Mad about Ruby Dhalla

FULL STORY: The beleaguered star MP has both passionate defenders and detractors

by Jonathon Gatehouse on Friday, May 15, 2009 4:00pm - 56 Comments

Mad about Ruby DhallaFor a woman who has never met a microphone she didn’t like, it can’t have been easy. Days of enforced silence as her personal reputation, and perhaps political future, were savaged by allegations she and her family illegally employed, then bullied and mistreated, caregivers for her aging mother. Watching the critics pile on, and her federal Liberal colleagues run for cover. And when Ruby Dhalla finally did face the public last week, it wasn’t so much to mount a defence—a task delegated to a pit bull Bay Street lawyer—as plead for more time. “I would once again ask the Canadian public to please hold judgment,” the MP said in her brief remarks before the dozens of cameras and reporters jammed into her Brampton, Ont., constituency office. “Because when the facts and the truth come forward, then I think true victory will be achieved.”

Less than a week before, Dhalla had been basking in her status as one of the Liberal party’s up-and-comers, arriving in a white stretch limo for the Vancouver convention and standing alongside new leader Michael Ignatieff, hoisting his arm in the air as the confetti flew. Now confronted by three former family employees, she finds herself at the centre of a controversy that has mushroomed to enmesh members of the Ontario government, and spark an ethics investigation as well as public hearings before the House of Commons immigration committee. Among the allegations—first aired at a round-table discussion on nannies’ rights attended by two provincial cabinet ministers and later reported in the Toronto Star—are charges that Dhalla seized the passports of the immigrant women hired to help her mother Tavinder, and used her position to try to sidestep the required paperwork. Furthermore, the caregivers allege they were overworked and underpaid, forced to take on tasks like washing cars, shovelling snow and cleaning the chiropractic clinics owned by Dhalla’s brother Neil. The MP has called the allegations against her “false and unsubstantiated,” and maintains that all who know her family recognize “how loving, and caring and compassionate we are.” Her lawyer, Howard Levitt, has gone even further, suggesting there is a political or media conspiracy at play, “a purposeful attempt to destroy [Ms.] Dhalla’s career and credibility,” as he told reporters. “The only question is: who’s really behind them? And who orchestrated, enabled or assisted these former employees of her brother to suddenly come forward?”

But for a woman whose ambitions have been on display since junior high, and who has previously flirted with a run for the reins of the party, the damage may already have been done. At just 35 years of age, Dhalla is one of the most recognizable faces in Canadian politics: a popular speaker at party functions, glamorous enough to stride the red carpet at the Oscars, anointed as the third “hottest” female politician in the world last fall by Maxim magazine. In Ottawa, such notoriety has engendered a typically peevish backlash—in the Hill Times annual survey, colleagues and opponents routinely place her near the top of the list of “sexiest” and “best-dressed” MPs, but also rank her as one of the biggest gossips, and “worst Scrooge to work for.” And it looks like the fatigue might be spreading. Recently, Dhalla has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons: seemingly callous comments about police beating the children who snatched an aide’s purse during a visit to India; a simmering dispute with the producer of a Bollywood-style film she starred in before entering politics; and now the even more toxic nanny allegations. The first South Asian woman elected to Canada’s Parliament (and one of our youngest female MPs ever) is on a bad roll. Her friends and supporters think somebody is out to get Ruby, but the real question might be whether she’s simply doing it to herself.

Ruby Dhalla has the type of backstory that would be rejected as “too unrealistic” if it were attached to a fictional character. But somewhere safely tucked away in their Mississauga home (the MP lives near, but not in her suburban Toronto riding), her mother Tavinder has the scrapbooks that prove it’s all true. The first clippings date back to the summer of 1984, when 10-year-old Ruby made international news for a letter she wrote to Indira Gandhi, urging her to forge peace between India’s Sikhs and Hindus after government troops stormed Punjab’s Sikh Golden Temple, killing hundreds. The Indian prime minister mentioned it at a press conference, and wrote back inviting the little girl and her family to visit. The meeting never happened. First Ruby made the papers again, progressing from childhood celebrity to legend in her native Winnipeg, when she was hit by a car while pulling a younger child from its path. It was October by the time she was well enough to travel. And the family was on a stopover in London, U.K., when Gandhi was assassinated by two of her Sikh bodyguards that October.

