I bought a car and it nearly killed me

A man of a certain marital status, age, self-consciousness is not simply buying a car. He is telling the world how he sees himself.

by Andrew Coyne on Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:20am - 43 Comments

I bought a car and it nearly killed meTo know why the American auto industry is in such a mess, you only have to ask my neighbours. Once, long ago, the aspirational young couples and empty-nesters on my midtown Toronto street might have driven American cars. Now they would rather be on fire.

Walking down the street, I count several Audis, a few BMWs, a couple of Volvos, the odd Mercedes-Benz or Saab. Not an American car in sight. Why? Much has been made of Detroit’s history of poor quality, and deservedly so. But it isn’t really about that. If it were about quality, or safety, or price, or any of the things people claim to care about when they buy a car, my neighbours would have all bought Japanese and Korean. That the street is instead tiled with European cars tells you something else was on their minds. And that something is self-image.

It isn’t really cars the Europeans are selling us. It’s Europe. Tooling about in the climate-controlled interior of his Audi A4 or BMW 335, the mid-towner can briefly imagine he lives in Berlin or Paris, and not in ghastly dull Toronto. Mind you, not just any European car will do. You are unlikely to see many French or Italian cars parked in front of my neighbours’ houses. But a German car precisely meets our complex psychological needs, reflecting back to us our desired image of ourselves: stylish, yet stable.

On another street, you might find other cultural codes prevail, and other cars proliferate: flashy Italian, sensible Japanese, even those insipid American cars my neighbours find so alien. Every purchase is the product of a cross-current of different sociological urges and identifications—age, class, race, and so on—which the buyer, as much as the seller, must navigate successfully. I should know, for I have just bought a car. And it nearly killed me.

You have to understand: when a man, especially a man of a certain age, marital status and self-consciousness, buys a car, he is not simply buying a car: the business takes on all the complex symbology of a graduate class in semiotics. You are telling the world how you see yourself, and how you want others to see you, and how you suspect they see you, and how you suspect they suspect you suspect they see you, and—well I told you it was complicated.

The basic rule is that any car you really want to drive you really don’t want to drive. That hot little two-seater? Forget about it. Looks like you’re having a mid-life crisis. Or you’re trying too hard. Or you’re compensating for something. On the other hand, go to the other extreme and buy a Taurus, and it means you’ve given up. Or never started.

There are any number of other rules you must learn, without being taught. The car you buy cannot cost too much, but neither can it cost too little. It can have leather seats, but not burl walnut trim. It should not be bland, but on no account can it be interesting. For interesting—an antique car, say—is halfway to whimsical, and whimsy in a man’s car has something of the overripe to it, like a deerstalker hat. Or an ascot.

Then there’s the phenomenon of the “chick car.” Automakers live in fear of this, for if at any moment the culture suddenly takes it into its head that something is a chick car, half its market drops out overnight. And yet for just about any car you will find someone who will decree, with utter authority, that it is a chick car. That rules out not only the Miata or Mini—cars whose chief sin appears to be that they are well-made, cheap and fun to drive—but also certain species of Audi, Lexus, and every car ever made by Volkswagen.

And who are the enforcers of this ludicrous orthodoxy? In my experience, women. A Mini, a woman of impeccably progressive and feminist leanings told me at a party, says one thing: I have a small penis. Another said with a shudder she would refuse to open the door if her date showed up in a Miata. I looked at her to see if she was joking. She wasn’t.

I suppose it’s a kind of revenge. A car is for a man what clothes are for a woman: an opportunity for others to judge you. You wear a car the way you wear a suit of clothes. You are putting on the same set of vanities and insecurities in yourself, the same prejudices and assumptions in the viewer.

In my own case, this is overlaid with filial guilt. My father has only ever driven a Ford—the cheapest, most practical Ford he could find. This is because my father is a better man than I am. I know that I should be more like him, and yet I fail. I am weak, and my willingness to spend more than $15,000 on a car is further proof of it.

So I cannot help seeing some sort of divine retribution in this coda. After months of dithering, I finally settled on a car: a nifty little BMW 128i, in “space grey.” Sporty, yet dignified, I thought. (Chick car, I can hear some reader snorting.) Picked it up last Thursday, wheeled about in it for a bit, feeling alternately pleased and sheepish. That evening, as I was driving downtown, a cop ran a red light and smashed into me. They had to tow the car to the shop.

My shallowness and self-importance, they left spread-eagled on the road.

Bookmark and Share
  • Mulletaur

    I hope you weren't injured !

    Your Daddy is a wise man. And Ford never had to go begging to the government for money like GM and Chrysler. But then never has BMW to my knowledge ;->

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Be_rad Be_rad

    From current experience, a BMW is a treat to drive and a penance to own. For a so-called premium ride, they have taken to using cheap components that routinely break. The side mirrors oxidize and need to be replaced, the headlights fog up with condensation and the AM radio conks out because the leads from the amplifier oxidize (don't fall for the $1,500 fix when it is proposed, you can find a YouTube video to show how you can fix it yourself).

