John Parisella

John Parisella

John Parisella writes about U.S. politics from his vantage point as the former Delegate-General in New York City for Quebec. Follow John on Twitter:  @JohnParisella

Palin and Gingrich are not doing the GOP any favours

by John Parisella on Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:21pm - 30 Comments

Republicans are still searching for their voice eight months after losing the presidency. It is not unique that a party still be in search of itself after such a decisive loss. What is strange is the fact that personality politics and not policy debates are dominating the discussion. After all, we are still a long way from 2012 and it is too early to project a nominee. Yet, in recent days, it seems the attention has shifted from the Dick Cheney/Rush Limbaugh sideshow to the Sarah Palin/Newt Gingrich roadshow.

Just recently, Governor Palin delivered a speech in New York and made a well noticed appearance at a fundraiser where Newt Gingrich was the main speaker. David Letterman’s controversial top ten on Sarah Palin further served to keep the Alaska governor in the news. (Expect her to be a guest on the Letterman show soon as it reinforces her celebrity status.) Meanwhile, Gingrich is commenting daily and appearing on the Sunday news show regularly.

The effect on the GOP is hard to discern. The party seems in disarray despite occasional interventions to push the conservative viewpoint on crucial issues like the economy, national security and judicial activism. But no spokesperson seems to be emerging as  a potential presidential candidate and no idea or policy proposal seems to be catching on. Palin clearly has a few ideas to offer but, beyond her obvious celebrity status, there is little to get excited about. Gingrich offers coherent and well articulated ideas, but still comes across as a polarizing figure. All this personality-driven activity only serves to muddle the GOP message.

Democrats are understandably overjoyed. Limbaugh, while not insignificant, is a marginal figure who does little to attract voters to the GOP. Cheney’s legacy tour also does not represent the future of his party; he is instead proving just how hard it is to spin the unspinnable. And now Palin and Gingrich, while they may be more serious potential contenders, are demonstrating their shortcomings every time they come out.

There is perhaps a ray of hope that the Republicans will soon find their voice. The economy is still in recession and, at best, will remain sluggish for some time to come. Obama’s agenda is really ambitious and could run into difficulty on healthcare and Middle East policy. In short, there are issues that will beckon a conservative alternative. Figures such as Morning Joe Scarborough, who have preferred talking about vision, principles and policies rather than personality, may be on to something. I am certain that this approach represents a bigger threat to the Obama people as the 2010 mid-term campaign begins to ramp up than the musings of Cheney, Limbaugh, Palin and Gingrich.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/avr avr

    Figures such as Morning Joe Scarborough, who have preferred talking about vision, principles and policies rather than personality, may be on to something.

    All I'm seeing is yet another installment of "Here are some Republicans I personally loathe, and over there are some others I like because they're pretty liberal, and does it really matter if they're not very popular with their own party?"

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/avr avr

    Figures such as Morning Joe Scarborough, who have preferred talking about vision, principles and policies rather than personality, may be on to something.

    All I'm seeing is yet another analysis-free installment of "Here are some Republicans who I personally loathe (as should all right-thinking people), and over there are some others I like because they're pretty liberal; does it really matter if they're not very popular with their own party?"

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/avr avr

    Figures such as Morning Joe Scarborough, who have preferred talking about vision, principles and policies rather than personality, may be on to something.

    All I'm seeing is yet another analysis-free installment of "Here are some Republicans who I and my friends personally loathe, but over there are some others I like because they're pretty liberal, and does it really matter if they're not very popular with their own party?"

  • Steve M

    I just don't see what the big deal is about the Republicans not having one clear spokesperson this early. The losing party never does after an American presidential election. Nobody would have bet on Pres. Obama back in 2005, Clinton in 1989, or W in 1997.

    • Mike Jr

      I actually bet on Obama in 2004. Money and everything.

      • Steve M

        I stand corrected.

        FEW would have bet on Pres.Obama in 2005, etc….

  • Lord Kitchener's Own

    Scarborough's been "talking about vision, principles and policies rather than personality"???

    I thought he spent most of his time freaking out about Jon Stewart and drinking Starbucks coffee.

  • joetheelectrician

    I like Palin . She's cool . Gingrich is smart . Scarborough is an idiot going nowhere . We need a younger version of cCeney with star power like Rush ,and close to the people after 4 years of latte drinking , wine loving in France , elitist socialism in the White House . Starts to sound like the girl from Alaska !!!!

  • Anon

    "Republicans are still searching for their voice…"

    You mean the screeching, hissing screaming loony-tunes hysteria isn't their voice?

    Listen to their supporters now and again. This is as good as it's going to get.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    I'll leave aside your assertion that Gingrich/Palin are hindering the GOP and just say that Letterman cracking wise about molesting Palin's underage daughter did a whole lot of good for Palin with Repub base.

    • Anon

      By forcing them to sound stupider when they reacted to it? I don't think so.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      She's 18, I believe.