However, the idea that a girl from a poor, single-parent family (Dhalla’s father Nick died when she and her brother were quite young) could make a difference was already firmly entrenched. In Grade 8, she racked up her first election victory—she has yet to lose one—becoming class president at Isaac Newton Junior High. At age 12, she started attending Liberal rallies with her uncle Paul Dhillon, a true partisan, and joined the party. By her first year of high school, she was a regular volunteer in the office of David Walker, the then-newly minted MP for Winnipeg North Centre. “She was just so much more mature and skilled than her peers,” says the former politician, who now has his own Winnipeg consulting firm. “You knew that this was a person who was going to be a star, who was trying hard to be a star.”

When the other kids at Daniel McIntyre High were listening to U2’s Paul “Bono” Hewson, she was hanging out with Paul “Finance Minister” Martin. “[During high school] people would go off and party and I would go to a policy convention,” she told the Star shortly after first winning federal office in 2004.

But Ruby wasn’t just brainy, she was beautiful. While doing her undergrad in biochemistry and political science at the University of Winnipeg, she participated in the 1993 Miss India Canada pageant, placing second behind Ruby Bhatia, now a well-known film and TV star in India. When Dhalla moved to Toronto two years later, modelling gigs helped pay her way through chiropractic college. And in 1999, she even made her own brief stab at a Bollywood career, moving to India and finding work in commercials and as a music-channel veejay. Her practical side won out, however, and she soon returned home to establish a chain of chiropractic clinics with brother Neil.

The doctors Dhalla prospered, buying the pleasant red-brick suburban home they still share—both are unmarried—with their mother. But politics continued to be the focal point of Ruby’s life. She was a national organizer for Paul Martin’s 2003 leadership campaign. And when he decided to go to the polls in June 2004, the new prime minister hand-picked her as his candidate for the new riding of Brampton-Springdale. It wasn’t a widely acclaimed choice. Upset that their favoured candidate, Andrew Kania, a lawyer and backer of Martin’s leadership rival John Manley, had been punted, 12 of the riding association’s 20-member executive formally endorsed Dhalla’s NDP challenger. (Kania won election as the Liberal MP for neighbouring Brampton West in 2008.)

Bookmark and Share
  • Rochelle

    This piece is so sexist, Jonathon.

    • Wendy Hope

      If by sexist you mean insightful and true, then I guess it is.

      If you don’t agree with the article say you don’t agree with the article…as a woman you should be able to coherently express why you disagree, but by playing the sexist! card all you do is demean womankind as a gender in need of protection from the big bad men.

      • Rochelle

        Fire is coming out of your hears. I fear for your children.

        • http://parentalalienationcanad.blogspot.com Mike Murphy

          Would you like to rephrase that Rochelle. Your level of coherence is diminishing my capacity to understand your utterances. I suppose you think anything said that looks unfavourably of a former female “star” in the Liberal party would be sexist. Would you say the same thing now if this was say Elliot Spitzer being castigated for his transgressions and dalliances? When is something sexist? Only when it discusses females or are we seeking only favourable press for women and to hell with men?

        • theragingranter

          Rochelle, I bet you fear a lot of things that aren’t real.

  • Cy in Cgy

    I do agree with Rochelle, but more to substance. Ruby and her family have grown up in an environment of entitlement. In the lives they may lead on a day to day basis, they may have sincerely believed that they were truly being good employers, but the facts are that we have more than one independent person making these allegations. As people have continued to yell conspiracy, they forget to realize that the complainants are on significantly different social levels as compared to Ruby. Forgetting all the allegations, the slope in social differences is so great, it’s likely intimidating. These people have a great amount of courage to come forward. At the very least, I believe the Dhallas have forgotten that the people in their employ need time to call their own and fair compensation for their contribution. I certainly stop short of calling these caregivers slaves, but it sounds as though they are treated somewhat like “Cinderellas”. Regardless of who employed who, I think it’s incumbent on Ruby as an elected MP of Canada to ensure that people are not treated even 1/4 to the extent that the caregivers allege rather than conveniently push the blame on another family member.

    • John

      Ruby and her people have grown up in an environment of entitlement?

      She was raised by a single mother whose father skipped out on the family. This reminds me of the eliltist charge against Barrack Obama who had to start from scratch to build himself up.

