The feud

Two titans, bad blood, and a growing rift that threatens to divide the Conservative party

by Paul Wells on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:50pm - 62 Comments

Amazingly, Mulroney became a close Harper adviser and confidant. They spoke on the phone all the time. Marjory LeBreton, a Mulroney-appointed senator who acted as his unfailing advocate on Parliament Hill, went on the campaign bus for Harper’s victorious 2006 campaign.

And they all would have lived happily ever after—except Conservatives almost never get to do that, do they? Every once in a while, old tensions would resurface. During the party’s first formal convention, in Montreal in 2005, a debate over delegate rules for future conventions pitted former Alliance members against former Progressive Conservatives. The former outnumbered the latter 10 to 1. Peter MacKay threw a strategic tantrum, telling reporters, “This party is in real jeopardy, in my view.” Harper kicked a chair over and, days later, took MacKay and Belinda Stronach into his office to berate them for airing the party’s dirty laundry in public. The incident led directly to Stronach’s departure from the party.

But none of that mattered much as long as it involved temporary tensions and minor characters. The saga of Mulroney’s dealings with Schreiber obeyed neither of those rules.

Mulroney had denied for years that he had any business dealings with Schreiber, a cheerfully crooked operator who faced extradition on charges of bribing German officials. But on Nov. 8, 2007, Schreiber filed an affidavit claiming he visited Mulroney on June 23, 1993—two days before Mulroney ended his term as prime minister. At that meeting, Schreiber claimed, he negotiated a $300,000 lobbying deal with Mulroney.

Suddenly Mulroney’s dealings with Schreiber weren’t necessarily those of a private citizen in retirement, but those of a serving politician. And his close relationship with his one-time apostate successor, Harper, meant allegations against Mulroney could hurt Harper.

Harper announced an independent review of Schreiber’s allegations. Mulroney said that wasn’t enough and called for a full public inquiry: “It’s time we put this issue to bed, once and for all.” Harper took Mulroney at his word and announced what would eventually become, in the fullness of bureaucratic time, the Oliphant commission. At a news conference announcing the commission, quite unprompted by reporters, Harper went a step further and cut the ties that connected the two prime ministers.

“I think it will be incumbent on me and also upon members of the government not to have dealings with Mr. Mulroney until this issue is resolved,’’ Harper said.

This was something new. “It put a suggestion of persona non grata on Mulroney,” L. Ian MacDonald, a Montreal political journalist who served for years as Mulroney’s chief speechwriter, wrote in his Gazette column. Harper’s hands-off-Mulroney edict, MacDonald wrote, “has created serious rumblings in the old Tory tent this week, especially in Quebec, where Mulroney is held in high regard.”

A year later Harper won re-election, no thanks to Quebec, where his government’s cuts to arts funding sparked a truly formidable voter backlash. Facing his own re-election campaign, Premier Jean Charest joined the criticism rather than defend Harper. In MacDonald’s Gazette column and others in Quebec newspapers, the theory spread that if Harper had kept lines of communication open to Mulroney, he wouldn’t have been so tone-deaf in Quebec.

Three days before Christmas 2008, Harper named 18 new Conservative senators. One was Irving Gerstein, the party’s chief fundraiser. Shortly after the New Year, Gerstein took a phone call from Mulroney.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://macleans.ca joetheelectrician

    We need Don Cherry as the new Conservative leader .

    • Elizabeth Montgomery

      hahahaha . . . lol. He’d be perfect.

  • http://mentmore24@msn.com David

    I am intrigued by the many Liberal articles pointing out how Mr.Harper “kicks over a chair”. It might help their propaganda machine if they could get one of their numerous friends, journalists,media anchors, etc. to have a photograph of one of these alleged events. Every time I’ve seen our PM on TV he seems cool, detached and reasonable. Perhaps you were using the Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde scenario.to bolster your quest to destroy Mr.Harper.

    • Derek Pearce

      There are numerous reports of Harper having a pretty bad temper behind closed doors. The same went for Paul Martin, and apparently John McCain. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide is bang-on. This is all secondary to policy discussion of course– but we don’t need to see him kicking over the chair on YouTube to believe it’s damn true.

  • delford t. louis

    did someone mention ben mulroney? with all respect to success finding people… the guy is there doing whatever he does with plummeting ratings wherever he shows up… what did he do to earn this forced celebrity status? possibly taxpayer money?

  • Pingback: Behind closed doors at Passing Lad

  • dArt

    Mr. Harper is only doing what one would do in order not to have any of the fluff stick to him. Any politician would do that. I do feel great hope that Mr. Mulroney is found free of any guilt for I do not want that he has done wrong. I liked him as our Prime Minister.

  • keith c

    very funny article as usual that takes us into interesting inside baseball.
    HOWEVER.
    The thesis of your attack on Harper here really strikes me as a little silly, once all the interesting details are removed. As posters above me have stated:
    1) Mulroney took a wad of cash from a shady dude. proven fact. He denied it for years and it was revealed to be true in the end. As americanindian says, this is something that villains do in movies.
    2) the inquiry will probably tell us what happened after all these years. Do you really think Mulroney gets out of this one intact?
    3) and it’s somehow WEIRD or politically stupid that Harper wanted to sever ties with the guy? It should have been obvious this was going to happen.

    Harper’s choice was to keep Mulroney/Charest on side for, at most, 20 quebec seats or else be associated with a toxic brand in english canada. Easy choice in my books. Iggy may beat Harper by making him wear the recession, but he won’t be able to do it by referring to `Mulroney Sleaze’.
    he’s splitting his caucus yes but it’s not obvious to me that it’s the wrong thing to do long term – he can’t do worse than the 1993 Tory wipeout that Mulroney has never had the decency to take an ounce of responsibility for.

  • Critical Reasoning

    Great piece! The definitive account (so far) of the Mulroney-Harper feud. No doubt it has already been read by many senior Conservatives. Perhaps it even had an impact on Harper`s efforts today to mend fences during the caucus meeting.

  • Zamprelli

    This article made realclearworld.com. Congrats, Mr. Wells.

  • Paul Wells

    Yeah, that was fun. Helps our traffic too. Greetings, Mr. and Mrs. America!

  • DianeG

    Mulroney and Harper “two titans”

    C’mon now. There’s no way in which Haper resembles a titan.

    Conservative for life – gave me a giggle or two. The Conservatives surely have enough money to give Mulroney a free life-membership. But M. has been tagged as dirty so they won’t, or if they did, the probably retracted it.

    Some folk thought lyin’ Brian had charm. Too bad it’s not a saleable asset. anymore.

From Macleans