The soaring cost of Asper’s dream

The Museum of Human Rights is over budget and desperate for cash

by Jonathon Gatehouse on Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:00pm - 12 Comments

The soaring cost of Asper’s dreamThe country’s newest national museum is deep in the hole, before digging for its foundation has even been completed. Work on the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, in downtown Winnipeg, only began in early April, but the building is already $45 million over budget. When Ottawa agreed in April 2007 to take over the private project—the dream of the late Izzy Asper, founder of Canwest Global Communications—construction costs for Antoine Predock’s soaring, glass castle design had been estimated at $165 million—not including exhibits or the interior. But a combination of inflation, a fluctuating dollar, and the price of importing glass and steel for its unique structure, has since seen costs rise by 27 per cent. “The bulk of this is inflation,” says Patrick O’Reilly, the museum’s chief operating officer. “We hear a lot about the economic downturn, but it has not affected construction costs in Western Canada.”

The museum’s board of trustees, appointed by the Conservative government last August, considered scrapping the landmark design, but ultimately decided the savings would be negated by the costs of replacement plans and construction delays. Instead, they have trimmed $12.6 million from the budget by modifying electrical and ventilation systems, reducing the protective coating on concrete floors and opting for less costly stone for its walls. And they have launched a renewed fundraising push—and an appeal to all levels of government—to try to make up the shortfall. “We’re hoping that current donors will increase their gifts,” says O’Reilly. The City of Winnipeg has so far given $20 million to the project. Manitoba has pledged $40 million, and Ottawa $100 million, as well as $21.7 million in annual operating funds. Premier Gary Doer said last week that his government might be willing to dig a little deeper, if the private sector takes the lead. (The separate fundraising arm “Friends of the CMHR” has so far collected $105 million.) But Heritage Minister James Moore says no additional federal money will be forthcoming. Perhaps an indication that the Tories feel they have done enough for Asper-backed causes, with tax dollars already committed to a new football stadium for the soon-to-be family-owned Blue Bombers, and a bailout of private television broadcasters including Canwest’s Global and E! channels reportedly in the works.

As for the museum, it appears that there will be more red ink in its future. The latest corporate plan, tabled in the House of Commons last month, predicts an unspecified operating deficit once the doors finally open in 2011. Original estimates did not factor in the $9 million a year in property taxes the national institution will be expected to pay. (In Manitoba, private museums get a tax holiday, but not public ones.) And the board intends to approach Ottawa for an “appropriate future level of funding” above and beyond the nearly $22 million a year the Harper government has agreed to provide. “We don’t have precision around what it will cost to run the building,” says O’Reilly. “We’re just trying to put our markers down.”

At this point, it’s not even clear what exhibits museum-goers will see in three years, or their cost, beyond a rough $100-million estimate for the building’s interior. The museum has just completed the first of 18 cross-Canada consultations to solicit public input on its displays. The board is counting on 250,000 visitors a year (down from the original estimate of 800,000) but no decision has been made about what admission will be charged. There will be attempts to generate other revenue from event rentals, a restaurant and a gift shop. “Often that’s the bread-and-butter for museums,” notes O’Reilly.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ottawasteph ottawasteph

    There's a pretty picture. So many happy white people. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy, don't it?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      I presume the white folks in question have played a major role in supporting this project. From the aroma of sarcasm emanating from your comment, I am torn between two questions, so I will just ask you both of them:

      Would tossing in a token non-white person really make you feel better?

      What have you got against white people?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/ottawasteph ottawasteph

        Embracing diversity and promoting minority rights has nothing to do with this white elephant (pun intended).

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

        No quarrel with the white elephant bit, steph. But, forgive me, which of my two questions were you trying to answer 12 hours ago?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PoliticalPundit PoliticalPundit

    This Museum of Human Rights is long overdue. But the lack of private philanthropy is disgusting given the corporate profits and handsoem CEO salaries and bonuses which prevailed over the past decade. In the US this project would have been completely funded by the private sector, but in Canada everyone including the corporations and their executives, expects the state to pick up the lion's share of the costs. Mr Izzy Asper must be spinning in his grave.
    The Asper corporation has been so badly managed since the death of Izzy Asper that the Harper government, in recognition for all the political and financial support from the young Aspers, has used Canadian Taxpayers' funds to keep the project going forward. And all this for a paltry 250,00 visitors a year!! Figure out the cost per visitor. It will be astronomical!!!!
    PM Harper decided to end AECL's production of Isotopes and make Canada and Canadians dependent upon corporations around the world. Perhaps Harper and the Cabinet might rethink the Canadian government's extravagant take-over and funding of the Human Rights Museum. For the neo-cons in Western Canada this is most assuredly a great disappointment.
    For the supporters of a grand legacy to Izzy Asper who did so much for Canada and Canadians it is also a great disappointment.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/keith_c keith_c

      Are you nuts? Izzy Asper spinning in his grave? He was one of the biggest subsidy hunters in a protected market that there ever was, and this museum was always going to shake down the feds and province from day 1. It's all going to his plan. You talk like he actually wanted to fund this out of his own fortune and others'. His sons are at it again with the Blue Bombers, blackmailing taxpayers into spending money on his toy.

      I'll agree with you that the sons have badly run their dad's company but their fate was sealed when Conrad hosed Izzy with the newspaper deal.

  • Joe from to

    It’s like the Rogers Centre which ran over cost and Ted Rogers bought for a mere$20m.
    This vision though for a human rights museum is profound and will give a space for reflection about values and how to treat others.
    Why is it having problems with getting private support?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/keith_c keith_c

      Winnipeg ain't Calgary or TO. I'm amazed they managed to get $100 million in private donations already. I presume much of that is from the Toronto Jewish scene, but rumor has it that Izzy and his sons have angered the community there over the years enough to turn off a lot of potential donors.

  • MPOtt

    I like how private ventures continue to be bailed out by government. Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/keith_c keith_c

    As a Winnipegger I've always found it amusing how we've been able to shake down the Feds over the years.. i wonder how much of a decaying, Detroit-esque wreck the town would be without federal largesse to build the Forks and river walks, preserve the exchange district, build the mega-virus research hospital etc. We're sort of the acceptable face of the West when it comes to the central government giving out pork, since there's no political benefit for Libs to give dough to projects in Calgary and it looks too blatant for Tories to shovel much federal cash to their heartland. (and, er, there's no political benefit to giving pork to voters who give you 70% support anyway.)

  • Dave

    Let me guess they will have a shrine dedicated to Emily Murphy, the woman that hated anyone non-white.

    Real Champion to human rights there.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Government touched it. Costs soar. It goes ahead anyways, of course.

    Pure private sector with costs that balloon: Project is mercifully killed.

    Anyone else recognize the irony of the first and lasting legacy of a HUMAN RIGHTS venue being the increasing coerced obligation of taxpayers to fork over for it?

From Macleans