      • Steve M

        From what I've read, it was the 14-yr-old Palin daughter with them in New York. Hopefully, Dave thought he was making a joke about the 18-yr-old one with the baby.

        • Logician

          The latest information indicates that to be the case. Clearly there was poor research on the part of the Letterman show, but since publicity serves both sides well, both should be pleased.

  • http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com bigcitylib

    Republican base doesn't consist of enough people to matter anymore. And if it thrills the base, it probably turns off the other 2/3 of America. Go naughty Librarian with a machine gun! Thrill 'em all!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    "Them Jews aren't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office. …

    "They will not let him to talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is. … I said from the beginning: He's a politician; I'm a pastor. He's got to do what politicians do." Jeremiah Wright, June 10 '09, in answer to question if he's talked to Obama

    I forgot to ask earlier, Parisella, if you think Obama's mentor and pastor is doing the Dem party any favours. It's hard to know, what with the left's dalliance with anti-semitism, how this will play out. I wonder if Israelis question Obama's beliefs/motives when they hear what his mentor has to say.

    I am not surprised you are trying the sleight of hand trick by focusing on Repub problems when you got these 'progressive' and 'tolerant' people cracking wise about molesting underage children or talking about 'them jews'.

    • lmn

      Joylon:
      you show us why the GOP is in disarray . You are intellectually dishonest . Letterman never referred to her underage daughter . I heard it and relistened to it . You are a liar to say otherwise . As for Pastor Wright , again you are on right wing talking points . You believe this vain man . All Obama has shown to date is a tolerant , unifying figure. You guys are spaced out with your southern , implicitly racist strategy , opposing everything . What did you do about healthcare . You defend torture and lie about a war . You are defending typical right wing lying Republicanism .I`ve had it with this crap . Parisella is TOO generous to the GOP.

      • Anon

        Parisella and other critics have to be hesitant, tentative and generous when talking about the GOP. Otherwise, they'll get hundreds of thousands of obscene and threatening hate mail and phone calls until they're forced to get bodyguards.

        • Sisyphus

          Yeah. And the Gunners are crap too. So there.

      • Sav

        "All Obama has shown to date is a tolerant , unifying figure. "

        Well sure, if you ignore his decidedly non-unifying comments on people protesting government spending or those opposed to embryonic stem-cell research. Not to mention Barry's opposed to gay marriage but since he's a messianic lefty, nobody cares. Tolerance indeed.

        It should also be pointed out that Letterman's "joke" was about the daughter who was with Palin at the Yankke game, and that would've been the 14-year-old. Perhaps Dave and his writers are too lazy to check the facts or too dumb to know the difference.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/TJCook TJCook

      Really? All those words and no mention of the right-wing extremist who *opened fire at the Holocaust museum* this week?

      "Them Jews" indeed.

      • Sav

        "All those words and no mention of the right-wing extremist who *opened fire at the Holocaust museum* this week? "

        The "right-wing extremist" who hated Bill O'Reilly , "neo-cons" and Christianity, had a Fox News building as one of his future targets and claimed Bush may have been behind 9/11.

        Yes TJ, you hit the nail on the head there. Sounds just like a right-winger.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TJCook TJCook

    I agree – just what the GOP needs in 2012 is a Palin/Gingrich ticket.

    As an Obama supporter, I heartily endorse this strategy.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/The_Cynic The_Cynic

    Palin clearly has a few ideas to offer but, beyond her obvious celebrity status, there is little to get excited about.

    Unless you are a GOPer – they are so convinced that she is an odds on favourite to beat Obama come the next election. So much so that they say – and have on my blog – 'Be careful what you wish for'.

    I do want a Palin ticket with whomever – that is an almost guarntee that Obama will get a second term.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/The_Cynic The_Cynic

    Palin clearly has a few ideas to offer but, beyond her obvious celebrity status, there is little to get excited about.

    Unless you are a GOPer – they are so convinced that she is an odds on favourite to beat Obama come the next election. So much so that they say – and have on my blog – 'Be careful what you wish for'.

    I do want a Palin ticket with whomever – that is an almost guarantee that Obama will get a second term.

  • lmn

    You make sense. She is a loser with an ego to boot. Very hypocritical as well.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    "And the Gunners are crap too"

    Them's fightin' words. Who do you support?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TJCook TJCook

    I didn't say "right-winger", "movement conservative" or "Republican".

    I said "right-wing extremist". If this guy is crazy enough to believe that Jews control the world, and crazy enough to shoot up the Holocaust museum, don't you think he's crazy enough to come up with a reason to hate things that stalwart right-wingers happen to love?

  • joetheelectrician

    TJ is so pro Obama that he has lost reason .

  • Doug

    Let's face it–the USA is monetarily bankrupt, and Obama is tripling the deficit just because his worshippers feel he can do no wrong (cough, cough). Well Gingrich/Palin might win in 2012 and be voices of sanity in a desperate society, but it will be too late.

From Macleans