Europe’s great shift to the right

Will the apathy and rage seen this week now spill over into national elections?

by Jonathon Gatehouse on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:10pm - 21 Comments

Arguably, the more pressing concern for the European Union is the substantial gains made by parties like UK Independence, which doesn’t believe in its model of economic and political integration. Now there is a significant portion of the European Parliament that (much like the Bloc Québécois in Ottawa) is fundamentally at odds with the institution and its goals, actively seeking to reduce its size and powers—hardly the tonic needed to drive up plummeting voter turnout. In large part, the EU has only itself to blame for the increasing sense that it is irrelevant. The economic crisis has hardly been its finest hour. As unemployment soars across the Continent and the banking crisis spreads, member nations have been squabbling about who deserves to be bailed out, with the rich west mostly spurning the poorer former Soviet Bloc. And rather than acting in concert, for the good of Europe as a whole, powerhouses like France, Britain and Germany have been shoring up their own industries (like the deal Angela Merkel cut with Canada’s Magna to save 35,000 German jobs at Opel) and passing laws to protect domestic markets.

It’s the paradox that has long plagued the organization. “By any means the EU is a staggering success. It has contributed to five decades of peace and prosperity. Countries are lined up to join,” says Randall Hansen, director of the Centre for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at the University of Toronto. “But there is a mismatch with public perception. People view it as ineffectual and somehow out of touch.” And that public desire to politically rebuke the EU’s elites has been on increasing display since 2005, when voters in France and the Netherlands rejected a proposed European constitution. Efforts to water down the treaty and make it more palatable have also failed, with Irish voters turning up their noses in 2008.

Whether that creeping dissatisfaction, along with the economic angst and immigrant scapegoating, are creating the conditions for fascism to again rise on the continent is now a matter of open debate. Hansen doubts it. “There’s always been a huge degree of anti-immigration sentiment in Europe,” he says. “But this is not the 1930s. There are huge political and social constraints on the far right. In order to achieve power, they have to change the message and broaden their base.”

But in some parts of Europe, the extremists are undeniably gaining popularity. Last fall, in the Austrian election, the far-right Freedom and Alliance for the Future parties captured a combined 28 per cent—one point behind the ruling Social Democrats. In Denmark, the anti-immigrant Danish People’s Party remains the third largest political force with 25 seats. British historian David Kynaston says he does see parallels with Germany’s pre-war years, most notably in the economic crisis that threw millions out of work. “The Wall Street Crash took place in 1929, but it wasn’t until January 1933 that Hitler became chancellor of Germany,” he writes on the Guardian’s website. This recession has already seen an uptick in populist anger against bankers, and a declining faith in government. Low voter turnout may just be the canary in the coal mine. “People who, a generation ago, did not used to be cynical about politics now are. Worse still, people are not just indifferent to politics, they are ignorant about it.”

Bookmark and Share
  • hosertohoosier

    I don't think it is accurate to attribute these anti-immigrant sentiments to the rise of the "far right". In eastern Europe the most pro-Europe and pro-tolerance parties tend to be liberal parties (in the European sense), which we would consider fiscally conservative. In western Europe, there is a krypto-fascist far right but in some cases it draws support from the disgruntled old left. For instance, the best ridings for the BNP are usually Labour strongholds.

    Most interestingly, while this article emphasizes Geert Wilders, it doesn't mention Pim Fortuyn. Fortuyn was, if anything, an anti-immigrant crusader from the new left – he was openly gay, an environmentalist, and an opponent of Muslim immigration because (in part) of the value disconnect between the freewheeling Dutch culture, and the conservative values of Islam. There is a portion of the Dutch electorate that is violently intolerant of people that it deems intolerant. That shouldn't surprise anybody who has listened to most American liberal describe social conservatives (if you ask "why are people conservative" on dailykos, for instance, I would bet "brain damage" would be neck-in-neck with "the Hitler gene").

  • HoweeCarr

    No more fearsome than any rise or shift to the Left, be it in Europe, the Americas, or elsewhere. More misery and death have been unleashed under the banners of the Left (Marxism, Stalinism, Maoism, Castro, Shining Path, Pol Pot, the Krazy Korean Kim family- feel free to add your own!) including the shared soft mediocrity that is socialism, than by their peers on the Far Right.

  • joe

    why would someone support immigration, legal or illegal? there is ZERO benefit to having a mass influx of foreigners into your country. Let me repeat that..ZERO benefit…and no, diversity is NOT a benefit..

    • Gevulde Koek

      Actually, you're absolutely mistaken. The idea that immigration and cultural diversity are harmful – be it with regards to economic growth, social solidarity, welfare spending – has been thankfully put to rest by several studies (Kymlicka and Banting, 2003, in particular).

      Sorry to shatter an idea that you apparently hold very dear. Time to look for another scapegoat.

  • Pingback: Europe’s great shift to the right - Macleanans | Geopolitica OnLine

  • scf

    "far right"? Gimme a break. There's nothing "right" about them. They are a ragtag group of protest parties.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

      I agree. If the related article about Fascism is using the label properly it's in everyone's interest to put the left-right dichotomy aside because that distinction dissolves as arbitrary power progresses and individualism caves to conformity.

      "Right" in the sense that select private enterprise benefits from the authority of the State but as the Austrians pointed out during their heyday, it ain't your pappy's idea of a boardroom. (not that it ever has been)

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

      I agree. If the related article about Fascism is using the label properly it's in everyone's interest to put the left-right dichotomy aside because that distinction dissolves as arbitrary power progresses and individualism caves to conformity.

