Nation in progress

AN EXCLUSIVE EXCERPT FROM MICHAEL IGNATIEFF’S NEW BOOK

by Michael Ignatieff on Saturday, April 18, 2009 3:20pm - 9 Comments

But government does still matter. Countries with good government can master globalization; countries with bad government will be its victims. George Grant’s mistake was to abandon faith in ordinary politics and the capacity of his fellow citizens to shape their lives through free institutions. No country may be fully sovereign over its identity, but well-governed countries are more sovereign than others, more capable of mastering change and preserving the vital core of traditions, beliefs and values that give a people their identity. Well-governed countries maintain peace, order and good government at home. They punish crime; they hold their citizens accountable for basic standards of conduct. These successful countries run immigration programs that attract entrepreneurial and able people from around the world to become citizens. Bipartisan political consensus guarantees steady national investment in education and training, in science and technology, in infrastructure, and in the public goods that draw citizens together and help to make them productive. These successful countries knock down the barriers—of red tape, regulation and monopoly—that divide citizens, confer unfair advantages or prevent people from working together.

None of these successful countries is foolish enough to believe that it is a finished creation. They all take their promises of equality, fairness and justice seriously, which means that their leaders know that there are still promises to keep. These countries don’t protect their markets against global competition; they invest in their own people’s vision and enterprise so they can gain footholds in other people’s markets. Above all, these successful countries keep their governments honest and accountable. Trust in government, faith in the people who are elected, belief that public policy can actually improve people’s lives—these are the emotions that sustain the citizenship of successful societies.

Such societies are successful not just because they are prosperous and free, but because their citizens share a sense that they know where they came from and know where they are headed in the future. They are hopeful. They believe in themselves. They believe in the capacity of their people to do great things. They are patriots.

Patriotism—enduring, impatient, non-ironic belief in the promise of the land you love—is the single greatest asset of successful societies. Successful societies struggle with their deficiencies and overcome them through collective efforts of will and sacrifice. Patriotism is the sentiment that makes a people demand reform, change and improvement in their country; patriotism is the source of the impatience and anger that makes abuses intolerable, injustice unacceptable and complacency a delusion.

It is this sentiment that makes us want to be one people. It is this shared feeling that allows us to rise above our differences—English and French, Aboriginal, Métis, Inuit, immigrants from every land—and makes a complex unity of us all.

This unity, never certain, never to be taken for granted, always a work in progress, has meaning for us, but it also offers an example to others. Canadians know as much as anyone about living together across the gulf of great differences; we know how to compromise with each other and yet maintain what is essential; we know how to live with the differences that cannot be overcome. We have some experience in respecting the rights of individuals and yet also protecting the collectivities of language and culture that give individuality meaning. We know something, too, about a national pride that is ironic, modest, self-deprecating yet also robust. We know the difference between true patriot love and false, between love that always respects the truth of who we are, however painful, and the love that devours the truth and replaces it with lies. Most of all, we know—as some other nations do not—that the question of who we are is never settled and that we rise to our best when we allow ourselves to imagine ourselves anew.

From True Patriot Love by Michael Ignatieff. Copyright © Michael Ignatieff, 2009. Reprinted with permission of Penguin Group (Canada).

Bookmark and Share
  • Anon

    “The Europeans have used high-speed railways to tie Europe together.”

    Is that right? So, I guess the Balkan conflict existed (and exists today) because the TGV does not run through Sarajevo.

    On the other hand, I guess the Americans are a nation divided because they do not have these high-speed rail links.

    The economics of rail networks are such that they only work in high-population density high-usage corridors. In a country like Canada, they’re more likely to become white elephants.

    • John.K

      Do you know of any studies on just how high-density, high usage a corridor must be to support a high speed rail system? I’ve been hearing this assertion for decades now, but I don’t know if anyone has done any studies.

      Obviously, if no high speed rail lines have been built in “low” density corridors, we can’t point to their subsequent failure. However low(er) speed rail in high density corridors has been a notable failure in several countries.

      • Anon

        According to this article in The Economist:

        “High-speed rail is most viable, reports the Government Accountability Office, when it runs through a crowded corridor for distances of 100-500 miles. Trains must compete with cars and planes for speed, reliability and cost-effectiveness.”

        The original GAO study can be downloaded at => http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09317.pdf

        • John.K

          Thank you.

  • Critical Reasoning

    A valid question. Presumably, Finance Minister McCallum would help keep Iggy grounded in sober reality.

  • Critical Reasoning

    I will probably buy a copy of Iggy’s new book. Though I am still skeptical, I must say that I find him impressive in many ways. He is certainly the most impressive Liberal leader in the past quarter-century.

    • http://www.savedarfur.org Sophia Geffros

      I’m on the waiting list at the library- I was one of the people who were royally ticked off at Iggy’s acclimation, but having since read a large part of his body of work… he’s certainly a very smart man.

  • Jan

    Having read the review of Ignatieff’s book, one must say it is impressive, but it also left the uneasy impression that what the man writes is entirely different with reality. One would draw the conclusion that Ignatieff is a Conservative through and through. And that would be a bad fit in the Liberal Party of Canada.
    It also indicates that the Ignatieff vision is no different than the one espoused by PM Harper who is acting out his vision if only seen by the Liberal blindness of the general population aided and abetted by a Liberal symphatetic media for whatever reason.

  • p.v.

    Forget about the call for some grand public works projects for a minute and even the fact that the writer is the current leader of the Liberal party. He is asking some really important questions that every politician in this country should be able to answer:

    1) What is your national vision for Canada and how does it incorporate regionalism, immigration and our aboriginal, French and English past.

    2) How do we master globalization instead of getting swept away by it?

    3) How are we going to achieve energy independence without a national grid? Without a national strategy?

    4) Do we really believe in a Canada or do we simply take it for granted as a state of convenience where we defer to being a U.S. satellite state with allegiance to wherever your or your ancestors came from?

From Macleans