Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Twirling, twirling around the corner

by Aaron Wherry on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:26pm - 6 Comments

John Baird, April 26, 2007. “Canada needs to do a U-Turn, because we are going in the wrong direction. Since the Liberals promised to reduce greenhouse gases in 1997, they have only gone up. Canadians want action, they want it now and our government is delivering. We are serving notice that beginning today, industry will need to make real reductions. In as little as three years, greenhouse gases could be going down, instead of up. After years of inaction, Canada now has one of the most aggressive plans to tackle greenhouse gases and air pollution in the world.”

Environment Commissioner, today. “For the Regulatory Framework for Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environment Canada could not provide evidence that the information in the annual climate change plans was based on adequate rationale. The expected emission reductions claimed in the plans are overstated, and the uncertainties related to these reductions are not disclosed … in the plans prepared to date, the Department has not explained why expected emission reductions can be estimated in advance but actual reductions cannot be measured after the fact.”

Jim Prentice, today. “To the extent that they have criticism or comments about the way in which the calculations are made, we’re pleased to have a look at that and we will improve the method by which we do the calculations. But the real issue here is that we are working together on a continental basis and an international basis in this year which is a critical year in terms of arriving at an overall approach to greenhouse gases. I’ve said that by the time we get to Copenhagen we will have domestic policies laid out for each source of emissions in Canada. That’s the same commitment that the United States has given. It’s the same commitment that the Australians have given and other countries.”

Bookmark and Share
  • TJ Cook

    You think it’s easy to maintain a solid commitment to inaction?

  • Wayne

    I detect a hint of the legislation that will be coming down in the fall with the Obama seal of approval on it here me thinks me does.

  • Bonnie N

    I was going to make a comment and then I noticed that the advertiser next to “Join the Discussion” is none other than canadaoilsands.ca.

    Enough said…

  • JMD

    This is all such nonsense. The climate is not heating; it is in fact cooling slightly and has been for a few years. (This fact alone discredits the hypothesis that rising CO2 levels lead to warmer temperatures and that CO2 is the main driver of climate change). Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant or a toxic gas: it is necessary for plant life and higher CO2 levels benefit plants. So why should anyone care that our CO2 emissions are rising? What would you expect in a country that has cold winters and a rapidly growing population?

    • Blaze

      Is the cooling due to the solar cycle that ended in 2001?
      And if so, why isn’t there any layers of new ice being accumulated on the polar ice caps?
      Why has it in fact been disappearing? Is that due the lunar cycle? Or the second coming of Christ?

      • JMD

        The polar ice caps are growing. Despite the brief warming in the 1980s and 1990s, the Antarctic ice cap has been thickening for about 60 years. Arctic sea is growing again after an unusual thinning in 2007 that scientists ascribe to a peculiar wind pattern that pushed sea ice to warmer latitudes.

        The most recent solar cylce (23) ended in 2006-07. The next solar cycle (24) hasn’t really got going yet and scientists are puzzled as to why the sun is so quiet. (You can check daily sun conditions at spaceweather.com). What worries some scientists is that the last time the sun was really quiet for a long time, it coincided with the Little Ice Age. It may be hard to accept for those who believe that climate science is settled but that nuclear furnace in the sky appears to affect climate more powerfully than CO2, an atmospheric trace gas.

        We aren’t in a mini ice age yet and let’s hope we don’t get there. Even though cooling would blessedly force Gore and Suzuki to shut up and find new gigs, shorter growing seasons and longer, harsher winters are not good for anyone, especially for Canadians.

From Macleans