    But man, are they ever sweet to drive.

    Can the driving experience of a dependable Japanese premium model like Lexus or Infiniti equal it? If so, I'm in because increasingly the message buying BMW says to me is that I have more money than good sense.

    Hope you are OK – see that the officer of the law is charged with careless driving. They like to hand that one out like party favors for the slightest incident.

    • YTZ

      Keep your Bimmer in warranty…that's my strategy. If I wanted to ride, I'd buy a mercedes or a lexus. Since I like to drive BMW or Audi it is.

    • André

      Mazda.

      They are lauded everywhere for their fun to drive factor. They have an appeal thats lasts almost as long as their components. They don't break the bank. And are starting to get an edgy rep.

      Before trying any other car, try a Mazda.

      And by the way, only in america are Miatas considered chick cars. Because coming down the alps or mount Fuji, when the longest straight is 3 meter long, only agility matters. And in that, the Miata is King.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Be_rad Be_rad

        Sorry, but Mazdas are not even in the same class. Like Nissans, Toyotas and Hondas, they are fun, tight and cost effective to own, but they are not in the same league as BMW, Audi, Mercedes or other so-called premium makes that specialize in driving engineering. I Haven't yet driven a Lexus, Infiniti or other Japanese premium brand, but if they offer the same value features and ergonomics of thier less expensive cousins with the same drive experience of the ones above, then I'm in, because the Germans seem to have forgotten there is a human being involved in driving the thing and the outlandish problems and expensive fixes that come up – check the internet – are astonishing

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    Funny article, but I think you're wrong Coyne. Those of us who grew up watching our fathers bash their heads against the hoods of their (broken) Fords resolved never to buy anything that requires more than routine maintenance. Ergo, Japanese, Korean, and German cars are where it's at. Preferably Japanese.

    Six sigma. The Japanese refined it to break into the North American market. The Big 3 ignored it for 20 years on the premise that people would always 'buy American'. Now they're behind and they will likely never catch up. It was the combined errors of underestimating a hard-working competitor and overestimating the value of a brand.

    • Mulletaur

      "Those of us who grew up watching our fathers bash their heads against the hoods of their (broken) Fords …"

      Hah, total nonsense. You clearly work for a GM dealership.

      • André

        Nope, Fords broke down often as well until they started using Mazda and Volvo components.

        • Mulletaur

          Not in my era they didn't.

          • André

            What are you 10?

          • André

            Actually com to think of it there isn't any era where fords were known for their reliability. You clearly DON'T work at a ford dealership.

          • Mulletaur

            Did Ford go begging for a government subsidy to stay afloat ? No. I rest my case.

          • Matthew Fletcher

            That doesn't necessarily mean their cars are reliable. A car's tendency to breakdown does not equate directly to its company requiring government bailouts. There are only about a thousand other factors. Case dismissed.

  • Mike

    128i? Chick car indeed (snort). That being said, I'm so very glad BMW engineers cars like no other and that you are alive and well.

  • F.Pike

    Mr.Coyne: I enjoyed you column on your new car,but it is rather cheap.I drive around in a $250.000 vehicle with a fleet of drivers.It is called MetroBus and you can go anywhere for $2.00 driver included.PS I also enjoy seeing you on the national,and O yes I have a subscription to Macleans.

  • hosertohoosier

    Interesting article, and quite true. My parents would always buy stuff from Ford's Mercury line. Boring, reliable, and just pricey enough that they could feel a little better than the common man. "This isn't a puny Taurus, this is a Sable!"

    I have recently been looking at cars (on the much crappier end of the market than you), and it amazed me how far cheaper cars have come in the past ten years. Once upon a time, if you had no money, you might drive a k car or other cramped coffin – complete with a spartan interior that was a constant reminder of where you were in the market for automobiles. I think car companies clued in that even (indeed especially) those of us at the bottom of the market have aspirations. So today, when I get in a Fit, a Versa, a Yaris, an Accent or an Aveo I don't feel so much like somebody's poor cousin.

  • http://www.persiankitty.com 1luvruby

    What are Macleans paying their scibes these days?

  • George

    Hadn't pegged you as a car guy and you probably aren't. But had you moved up to the 135i, the extra turbocharged 70 h.p. might have given you the incentive to move along a little faster thus avoiding the police car and definitely avoiding the dreaded chick car status.
    Here in the middle class suburbia of Mount Pearl, Newfoundland, I drive a Honda Accord Coupe V6 with the 6 speed manual, of course.
    Growing up, my mother at one point labelled me as shiftless so I've always driven cars with manual transmissions as a joking response to that label. I don't know if my mother ever got the joke, but I went on to discover and enjoy to this very day, the joy of driving. It transcends cultural codes and is one of life's pleasures thaat you may not discover until you leave the environs of the GTA. Happy motoring!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/andrewcoyne Andrew Coyne

      The 135 is about $8,000 more. Call me a chick, but that's more than I can afford (to answer 1luvruby's question), or certainly more than I'm willing to pay for 70 hp I don't need. So maybe I am my father's son after all…

      • MJ Patchouli

        I'm disconcerted by the sub-thesis here: if you, a man, buy a certain car, you are labelled a "chick." Clearly, you don't want that, and so I take it the word connotes weak, or feminine or something that men don't want to be, not that I've seen many cars I consider feminine.

