Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Off probation

by Paul Wells on Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:28pm - 101 Comments

Off probationWow, does Michael Ignatieff ever talk a lot when he has nothing to say. There he is on the TV as I type, taking his tenth or 15th question in a scrum in Montreal, jousting with reporters, a strained smile on his face because they keep asking him the same thing and how many different ways can he say he hasn’t made a decision yet? Not a lot of different ways, it turns out, and yet he won’t back away from the microphone. So he’s having to say them again and again. And it’s making him testy. But he won’t stop. So he repeats himself. And then the reporters do. And still he won’t walk away.

There. He finally stopped. He’s gonna read the thing tonight and make a decision. Except all week I’ve been hearing from Liberals about their vacation plans. Those plans don’t involve door-knocking and debate prep. So if this whole election thing is still a live option, somebody forgot to tell the party.

Let us strain past the limits of this town’s attention span to recall a few simple things. The reason Stephen Harper was in Cambridge today was to update the country on the status of budget implementation. Excellent idea! Whose was it? Michael Ignatieff’s. The Prime Minister didn’t mention that, and yet it was really not long ago — the end of January — that Ignatieff cooked up this whole “probation” scheme. He’d vote for the budget, but he didn’t have to like it. In return the feds would have to report in March and June and December. There’s even a website. So you know it was a serious deal.

Now here’s the thing about probation. It is a daily state of binary possibility: Pass-fail. If I’m the opposition leader and I have Put The Government On Probation, then every day I do not announce the government’s failure is an endorsement. Tomorrow Michael Ignatieff will find a microphone somewhere and announce, at extravagant length, that he is endorsing the government again. The NDP and Bloc will announce they were ready to vote yet again to bring this government down, but yet again the Liberals have chickened out. It’ll all work out precisely as Ignatieff designed it to.

I now believe the opposition parties will not get their act together to vote the government down until after it delivers its next full budget. Of course that’s the worst possible time from the opposition’s point of view, because a budget is a chance to spend $200 billion: it’s the moment of maximum strength for any government.

But there’s always a reason not to make a decision. Was it 10 days ago the opposition parties, led by the Liberals, were demanding the finance minister be fired because he’d dug a $50 billion deficit? Stephen Harper ignored them. They did nothing in response. Paper tigers. Now they will wait until the recovery is in full swing and force an election on a good-news budget. That’s how Michael Ignatieff messes with you until he’s done.

Bookmark and Share
  • Art in Calgary

    Iggy's gotta stick around and huff-n puff, else he looks like he's a temp. leader.

    Bob R can travel around, getting banned from other countries.

    The Cons keep on keepin on. Too boring for the media.

  • farmer fred

    So we went from Mr Dithers to bumbling Inspector Clouseau back to another type of Mr Dithers. The country has been served so well by the Liberals- not.

    If the Liberals actually believed in something they would have the courage of their convictions and either pull the plug, or formalize the Conservative-Liberal coalition that is currently governing the country. They have none- so instead they have to play these silly games. Meanwhile Rome burns.

    • Mulletaur

      Stop sniffin' the silage, Fred.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/OntarioTown OntarioTown

    Well, I guess you should have watched the new Mike Duffy live instead – a real performance.

  • Otis

    It's obvious, isn't it ? Dean Ignatieff has Stephen 'Muskrat' Harper and the rest of the gang at Tory House on
    Double Secret Probation. Now that's the probation to worry about.

    • Orson Bean

      Kudos for the Animal House reference. Plus it perfectly encapsulates the absurdity of Ignatieff pretending to be a Tough Guy while actually doing/accomplishing SFA.

      • Mulletaur

        That was actually pretty funny, Otis.

  • Catherine

    I predict a summer election.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

      I'll remember your prediction, Catherine! I predict an election some time in 2010.

    • scf

      Yeah, if you go to the race-track you take the horse with the long odds, don't you?

