Categories: Polls
Print
Comment
33 Responses to “When should the Liberals attempt to bring down the federal government?”
- Col. Russell Williams' double life? - 128 Comments
- Credibility is what’s really melting - 326 Comments
- Maxime Bernier unplugged - 96 Comments
- Shy Adam Lambert comes to town - 62 Comments
- Our banking rules are smarter, not tighter - 36 Comments
Contrary to popular belief, the ceremonial lighting of the Olympic flame at the Opening Ceremonies is, in fact, a decidedly modern affair. The culmination of the torch relay in a grandiose display at the Opening Ceremonies is a relic of the 1936 Berlin Games—just one of many attempts by the Nazi regime to lend a mythical air to the Games. Still, despite its dubious history, the lighting of the cauldron has evolved into one of the most spectacular and ostentatious displays at the Games. And the secretiveness that surrounds the lead-up to the ceremony only lends to the hype.
When it comes to the 2010 Games, the speculation about who will be selected to light the cauldron has coalesced around whether VANOC will go the traditional route and opt for a former Olympian or take the road less-travelled and pick someone from outside the sports world. Facebook groups have popped up promoting everyone from Terry Fox’s mother, Betty, to former Vancouver Canucks captain Trevor Linden. So far, Vancouver’s Olympic organizers have kept a tight lid on who the potential candidates might be. We’ve assembled a list of the names making the rounds, but feel free to add your own in the poll or in the comments below.
From Macleans
Health
Could cows hold the cure for Crohn’s?
A pathogen found in cattle may lead to a cure for Crohn’s disease
Andrew Coyne
Our banking rules are smarter, not tighter
ANDREW COYNE: Obama’s banking reforms would make the U.S. and Canadian systems even less alike than they are at present
Beyond The Commons
The Commons: Jack Layton doing as Jack Layton does
In all sorts of ways, it’s difficult to imagine him ever stopping
Arts & Culture
Shy Adam Lambert comes to town
The ‘American Idol’ runner-up shares his views on gays on TV and the ‘closed-minded’
Colby Cosh
The Wardrobe Malfunction Paradox
Colby Cosh on the current state of the Super Bowl halftime show—and how to fix it
Arts & Culture
Tales of over-the-top Christmas
In a wealthy suburb, a writer discovers people who take celebrating to a whole new level
Newsmakers
Friend in high places, Dog tired and Bubba’s other bombshell
Newsmakers of the week
Sick & tired of this "Iggy" blackmailing Harper!!!! If I was Harper I'd tell him where 2 go–& welcome an election. Who in their right minds– would vote for an arrogant–pompous–threatening– blackmailing—aloof–"Iggy"–with no platform-policies–principals–convictions of his own–just offering maple syrup– will not do! Do we really want to look a t this Iggy for a term of 4 years? He better look in the mirror & decide–what he really stands for– so far "nothing"!!!!!!
Pretty hilarious. That sounds like a perfect description of Harper. Projection, anyone?
Ah yes, Iggy, the Convenient Canadian, vs Harper, a Proud Canadian. This is kinda like Mordicai Richler vs Pierre Burton, or maybe Celine Dion vs Anne Murray. Ig is a pompous wannabe who has bought his way this far, and the only thing between him and his prize is… the millions of Canadians who didn't vote for him. I say bring on the summer run for the roses and watch us all stir from our GI Lager, Labatt's 50 and Moosehead long enough to send him camping in Siberia for good!
Ohh right, the Iggy as not Canadian enough argument. As flawless as it is beautiful.
And what is the measure used to define what is Canadian? Would it be someone from a smaller-populated province whose views run counter to a majority of Canadians? Perhaps only middle-aged white people with non-visible tattoos? Those from the suburbs who appreciate rural Canada? Perhaps it is only rural Canadians who are truly Canadian anymore?
