Ignatieff hints at election timing

by Nancy Macdonald on Sunday, May 3, 2009 3:42pm - 15 Comments

iggypressconferenceLiberal leader Michael Ignatieff will have a “coherent” Liberal platform ready by June. And—if Harper doesn’t make immediate reforms to the country’s Employment Insurance system—he’ll consider revoking the lifeline the Liberals handed the prime minister in January.

He made the comments in a sit-down with reporters this morning, at the close of the Liberal Convention in Vancouver. “We have an E.I. system that is not purpose built for the most serious economic crisis since 1945, and we have to fix it, and we have to fix it now,” he said, adding that unemployment has climbed well above eight per cent.

The newly confirmed Liberal leader would like an “immediate,” yet “temporary,” change making Canadians eligible for E.I. benefits if they’ve worked 360 hours in the previous year, regardless of where in the country they live.

The spring platform, however, “is not going to be an E.I. platform,” but a “knowledge society platform,” which includes investments to early childhood learning, post-secondary and Aboriginal education, as well as to science, technology and research. It won’t be publicly released—”with fanfare, bells and whistles,” he added—but will sit at ready in the Liberal vault. Today, however, the “urgency,” rests with E.I—and making temporary reforms to “get us through [the] crisis.”

Bookmark and Share
  • catherine

    Watching that same interview, I would not say Ignatieff was hinting at election timing. In fact, Ignatieff said he would not be drawn into hypotheticals about voting the government down.

    • Will

      I agree. The media is playing up the threat of an election when in fact Ignatieff knows that Harper would not want to risk political suicide over this. It only makes Ignatieff looks like he’s in charge.

      • Elizabeth Montgomery

        It’s annoying how the media will pick things out and create headlines to make their articles more sensational. Ignatieff is too methodical, and organized to rush into anything. I guess all those years as a prof and author have paid off.

  • Anon

    It’s a clever move. The NDP & Bloc will have to support this move to change EI, and if Harper accepts (which he must), Iggy can claim credit for it.

    Once again, he gains a tactical communications advantage, making it seem as if he is responsible for all the good things (stimulus spending, EI reform, etc) and Harper is responsible for all the bad.

    Not sure what Harper gains by giving in and kissing Iggy’s feet, yet again. A few more months at 24 Sussex, I guess.

    • Will

      It’s interesting. The media has always said that Harper was a clever tactician. I think he has met his match.

      • Douglass

        I think as the fall fiscal update showed, Harper’s strategic genius was highly over rated.

        • Elizabeth Montgomery

          I think Harper has been highly over-rated. It’s only because the Liberals were in such disarray that he got there at all, and that he’s managed to stay. All these claims about his high intelligence — all I can see is a man who is very controlled, and very wordy – using over-verbalization to sound like he’s smarter than everyone else — just reminds me of one of those overindulged only children who will talk down even to adults.

          Which reminds me, why do we hear absolutely nothing about Harper’s family? We know all about Ignatieff’s, right back to the great-great grandparents, and he’s told the public pretty much everything about himself. Where is Harper on this? I know he’s fromToronto, and that’s about it.

          • Will

            RE: Harper’s family. I’m sure he’s got a nice family but he cannot risk bragging about him being from Toronto. Otherwise, he risks losing his core votes in Alberta.

        • Stephen

          Harper’s strategic genius was highly over rated.

          Quite true.

          At the same time, anyone who praises Ignatieff’s intelligence is a person unfamiliar with his essays and books.

  • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

    More accurate to say that Ignatieff hints at possible election timing. Harper has not yet dug himself a hole sufficiently deep. Of course, Harper could well buckle on this and every meaty issue; few would deny he’s willing to sacrifice every principle he once appeared to stand for.

  • kc

    Iggy’s practicing smart politics, appear to have the other guy on a string, even if it’s not entirely true. I don’t think Mr H much relishes playing second fiddle to anyone. I wonder what his next blunder will be? Cutting subs to political parties? Nope tried that one, backfired with nasty consequences. Wonder if Steve wishes he’d been nicer to Stephane? He could offer to praise Iggy’s new book, or would that be one sacrifice too many!

  • Kat

    I totally disagree with the proposed change. EI is an insurance program that you must pay into in order to receive. It’s not unlike home, car or life insurance. You have to pay a percentage of your premium in order to qualify.

    The proposed 360 hours is slightly more than 2 months at a full time job. Under the legislation as it is written now, if you live in an area with less than 6% unemployment (the lowest number) you are required to work 700 hours to qualify or approx 4 1/2 months.

    While Ontario is suffering from this economic downturn, Saskatchewan is not. So why should those in Saskatchewan be required to only work 2 months in order to qualify for EI when the jobs are plentiful.

    EI is supposed to be a hand up, not a career choice. And there will always be those who will try to make it a career choice.

    Here is a link to a table showing the regional rate of unemployment and the number of hours required to qualify. Personally, I think it’s fair as it stands….

    http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/ei/legislation/ei_act_part1_1.shtml#a7

    • Maureen

      Agree 100% – under previous Liberal governments they ‘revised’ EI so many times, no one can understand the program. They used surpluses from the EI fund to do their ‘magic’ of balancing the budget (along with a bunch of other less than ethical ways such as downloading to the provinces, cutting health care funding, etc. etc. etc). EI needs to be revamped, but it should be back to an insurance program where your rates and benefits are decided by the sector you are working in (and many sectors have routine layoffs subsidized by EI funds) and the work history of the individual (I have never had to claim EI in over 25 years of working and none of my family or friends have claimed EI – why should be we paying the same premiums as others to support their EI careers).

      As for Iggy’s other suggestions – such as becoming more involved in education – news flash – education is a provincial responsibility. During the 1980s and 1990s, the federals got their fingers into supporting education, job training etc. and when the budget got tight – they dumped all of that on provincial governments who in turn had to cut programs and services in education. The last thing we need in any federal government is to start meddling in provincial responsibilities again – Harper has done a lot to move out of that area (much more is needed) and you can bet Quebec would be very annoyed, since much of the separatist rhetoric is around federal funding of provincial responsibilities – unless the feds are prepared to just give them the money with no strings/accountability attached. And I as a taxpayer is not prepared to see the feds spend any more money without proof that the money is being used for what is is intended and produces results – which cannot happen if the feds give the provinces money to fund provincial responsibilities – the provinces would rightly tell the feds “thank you for the money, now go away because you have no jurisdiction in this area!”

  • Wayne

    There is much more going on here than meets the eye. It’s obvious that Iggy is trying to get out in front here in case Jack and or Gilles plays the EI card and votes on a bill or amendment of such pertaining to an EI bill of some sort. As well don’t forget that we have a wife of a minister who is running for a leader of a provincial conservative party and is also pressing this item as a plank in a platform which has all sorts of possibilities. I give Iggy a very small cookie for playing this card right now but then take it back when you consider the history involved by the LPC when it comes to this file. Nope this item makes a good headline outside of that just liberal smoke and mirrors. Iggy has to keep some headlines going else the same old pattern during the summer will kick in and the opposition numbers go down.

  • Sliz

    No politycians want to help me: I filed a compalint to the College of Physicians and Surgeon of Ontario and since then I have problem to find a specialist who will be willing to check my neurological symptoms since Nov. 2008. Letters to our premier, my MP were ignored! I fear for my health and life!!! I am 57 disabled person.

From Macleans