in Iraq…” During all that time he did nothing for Canada, not even paid a penny of taxes here.

        For some reason, the back room boys of the Liberal party, decided that he should be their leader. They provided him with a safe seat in Toronto while not allowing anyone else to contest his candidacy. When contrary to their plans, Stephane Dion was elected leader of the Liberal Party, they did a great political assassination of Dion, to the point that they even messed up his final TV address to show him as incompetent. All this with Ignatieff’s approval and support. So democracy is rather far away from all of this.

        Any way, we shall see if Canadians will indeed elect the grandson of a Russian princess, who was absent from Canada during the whole of his most productive life.

        • Critical Reasoning

          who was absent from Canada during the whole of his most productive life.

          Ah, yes. Before he was reincarnated as Ignatieff in 1947, he lived a short but intensely productive life as a monarch butterfly in South America in 1945-46. This was by far the most productive of his many lives, but not once during those two years did he fly over to Canada.

          • Sylvia Dennis

            A few words to those who are expressing their ugly demeaning remarks about Michael Ignatieff. What have you done for your country? How many years have you lived in Canada? How does your intelligence compare with Michael’s? Your glass appears to be very low in content. Please fill it with love and knowledge. It will help you to feel better about yourselves and others.

          • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

            He must have been a particularly virtuous butterfly to return as George Grant’s nephew.

          • http://www.savedarfur.org Sophia Geffros

            Was that common knowledge?:*0
            At any rate, In Canadians: a Portrait of A Country and its People, Roy Macgregor sets out to interview George Grant- and he’d become moderately optimistic in his old age.

          • James

            A few words to those who are expressing their ugly demeaning remarks about Michael Ignatieff. What have you done for your country? How many years have you lived in Canada? How does your intelligence compare with Michael’s? Your glass appears to be very low in content. Please fill it with love and knowledge. It will help you to feel better about yourselves and others.
            ======================================================

            I have live here, paied taxes, voted in elections, worked in the economy and volenteered in the community. I have lived here 27 years. I am smarter and probably faster then Mr. Ignatieff. As proff I offer that I haven’t joined a political party or attempted to wade neck deep in the slime that congeals around Ottawa. Complaining about others who raise valid concerns about people seeking high office is silly. If their motives and history diminish their chance or disqualify them from the office then it is important that they be so vetted.

            JH

    • Conan the Agrarian

      George, why wait until Ignatieff’s election to be ashamed? Start now. Except instead of being ashamed “to be Canadian”, try being ashamed of being a narrow-minded twit.

      • George

        No, Conan, I will not start now, because I believe in the intelligence of Canadians and that they will reject this fraud Ignatieff during the next elections. I personally voted Liberal most of my life, but this time I will do everything possible to see them lose.

        But you didn’t answer any of the points I made earlier. Let me repeat. Ignatieff is a fraud politically speaking because he did not win the leadership of the Liberal Party in an honest way but was pushed through the back door by the Toronto Liberal Establishment. He is a fraud, because he was never loyal to the elected leader Stephane Dion and worked hard behind his back to depose him. He is a fraud, because after being absent for thirty years, he really doesn’t know Canada well enough to lead it. All these points will be well exploited by the other parties during the next elections and I am pretty sure that after the elections I will rather feel as “a proud Canadian”.

    • danby

      Neil Young hasn’t lived in Canada in 40 years, yet he was number 14 on the list of “Greatest Canadians Ever”
      Does this mean he’s not a Canadian?

      Is there a rule book I can consult on this?

      • George

        I never said that Ignatieff is not “a Canadian” or “a great Canadian writer”. He already received the Governor General’s award in 1987 and was even shortlisted for the Booker prize for his novel Scar Tissue. So, by all means, let him write novels and biographies and achieve all the greatness he can that way.

        I simply say that a guy who was absent from Canada most of his adult life, should not suddenly show up and become Prime Minister of this country. This is because from the political standpoint and the standpoint of real life and needs of Canadians, he is a neophyte and it would be a big mistake to let him direct this country in perhaps the most difficult time in a generation or two.

        Show me any other country, where someone who left it just after university graduation, came back some thirty years later and became its political leader.

      • Wayne

        Neil Young has lived on Salt Spring Island for 40 years now – admittedly you might not want to inlcude it in Canada as it is indeed full of frustrated left wing nuts however techinically it is still Canada.

        • James Connors

          John Stuart Mill; the gift that keeps on giving.

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Some of the comments are pretty stupid. They don’t care – they want an excuse to attack and think they’re saying clever thing…..sigh..

    Oh, by the way, do you consider Gretzky Canadian? Polish roots, living in L.A. for over 17 years now? Hmmmm….other no more Canadian – Martin Short, William Shatner, Leslie Neilson, Walt Disney, and the list goes on.

    • John.K

      Walt’s father Elias was born a Canadian. Sort of like Ignatief’s grandparents were Russian nobility, so he’s The Count, Elias is known around here as “that Disney fella whose boy had something to do with movies”

    • George

      None of them are trying to become Prime Minister of Canada.

      • Conan the Agrarian

        Call me crazy, but I’m more interested in which of the two plausible winners of the next election under our execrable first-past-the-post system would provide better governance, than in the question of where they spent the past few decades.

      • danby

        You’re right George.
        It’s a goddam plot to sell Canada out to foreign interests…..

    • jp

      Walt Disney was Canadian! you’re kidding.

  • Derek Pearce

    In our small way Canada is experimenting with becoming one of the first (if not THE first) postmodern nation. Maple leaves/hockey/and curling aside, we are evolving into a “state, a governed unit, that exists in the world” from a colonial nation-state. This doesn’t mean you ignore the tug at your heart when you hear the national anthem or when a soldier is killed by and IED, or that you raise your hackles because a guy had the nerve to work in the UK and US. It means we are grown up enough to judge a person’s ability to do a job– in this case the job of PM– by their talent/intelligence/work ethic etc. Ignatieff has to work on his retail politics but he’s certainly worthy of the job, a postmodern PM for postmodern Canada.

  • James

    In our small way Canada is experimenting with becoming one of the first (if not THE first) postmodern nation. Maple leaves/hockey/and curling aside, we are evolving into a “state, a governed unit, that exists in the world” from a colonial nation-state. This doesn’t mean you ignore the tug at your heart when you hear the national anthem or when a soldier is killed by and IED, or that you raise your hackles because a guy had the nerve to work in the UK and US. It means we are grown up enough to judge a person’s ability to do a job– in this case the job of PM– by their talent/intelligence/work ethic etc. Ignatieff has to work on his retail politics but he’s certainly worthy of the job, a postmodern PM for postmodern Canada.

    =================================

    Never felt that heart tug. Sorry, can’t help you there. Postmodernism isn’t a state of being. Its a form of literary critique. Please go and look it up. It would help things alot if people used terms at made any kind of sence.

    JH

From Macleans