Comments on: That's not funny!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:01:48 +0000

Cool story, bro.

By: James Kwon

James Kwon — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:30:48 +0000

That's disgusting I hope he stays in jail. I've heard many stories similar to this, men that just behave in a unmoral disgusting manner. Unfortunately there was a similar incident in my neighborhood, where a Freeport dentist convinced his female patients to come over his house because he had tools at home that can treat their dental problem. The dentist would gain their trust, and when the patient arrives he would attack and rape them. People like this make me consider the death penalty.

By: tree pruning

tree pruning — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:33:15 +0000

This is sad. I hope he will go to jail for good.

By: Bushnell Rangefinder

Bushnell Rangefinder — Mon, 17 May 2010 15:43:20 +0000

ugh, thats just disgusting

By: Soller

Soller — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:21:59 +0000

I went there once. Browsed around their Culture and Art pages. A lot douche european nationalists populate that site. A guy from Italy started complaining about blacks and muslims in his country. Read through most of the comments and had to stop. It's stuff like that that makes me despise nationalism.

By: David

David — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:28:09 +0000

What is amusing is that most people seem to forget we have this thing called the PATRIOT act. Which has a series of special provisions which are as followed:
If suspected of domestic or cyber terrorism, the subjects can be held without bail for an indefinite amount of time to seek public safety.

Meaning, if DA MAN actually considered anons a threat, they would ALL be under arrest and in guantanamo bay.

Fact:
The so called "Bomb threats all turned out to be self perpetuated and unfounded.
Fact:
There have only been 10 arrests made. all of which involved an actually illegal act being committed and proven.

Fact;
The community supports anonymous.

By: mudkipz

mudkipz — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:00:55 +0000

▲
▲ ▲

By: zorro

zorro — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:03:08 +0000

wait for october 27th
coming from paris france

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:39:55 +0000

the horribly researched article also fails to mention that there are other *chans like http://888chan.org/hell/ this one. You should really check that out, some really interesting things in there.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:21:26 +0000

Silly how they think they can judge a whole by the actions of a few. 4chan does have the occasional sick freaks, but other than that, they mean no harm. Plus while everyone on 4chan is technically anonymous, the actual anon wearing the mass and shit are totally different.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:42:44 +0000

BUTT FUCKERS ARE FUN TO FUCK IN THE BUTT.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:42:00 +0000

I haven't heard bull shit this thick in a very VERY long time.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:39:45 +0000

Wow aren't you a filthy liar.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:43:09 +0000

SPERM BERM

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:40:12 +0000

WTF??????

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:39:50 +0000

[youtube PsJmRsgpxik&feature=channel_page http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsJmRsgpxik&fe... youtube]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:24:25 +0000

RRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEE

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:10:22 +0000

This article is now about BOXXY

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:58:06 +0000

Wow just… wow

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:39:22 +0000

ITT: Fail nothing but fail.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:37:37 +0000

FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:37:24 +0000

FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUA

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:31:52 +0000

Agreed,

All of this has been discussed.
4chan=/=Anonymous.

"Weird, I found this article through a Freedom Watch link. I think their propaganda machine is totally bwoken! "

As did I.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:19:31 +0000

I am 12, and what is this?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:17:46 +0000

lulz

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:17:32 +0000

You suck so much!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:05:42 +0000

Anonymous has many faces, but not one is real. you may try to sum all of us up as "bad" people, but to do o is to do the same to your self. The Internet has many sides just as the real world, You have to take the best with worst. [youtube qJq8NPHFOms&feature=channel_page http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJq8NPHFOms&fe... youtube]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:45:58 +0000

Jesus. We've been waiting for something as lulzy as this.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:27:38 +0000

4chan isn't exactly a secret. It gets 300 million page views a month, and has been profiled by many major news organizations. You would think that an organization of such vaunted journalistic integrity as Maclean's would be able to find at least one actual user to talk to. Would you profile an organization such as the Co$ without talking to any of their members? How is it that you managed to profile Anonymous without talking to any current members? We're not hard to find. Look around and find the nearest nerdy type with a sense of humour and there's a good chance he's a /b/tard. You probably have dozens working in your offices.

Lazy reporting is Lazy.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:22:10 +0000

Really?