      • http://parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com Mike Murphy

        Can you give us more background on why the dad left? He is dead now and can’t defend himself? Did you know being raised by a single mother increases your chances of some kind of unfavourable social outcome, like pregnancy, promiscuity, drug use, jail, if you are a boy raping someone. You make it sound as though the dad is all wrong here – please elucidate for our enlightenment. I am in the dark.

        • simon

          can you add “becoming a MP’ to that list of unfavourable social outcomes? sheesh

          • Casa

            Whether her dad was in the right to leave I think is a bit beside the point. He left and passed away when Ruby and her brother were young, so one can hardly attribute anything to do with his leaving to her. That being said growing up in a single parent home is difficult for children, regardless of the reasons that lead to there only being one parent. So I think when John questions “environment of entitlement” he is accurate in doing so. I am a first generation immigrant of south asian descent that grow up in Winnipeg (and before anyone ask no I do not know her family). I can say from experience very few families with parents that were first generation immigrants from south asia grew up in an environment of entitlement. My parents (as many like them) had to take jobs that were well below their education level (their educations weren’t seen as equivolent in Canada as is often the case) so that their children could have a better life. They never complained that the jobs were below them because they were willing to sacrifice for us, that to me is the opposite of entitlement. Most of my parents friends were in similar situations with similar attitudes. You don’t give up everything to come to Canada to give your kids a better life because of entitlement.

      • zilla

        and Obama aligned himself with corrupt poloticians and mobsters to get ahead.

        • theragingranter

          Mobsters?

  • Anon

    I agree that she’s hot to trot, and would fit right in as an aging Bollywood actress if this Parliament gig doesn’t work out.

    You know what she could really use, right now: a romantic story about her torrid affair with Pierre Polievre, or Jason Kenney. I think that would put this nannygate stuff out of the news.

    • Derek Pearce

      It’d be better if it was a torrid affair between Polievre and Kenney. Now *that* would get her out of the news.

      • Anon

        Yuk. That image will haunt me for awhile.

        Actually, this whole Dhalla thing has really been Kenney’s masterplot to win her affection. I think Freud has written about this sort of obsessive-compulsive-manipulative behavior.

  • Dot

    I wonder how much that dress might fetch at a charity auction.

  • EveryTurkeyHasHerTime

    This event confirms what I have suspected for quite a while – Ruby Dhalla is just not a nice person. She radiates entitlement and smug superiority and cynicism – a good fit for the Liberal Party.

    It seems to me that there is some kind of justice going on here. Ms. Dhalla has always been quite eager to attack and smear her political opponents with innuendo and half-truths. What goes around comes around…

  • NordicNorm

    An insightful article? Hardly. Just more innuenndo and character assassination.

    Hopefully the full article delves more into the known “facts”.

  • Aaron Singh

    She is obviously being targeted by an entity that can influence parliament and the Canadian media. The campaign is extremely orchestrated and planned.

    The question is who benefits from derailing her? Possible beneficiaries:
    1) A competitor cabal in the upper echelons of the liberal party.
    2) Part of the PC’s playbook for upcoming election.
    3) Part of the Brahminist-dominated Indian regime’s policy of using its intelligence assets in Canadian polity & media agency to stop a Canadian Sikh from rising to higher political office.

