Bitterness is our birthright, people

Psychiatry now calls it an illness, but if being bitter is wrong why did God create blogs?

by Scott Feschuk on Friday, June 12, 2009 12:40pm - 18 Comments

Bitterness is our birthright, peopleThe world’s authoritative text on mental health is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Updated by psychiatrists since the 1950s, it lists all the ways in which humans can be nuts, and therefore features many big words and several photographs of Gary Busey.

The book—known among mental health professionals as the DSM, because that’s quicker to say than Big Book of Crazy—is currently being revised and expanded by the American Psychiatric Association. Eight new mental illnesses are being considered for inclusion in the next edition. This is very controversial, and not just because marrying Sean Penn isn’t one of them.

According to reports, the up-and-coming disorders vying to make the cut are:

Sex Addiction: Defined as “a pattern of repeated sexual relationships involving a succession of lovers who are experienced by the individual only as things to be used,” this disorder would classify as mentally ill several former U.S. presidents, all former Backstreet Boys and every man ever featured in a Coors Light commercial.

Binge Eating: This is described by psychiatrists as “a serious disorder in which you frequently consume unusually large amounts of food.” Statistics indicate this “illness” afflicts one out of every one Kirstie Alley.

Pathological Hoarding: Long considered a symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder, hoarding is on its way to being its very own syndrome. Sufferers just can’t let go. Think of old people with stacks of magazines from 1942 or Stephen Harper with power.

Internet Addiction: According to the APA, this addiction “consists of at least three subtypes: excessive gaming, sexual preoccupations and email/text messaging.” This raises a number of questions, such as how the APA gained access to my browser history.

And the list goes on. Do you go shopping a lot? You have a mental disorder. Are you “pathologically” biased in your views? You have a mental disorder. Are huge quantities of food disappearing from your fridge at night? You have a mental disorder—or Rosie O’Donnell as a house guest. Either way, you’re deeply troubled.

If some psychiatrists get their way, there will be yet one more affliction added: being bitter. Apparently, bitterness is not just a feeling we all have at some point—it’s a mental illness! Begin fitting Andy Rooney, Rush Limbaugh and Squidward for straitjackets—they’re all loco. So are Billy Bob Thornton, Jennifer Aniston and every person in the world after three beers.

Under proposed changes, the state of being bitter will be officially classified as post-traumatic embitterment disorder. One news story quoted the German psychiatrist who named the affliction as saying of its sufferers, “It’s one step more complex than anger. They’re angry plus helpless.” Angry plus helpless? In North America we refer to that condition as “looking at our RRSP statement.”

Enough already. Bitterness is the birthright of every citizen and the default state of every Baldwin. It’s a sign that we are alert and awake to the variety of ways in which our world is conspiring against us. I ask the American Psychiatric Association: if being consumed by a sense of injustice is wrong, why did God invent blogs and ulcers?

I suppose it could be argued that psychiatrists are just keeping up with the times. The 21st century is all about feeling special. We’re buoyed by people following our bursts of adjectives and emoticons on Twitter. Our kids are handed Olympic-calibre medals for finishing a 2K fun run. People as special as us can’t just be weird or unwilling to exercise self-restraint—we have to be ill.

Yesterday’s bad habit is today’s mental disorder. And today’s mental disorder is tomorrow’s pharmaceutical solution. It’s a good bet that by the time the new DSM is published in 2012, drug companies will have created new pills for these new disorders, complete with new side effects involving even longer and more dangerous erections. The New England Journal of Medicine recently discovered that more than half of the 137 psychiatrists working on the DSM have ties to the pharmaceutical industry. One U.S. professor found DSM working groups in which “every single person has ties” to drug companies.

But at a moment when good old-fashioned bitterness is being redefined as a disorder, perhaps it’s optimism that’s the real mental illness. There’s no good reason to feel it. There’s no rational excuse for expressing it.

Fear not, those of sunny disposition—I’m sure they’re working on a pill to “cure” you. In the meantime, to prevent serious injury, be sure to immediately consult your psychiatrist if you experience a smile lasting longer than four hours.

So congratulations, American Psychiatric Association: you have catalogued the full range of human behaviours, and defined almost every one of them as crazy. Commence charging $150 an hour to link them to our feelings about our mothers.