      It's funny how the Conservatives have mobilized for an election they don't want, while the Liberals claim to want an election but have done absolutely nothing to prepare for it.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      You and Potter would make a great pair: he predicted a Stanley Cup Parade in Detroit this year.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

    Man. The actual update is a rag. I checked that interactive map as well and most of the projects in my area have a 1000% plus minus and were announced at the last minute.

    Harper sure knows how to push his luck.

  • Eva

    Either way, election now or in the fall or even spring 2010, Ignatieff will eventually be Prime Minister.
    Can't wait to see Harper in the Opposition benches!!!

    • Orson Bean

      IGGY AND THE LIBERALS MUST RULE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

    • dkite

      I think the Liberals are thinking just that. Now how can they make it happen?

      Umm. Looks like the Conservative ads have stuck. The possible scenario of a Liberal majority is playing out in the US, and the salient characteristic seems to be obscenely large deficits.

      My prediction is that Ignatieff will be prime minister after losing one election, taking the loss in a dignified way and the time to rebuild the party. Then he will win.

      The unfortunate part about the prediction is it's improbability. Not the losing part.

      Derek

  • Dieter Sprockets

    He's a motor-mouth.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    The quarterly probationary updates sired by the Liberals were crass politics — they were certainly not best-interests-of-Canada stuff. Iggy wanted an obvious opportunity to hold a big sword over the Tories every three months, so he could drop it at a time of his choosing. Perhaps he neglected the thought that everybody will be watching HIM dither every three months. Oh well, live by the sword…

    As to commentary above that is cheering on further economic misery for this country, the better to improve the electoral chances of an opposition party… wow.

  • French canadian

    I think that Harper's government is doing a good job on the whole. You can see the morning traffic increasing day by day, so that's a good indicator as any about the economy restarting. It's actually the most accurate one I know. Everyone was laughing at him when he was saying last year was a good time to buy stocks and that Canada will rebound this year. Guess what : he was right!

    Ignatieff is showing that he has the mettle to rise above partisan politics and do what's right for the country by supporting Harper's government. This guy'll should make a good prime minister one day.

    What I don't get is the opposition from the Bloc and NDP. Don't they know the kind of partisan politics game they are playing will fuck them up? Their approval rating is already down…. don't they get the message?

  • john g

    Love this quote from Ignatieff:

    So I'm going to look at the report tonight if I get a minute

    LOL…"if I get a minute"? What else does he have to do? Trim his eyebrows?

  • pubic mullet

    Iggy is polluting the air with CO2 the more he talks.

    None of the people I know care about this report card / probation thing. They are too busy living and working each day to stop and watch boring, irrelevant blowhards.

    The Libs won't provoke an election for awhile. They still have much work to do to catch the Cons re: profiling and motivating the swing voters. Ig's back office has to work OT to catch up on this and fundraising.

    Can anyone tell me how much $$/job saved the federal bailout of the automakers will cost? $250K per employee? $500K per employee?

    Or how much does the bailout cost per Ontario swing ridings?

  • C.C.M

    i AM FED UP WITH THE LIBS AND NDP ASKING FOR MORE AND MORE MONEY TO BE SPENT…THEN DECRYING THE DEFICIT…IF HARPER HAD A MAJORITY…THE DEFICIT WOULD BE A LOT LESS….BUT CANADA IS TURINING INTO ONE OF THOSE COUNTRYS WITH SO MANY PARTIES…WE WILL NEVER GET THE MAJORITY….SOME ONE HAS TO GO…I SAY GET RID OF THE NDP AND THE BLOC….ITS TIME WE HAD A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT

  • Sea Otter

    FWIW, absolutely none of the national media seem to be taking this very seriously either. There is absolutely nothing in any of the weekend media about the threat of a summer election.

