Don't mess with Michelle Obama

Every ounce of the First Lady, writes Barbara Amiel, means change

by Barbara Amiel on Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:40am - 49 Comments

Don’t mess with Michelle ObamaI thought about Michelle Obama on Mother’s Day. No special reason except I was in a West Palm Beach park walking my two dogs (who caught fleas as the town seems to be cutting its pesticide program now that President Obama has said they can’t use his stimulus money to operate the train system) and I passed several Mother’s Day celebrations. Swarms of children and women, but the fathers were, as President Obama puts it, MIA.

Half a dozen Afro-American kiddies came up to me and pointed at the dogs. “Will they bite?” they asked sensibly. “Not if you’re nice to them,” I replied as one little rotter started jabbing a stick menacingly toward the dog’s eyes. Little Maya (115 lb. of dog) did her well-known teeth-baring-and-snarl number known as “Holy S–t” around town. I was all for her taking the horrid child’s arm in her jaw but given my circumstances that’s not too helpful.

Heaven knows I didn’t want to ruin the child’s future relationship with the Lassie of his dreams, but there is a limit. I was nurtured on Ruthless Rhymes for Heartless Homes: “Billy in one of his nice new sashes / Fell in the fire and was burnt to ashes / Now, although the room grows chilly / I haven’t the heart to poke poor Billy.” The London Times spoke of author Harry Graham’s “enchanted world where there are no values, nor standards of conduct or feeling and where the plainest sense is the plainest nonsense,” but that was 1898 and this is Hallmark America 2009. One bite and I’d get 20 years to life.

So, instead, I warmly asked the little lad where his dad was and he looked at me, duh. I tried for mom. He pointed at one of the large ladies sitting eating who seemed wildly disinterested in the possible amputation of her son’s arm. The remaining children, having run away, came back one by one to stroke my big white dogs in wonder. All they see are pit bull mixes. I rather like pit bulls, who can be as gentle as St. Bernards if treated properly, though the ones here mainly live chained in littered yards of cracked earth covered with tin cans, torn bits of paper and broken kettles with a short piece of electric cord and a sign, “Bad Dog.”

As the sun went down, cars of young men arrived, clearly not dad material in any permanent sense, with their hip-hop music booming “I still don’t love ’em, I still don’t trust ’em / I get paranoid every time I f–k ’em.” Ruthless Rhymes for Disappearing Dads, I suppose.

Which is why I thought of Michelle Obama. Mrs. Obama is a big mother of a woman but not fat. Every toned ounce of her says don’t mess with me. If Helmut Newton were alive he’d be doing kip-ups to photograph her for a Big Nudes volume two (no disrespect meant). Those deltoids, biceps and triceps brachii are killer attractive. When Barack lectures on the need to get absent fathers in line, he sounds sincere but weedy. Michelle on the other hand doesn’t need a teeth-baring snarl to give her admonitions some menace, though given her slight underbite she could do it pretty well.

Quite interesting, living at that point when the beauty aesthetic changes from scarecrow to curvy. Mrs. Obama has put the seal of approval on being big, and having limbs like four toothpicks myself now feels revolting. Racial equality really kicks in when non-Caucasian bodies become a universal beauty ideal. Mannequin suppliers clocked the demand for bigger bottomed models around the 1992 “more junk in the trunk” movement, but Jennifer Lopez’s 1997 breakthrough performance in Selena made it mainstream.

Now, manufacturers are butt-mad, looking for the sorcerer’s stone of jeans construction that will lift up the pancake asses of whites. Since beauty ideals often take their cues from the seats of power—le mot juste—Mrs. Obama’s five-foot-eleven, I’d guess 150-lb. look is bound to confirm the attraction of more flesh, not wobbling Rubenesque, but firmer everything.

That bizarre 1962 film Mondo Cane showed some culture where recumbent mountains of female flesh lay happily being stuffed with food in the hope of becoming the fattest, ergo most respected wife for the chieftain. Even in normal cultures most men find a full-figured woman more sexually attractive than a sylphide, but that’s distinct from the ideal of beauty. With a size 12 in the White House on a good-looking woman, it’s the long goodbye for anorexics. Are there body dysmorphic disorders of the “I’m too thin” kind? We’ll soon know.

Bookmark and Share
  • Patti Nicholls

    I’m sure with all the admiration she is getting Michelle Obama will be imitated for years. However, it will be interesting to see if she takes any heat over her glamourous attire as Nancy Reagen did. Probably not because she a Democrat. Don’t get me wrong; I love glamour. I just don’t like the Obamas’ politics.

