Britain's unravelling

The expenses scandal is a blow to the entire political establishment

by Michael Petrou on Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:00am - 19 Comments

Local elections in Britain are fought on party lines and tend to reflect national political fortunes. With local and European elections taking place this month, anti-Brown plotters suspected—rightly, it turns out—that the results would be dismal for Labour. Several ministers resigned to weaken Brown in advance of the election results. Brown then faced the additional humiliation of trying to reshuffle his cabinet with MPs who didn’t want the job.

The resignations continued this week. Environment Minister Jane Kennedy quit on Monday and declared she could no longer support Brown’s leadership. A draft email asking Brown to step aside was circulated with the understanding that it would not be sent unless 50 MPs attached their names to it. Other rebels pushed for a secret ballot. Their goal, one way or the other, was to force Brown to step down. His replacement would likely have been the current home secretary, Alan Johnson, who publicly defends Brown while holding out the possibility that he may one day run to succeed him.

The Labour mutiny, however, has failed. While David Cameron describes the sparring as a “slow dance of political death,” Brown proved to be more resilient than the plotters had anticipated. First he hung on by his compulsively chewed, bloody fingernails. Then he fought back and was finally able to put together a cabinet that, for now, will stand behind him. His critics retreated. It turns out they’re not so brave after all. They’ll plot a coup but don’t have the guts to carry one out.

Gordon Brown’s refusal to roll over is more than stubborn pride. He believes—with some justification—that Labour MPs want to sacrifice him to appease voters who are furious at them because of the expenses scandal. The rebel MPs, on the other hand, calculated that Labour’s electoral prospects are so dire that Brown should fall on his sword for the good of the party. Few expect Labour to win the next general election anymore, but some MPs fear that the defeat under Brown could doom the party for a generation or worse.

“Nobody is using the ‘Canada word’ yet, but anyone who knows anything about the history of Canada will know that it’s not inconceivable for a major political party to be reduced to a small number of seats,” says Travers, the LSE professor. Canada’s once powerful Progressive Conservative party won only two seats in the 1993 federal election and ceased to exist a decade later. “That is the kind of threat they all feel hovers over them.”

A poll this week suggested that Labour would do better in the next general election if Alan Johnson were leader rather than Gordon Brown. On the other hand, there is some logic in allowing Brown to lead Labour into the next election, due by next June. He’ll absorb a beating before stepping aside for a new leader, untainted by defeat.

Either way, Brown, though still standing, has been wounded beyond recovery. His role in reviving the Labour Party and helping lead it to three electoral triumphs has been overshadowed by everything that’s happened since. “It’s an unfair world,” says James Hanning, deputy editor of the Independent on Sunday. “He’s waited 10 years for the job, and was in many ways the architect of New Labour. He didn’t get much credit for it when Blair was in power, and now he’s inherited it when everyone is fed up. The pendulum does swing. You can say that’s unfair, but I’m not sure what Gordon Brown or anybody else can do to prevent that.”

It’s a story that’s almost tragic, in the real, theatrical sense of the term. While Brown likened himself to Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights, British journalist Anne McElvoy sees parallels with another tormented character in British literature. “Now he resembles a political King Lear, a once towering figure on the blighted Labour landscape, the storms of the expenses crisis and economic turbulence howling around him,” she writes, and notes in his resolution a drift toward fatalism, as when Lear declared: “I am tied to the stake and must stand the course.”

Brown’s last stand does have a touch of noble defiance about it. But whether the storm buffeting Brown persists for days or months, it’s unlikely to end with another chance at redemption. Gordon Brown’s political career is ending. All that’s left for him to decide is how, and perhaps when, he faces his downfall.

Bookmark and Share
  • Pingback: Britain’s unravelling | WhoSayWhatWhen

  • valwayne

    As an American I clearly don't have a good understanding of British politics. I was incredulous when you booted a successful PM..Tony Blair..and can only sit back and look at what is currently going on with Gordon Brown with a sense of….well…you got what you asked for. However, I'm truly envious that you British are close to being able to oust your current nightmare. In America we wanted change also and picked a man who is now leading us down "The Road to Hell". And we are stuck with him for another 31/2 years.

    • hosertohoosier

      Tony Blair wasn't that successful. His domestic policies were roughly the same as those of his predecessors, and his international adventures were an utter failure. He was fairly unpopular, and polled behind the Conservatives. He won in 2005 with only 36% of the vote (Labour benefits from the distribution of seats), despite a relatively strong economy. Give him the expenses scandal and the present recession, and he might be doing worse than Brown in the polls today.

