Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Because recruiting washed-up separatists always works so well

by Paul Wells on Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:00am - 18 Comments

I used to have a bit of a soft spot for Pierre Brien, who was 24 by the time I came to Ottawa in 1994 and whose adoration for Lucien Bouchard was visible in the way he had, probably quite unconsciously, affected almost all of Bouchard’s mannerisms: the quick hand jab to straighten the hair, the rushing/pausing speech pattern, the way he’d look just over the government MPs’ heads, into the middle distance, as he formulated his next sentence for maximum impact. Later, still quite young, he became the Bloc’s Intergovernmental Affairs critic, which means he was their main spokesman against referendum clarity, the threat of partition, and all the other elements of the Liberals’ so-called “Plan B” that the Reform Party had so vigorously supported and, in fact, believed their man Stephen Harper had invented.

So then Brien quit federal politics in 2003 because that was one of those moments where if you kind of half-squinted you could imagine Mario Dumont was going to become the next premier. Yeah, they never last, do they. Brien lost up in Rouyn in ’03 (strong third in a three-way race), then lost badly in a Laval riding in ’08 (11% of the vote), and now he’s washed up in the next logical place given such a trajectory: Stephen Harper’s Quebec kitchen cabinet, where he’s a political counsellor to Christian Paradis but where he may one day wind up replacing Dimitri Soudas. (Pop quiz: One’s a serial ADQ loser. The other used to do Lucien Bouchard imitations in the House!)

This is where I would normally point out that Harper has now surrounded himself with everything he used to decry in Quebec. I assume we’re only days away from a Bill Johnson article somewhere explaining why this is a brilliant strategic move. But you know what? Whatever. One day, perhaps still distant, Stephen Harper will be a distinguished ex-prime minister writing Fraser Forum commentaries about how the rest of Canada must never bow to separatist blackmail, and when a few people snicker, Harper will tell himself it’s media bias.

Bookmark and Share
  • Anon

    "..distinguished ex-prime minister writing Fraser Forum"

    I see him more at the AEI, writing disparaging columns about Canadians' choices.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      Ya, the Fraser Forum tends to prefer right wing perspectives.

  • http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com bigcitylib

    Definitely a think-tanker, though. Maybe one with the word "Freedom" in the name. Or maybe "Prosperity".

    • MJ Patchouli

      Promise keeper.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    Wells, Anon and BCL have got me wondering if Harper has a future at a right wing think-tank. I understand that some org would like the prestige that comes with having a former PM on the payroll but wouldn't the audience, presumably cons, need to find the PM's writing/thoughts creditable. For many cons, emperor Harper has been wearing new clothes for a while now.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Nich Nich

    After his Australian Iraq speech, perhaps he could work at the Conference Board of Canada

  • Bill Simpson

    Why is it so hard to get good political advice out of Quebec these days. The liberals under Martin botched it up, and now the Tories have as well. What's the problem?

  • Mulletaur

    Poor Stevie. Wonder if he sits by himself in 24 Sussex sipping scotch and listening to "Fell on Black Days" by Soundgarden over and over again, obsessively.

  • CAPS

    Was Jean Lapierre unavailable?

  • http://liberalvideodepot.blogspot.com Ted

    Because recruiting washed-up separatists always works so well

    What are you talking about Paul. Could you please be a little bit clearer. Perhaps you could kindly provide an example or two? Or three?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PoliticalPundit PoliticalPundit

    In sheer desperation, PM Harper is 'rolling the dice' once again in Quebec!
    PM Harper's on again/off again dalliance (called the eternal French Kiss by Chantal Hébert) with Québécois nationalistes in the moribund ADQ and washed-up but still committed secessionists is the most troubling dimension of his entire approach to national unity.
    In listening to William Johnson — a former Trudeau supporter turned Reform/Alliance devotee and Harper biographer — Harper has put a noose around his neck and has endangered national unity.
    On the crucial issue of Québécois secessionism, PM Harper can't make up his mind up about whether is aka, Stephen Harper of the Reform era when he was ready to slay the secessionist dragon, or a very pale replica of former PM Brian Mulroney because he has no roots in or understanding of Quebec.
    We all remember that Mulroney came close to destroying the federation and eventually destroyed both his legacy and the Progressive Conservative Party by making a pact with Lucien Bouchard in the run up to the election of 1984.
    At the time and in his subsequent writings and public statements, Bill Johnson was one of the most outspoken critics of Mulroney's ill-fated deal with the Québécois nationalistes and secessionists many of whom became MPs and Cabinet ministers and eventually derailed his government.
    Harper has been able to take this highly explosive approach to national unity because the Leader of the Liberal Party, Michael Ignatieff, committed himself and the party to recognize the Quebec State as a distinct entity within the Constitution. The leaders of both major national parties have rejected Trudeau's approach to the Québécois nationaliste and secessionist movements. In so doing, both Ignatieff and Harper have put national unity in jeopardy. Political expediency has trumped Canada's and Canadians' vital interests.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/keith_c keith_c

      Jeffrey Simpson ? is that you? I didn't realize Mulroney and Bouchard signed a secret pact in 1984. I thought the secret pact was with Franz Josef Strauss in 1983. So confusing.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack_Mitchell

    Is Stephen Harper a traitor? I mean, he's hiring an evil separatist. So is he a traitor?

  • Anon

    As if the Conservatives care whether anyone thinks they're hypocrites. News Flash: They don't. "Hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue."

  • Wotcher?

    Perhaps he could write for some think-tank on why political expediency should trump everything else. He'd be a natural.

  • http://liberalvideodepot.blogspot.com Ted

    He could turn his MA thesis into a Ph.D thesis.

    It may have to be completely re-written though, since his MA thesis – the sole basis for the claim that Harper is an "economist" – concluded that stimulus spending even in bad times was not a good thing and was all about politicians saving their own job rather than doing anything good for the economy.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/charlesh Charles H.

    "[...] all about politicians saving their own job rather than doing anything good for the economy. "

    And in his case, he was right!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Habitant Habitant

    Where is this MA thesis available (to read), do you know?

From Macleans