      "Right" in the sense that select private enterprise benefits from the authority of the State but as the Austrians aptly pointed out during their heyday, it ain't your pappy's idea of a boardroom. (not that it ever has been) Case in point, though gravely effected by it, in his seminal work Hayak hardly uses the term Fascism "The Road to Serfdom" at all.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

      I agree. If the related article about Fascism is using the label properly it's in everyone's interest to put the left-right dichotomy aside because that distinction dissolves as arbitrary power progresses and individualism caves to conformity.

      "Right" in the sense that select private enterprise benefits from the authority of the State but as the Austrians aptly pointed out during their heyday, it ain't your pappy's idea of a boardroom. (not that it ever has been) Case in point, though gravely effected by it, in his seminal work Hayak hardly uses the term Fascism "The Road to Serfdom" at all. He thought he had it covered.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

      I agree. If the related article about Fascism is using the label properly it's in everyone's interest to put the left-right dichotomy aside because that distinction dissolves as arbitrary power progresses and individualism caves to conformity.

      "Right" in the sense that select private enterprise benefits from the authority of the State but as the Austrians aptly pointed out during their heyday, it ain't your pappy's idea of a boardroom. (not that it ever has been) Case in point, though gravely effected by it, in his seminal work Hayak hardly uses the term Fascism in "The Road to Serfdom" at all. He thought he had it covered.

  • http://www.jubalbiggs.wordpress.com Jubal

    The author cannot seem to understand the feeling of most Europeans that the EU is "out of touch", and is surprised that over 200 million people didn't vote given that the EU now creates about two thirds of all laws in Europe. Well, has he actually studied the structure of the EU at all? Compared to the commission, the EU parliament has about enough power to ask for a kleenex, so long as the Commission signs off on the expenditure. While the unelected Commission creates two thirds of all law in Europe, the citizens are supposed to be happy with a powerless sop like the debate society called the EU Parliament? To call it a Parliament is a joke. It is a fig leaf. European voters are not stupid, and they are reacting predictably to the dilution of democracy in Europe.

  • Fed up

    imagine that you invite a family to live in your home. Soon you find that 'they' don't like the way you live and demand that you only watch what they like on TV and demand that you stop living as you have for your entire life. They also tell you that you must change all the rules in your house.That is what open immigration has done to the UK and the EU.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Econ_Guy Econ_Guy

    “I think we’re in for a very hard few years,” says Heather Grabbe, director of the Open Society Institute in Brussels, a democracy-building NGO financed by billionaire George Soros. “It’s the politics of fear. Of course she does-Has anyone else grown concerned about George Soros? He almost bankrupted England shorting the currency, now he is meddling all over the world. Here in the US thee is growing group who believes he helped engineer the financial crisis to install our Muslim President

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Econ_Guy Econ_Guy

    “I think we’re in for a very hard few years,” says Heather Grabbe, director of the Open Society Institute in Brussels, a democracy-building NGO financed by billionaire George Soros. “It’s the politics of fear. Of course she does-Has anyone else grown concerned about George Soros? He almost bankrupted England shorting the currency, now he is meddling all over the world. Here in the US there is a growing group who believes he helped engineer the financial crisis to install our Muslim President

  • http://sanityinjection.wordpress.com Sanity Injection

    As the article notes, the EP vote was a protest vote designed to send an anti-incumbent message. Don't expect the results to be the same when people are voting for an office that actually matters to them.

  • Bernie

    The Gestalt is favorable to the promotion of Fascism. The present is strangely reminiscent of the Thirties. The question is whether the Europeans can summon enough energy to at least defuse the rising tide. As for the voters thety should always remember that General Von Schleicher was always a better choice than Adolf Hitler. Keep away from repeating that mistake.

  • Greg Bates

    Your Immigration problem is of your own doing (as it is of ours in Canada). Europe now has an appalling 1.38 baby/woman fertility rate. This means that your culture is dying. Every generation (27 years), your native population will decrease by 1/3!! How do you think you can sustain your economy and tax structure? Unless you are able to pay an extra 33% in TAXES on an already heavily burdened taxation policy, you must bring in immigrants to maintain your population and tax base.

    My suggestion to you is: "Start making babies"!! You must average 2.11 babies per woman in order to maintain your culture, religion and tax base. Unfortunetely , I think it is too late for you guys as no culture has ever survived a fertility rate of 1.9 babies per woman (let alone Europe's 1.38 fertility rate).

    Check out this link…it's a reality check….

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

  • Pingback: Europe’s great shift to the right « THE BLACK KETTLE

  • Pingback: The Weekly Wilders Round-Up « Defend Geert Wilders

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/VladimirNik VladimirNik

    It looks like the author as an leftist totalitarian himself has no idea what he is talking about. Fascism (national socialism) is the left phenomenon as it shares the same worship to the Almighty State as the Left does. Wilders is a centrist- all he wants is a freedom of speech for every one, not only politically correct BS. Spectrum shifts to the center. Who said that the UK leftist Labour party with 15% is mainstream while UKIP with 17% is "fringe"?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/VladimirNik VladimirNik

    Bismark introduced socialism in Europe taxing people and returning them part of their money as a "pension" thus eliminating need to invest into your chirdren for your retirement. If you really want to cure demographics- fire 90% of the government, slash 90% of taxes and eliminate 90% of the socialist "entitlement" programs starting with usurped by the government retirement programs. DOn't forget free market and a return of individual freedoms instead of soft-totalitarian Nanny State dictatorship. Follow the R. Reagan advices-only then the Europe has a chance to survive.Then investing in your kids will make sense. DOn't have guts to do so? Well, then you will prove that social democracy is a dead end of civilization. Literally. Welcome to Eurostan.

From Macleans