It took Iggy nine years to write 177 pages?

True patriot love? From a man who’s spent most all of his adult life outside Canada?

by Allan Fotheringham on Thursday, May 7, 2009 9:20am - 29 Comments

It took Iggy nine years to write 177 pages?Oh dear. Is Michael Ignatieff the most naive politician to ever come down the pike? Or the most insulting, presumptive sort of animal to travel the same route?

The obvious question comes apparent with last week’s publishing of his 17th “book” bearing the astonishing/embarrassing title of True Patriot Love. This coming from an author who has spent half his life, most all of his adult life, living outside Canada? Give us a frigging break.

He opens with: True patriot love in all thy sons command.

With glowing hearts we see thee rise,

The True North strong and free!

And then adds: FROM “O CANADA!,” THE NATIONAL ANTHEM OF CANADA—as if he is addressing a foreign audience. Yes, Michael, we know our own anthem. Do you?

The subtitle is equally puzzling: Four Generations in Search of Canada. As if the poor soul, from the fastness of the academic halls of Harvard and Cambridge, couldn’t find an atlas to discover where the land of his birth was.

There is an air of panic to this project. Penguin Group (Canada) announced in 2005 that it had signed Ignatieff to a book contract, just as he first indicated he was venturing into Canadian politics after nearly 30 years abroad. Now, of course, most pundits predict Stephen Harper’s shaky minority government will likely have to go to the polls this fall as the three opposition parties can win a confidence vote whenever they choose.

Ignatieff finally started to deliver his manuscript in “chunks” by last August. The final chunk was delivered on Jan. 5. The publisher admits to having to put “extra care and extra people onto the copy editing and the proof-reading” to make an unusually fast turnaround for the April 21 publication.

There are some peculiar aspects to this publication. It is advertised at $30 for its modest “224 pages.” But it’s actually only a slim 177 pages—the rest is larded out with “Notes, Primary Sources and Acknowledgments, Secondary Sources and Index.”

Now we all know how brainy the author is. A few years ago, a survey conducted by Foreign Policy magazine and Prospect, a British journal, ranked Mr. Ignatieff as the 37th-most “public intellectual” in the world. The author writes in a note here that he began writing this book in 2000 and finished it in 2009. Is he in fact a slow typist? (Perhaps he does his composing in longhand?)

Even more disturbing is his listings under “Secondary Sources”—61 books, their authors, publishers and dates of publication. Does it really take 61 books of reference to produce 177 pages? It is a bit of an insult to Ordinary Reader.

He writes, “My mother used to go about the house humming a Judy Garland song with a line about how, if you haven’t played the Palace, you might as well be dead. The Palace Theatre was elsewhere—not in Ottawa, where I grew up, but in the big bright world beyond. So the family question wormed its way into how I thought of my life, and the answer I gave myself was to get out of here, to go out into the bright world beyond and play the palace. I played the palace in London for 20 years, as a journalist and writer, and for five years at Harvard as a professor.”

A wise editor might have suggested leaving that passage out. But at least he was being honest. Canada was too dull for someone so talented.

The hero of this small tome turns out to be George Monro Grant, the writer’s great-grandfather on his mother’s side. He was famous for setting out in 1872 with Sir Sandford Fleming to map out a route across Canada that would become the Canadian Pacific Railway and supposedly bind this difficult country together. Ignatieff was so taken with his relative that he devotes 37 of his precious 177 pages to him, including the sabbatical he was awarded after a decade at Queen’s University that gave him a world tour of the British Empire.

In all, the small book goes on to the longest descriptions of Grant’s oldest son, William Lawson Grant (1872-1935), who was a principal of Canada’s most famous private school, Upper Canada College. Not to mention Ignatieff’s uncle, George Parkin Grant (1918-1988), the renowned philosopher and author of the controversial Lament for a Nation.

Throughout, there is the overwhelming desire to convince us of the brilliant, educational gift of the Anglo-Saxon mind—while leaving unspoken the heritage of where he came from. We all know the dazzling background, that both his great-grandfather and his grandfather were Russian counts who served as cabinet ministers in the czar governments.

In the index, the actual word “Ignatieff” is mentioned only four times. The Grant family makes it to 66. What we have here, one cynically suspects, is a desire—an election coming up—to appeal most of all to that rich, decades-old Ontario base of Anglo-Saxon vote that, thanks to its population, can decide most of all our elections.

Ignatieff writes that this book was devised in 2000 when he and his second wife, Zsuzsanna Zsohar, a Hungarian, set out in a rented Ford to retrace the 1872 route of his distant relative, George Monro Grant.

The book is going to have to survive without the backing of Canada’s natural ruling party. Penguin’s Diane Turbide has confessed, “We can’t use Liberal party lists or any apparatus of the Liberal party to promote the book. They have been very clear about that.”

The party realized this was a turkey. Too bad the author didn’t.

Bookmark and Share
  • Elizabeth Montgomery

    “A wise editor might have suggested leaving that passage out. But at least he was being honest. Canada was too dull for someone so talented.”