    Pulling the pin now would be a disaster for Ignatieff. Neither he nor his party are ready for a national campaign, and he knows it. Further, should he announce on Monday that he is voting non-confidence, Ignatieff and his team instantly become the issue. The barren state of both the Liberal coffers and policy binders will be laid bare for all to see, and instantly Harper is made into a victim. That takes some doing, but prompting a summer election might actually make Harper into a sympathetic figure.

    Now, the other possibility is to announce that you are voting non-confidence, and watch the NDP and the Bloc turn completely ashen faced. At that point, one or both of them would have to start considering ways to climb down. The risk Ignatieff would run is that both the NDP and the Bloc are so stupid that they would charge into a campaign anyway, but I still think one of them would blink before the vote.

  • some thoughts

    It is time to stop the foolishness. Mr. Ignatieff must say no an leave that windbag Layton the choice of the rock or the hard place.

  • CAPS

    Funner fact: Banks can't donate anything to any party or candidate. Bankers and all bank employees can donate up to $1,100/annum to one party, the same amount to riding association(s) and another $1,100 to leadership candidate(s).

  • AT1

    It's possible that Ignatief is not different from Dion in this respect…threaten and then back down. In this instance, however, perhaps he doesn't have to back down, even while not provoking election. That is, despite the pretension, the Liberals don't have the numbers to vote down the government alone, and if they word the non-confidence motions cleverly (so as to count on the NDP or Bloc to vote against it), they could actually come out of this with more clout.

  • matt

    Could she have meant extending the necessary lines of credit/loans to the party finance people?

  • http://bcinto.blogpot.com BCer in Toronto

    Come now, Paul. Yes, the Liberals requested this report, all 270ish pages of it. And you want Ignatieff to scrum minutes after Harper gets off camera from his scripted and spun sham-wow! infomercial and pass judgment on it? That's silly. Let's not let the cart get ahead of the horse here.

    Ignatieff has said he wants to take the evening to actually read the report. Sounds crazy, I know, but if it's going to be the election trigger, maybe it makes sense, no? "Well, I haven't read this report, but I know in my gut it sucks, so, election!"

    It may not fit the media's timetable and lust for election speculation stories, but perhaps will Michael reads the report the media could, well, read it too, and perhaps analyze its claims and let us know just how accurate they are, so we're all a little better informed of the landscape before we get back on the election merry-go-round.

    And if the future does unfold as you predict, we'll tackle that one then.

  • john g

    Bingo. How else did the nearly-bankrupt Liberals finance the last couple of elections?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tdotlib tdotlib

    So let me get this straight – the Cons don't want us to read too much in to her comments about the isotope crisis or the turbine money thing, but we should believe that a group of bankers forced Michael Ignatieff not to defeat the government AND we need to extrapolate the fact that they meant they wouldn't extend credit, not withhold donations.

    One way or another losers – not both ways.

  • john g

    Not quite. Not much should be read into the appropriateness of her isotope comments because it was a private, frank conversation with a trusted aide.

    And since it was a private conversation with her aide, I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of what she described. What purpose would she have to make it up?

  • PolJunkie

    BCer, give me a break. Do you actually believe that Iggy is going to do anything but support this report so as to avoid an election?

  • Liz J

    Get real. Heard anything from Iggy aside from criticism? Since when do they bother to read anything before foaming at the mouth? One can assume the Opposition leader would have an advance copy to mull over before

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

    Lookatme! syndrome.

    A lot of politicians have it.

    Consider what you're asking us to believe, that somehow 3 of the 6 bank CEOs stood up and basically threatened the Liberal party, and that even though somehow Raitt heard of this, nobody has said a peep about it anywhere else. Not even other Harper party ministers.

    This is your believable alternative?

  • http://bcinto.blogpot.com BCer in Toronto

    I'm willing to wait an evening to find out instead of speculating mindlessly. And I'm also willing to take the time to read the thing myself so I can decide whether or not I agree with whatever decision he eventually makes, rather than just hyperventiliating based on media soundbites according to my partisan biases.