(part 2, as there are unspecified length limits…)
As soon as you start compartmentalizing 'Canadians' and defining for them who they are, you cross a line.
As a voter, you can decide for yourself how 'Canadian' you find all the candidates. As a person however, it is pretty deplorable how many people are willing to define other people contrary to how they define themselves.
What gives you the right (or clairvoyance) to tell other people who they are and how to define themselves? Are you a 19 year old scenester or something, trying to be more scene than your friends?
You are Canadian because it is convenient for you; you were likely born into it. Does that make you more Canadian therefore than immigrants? First-generation 'Canadians'? Second-generation? How far back does ones roots have to go (without a few decades anywhere else of course) until one can be a part of this 'Canada' of yours?
/end rant
Canadians have every right to know all about anyone who wants to be Prime minister. Iggy is a Canadian except he is more American, he did not come to Canada to live, he was recruited by the bankrupt, corrupt, devoid of leadership liberals. has not been elected leader, he lost when he ran.
ask any immigrant who has been away from his or her country for 3 decades they no longer understand the country that they have been out of, they care for it even love it but know it as it was 3 decades ago.
Iggy is shallow, he is not a leader, he is out of touch. i cannot believe the liberals, they had plenty of liberals, Makenna, Kopps, and others why bring in a stranger to Canada.
How's the new tinfoil hat fitting? Too tight?
Beautifully put Nich…
And then the young child pointed out that the Emperor has no clothes on. Now if only the Media will stop taking Harper at his word and actually make him back up his claims with facts, they to will be able to see what exactly Harper is wearing.
The option ''Never; the Conservatives should get a full mandate'' should not apply as the Government itself does not necessarily feel obliged to exercise its ''full mandate'' when it does not suit them.
Last year, under the guise of a ''dysfunctional Parliament'', Harper decided he wasn't going to go with the ''full mandate''… Truth is, he figured opportunity knocked, a majority awaited him. Wrong!!!
Today, opportunity has gone and left the Conservatives… The holes they have dug themselves (particularly in Quebec and Ontario) are likely insurmountable. If they want to govern, it 's on this mandate.
The only problem is they do not know how to govern within the confines of the mandates they were issued (minority).
I think they meant Man Date.
I for one am tired of the Liberals getting in the way of progress. If they truly cared about Canada they would stop bickering and start getting things done. Its bad enough we pay the gov't as much as we do for how little time they actually spend at work, you would think they would want to make the most of it.
I'd love to see some specifics on how exactly the Liberals are getting in the way of progress. We wouldn't even have a stimulus package that Harper is so desperate to save if it hadn't been for the threat of the coalition.
And we would also have a much smaller deficit too.
yeah right, like Jim Flaherty could be trusted to keep your lunch money safe…
I for one am tired of the Conservatives getting in the way of progress. If they truly cared about Canada they would stop bickering and start getting things done. Its bad enough we pay the gov't as much as we do for how little time they actually spend at work, you would think they would want to make the most of it.
Your statements are unfounded, or if they are founded, they are founded in foolishness and misinformation.
First of all, the Liberals aren't blocking anything. Second of all, even if they were, that's what democracy is about. We didn't elect a dictator, and we don't appoint an unchecked politburo. By suggesting that any MP's are getting in the way of progress, you are also implying that the majority of Canadian voters who didn't vote for the government are undeserving of their fair representation.
Next point.
Politicians work hard. We joke about "summers off" and weeks away from the HoC, but during that time, most politicians are meeting with their constiuency, attending events, and generally being accessible to the electorate…including on weekends, evenings, and everything else.
They are professionals, and deserve the breaks they get. It's such a load of crap to suggest they don't work for their money.
Who cares, the poll indicates exactly what will happen, another consevative minority and the election will just be another waste of time.
You are right Greg. It is time we stick to the 4 year platform which Harper had put through, times have changed, it is time to forget the long past ways and implement the 4 year plan and stick to it. We are in a financial crisis, the only ones that win from spending 300 million every year for an election is the news networks which are mostly foreign owned.