    I grew up knowing, and I’m sure this writer must have as well — that everything was ‘happening’ outside Canada, not in it. We’ve always known that talent both artistic and technical ends up leaving the country. We also know that nobody is harder on Canada’s talent than Canadians.

    So I find this take on Ignatieff’s book – Fotheringham’s interpretation of Ignatieff’s reasons for leaving the country to be quite false, and misleading. You can I suppose fool the more recent generation; but you can’t fool those of us born before 1980, some of whom have lived outside of Canada and in most of the provinces. I know what the attitude has always been towards Canadians trying to make it and be recognized in Canada – it’s punishing. From rock stars, to comedians, doctors, and authors/intellectuals. The recognition is better outside Canada, and so are the rewards.

    I don’t know — I just sense a lot of jealousy from the writers in Canada towards Ignatieff. If he were not an author himself, it might not be so bad – but he’s very successful, and he’s very good. So now writers like this one get to rip up a very high-profile, accomplished author in public.

    That opportunity can’t come along very often — especially when Ignatieff cannot really defend himself in print. If he could – your ass would likely be grass.

    • politics2009

      I do not agree, there are plenty of canadians who don’t need to leave Canada to make it!
      Ignatieff is a great writer and intelectual, just not the right person to lead this country!

      • Rick Alexander

        Politics, name one Canadian who is at the top of his/her field internationally who has not done a seriously lengthy stint in another country.

    • David Griffin

      I agree with Elizabeth. By returning to his home country Ignatieff has given us the clearest evidence that he believes in what we claim to stand for as a nation… His achievements as a ‘public intellectual’ are surely not in dispute, and “Carpetbagger” is a silly accusation.
      I for one would vote without hesitation for someone with his record of engagement with the world, via publishing alone.

  • Rick Alexander

    I wonder what are Foth’s reasons for this bizarre bit of sarcasm.

    He seems to be suggesting that a) people with immigrant backgrounds aren’t worthy leaders, b) only people who stay at home their whole lives are true patriots, and c) there’s something suspicious about people who succeed outside Canada, especially if they’re from immigrant backgrounds.

    It’s a very small-town attitude. And it’s redolent of an old Orange Order Canada in which only people with names like “Fotheringham” were worthy to be leaders. Really, Mr. Fotheringham, this sort of jingoistic hate-speech is not becoming.

    • Elizabeth Montgomery

      I have never, ever liked Fotheringham, because he has always struck me as an elitist snot. However, even for him – I would have thought the standards would be higher. “Jingoistic” is exactly right, R.A. A writer of Fotheringham’s supposed stature should not be stooping to such garbage. The only explanation I have is jealousy.

      • Critical Reasoning

        First Potter, now Fotheringham. You seem convinced that anyone who is critical of Ignatieff’s book is just jealous.

  • Wayne

    Sometimes I like books by an author who uses a sort of Jamesian stream of consciousness approach to writing, but with Iggy after about 10 pages it starts to become self-indulgent and the point being made receedes further and further away the more you read. He does have a excellent command of the english language though – I would suggest he try poetry as there is an occasional turn of phrase that is well thought out and works reasonably well … however it is like eating marshmallows a brief moment of a decent taste and then no satisfaction from the stomach.

    • politics2009

      I agree with you Wayne, he does have a great command of the english lenguage! I am actually feeling offended with his trying to brainwashing us, How he is a different kind of patriot! If the US would of come to him and ask him to run there, then he would of wrote a different kind of patriot book.

  • http://deleted Sandi

    Hmmm….coming from a writer who constantly puts Toronto/Ontario down – right Dr. Foth? How patriotic of you to put one city/province against another in your writings.

  • Critical Reasoning

    Fotheringham is perceptive, as always.

  • Albertosaurus

    “Even more disturbing is his listings under “Secondary Sources”—61 books, their authors, publishers and dates of publication. Does it really take 61 books of reference to produce 177 pages? It is a bit of an insult to Ordinary Reader.”

    Because god forbid he read other books, and provide proper citations. My girlfriend, who just completed a 75 page honours thesis had over 100 sources. I would suggest 61 is a bit thin. And going after a book for the fact that it is over referenced? Give me a break.

    • jka

      I agree. I don’t have an opinion one way or the other about Ignatieff as a politician yet, but anyone who’s worked in the academic world knows how important it is to cite sources. That comment by Fotheringham was the most ridiculous thing I’ve read in a while.

  • John

    How long would it take Stephen Harper or John Baird to write 177 pages? LOL

  • Conan the Agrarian

    Fotheringham, this piece is exceedingly weak. Why do Canadian authors so often feel the need to cut down the tall poppies? It seems like the only safe path for a person in public life is to say nothing at all, write nothing at all, do nothing at all, because no matter how smart or good you are, anything you say will be sneered to shreds. Everyone seems to feel that every time a guy attempts to show some political engagement, the appropriate response is to pile on the contempt, and play another game of “Let’s Wreck the New Guy”. What a great strategy… if what you’re trying to do is persuade smart public intellectuals to stay well away from considering elected office.