    I believe reason 3) is the primary driver (with obvious co-operation from 1) & 2)). Over the past 3 decades, CBC has acquired a notorious reputation of piping anti-Sikh propaganda and imagery from the Indian Government & Media to the Canadian Pubic. For example, just last year on June 30, 2008, CBC aired its Air India Bombing documentary (a disorganized collection of Pravda-style anti-Sikh insinuations and “terrorist innuendos” from the Indian press). Over a span of 25 years, the CBC has never reported an independent Sikh point of view on India or the Air India Bombing (AIB):
    1) Most Sikhs believe that the AIB was a staged false-flag operation to brand them as a “terrorist community” so they could not organize international human rights outrage against the Indian Army and Paramilitary let loose to terrorize the Sikh population of Punjab over 1984-93 (apparently, over 250,000 Sikhs were killed while catching Indira Gandhi’s “300 Silk militants”; Indian Parliamentary Hansard of 1984).
    2) CBC has never investigated why CSIS erased 32 filed tapes in 1987 which linked their “Sikh terrorist” subjects to Indian consulates in Toronto and Vancouver (see Soft Target by Globe & Mail journalists Brian McAndrew & Zuhair Kashmeri). The authors of Soft Target write from interviews with CSIS field agents that the Canadian agents had come to surmise from their wiretaps and investigations that the primary suspect of the Air India bombing (AIB) was the Government of India (GOI) and its RAW intelligence apparatus operating in Canada.
    3) There is direct evidence that Parmar and Reyat were agents of Indian intelligence (RAW is the world’ fourth most powerful spy agency – India’s KGB trained by the Soviet KGB in 1960s but allied with the CIA & MI6). For example, despite its narrow focus, the Air India Inquiry in May 2007 revealed that CSIS suspected the “Sikh terrorist” Parmar of being an agent provocateur of the Indian government (http://ottsun.canoe.ca/News/BreakingNews/2007/05/24/4204893.html; May 24, 2007).
    4) Curiously, Parmar was “eliminated” by the Indian police in 1992 while in their custody! This begs the obvious question: what was he doing visiting the very country that was accusing him of blowing-up its plane? (It is like Abu-Nidal wanting to visit Israel!) Was he lured-in by his RAW handlers to eliminate evidence of the Indian government’s complicity?

    It seems that the Canadian police and media have been long outsourcing their investigatory and journalism duties regarding Sikhs to RAW’s Brahminist Commissars and Indian Consulates here (Brahminist garbage in, and CBC & RCMP garbage out). Was this where the new intrigue against Dhalla, a rising Sikh Member of Parliament, hatched? If truth matters, I think MacClean’s should follow up on this.

    To reach the truth, western journalists need to ask “what is the nature and agenda of India’s new Brahminist establishment?”. India is lauded as a democracy, but its bureaucracy and political institutions are totally corrupted and criminalized and are under Brahminist control.

    • John

      While your conclusions may prove entertaining(I did not bother reading most of them) you avoid the obvious. Sikh, Indian, etc are cast societies where those at the top consider themselves entitled and above the law of the land. She is clearly arrogant and untrustworthy and I do believe guilty as charged. I would also surmise you are directly involved some way with this individual and attempting to deflect the truth.

      • NordicNorm

        “and I do believe guilty as charged”

        So much for the concept of “innocent until proven guilty”.

        And no, I am not involved (directly or indirectly) with Ms. Dhalla.

        • torjay

          NordicNorm says.
          “So much for the concept of “innocent until proven guilty”.

          LOL.. honest to god…

          If the police pull over a driver and ask for their drivers license and insurance
          and they don’t have it on them. There is “no” innocent. They plead guilty with an explanation.

          No Work Permit… Guilty..
          Cash Under The Table.. ( no cancelled cheques. ) Guilty.
          Withholding another persons passport. Guilty.

          All the allegations regarding Labor Relations are redundant..
          These woman were not working as “legal employees”, therefore,
          they’re not protected under the Labor Act. That’s just another screen
          Ms. Dhalla, and her Lawyer keep putting up,
          to defuse the laws that have been broken. ( see above )

          • NordicNorm

            You’re comparing apples to oranges torjay!?

            You are simply assuming that the allegations (no work permit, etc.) are true – this hasn’t been proven in court.

            And if I am caught without my drivers license, I have 24 hours to produce it. So your example is crap.

      • Casa

        Wow, how incredibly racist of you. I am Indian as are my parents, Sikh even. No one in my family feels or behaves that we are entitled or about the law of the land. You can feel whatever you want about Ruby but making a sweeping generalization like that is a bit much. It would be like me taking your comment and saying all people named John are narrow minded and racist.

    • http://parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com Mike Murphy

      At least you have gone beyond a “wide ranging right wing conspiracy” but your musings are as out to lunch – perhaps even more so that the usual lunatic conspiracy theorists. Everybody is a victim of somebody else. Ruby will have enough allies in the gender feminist mafia who believe it is a patriarchal conspiracy as all women are victims and in need of protection.

    • John

      wow….persecuted by entities……..i thought those were rockets under that flashy bollywood dress.

    • Alex Pacis

      Huh?!? What are you talking about? Stick to the topic man.