  • Kaplan

    Ah, so you’re the nice lady in the park who, upon showing the little kids your dog and inquiring about their parents, proceeded to write a column in which you lamented not letting your dog bite the black child’s arm while trotting out the ever-handy racist stereotypes of black parents.

    • Daniel

      If the shoe fits….

    • hosertohoosier

      1. I think it is sad that 5’11 and 150 lbs (and a very toned 150 lbs) is considered “full figured” or a major departure from old norms. According to a BMI calculation site (I know BMI is a dubious tool – but here it is a conservative estimator of Michelle’s thinness, because she is very muscular) her BMI puts her in the 8th percentile. That is to say, 92% of women in the US are fatter than Michelle Obama. Michelle’s tone is also probably more unattainable for women than the anorexic thinness of most models.

      2. You have a lot of opinions about the lifestyles of black people (and lower income folks in general). I can’t imagine where you might have formed them (at least your husband has gained some first-hand experience, in his present vocation).

      PS: best of luck to Connie in his upcoming supreme court hearing (I do think he is unjustly imprisoned).

    • Julie

      Amen to that! I read this racist-laced article and couldn't believe Maclean's allowed it to print.

  • Muskoka Mom

    That piece was the the most disorganized, scattered pile of judgmental ramblings, and not to mention, what exactly was your point? You touched on many controversial subjects, adding your own racist remarks to each.

    You imply that dogs like pit bulls, have obtained their bad names from the ‘poor, unkempt folk’ not caring for them as well as say, someone like yourself could? I see. Is it not the fault of those raising such dogs for a vicious purpose the reason for their being banned in so many places? As apposed to your ‘suggestion.’ Do you wear your stilettos while you walk your dogs? Oh, I’m sorry, that was rude of me to place you in some stereotypical group. I must have been caught up in the moment there.

    As for your ‘issue’ with Michelle, I really don’t know what that was all about. Are you the skinny white chick with no ass? I’m sorry, there I go stereotyping again! All women are beautiful in their own special way. Larger women have been sought after for centuries now. Look at Marilyn Monroe. Your uneducated assumptions have ( from what I hear) insulted many many people. Don’t even get me started on the father issue. ‘Deadbeat’ Fathers, and Mothers alike are an issue everywhere, but to assume, that some active children in a park are part of this group, where do you get off? Did you not SAY to the ‘stick jabber’ “please don’t do that, my dog doesn’t appreciate it?” The last I checked, children are people to, and they can ( believe it or not) be spoken to and even reasoned with. Maybe he had never been around a dog. I myself have a Rottweiler, and run into this type of situation often. Lots of people are afraid of her, and understandably so, the ‘media’ ( cough) portrays them as vicious killers. My point is, maybe you should have spoken to the children and their ‘disinterested’ mothers rather than writing such a horrible little story. Shame on you.

    • Patti Nicholls

      I wouldn’t consider Marilyn Monroe a larger women.

      • Muskoka Mom

        She was full figured, like Michelle. She was no string bean, I mean she was curvy. I think I have read size 16. Not fat, but full.

        • Sybil

          Marilyn Monroe was said to be a size 16 but thanks to vanity sizing that's now about a size 10 or 12. As a tall, slim teenager I wore sizes 14 and 16. I'm a little heavier and thicker in the middle now but have sizes from 8 to 12 and occasionally 14 in my closet. Men's clothes are easier to buy because they put the actual measurements on them. I live in Muskoka too.

    • wayne moores

      My God, what to say about all this. Leave it to a neocon to blame Obama for her pitbull’s fleas. Before she went totally off the rails I got the feeling she was pining for a time when a certain Italian facist dictator had the trains running on time. Boy ole’ Conrad better get sprung soon before she wanders off into a Florida swamp and starts scaring the ‘gators. Cheers.

      • Wayne

        Mondo Cane is an outstanding film!

      • http://www.eliteracists.com Michael Ignatieff

        The only fool that would want to be associated with this garbage person is one that shares her racist viewpoint and doesn't give a shit. You must be proud.

      • Laibach

        Dear Ms. Amiel, could you please elaborate on how you determined that the said young black men were "clearly not dad material in any permanent sense" other than by the fact that they were listening to hip hop?

        Next time, write an editorial that says a little less about your biased self and a little more about the people you seem to see as only caricatures of themselves.

  • madeyoulook

    I am no partisan reflexively anti-Amiel person like some not to be named commenters around here.

    But.

    This is indeed worse than a disorganized Andy-Rooney rant, that has the added disadvantage of no apparent attempt at humour whatsoever. Cringe after cringe after cringe.

    There is a very important point to be made about fatherless Black American children. From the above text, madam, I conclude that you are most certainly not the one to be making it.

