Why Canada ranks eighth for peace

If not for our soldiers overseas, we would have ranked higher

by Stephanie Findlay on Monday, June 15, 2009 3:00pm - 8 Comments

Why Canada ranks eighth for peaceCanada is the eighth most peaceful country in the world, according to the 2009 Global Peace Index. We might have done better, if it weren’t for the troops in Kandahar.

Canada’s mission in Afghanistan prevented a top five spot, says Clyde McConaghy, president of the Global Peace Index. We also fell in the ranking because of our “high military sophistication,” scoring a three out of five for “the actuality and likelihood of gearing up for violence.” Canada slipped further because of a high likelihood of a terrorist attack and an increase in jailed criminals.

Still, we’re up from 11th place last year, and the Global Peace Index report attributes that rise to an “improvement in the score for the level of respect for human rights.” Canada’s politically stable climate also helped us to secure a top-10 place. “There are some areas that could be improved,” but Canada does “really well,” says McConaghy. “Actually, it’s an example.”

The recent edition of the Global Peace Index was composed of 23 indicators including human rights, gender equality and democratic participation. Weights were assigned to the indicators to produce a final score. This year Iceland fell from first to fourth place because of an “unprecedented collapse in the country’s financial system.” New Zealand is now on top, followed by Denmark and Norway, and Iraq remained in last place, despite improving its score. It had the highest possible score for homicide rate, level of violent crime, and potential for terrorist attacks.

McConaghy says there are “tentative signs” of a causal relationship between peace and the strength of the economy, and he hopes the study will direct policy and business decision makers to make peace, not war. “Canada would benefit US$200 billion per annum in terms of economic activity in absence of violence,” he says.

Bookmark and Share
  • Terry S

    Do these people do no research? Compared to the size of its population Denmark makes a significantly larger contribution to NATO in Afghanistan then we do (we have 4 times as many troops deployed but 6 times the population) and they're in an equally active region (Helmand). Denmark also had almost 600 combat troops in Iraq for many years. Obviously that didn't pose a problem for their ranking on this ridiculous "peace" index.

    • Bill Jones

      Despite NATO's highest Afghan casualty rate,. Europe's most successful social democracy (education, health care, employment, standard of living, cell phone usage, Internet access – Denmark ranks near the top)) continues to support involvement in Afghanistan:

      Danes support Afghanistan ops

      http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article740717.e…

      Twenty-four Danes have now been killed in Afghanistan since Denmark deployed troops at the end of 2001, giving the Scandinavian country the highest per capita death rate among NATO forces in the war-torn country.

      http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeq…

  • Chris G

    So what we are 8th? Its just a label. Canada is still a wonderful place to live. Its not like if this thing told us we were 30th anything would change. Its a rating based on variables that most of us in Canada thankfully don't even see. When we start having public massacres of terrorist attacks in the streets ill feel concerned. Until then, this system means nothing to me.

  • Dan Hardy

    So you're better if you allow unpeaceful behaviour to go on unabated? Wow, really progressive. Switzerland and Sweden would have ranked higher than Britain and the US during WWII. Great idea.

  • vector

    The criteria for this peace index is silly. Go look it up. You can make any out come you want by just changing the variables or the weight of the variables.

    The US might have a higher peace index if it let Europe burn in the next war. Won't that make us feel superior!

  • Dieter Sprockets

    We're getting better. Now that we've given up ou image a s a nation of cops for cancer, girl guides unlimited, and high priests on top of Mount Pious, we are learning that the world is beginning to take us a little more seriously.

  • JB Digriz

    Of course this "peace index" is a joke: Libya is ranked 46th?
    The biggest joke, of course, is that so many media outlets actually waste their time and ours reporting on this, and giving credence to a very marginal and questionable organization.

  • Dieter Sprockets

    If we want number one spot, we will have to train our soldiers on easy bake ovens rather than anti-tang guns, teach them to lob bagged lunches from the safety of 32 000 feet, teach them run like hell, if someone;s firing at them, and teach them to believe that we are the evil doer and are obligated to atone for past sins.

From Macleans