      Here are the facts:
      1. The nannies needed 2 years of service under their restricted visa within three years here in Canada. Failing that, they can be deported which is the last thing they would allow to happen in their lives.
      2. Ruby Dhalla claimed that the nannies were treated with respectl love and care.
      3. Ruby also claimed that they were paid fairly and legally for the legal amount of time worked done on only the required responsibilities allowed under the nannies’ employment visa.
      4. Ruby claimed further that the nannies living conditions were the best any one of them could hope for.
      5. Ruby claimed that she did not really live there and when she was there, she was hardly around to know what is going on. It was her brother’s business to hire and give those nannies their jobs.

      In all of these facts and claims, why would a desperate nanny who would take a half decent emploment conditions pass this one up? I can understand one nanny quitting from this opportunity, but THREE? If Ruby was never around, how would she know that the nannies were treated as she described by her family. She never really lived there, right?

      One must wonder!

  • jake

    Sad to see recent enthic Canadians such as the Dhalla family involved in allegations that they mistreated other ethics who would want to eventually become new Canadians. It so “unCanadian” of them is these allegation prove true. Jake

    • PhilCP

      “…mistreated other ethics…”

      ethnics or ethics……Freudian slip?

  • delford t louis

    aaron singh now that we know your agenda such words as brahminist, indian commissars, rising to higher political office, rcmp garbage,where do you get off on this goobledegook buddy man friendly canadian person. jeepers man, slow down, you are fast you blind me and i haven’t even finished reading your rant and decidedly will not. it reeks of paranoid delusional grandiosity and untruths. i am just an ordinary canadian and wholly so, but do not try to be offensive especially in canada when this country invites immigrants wholeheartedly and is coping with the trojan horse dilemma. canada will never be a version of another country. go away for a bit, be grateful for life in your adopted land, take a vacation to some secluded island and take a long hard look into your character, demeanor and temperament not to mention attitude.
    it is evident canada likes ruby dhalla in one way or the other.

  • Aaron Singh

    Dear Mr. Louis,

    The purpose of my post was to propose a third alternative “theory” for the attack on M.P. Dhalla, aside from the “right wing conspiracy” being thrown around by the Liberals.

    The reality is that there is a lot of interference into Canadian affairs by the Indian Government and its intelligence service (RAW) which our CBC will never report on – this is your real “trojan horse dilemma”, especially, in a world of globalized economic systems and outsourcing (of jobs, intelligence, and propaganda). Most of their activity is targeted against Sikhs (and Pakistan).

    If you wish to get some inkling of all this, please read “Soft Target” by Globe & Mail journalists Brian McAndrew & Zuhair Kashmeri (the second edition came out recently).

    Regards,
    Aaron

    • http://parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com Mike Murphy

      Mr. Singh:

      It is your kind of paranoia that led to the worst terrorist attack in Canadian History when the Air India plane went down killing over 329 including 280 Canadians. Please keep your old country ethnic/religious conspiracies in the old country. I and many tens of thousands of Canadians of Irish descent didn’t fight the IRA’s battles against the UK inside Canada and it would be appreciated if you kept these lunatic theories out of Canadian discourse.

      After that bombing if I were the Indian government I’d be watching the loonies and their apologists who did it too. Who could blame them. I would expect my government to protect Canadian interests in the same manner.

      We have enough of the Tamils, the Palestinians and in the past the Serb Canadians fighting their battles and disrupting our lives over matters we just don’t give a damn about. You are not helping your fellow sikh, Ms. Dallah, if this is the kind of rubbish she is involved with as well as nannygate.

      • Aaron Singh

        Dear Mr. Murphy,

        Your condescending and borderline-racist tone not withstanding, why does not the Canadian Government get to the real truth on AIB and set up a Royal Commission to investigate the mass murder of “over 329 including 280 Canadians” (the majority of whom were Sikh-Canadians)? A Royal Commission is set up when an innocent Canadian goes to jail . . . here we have the murder of 280 Canadians and no Royal Commission!

        Regarding your ethnic rant, I am sure many Canadians gave a “damn” when the Germans were bombing London in 1940 and occupied Paris. I bet you will give a “damn” if such a thing happened again. Apparently, so did the Sikhs back then: they formed 50% of the British Indian Army prior to 1947 and over 83,000 Sikhs died fighting, and 185,000 were wounded, in WWI and WWII (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKdOuP1Y-ig&feature=related). Now you are asking their descendants in Canada to not give “a damn” when the Brahminist regime in India sends in their army into their Punjab homeland (1984-93; +250,000 Sikhs killed) or decides to kill over 3,000 Sikhs in Delhi through state-sponsored “riots” (November 1984).