    Of course, you're welcome to chart your own path.

  • Smoke Eater

    Count Dithers said he would read the report tonight "if he has time" and then again tomorrow night.

    That's code for "I need to run this by my bankers first."

  • http://bcinto.blogpot.com BCer in Toronto

    Not just the bankers. Also the butchers, the bakers, and the candle stick makers.

    As well, of course, as the Free Masons, the Illuminati, and the Stone Cutters.

    It's on our agenda right after finding a new vehicle for Steve Gutenberg.

  • http://bcinto.blogpot.com BCer in Toronto

    Really? You really think Stephen Harper would give the official opposition a copy in advance? If you do, I have a bridge in Gatineau I'd love to sell you.

  • Andrew (not P or C)

    You are one gullible puppy.

  • paulsstuff

    You should tell McCallum to recommend a Chevy to Guttenberg. That's what he drives.

    As for Iggy reading the report, I'll take the word of the RBC CEO, who was voted best CEO last year, who said today that the financial crisis is over and the economy is rebounding. Any word if the Liberal's will be quoting him as thay did TD's Don Drummond over his doom and gloom comments and projections?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Douglass Douglass

    BCer:Not just the bankers. Also the butchers, the bakers, and the candle stick makers.

    As well, of course, as the Free Masons, the Illuminati, and the Stone Cutters.

    It's on our agenda right after finding a new vehicle for Steve Gutenberg.

    You've got me singing that stonecutter's song from the Simpsons now!

    Who controls the British Crown,
    who Keeps the metric system down,
    we do……
    We do……

    he he.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Douglass Douglass

    BCer:Not just the bankers. Also the butchers, the bakers, and the candle stick makers.

    As well, of course, as the Free Masons, the Illuminati, and the Stone Cutters.

    It's on our agenda right after finding a new vehicle for Steve Gutenberg.
    *****
    You've got me singing that stonecutter's song from the Simpsons now!

    Who controls the British Crown,
    who Keeps the metric system down,
    we do……
    We do……

    he he.

  • Red Fox

    Something tells me that any day now Iggy is going to give that chicken in every pot,a car in every garage speech and present it as his own to the unwashed Canuck masses.

  • http://www.canadianrosebud.blogspot.com rockfish

    Also 'being fed' syndrome. CON war room trying out the latest rumour, spilled some on Lisa while she bumbled through a coffee line in the war-room cafeteria. She found it irresistably cute in a self-serving way and pumped it up to her dim-bulb assistant. It's one of those whisper-into-a-dozen-ears trick…

  • PolJunkie

    I'll say…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/thedingo8 thedingo8

    its all about the first time MPs pensions.. plain aNDP simple.. no election until they qualify..

  • Manny

    Wells forgot the most important issue here: the Libs are too poor to run a campaign.

  • Arnie Alberta

    At least we might see a person who doesn't live for tomorrow – Harper will do all thes e wonderful things for our flagging economy but not until 6 months, tw0 years or longer; he has no plans for now. Harper truly believes this is the land of promise; he'll promise you any thing and everything as long as it is to done for several months or even years from when he announces it! He obviously doesn't know how much work has be be done, engineered and planned before the "shovle is really ready"!!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JustinWordswrth JustinWordswrth

    Leader of the Flawed Position

    Is it true that Michael Ignatieff wants to reduce the minimum qualification for EI to the number of hours he has lived in Canada?

  • Edward

    The journalists are just doing a dis-service to the people of this country.They have no principle. They are just after sensationalism. Just need material to write about to satisfy their editor. Instead of commenting on the position of
    the leaders whether it's right or wrong and good or bad for the country, they always take the opposite views. If the
    leader of the opposition does not bring down the government, then he is chicken. If he brings down the government, then he is macho and don't care about the country going into a fifth election in 5 years. They will then harp about the
    waste of money. Journalism has plunged so low that I am wondering about their relevance at this time. EDDY.

From Macleans