Bookmark and Share
  • Piper Woods

    Wow. I guess interesting. Maybe not. THere is only one "exBackstreet Boy" and he's been happily married for quite a few years. Is ignorance humorous?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Timentimeagain Timentimeagain

    I'd say you, Mr. Feschuk , are the one who has a bitterness problem.
    Oh, and the commenter above is correct, there is only one ex-Backstreet boy.
    Not doing your research isn't helping you out much.

    • GregRWJ

      Wow, the two of you are pretty bitter. Who cares if he got his facts wrong? It's still a funny column…

      But why so bitter about the Backstreet boys? I'd say you need some extensive sessions with your psychiatrist- they only charge $150 an hour!

  • HowieLover

    I'd have to agree with the post by "Timentimeagain"…all of it.

  • Claude

    Man, are those Backstreet Boys fans ever bitter! You're missing the point of the joke of the whole article.! This wasn't a scholarly research piece. (Scott – Am I right about this? I don't want you to be bitter about my comment.)

  • Lauren

    Yeah, this could have worked better with…any other boyband. The Backstreet Boys are still together, douche.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tceh Tceh

    Feschuk you a funny man. Don't listen to these other sad sacks. I just had a spontaneous laughing event (SLE) which I suppose is also not good on some level. Well off I go to self-medicate.

  • MJ Patchouli

    You got called a douche by a Backstreet Boys fan. Ha!

    Sorry but I find that hilarious. Up side is that you've clearly got some readers in their twenties — who knew?

    Frankly, I think it's high time they were referred to as the Backstreet Men, which sounds creepy, and is.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ScottFeschuk ScottFeschuk

      Being called a douche is tough to take only because i've worked so hard to define myself as an asshat.

  • Kevin

    The serious point within this humour was to alert people to the possible conflict of interest psychiatrists are in when they classify everything under the sun as an "illness", due to their ties to the drug industry.

    I feel the need to point this out, because so far, THREE different people appear to think the most serious thing about the article is the offhand joke about the Backstreet Boys. God save the Republic.

  • sol

    Mr. Feschuk,
    You really should have connected your article to this week's shenanigans involving Raitt and Baird and Harper and all the members of the House of Parliament. They are a study for all the psycho diseases or all the clowns or megalomaniae, etc., etc.,!
    Please, keep writing because today, in our age, many aspire to clowning and politicking and we cannot take anyone seriuously any more. The trouble is that the joke is on us and many of us are not aware or prefer ignorance….it is truly blissful.

    Sol

  • delford t louis

    enter age of post-cynicism…prophetically announced in the republic by plato….but i love the bantering and yes i agree the joke is on us!

  • Lindsay

    I love it. All of it.
    And I am a huge Backstreet Boys fan.

  • Amy

    Psychiatrists need to quit playing games with unborn babies' hearts!
    Yes I'm bitter.

  • humphrey b.

    While I can appreciate that this article is intended to shed light on the conflict of interest arising from the involvement of pharmeceutical companies with the development of the DSM-V, it comes across as insensitive and unresearched (and I'm not talking about the Backstreet Boys). For one, this article makes light of Binge Eating Disorder (which is included in the current version of the DSM-IV), by implying that this condition is not a true illness, but rather a way to excuse weight gain from over-indulgent eating. In one pithy article (with national distribution, no less), Mr. Feschuk has succeeded in undermining the efforts of individuals in the mental health industry to fight stigma and increase awareness of the difficulties facing individuals living with mental illnesses. The DSM is not only used by psychiatrists, and it is not intended to diagnose everyone or pathologize every human feeling, but rather to create a common language for professionals in the industry, so that they may work together and provide the best possible care for those who need it.

    • Charlie

      The DSM isn't some manual of scientific data. Amongst BSE are listed disorders such as chewing on pencils, dislike of math, etc. Right next to the "illnesses" and "disorders" are ID numbers used for insurance billing purposes. Those ID numbers are used right up until the time your insurance runs out and the doc says, "You're cured."

      It's a sham. The DSM isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/truemuse truemuse

    Soon there will be a bitter pill to swallow. My meds are coming!!

  • Steve Cornell

From Macleans