        Regards,
        Aaron

        • http://parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com Mike Murphy

          Mr. Singh:

          You misconstrue my comments to suit your own ethno/religious agenda. To be a Canadian is to first and foremost have allegiance to a country which is a secular democracy. To not like or to disagree with ethnic rants about being persecuted by a foreign government or to bring your intolerance for said government to this country is something most Canadians dislike and frankly could care less about. It is not racist to offer such an opinion but people like you will try to slant in that direction to stifle debate. Muslims are experts at it.

          Top relate your ethnic squabbles with the foreign government of India, a country I have visited and find fascinating and diverse, to WWII is to propose a canard that is fallacious and illogical. Stick to the point. I repeat I don’t give a damn about your paranoid delusions about the Indian secret service. If they have need to watch your type or could be bothered with someone like Dallah then ask yourself why? Methinks they have bigger fish to fry right next door and withing their nation.

          I also treat all religions equally. Religions are a mass brainwashing scheme that turns otherwise intelligent people into walking, breathing disciples of dogmas that are, in all likelihood, pure unadulterated fiction. Religions, as we can see everyday in the newspapers and TV screens of the world turn one citizen against the other. Why is this Mr. Singh? Could it be intolerance of someone else’s point of view?

          There is far too much political correctness in dealing with the mutual intolerance of one religion over the other. In fact you speak of Sikhs as though you are not only a unique cultural entity but a religion as well. Sounds a lot like many Muslims who adhere to their dogma as superior to even the secularity of this countries laws.

          It ought not to be happening and clearly is most unwelcome by most secular Canadians. Keep your foreign battles to yourself and out of Canada. The Tamil demonstrations are the most recent example of this kind of opinion.

    • delford t louis

      i think maybe your valium just clicked in mr singh but you forgot this is canada and what your ethnicity (with all respect of course) dictates internally to anothers’ family or class standing is unfamiliar territory to the majority politic and interwoven into canadas way of life which thankfully is based on how we can live and become better contributing world citizens as opposed to ranting paranoia, fear mongering and infighting within ones’ ethnicity and birthright rants(which is your choice of course)…but yes we are a most tolerant bunch, but what do you know about such frivolous behaviorisms?
      ruby dhalla is a person first and what you interpret into her success and position is your perogative.
      regards

  • Critical Reasoning

    Neil Dhalla (Ruby’s brother) in a 2006 Liberal campaign ad:

    • keith c

      this is a pretty good ad actually. from the message you’d think it was from a conservative party! (which the liberals were from 1993-2004..)

  • Jo Schmo

    Are people on this site actually comparing Ruby Dhalla to Barack Obama? They both have star power but Obama has a lot behind it too, whereas Dhalla has only the star power and not a fraction of the substance.

  • Aaron Cant Singh

    Aaron what the heck are you talking about? The prime minister of India is a Sikh and he was just voted again to run that country. You sound like a brainwashed blind fanatic without any facts. You live in this beautiful country hence try to behave correctly. You and people like Dhalla make all new immigrants look bad. This issue has nothing to do with religion, race or caste. The woman is a public figure and she is being accused of slavery. Let’s justice run it’s course and then we can lay blames. If you want to behave like that then you ought to go back to Punjab and fight your fight there.

  • paulsstuff

    One glaring error in this story.

    I’ve seen Mike Bullard’s act, and he’s no comedian!

  • Sandy MacNabb

    Ruby is a Liberal – what more has to be said? The Liberal Party of Canada hopes it can divert attemtion from the fact that she has behaved with arrogance, questionable ethics, and sense of entitlement that are endemic within LPC ranks. Should Canadians become convinced that Ruby’s flaws are ethnic and cultural, the LPC gets off scot free.

  • richfisher

    She’s got Chretien’s lawyer so she’ll probably walk away with a hundred million of our stolen taxes and retire to Palm Springs .

  • Leasa

    This is actually quite simple: do you believe what Ruby said about these women laying on the couch sideXside with her mother watching TV and the women laid there while Ruby’s mom cooked for them? If you believe that, I have this swamp land for sale….