  • DL

    I’m extremely impressed with Iggy. His accomplishments and views are top notch. He makes sense … plain and simple. The fact that he has been abroad … and is very well respected abroad, only furthers my decision to give him my vote!

  • http://www.wernerpatels.com Werner Patels

    Why? A thing well done can’t be done quickly.

    • Colonel Sam Smith

      Really?

      Voting just takes a second, and those combined seconds can remove an incompetent government.

      And that is a thing well done, Werner.

      Cheers

  • peimac13

    More Foth, less Iggy. Seriously, the would be Doctor gives more debating points with true wit than our corrinated leader of the opposition. Ignatieff is wandering about one minute being an idealist, the next moment a populist.

    • Elizabeth Montgomery

      It’s interesting, always really remarkable how the people who are against Ignatieff cannot write in their own mother tongue. It’s as if they’re afraid of learning something.

  • James Jacuta

    I would guess that the Foth might have been well pickled when this one was penned. Or was it just cranky? Nevertheless, I am even more interested in picking up the book now. Thanks !

  • ron

    I was for years a devoted ‘Foth fan’. So it was sad to see his quality decline in his last while as a regular MacLeans’ columnist. To be blunt, it was a sense that his ‘best before’ date had passed. To read his new postings has been quite depressing. All I can say is that it’s too bad he wasn’t talented enough to make this ‘last stab’ a great one as Leonard Cohen has.

    • Critical Reasoning

      Ron is the type of fellow who is colloquially referred to as a ‘douche’.

  • Colonel Sam Smith

    So Fotheringham has never left Canada, eh?

    In any case, he makes the critic’s fatal mistake of attacking a book because the author has not covered a topic of interest to the critic. Perhaps Fotheringham enjoys Gothic romance, but is that a legitimate reason to attack any book that does not cover the subject of Gothic romance? Perhaps Fotheringham believes paternal ancestors, not maternal ancestors, are the only ancestors of consequence.

    And then there is the discussion of “length.” Methinks Fotheringham could surely find “other” books by Ignatieff if he wants to read “more.” Perhaps Fotheringham is disappointed Ignatieff’s inspiring tome does not ramble on and on and on and on …. ah, like a Dion speech at a Liberal convention.

    Or perhaps Fotheringham is just jealous of Peter Newman’s contract to write Ignatieff’s bio.

    By the way, Atwood’s recent book, Payback is rather slender too. Nor does she talk about her paternal relatives. No doubt Fotheringham would find it of no value.

    Finally, if Fotheringham’s “brief” article was an exercise in humour, it will fail to muster a chuckle even from Fotheringham’s paternal ancestors … wherever they are from.

    Cheerio

    • catherine

      Clearly, attacking the book because it does not say much about the Ignatieff-Russian side of the family has to be parody. Ignatieff had already written a book on that side of his family. He has stated on numerous occasions that after writing the Russian Albumn, he wanted to write a book on the Grant side too.

      This article is obviously Allan Fotheringham doing a parody of a brain-dead reviewer who hasn’t read this book or any other book. He has actually done a pretty good job, except that he chose to parody something that was too close to what his own profile has become, so it doesn’t quite work.

  • Catherine Smith

    Over the last 20 years, in the writings of quite a few authors, the 6th and 7th generation Canadians have been told there is no difference from new Canadians and you. Now, along comes Iggy, we are told by Iggy that you really have to be from the 6th or 7th generation to be Canadian. It does not matter if you have not been educated or employed in Canada for 30 years, you are still a Canadian. We are told by a Harvard graduate that he came back to lead us. Well, I have watched a Harvard graduate for about 6 years lead a major city in Canada and frankly, I am not impressed by Mayor Miller of Toronto.
    Catherine

  • Jason R

    If anything Canada needs more leaders from outside the country… more leaders who have travelled the world and seen what it has to offer. We’re falling behind the rest of the world when it comes to technology and infrastructure (and I don’t mean the small-town stuff Harper promotes) in a big way…. I believe Michael Ignatieff recognizes this and is prepared to make the investment necessary to finally move Canada closer to the 21st Century…anyone who’s travelled to Europe or asia recently knows what I’m speaking of.

  • cynic

    “Iggy” is an insincere opportunistic dilettante who only got involved in politics because some Liberal back room boys convinced him he could be the next hot thing, save the Liberal party, and become PM. This book, like much of his activities since returning “home”, is supposed to give him street cred. For the sake of the country, I hope that Canadians aren’t fooled.

    • David Griffin

      (From Merriam-Webster)
      Dilettante: a person having a superficial interest in an art or a branch of knowledge
      Cynic: a faultfinding captious critic ; esp: one who believes that human conduct is motivated wholly by self-interest.

      One of these words fits, the other does not.

From Macleans