  • John D. Froelich

    I agre that, in a parliamentary system, Obama might already be gone. I am predicting a strong populuist surge in 2010 and '12, similar to Reagan's.

    • Will

      You people really must only speak to people with the exact same opinions as yourselves. Have you not noticed that Obama's approval rating is over 60% during an unprecedented recession?

      • Old Fart

        And have you not noticed that approval of President Obama's policies is well below 50% and falling? Personal popularity only goes so far when you drive the country off a cliff…

        • PEIMAC

          Yes he maybe taking them off the cliff but he's doing it with an American domestic.

  • Glen in SF

    "Politicians as hard-working and more or less altruistic"? I may be just a dumb provincial American, but I don't think many of my fellow citizens would ever apply those adjectives to our politicians. For better or worse, our society was founded on the principles of limited government — not on the illusion of a benevolent, honest, centralized bureaucracy that always had our best interests at heart. I suppose this explains my bewilderment as to why so many Britons have yielded so much control over their daily lives to government officials. I guess they just trusted them?

    • hosertohoosier

      Politicians work much longer hours (certainly more than 40 hours a week), have terrible job security (they can get fired every four years are so) and are paid rather poorly for it. Because the public is so hostile to raising MP salaries, you get stuff like the expenses scandal.

      Incidentally, US government as a % of GDP is set to pass Canada and I would think Britain very soon. You guys spend more per capita on education and healthcare through your tax dollars than we do too, so it isn't just defence.
      http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolut…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/The_Cynic The_Cynic

    including, the newspaper alleges, information that would have been omitted when expenses details were made public.

    And they have been made public and look what you get: http://vpcyn.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/yeah-transp…

    What is most spectacular about the redacting is that most of the information that is blacked out has already been published by The Telegraph – MPs were offered the chance to look over what was to be published and say what they needed reacting. Odd that.

    You say that Brown was the architect of New Labour, whereas this is true in part, it is not fully – you leave off Peter Mandleson who, even now – a Lord and a member of the government – is still, essentially in charge.

    "New" Labour is a project that is, thankfully dead in the water – the defeat that is facing them will be welcomed by a vast majority of the British people. Those include many like myself who are truly left-wing. I supported Blair when he won in '97 – I have said it elsewhere and I will say it again, the morning where he walked down Downing St to take office I cried like a baby because the vile Conservatives had been crushed. I will now cheer when New Labour are done – I never thought I would ever say that – but I do, often and publicly.

    New Labour abandoned the working-class, the poor and so many others – Blair believed power was what mattered – and from then on in they lost my support.

    They claim to be left of centre – I would argue that they are, in fact, right of the Conservatives, the most left-wing in mainstream politics in the UK now could be said to be the LibDems – and it is they who I will be voting for come the next election.

    • scf

      Aren't you living in fantasy land. Your left wing fantasies don't mesh well with reality, as Labour has shown, but still you fail to wake up and smell the coffee. What you see in Britain is the typical result when you hand over such power to the government. They will abuse it.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Andrewp111 Andrewp111

    Maybe Labor should ditch Brown and bring back Blair. How could they do worse?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

      That might well be the only possible way.

  • scf

    Talk about a lame duck government. The fact that Brown considers to govern under these circumstances is a disgrace. He is a power-monger.

    • hosertohoosier

      They have done polls of other prospective Labour leaders – none poll much better than Brown. I kind of like Gordon Brown, but it looks like he is the Paul Martin (or Paul Keating if you're Australian) of the Labour party. He spent so long chasing the crown that he forgot why he wanted it in the first place.

  • dcm

    Gordon Brown's stategy is to delay the election for a year. The signs in the economy is of a start of recovery. He wants to go into the election saying he guided Britian through the worst recession. This is Labour's best strategy. I am a Canadian that has been living in Britian for the last 10 years. I watched the Tories revolving door in the leadership. It just doesn't work.

    As far as I'm concerned I've never seen 3 parties with so much in common. They are all falling over themselves to be in the middle. I'll make my decision next year.

  • Dudley Do-Right

    Expenses scandal? That's a distraction and light hearted romp compared to the financial scandal.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

    Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, for example, charged taxpayers for pornographic films her husband rented. But these revelations were only a sputtering stream of water dribbling through a leaky dike."

    LOL. Subtle, yet risqué.

  • jay

    The old PM looks like he could use a drink :)

From Macleans