    • Casa

      If my mother is anything to go by (as mentioned in previous posts she is Indian), it is possible that Ruby’s mom cooked for them. My mother cooked (or at least offered to cook) for everyone that ever entered our door, the cable guy, any carpenter that did any work on our house, our friends, our neighbours, family of our friends and neighbours, anyone that she met that expressed an interest in indian food. You get the point. She was raised to value hospitality and the best way she knows to be hospitable is to feed people. I am not saying I believe one way or another that Ruby’s mom cooked for these women. I am just offering the suggestion that it might not be that improbable.

      • michaeljmurphy

        Casa:

        You are stretching a point beyond credulity. I stayed at many homes in India with servants. Let me tell you clearly and succinctly the servants had their place, they did the cooking (or assisted the wife of my friend(s) on special dishes) and housework.

        A servant (or nanny in this case) is just that. Not a friend, not a confidant, not allowed to lay down on the couch and clearly not one to be served by the employers.

        You sure you are not related to Dallah. You sure do try and apologize for here big time!

  • windygeo

    The liberal version of Jack Layton. Although I must admit, Jack has gotten a little camera shy since his palace overthrow attempt got thrown under the bus by most Canadians.

  • http://rarsa.blogspot.com Raul Suarez

    Actually even if you don’t lend credence to the allegations from the caregivers that say they were abused. You can lend credence to the parliamentary aides that have her as the worst to work for. If she does that to people that maybe one day will be in a position of power, how do you think he treats people that depend 100% on her to be in Canada.

    I may not have all the evidence, but based on the evidence it does not look good for her.

    Could this be a conspiracy? yes, but with actual substance.

  • JJM

    The reality of this whole “Ruby-said/nannies-said” exercise is that Ruby can only lose.

    Whatever the truth of the matter, politics is a game of public perception. Ruby’s conundrum is this: how on earth, as a seemingly high-powered, up-and-coming politician, does she challenge the testimony of a couple of humble Filipino nannies without seeming utterly mean-spirited and heartless to the public?

    Her lawyer has already done her no great favour by implying some sort of conspiracy theory with persons unknown out to get her. Two strikes against her right there. First, there’s her credibility: Filipino nannies in a convoluted Canadian political conspiracy? Come off it.* Secondly, it’s all about poor little Ruby, isn’t it?

    Unless she can come up with close circuit TV footage of PM Harper in a Toronto hotel lobby handing the nannies an envelope containing $75,000, she’s going to have to wear this one.

    And because she is a politico, the sublime irony is that she’d be among the very first to yell for blood if an opponent across the floor were caught in the same predicament.

    By the way, no partisanship intended here. It’s not a Lib or a Tory or Kneedipper thing, it’s the price of being in politics.

    * Say what you like about the old blarney-master, but at least Brian Muldoon is sparring with a credible villain in public eyes (a dodgy German businessman)!

  • Pingback: Top Posts « WordPress.com

  • vicky

    No more Liberals for me, I judge the book by the cover and I was mistaken. Nice outside, very, very bad inside.Wow! what a great play.

  • mr. black

    ruby disgusts me, she seems to think she is God’ gift to Canada, but she comes off much more like a wannabe – a wannabe politician, a wannabe bollywood star, and a wannabe ‘real doctor.’ I’m looking forward to the next election and hopefully, never having to hear about her again. Yuck!

  • Geri

    The kind of entitlement the Ruby Dhalla’s of this world has is not about money or position although that is the aim. It is about how you should see yourself. They are taught they should have whatever they want even if it’s at other people’s expense. This attitude of the mind begins at home often with mom and dad playing the role of servant to their “more special than other children” believing they is giving their best. They are taught how to use other people. But all they are doing is fueling greed and ungratefulness which never fails the show the ugly results later in life. It’s a shame.

  • Robert Lock

    It would appear that with the complaints of mistreatment from these so called "nannies" combined with somplaints from astring of staffers asciting Dhallato be the "worst ' MP to work for andadding in for good measure her reported indifference to the children in India there is not only smoke but fire in all these accunulative allegations.
    However eceryone continues to lose sight of the fact that allegations of not being a nice person aside Dhalla 9along with her family) plain and simply broke the law by having people illegally working in the family home without work permits and in job descriptions they had not legally entered Canada to perform.
    This should be relatively easy to prove with a competent RCMP investegative team and Dhalla should be charged and booted from the Liberal party beauty queen or not. It's all so simple!

From Macleans