    Either the original submission was even more horrible before a massive rehab effort did its best at head office, or this author has some sort of free pass at the editor’s desk.

    • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

      “Either the original submission was even more horrible before a massive rehab effort did its best at head office, or this author has some sort of free pass at the editor’s desk.”

      Methinks she just has carte blanche to be as offensive as possible. Siccing pitt bulls on fatherless black children (or fantasising about doing so) is a kind of home run of Amielitude. Basically she’s well known and will write for free, a rare combination.

      • Patti Nicholls

        Who would have thought a Classics professor could be so mean? How sad.

        • Mac

          This is an unprovoked form of scurilous and hateful piece of writing I have ever come across. The juxtuposioning of the song lyrics she quotes to her jumping off to write about Michelle Obama is wicked. And who’s writing this piece of junk? A bejewelled and gaudily dressed lady — hesitate to use that word — what is the opposite of le mot juste?– whose husband is doing time for allegedly bilking millions of dollars from the shareholders of his newspaper empire.Me thinks the lady is unsettled by the fact of a black, well-educated and intelligent black woman in the White House.

        • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

          Au contraire, Ms. Nicholls, we Classics professors (former, in my case) are weaned on Hipponax, Martial, et al.

          You do realise that you are defending a woman who just wrote the following about dog-loving small children, right?

          “. . . one little rotter started jabbing a stick menacingly toward the dog’s eyes. Little Maya (115 lb. of dog) did her well-known teeth-baring-and-snarl number known as “Holy S–t” around town. I was all for her taking the horrid child’s arm in her jaw but given my circumstances that’s not too helpful.”

          • Patti Nicholls

            I wasn’t defending Barbara Amiel. I was just suggesting you had bad manners. And it’s disappointing coming from an academic.

          • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

            I’m not an academic, and anyway you are confusing good manners with docility. Bad manners involve giving offense accidentally. As Aristotle says (Nicomachaean Ethics 1125a), “the man of great spirit does not insult his enemies, except when he intends to give offense.”

          • Critical Reasoning

            Have you considered the possibility that those words, distasteful as they are, were written in a sort of curmudgeonly jest? In other words, Mrs. Amiel’s tongue was planted firmly in cheek when she wrote it?

            I completely agree that this column is offensive, but perhaps we should exercise a modicum of restraint before assuming the worst about its author.

          • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

            Quite right, CR; and it’s unfair of me to pick out that quote as being per se sadist. I guess it’s the combination of quite random bile about fatherlessness in the American black community with jests about siccing her pit bulls on children that makes the latter inexcusable. It’s the wanton callousness towards poor blacks that I find offensive, and the pit bull schtick is just Amiel’s way of being unapologetic about her theoretical racism. Anyway, by way of poisonous counter-comments, mine was quite good, n’est-ce pas?

          • wayne moores

            Well, in the sporting world we excuse the bad behavior of Manny Remariz as simply, Manny being Manny(now suspended for 50 games for failing a drug test). I suppose we could extend Ms. Amiel, the same courtesy and say it’s simply Babs, being Babs. Cheers.

      • R. Somers

        Jack, what makes you think she writes for free?

        • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

          Just a guess.

      • faith frances

        I'm with you guys. Couldn't get past the second para. Zero credibility. Undermined herself the whole way through. She has a serious chip on her shoulder and she's badly listing.

  • http://www.savedarfur.org Sophia Geffros

    That managed to be racist, disgusting, and poorly written all at once.
    Congrats!

  • h.nz

    I am always facinated in how a comments page developes: someone comments, then someone else does, and replies to a previous comment, then a third will reply to all. in a way, it makes sense, yet someone reading from the top can get confused if not noting the time stamps.
    similarly, I take an interest in how stories are written, or might be written: did BA want to write about FLMO and search for an interesting intro? or was she in the park interacting with the neighbors and think “where might this lead?” children, especially those not used to brilliant repertoire, will be confused when first (or second) spoken to and frequently need a repeat or rephrase.
    I can see BA misunderstanding the kids blank stare. I can understand the FLMO – jackie comparison. FLMO is hot. (I like figures that can throw a few hay bales).
    expect all dogs to bite unless you can guarantee that they have been raised “properly”. expect all people to “bite” unless you can guarantee that they have been raised better than me. and I was coddled. gee, maybe BA is saying “look at me: i’m just like they are.” bragging that she might have a bite (figuritively literarily) or complaining that they are normal.
    jack, you and cr are always good for an extra read. pro and con comments are ususally more thought provoking. sometimes I learn more here than in the column. that thing is just an excuse to time-limit the comments.