4 year plan… sounds so Stalinish. Going to try growing cotton in the Yukon next? Maybe some gulags.
Every poll in the last month has indicated that an election today would result in a Liberal minority.
So how does that reconcile with the 2 day old poll that read 78% of Canadians don't want an election!
Canadians are not in any mood for a change of government.
Which translates into Canadians thinking a Liberal government wouldn't do anything differently/better than the one we have.
How is that a rebuttal? Canadians never want an election. Who outside of politicos says "Yay we're having an election!" Do you break out the kegger and fire up the bbq and hot tub because the writ is dropped?
Apples and oranges.
Oh yeah, you don't speak for any other Canadian than yourself Wilson.
It is plain to see that most of your comments come from Rt. wing, Ultra rt. wing conservatives. Stephen Harper is a dictator in sheep's clothing. He is waiting to pounce. I don't care where someone comes from out of the blue, as long as he can strip this arrogant woman hating, minority hating phony out in the garbage! Canada deserves better. You business people are being herded like sheep! Stevie is a devious manipulative thing and it is obvious men don't get it. Why do think the caucus is not allowed to speak to the press? His wife will not be interviewed by the media. It is obvious she is too shy and he would not allow it anyway. Wake up Canada! Our rites are being eroded! The gov't tried to bury t he story about Lisa Raitt. They even took it to a high court in Nova Scotia. Thank God they lost. Our democracy is slowing going away. We need some good creative people who are not afraid of The thing that occupies the PM's chair.
At least Harper was 'elected ' by his party and Canadians to lead the country.
'We need some good creative people who are not afraid of The thing that occupies the PM's chair. '
Oooooh, somebody is very upset.
Bob Rae fan, are we?
Who funded Harper's nomination for the leadership of the Canadian Alliance Wilson? So many unanswered questions about that man you admire, such ethical hypocrisy.
Harper was elected as a member of parliament by the residents of his riding. Regardless of the popularity contest you are implying he was not elected by Canadians.
Sorry, but that is how the system works.
try being a bit nicer to them in the future. And dont give them mentos and diet coke.
It's a minority government so it's going to fall anyway whether Steven Harper calls an election or the opposition topples it.
If we have an a election at least the poloticians will be lying to our(the people who do vote) face instead of parliment being in session and having them lying to each other with backroom deal after backroom deal.
JOHN TORY FOR MAYOR!!!!!!!!!
Please tell me where the progress is with the current government? It took the Liberals to force the Reform (they are not Conservative. Joe Clark had been dead set against them and retired when the two parties joined) party to admit Canada was being affected by the global economic downturn. They were in LALA land as well as us thinking where every country in the world is suffering but not Canada. Give me a break. After the farce of the last election, he then admits yeah Canada is suffering just like the rest of the world. Now with BS comment that we are coming out of it. I think I will grow a 2nd head if I were to believe anything that comes out of Harper's mouth and the so called Federal government. I welcome the change when the Liberals are back in power. Then, I'll believe Canada has a fighting chance. I am not one that is in LALA land like the majority of people that believe bucky beaver harper.
This is why we must move to fixed election dates. Now all our elected representatives do is posture and play games instead of running the country. If after four years we don't like them turf them out but in the meantime the conservatives were elected to govern. I will vote against any party that wastes our money by deliberately causes an election.
Nothing will ever work as long as corruption reigns in Canada. That is what really governs this country. It is in your face obvious. Look at the monster, Gordon Campbell, convince me, that he isn't corrupt. Every election, we get all the mud slinging politicians and he who lies the best wins. Canada, is #20 on the list of the most corrupt country's, and falling more every day. Guess which are the top two reasons? Our politicians, and the RCMP. Out of all the government agencies, I only found one that isn't corrupt. So, forgive my contempt, that is all I can muster right now.