The feud

Two titans, bad blood, and a growing rift that threatens to divide the Conservative party

by Paul Wells on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:50pm - 62 Comments

“They had a nice long chat,” Robin Sears recalls. Mostly Mulroney wanted to congratulate Gerstein on landing a Senate perch. “Irv, being a good fundraiser, asked Mr. Mulroney whether he wanted to make his Leader’s Circle donation.” The Leader’s Circle is the list of top Conservative party donors.

“Mr. Mulroney said, ‘That’s a great idea, Irv, but as you know, they won’t talk to me, so I don’t think I’m in the Leader’s Circle any more.’ ” He added, according to Sears, that he would be happy to keep donating to Conservative party candidates he knew. Elections Canada records show that Brian and Mila Mulroney have donated almost $15,000 to the party and individual candidates since the 2004 election.

Now the thing to remember about Mulroney’s call to Gerstein is that it took place in January. And nobody heard any more about it until March 30 and 31, when reporters from at least three Ottawa news bureaus heard about it from officials in the Conservative party and the Harper government.

What happened in the meantime?

Clues might lie in the story that ran in Canwest newspapers on Sunday, March 29: “Mulroney reputation, legacy at stake as inquiry set to begin.” It’s an “understatement to say the stakes are high for Mr. Mulroney,” the story said, noting Schreiber’s claim to have evidence of “the biggest political scandal in the history of Canada.”

Each Monday morning at the Langevin Block meeting of the Prime Minister’s senior staff, Jenni Byrne, the director of issues management, reports to a group including the chief of staff, Guy Giorno, and the communication director, Kory Teneycke. Byrne’s role is to identify recent or coming events that might present political hazard or opportunity during the week ahead. The meeting starts at 7:30 a.m.; Harper enters around 8, if he is in town, or calls in if he is away. On this day he was in New York City, but it is impossible to know whether he called in to the March 30 meeting: in recent days, his office has stopped taking questions about Harper’s squabble with Mulroney.

Funny, they were a lot more chatty when this began. By March 31, a day after the senior staff meeting, three Ottawa news bureaus had been approached by PMO political staffers with the stale but suddenly handy “news” that Mulroney had asked to be stricken from Conservative party lists. And also that he had let his membership in the party lapse in 2006.

Tom Clark was the first with the news on CTV Newsnet. Robin Sears’ phone rang minutes later. “I got a call from the CBC saying CTV had a story saying, quote, ‘Mr. Mulroney has ripped up his membership card in frustration at the conduct of the Oliphant inquiry.’ Did I have any comment? I said I don’t know anything about that, let me check.”

Sears called Clark, who confirmed that was what he’d been told “by the PMO.” Then he called Mulroney, who took a little finding. A Monday evening dinner with Mila in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., had turned into a two-day hospital stint with food poisoning. Sears asked Mulroney whether he had torn up his party card and set the party loose.

“I guess my job is to delete a few expletives here,” Sears says, recounting the conversation. Mulroney “said, ‘Just tell him that I am a member of the Conservative party and I will be one til the day I die.’ ”

By Tuesday night the story was leading the cable newscasts. The PMO sent “talking points” to MPs and staff, urging them to direct reporters’ questions to the PMO. Those who did call were informed, cheerfully but off the record, that Mulroney had taken it upon himself to sever ties with the party.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://macleans.ca joetheelectrician

    We need Don Cherry as the new Conservative leader .

    • Elizabeth Montgomery

      hahahaha . . . lol. He’d be perfect.

  • http://mentmore24@msn.com David

    I am intrigued by the many Liberal articles pointing out how Mr.Harper “kicks over a chair”. It might help their propaganda machine if they could get one of their numerous friends, journalists,media anchors, etc. to have a photograph of one of these alleged events. Every time I’ve seen our PM on TV he seems cool, detached and reasonable. Perhaps you were using the Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde scenario.to bolster your quest to destroy Mr.Harper.

    • Derek Pearce

      There are numerous reports of Harper having a pretty bad temper behind closed doors. The same went for Paul Martin, and apparently John McCain. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide is bang-on. This is all secondary to policy discussion of course– but we don’t need to see him kicking over the chair on YouTube to believe it’s damn true.

  • delford t. louis

    did someone mention ben mulroney? with all respect to success finding people… the guy is there doing whatever he does with plummeting ratings wherever he shows up… what did he do to earn this forced celebrity status? possibly taxpayer money?

  • Pingback: Behind closed doors at Passing Lad

  • dArt

    Mr. Harper is only doing what one would do in order not to have any of the fluff stick to him. Any politician would do that. I do feel great hope that Mr. Mulroney is found free of any guilt for I do not want that he has done wrong. I liked him as our Prime Minister.

  • keith c

    very funny article as usual that takes us into interesting inside baseball.
    HOWEVER.
    The thesis of your attack on Harper here really strikes me as a little silly, once all the interesting details are removed. As posters above me have stated:
    1) Mulroney took a wad of cash from a shady dude. proven fact. He denied it for years and it was revealed to be true in the end. As americanindian says, this is something that villains do in movies.
    2) the inquiry will probably tell us what happened after all these years. Do you really think Mulroney gets out of this one intact?
    3) and it’s somehow WEIRD or politically stupid that Harper wanted to sever ties with the guy? It should have been obvious this was going to happen.

    Harper’s choice was to keep Mulroney/Charest on side for, at most, 20 quebec seats or else be associated with a toxic brand in english canada. Easy choice in my books. Iggy may beat Harper by making him wear the recession, but he won’t be able to do it by referring to `Mulroney Sleaze’.
    he’s splitting his caucus yes but it’s not obvious to me that it’s the wrong thing to do long term – he can’t do worse than the 1993 Tory wipeout that Mulroney has never had the decency to take an ounce of responsibility for.

  • Critical Reasoning

    Great piece! The definitive account (so far) of the Mulroney-Harper feud. No doubt it has already been read by many senior Conservatives. Perhaps it even had an impact on Harper`s efforts today to mend fences during the caucus meeting.

  • Zamprelli

    This article made realclearworld.com. Congrats, Mr. Wells.

  • Paul Wells

    Yeah, that was fun. Helps our traffic too. Greetings, Mr. and Mrs. America!

  • DianeG

    Mulroney and Harper “two titans”

    C’mon now. There’s no way in which Haper resembles a titan.

    Conservative for life – gave me a giggle or two. The Conservatives surely have enough money to give Mulroney a free life-membership. But M. has been tagged as dirty so they won’t, or if they did, the probably retracted it.

    Some folk thought lyin’ Brian had charm. Too bad it’s not a saleable asset. anymore.

From Macleans