    • Critical Reasoning

      Thanks!

    • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

      Yes, thanks, h.nz!

  • Eilleen

    This has to be one of the most poorly written columns yet produced by Barbara Amiel. It was hard to follow and lacked point or direction. Duh, indeed.

  • Tupac Shakur

    Even though I am a deadbeat dad, I can say with a high degree of probability that I am not as negative as the above aristocrat.

    How did I get here? I see this level of sophistication from children in youtube comments. Where is the added benefit of humour, however?

  • thepseudointellectual

    I would thoroughly appreciate if Maclean’s stopped publishing Barbara Amiel’s (mindless, insensitive, disorganized, biased, misleading, inaccurate, racist and condescending) tripe. I am personally offended every time I see her vile diatribes (and her disgustingly smug smile, for that matter) inside a magazine that I usually otherwise respect.

    • Mystic

      Touche.

  • Owen

    Agreed. “Racist, disgusting, and poorly written all at once”. My 14 year told me about how terrible this article was, even for Amiel. This trash, and the enormous errors of fact in your article about 10 million Finnish deaths in a country with less than half that population (in the same issue). MacLeans can’t be bothered to check facts or print a correction for egregious factual errors, so it’s no surprise to find garbage like this from Amiel. My subscription cancellation is in the mail.

    • Critical Reasoning

      You’re right about Susan Mohammad’s article, Finns still haunted by Lenin’s ghost. It’s amazing that it hasn’t been corrected yet. Incredible innumeracy.

  • Anne Mansfield

    Excellent article by Barbara Amiel. Interesting that all the rants against Mrs. Black are faceless, unlike that posted by Jack
    Mitchell. BTW the article came to my attention as a result of reading Mark Steyn, cue more rants.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack_Mitchell

      That's Lady Black to you, sweetie.

  • Julie

    This has got to stop. How can a "writer" or magazine be allowed to publish this sort of vile and racist garbage in 2009? I refuse to buy another MacLean's magazine until Barbara Amiel is forced to apologize and then quit! How dare she bring down every white person with this nonsense, but worse(!) how dare Maclean's allowed it to print!

  • Cein

    Babs… timeto up your meds, darling :)

    • ttttt

      That was eloquent, succinct and powerful. =D

  • Black and Proud

    I am disgusted that Macleans published this article. You aren't even eloquent enough to disguise your racism!!! I have lost so much respect for Macleans and well… Brabara Amiel… You're not even worthy of my time.

  • Estelle Smith

    An article that the KKK would appreciate. I am shocked tht MacLeans published it. Are there no editors or are they rascist too?

    E. Smith

  • Stefan

    I don't know who should be more offended by this "article"….white people or black people?….frankly I don't even know what to say, other than sorry to all the 'Afro-Americans' who had to read this "Pile of S–t", hopefully they didn't drop their watermelon on the floor.

    Well done Macleans, you managed to piss off everybody without even making a point

  • Marie

    I don't understand what everyone found so offensive. I read it as being complimentary.

    I generally enjoy Ms. Amiel's work; I find it intelligent, insightful and original. Quite often, I also get a good laugh.

    Well done. I look forward to more of the same.

  • BConway

    First article, ok second, I've ever read by Barbara. Well written, witty, funny. I doubt she's racist. She would know already that racism is indicative of low (mental, spiritual, emotional) intelligence, and she'd never brook that for a second.

    The challenge is to describe a meeting with someone and their dogs, and she did well.

  • http://www.profenceworks.com Fence Manager

    The best way for a woman to look at someone like Michelle Obama would be to look at her in a vacuum, emptied out of her husband, his politics (whether you like them or not) and her own political views. So what you have as an end product is her life, as she has lived as an African American woman. She is strong, confident, and realizes that there are problems in the world and so are the solution.

  • RideThisBlackCowboy

    As a boyishly handsome,57-year-old black lad,I VASTLY prefer a buxom blonde-her bra,34C-42D-over a glamazon such as U.S.
    FIRST LADY Michelle R. Obama.(I was one of the VERY FEW black dudes who wasn't enthralled with buxom but otherwise masculine-looking and -acting blaxploitation movie star Pam Grier,thinking her resembling a dominatrix rather than a babe.My favourite-ever chick is the luscious Latina Raquel Welch,though the just-deceased,buxom
    brunette Lady Jane Rusell was SOME gorgeous gal in the 40's and 50's!!!)

  • http://www.jackmitchell.ca Jack Mitchell

    Sadly, many of these women’s husbands are serving time in Florida prisons, leaving the poor wives to succumb to incipient senile dementia. Fact.

From Macleans