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

By: anonymous

anonymous — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:37:51 +0000

Yet another scientology loving anonymous hating piece of garbage on the internet. I'm surprised it mentioned any of anonymous's good intentions. Anonymous is everyone and everyone is anonymous, from your 89 year old great grandmother to the just born baby. Anonymous speaks it's mind whenever and wherever it wishes with no moral subjugation. No amount of threats or libel can stop anonymous. Anonymous is not a cult or a group, it's a state of mind. It is your mind released.

By: Mr. Anonymous Chaos

Mr. Anonymous Chaos — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:21:25 +0000

thank you for alerting anonymous of your existence, we have longed for a new targe.

By: truemuse

truemuse — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:53:56 +0000

I went to 4chan.org and every link I selected served up a few porn banner ads. I think you might have mentioned that would happen to visitors there. What is interesting to me is the role that image posting plays in the internet experience. Sharing images and viewing them is one of the main things we do on the internet. Many blogs are nothing more than image sharing sites. What about the writing that attends the image viewing? An image can be a potent muse for writing. Those are my observations of this second.

The one thing I wanted to also mention related to this post is this:
"The writer's audience is always a fiction" (ty DW).
This relates to your observations of what happens when the anonymous writers online take a stage in public with a physical audience. In that sense, your piece, though one commenter mentioned that it is old new, is valuable. I think we need to be reminded from time to time of the ways in which the internet has developed over the last decade.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:41:48 +0000

▲
▲ ▲

Newfags?
Ruining MY /b/?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:40:30 +0000

ಠ_ಠ

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:13:34 +0000

I'd make some remark about the complete lack of objectivity in this article, but this is Macleans, so lol.

By: Jeff Barea

Jeff Barea — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:49:37 +0000

Weird, I found this article through a Freedom Watch link. I think their propaganda machine is totally bwoken!

By: Mary

Mary — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:12:38 +0000

Very dumb and poorly researched article. Try a bit harder please.

By: IPblog | Intellectual Property Law in Canada » Article on Internet Law

IPblog | Intellectual Property Law in Canada » Article on Internet Law — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:49:33 +0000

[...] (macleans.ca) interviewed Richard Stobbe, lawyer with Brownlee’s Technology & IP Group, for an article on defamation and internet law. The article takes a look at the “dark side” of anonymity on the internet and the state [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:01:46 +0000

Scientology is insanely stupid and foolish, but we do believe in religious freedom.

By: lies

lies — Sun, 31 May 2009 10:22:01 +0000

Everything posted in /b/ is a hoax, to troll the media for lulz

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:56:48 +0000

My my…

Well as we all know scientologist do not live in objecive reality, but rather one of their
own making, however i do believe expressing such wild accusations with nothing to
base them on violates a law wich has been succesfully sued over many times by many
people and against larger animals then scientology…

in any case this battle will not last.
scientology has no friends outside of its own ranks, and enemies in just about
every dempographic one could think of.
technicly scientology is fighting a war on a virtualy unlimited number of fronts.
wile no1 has ever one a war on more then one.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:47:56 +0000

This story is awful. No real investigative research done, and all information from at least over a year ago (with the exception of the Time magazine bit). This whole thing is just a rehashing of stuff that’s been well covered by other sources.

Amateur writing is amateur.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 28 May 2009 23:21:07 +0000

You’ve got to be kidding me. A rhombus can be a square, but very few rhombuses are squares. If the reporter did any research at all, rather than rely on Church of Scientology propaganda, she would be able to differentiate 4chan visitors, from the global movement called Anonymous. Sure they may have the same origin, but don’t mushrooms grow from excrement? Any identifiable group may have individuals who commit crime. To link the crime of individuals to an Anonymous collective which has no membership requirements other than to maintain ones anonymity, is shoddy journalism. Talk about epic failure. If the author intends to be an advertisement for the CO$ why doesn’t she herself go for a free stress test, yell at some ashtrays, sign a million year SeaORG slavery contract, be coerced into aborting her baby, and be disconnected from her family.

By: John

John — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:37:09 +0000

Hmmm. I see mention of the COS complaints against Anonymous– which the FBI has expressly failed to support– but nothing of the recent assaults by the COS on “members” of anonymous. Google Baca. Look into what has happened at Gold Base recently and in Nashvillie recently. I know the media is afraid to be critical of the COS, but by avoiding all topics that make you afraid, you are failing in your jobs. The media is just as guilty at throwing us to the COS wolves as law enforcement is in this country. Belgium, France, and Germany see the insanity for what it is. Our peeps have no spine and have failed us here.