        So does this mean if a woman buys a truck, or an SUV, is she a — hmmm, what is the male equivalent of chick? Dude? And is that equally as bad as a man being called a chick? Or is it better because it's better to be manly than chicky?

      • Carol P.

        "So maybe I am my father's son after all… "

        You mean your father's daughter.

  • http://www.macleansfordummies.blogspot.com karen

    That car looks like a bowler hat! A bowler hat is something you take off and twirl on a stick. I'm not sure who is holding the stick. Those are my thoughts! Also I never learned how to drive. That way, I can always give control to whoever did learn how to drive and learn to trust. While I'm inside whatever car (always chauferred) I take zero responsibilty for the make, model, colour, etc. I make the car look good (or at least I want to…) so a poor choice is ok with me! I'm in it. Whoever is driving is LUCKY. That's just one femine p.o.v. :)

  • Neil from Calgary

    I just have to know one thing: does your 128i have an automatic or a manual transmission?

  • Hugo Del Pinga

    The moral of the story is that a government owned Ford Crown Vic hammered a 128i and Coyne is alive to write about it—and that Coyne has proven CDN politics is soooo boring that he's now a 'life & times' writer. I've never seen a Brinks truck at a funeral and safety, status, driving enjoyment, post sale service and overall choice have a value in western society. We work hard, take a pill for anything that ails us and the girl you end up marrying isn't the girlfriend you partied with and kept up with you ALL NIGHT. We don't have many escapes anymore but for some of us, the drive is all we have left. Now, if only we could sort out Coyne's State Farm adjuster. Remember, make sure they write it off. It'll never be the same car again.

  • sol

    My first car was an AMC Matador. It overheated on my way home and I was too young, too embarrassed (dumb) to bring it back and ask for my money back. There was no lemon law at that time in 1974. AMC cars were not just lemons–they were rotten lemons! It was so problematic that the company went bakrupt or was bought off by Chrysler ???__The next car was a 1980 Baby Blue Chev Cutlass Brougham. I bought it because my father always swore by GM (so I bought one mostly for my wife who liked it). The salesman was a big problem–he was from the Cro-magnon stage in the evolution of humanity. Most GM salesman have been similar or worse depending on what simian level they had reached in evolution. I don't really know

  • sol

    I don't really know who recruited them, but most left a bad feeling after leaving their offices and I never brought the cars back to be serviced by the company that had made them. My next car was a 1986 Chev Celebrity small engine–excellent on gas. The salesman was decent and actually reasoned with me after I presented my arguments for the price I was willing to pay for the car. It was the best overall value car. It lasted for ten years and I drove it to the ground!
    The next car was 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan–an excellent Family van but I had to argue and shout at the salesman for three days before we agreed on a price and then they said they could not find the car that they sold me. Then we had another day and a half of shouting and threatening until I told the manager that I would pay cash and he immediately found me a better car for the agreed price! Again the buying experience was atrocious even though the car was excellent! There is more !

  • mary

    oh boy, what you don't know about us "chicks" … is a lot!

  • J.R.

    A.C.,
    You "auto" focus on what really matters to us chicks….. we like men who are "road scholars".
    Good luck with the next vehicle.:) J.R.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hellomike hellomike

    This was completely enjoyable and I'm glad to see a little bit of summertime non-politics.

    Sucks about the car, for sure, but I'm glad you seem none the worse for wear and still able to predict 2012 elections!

  • 86er

    A cop running a red light? Well I never!

    Andrew, seeing as though a (probably) Crown Vic hit you, I'm guessing the 128 is no more?

  • George

    Actually, you get more for your $8000 than 70hp, for a total output of 300hp. The 135i has a stiffer suspension, larger brakes, 18-inch wheels with Bridgestone Potenza RE050A tires and the cachet of having a Bimmer that's lighter and faster than its 3-series big brother.
    No, I'm in no way affiliated with BMW.
    But this may be lost on you, Andrew because as I first suspected, you're not a car guy. You need an appliance! No offence but I think you'd be happier with a Buick!

  • Janie

    Andrew,
    You seem like a really fun and smart guy. If you showed up at my door in a Miata, I would get in! Not every woman is as judgmental as the 2 you mention. Just make sure your car is clean and in good shape. And oh yes, please hold the door open – gentlemen are the best!
    Janie

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Glad you made out all right from the collision, Andrew.

  • http://www.squibbsstationers.com Suri

    FYI — the 'progressive feminist' you mentioned has it backwards. A Mini or Miata says: "I am comfortable with my appendage and do not need to compensate for it". A Hummer and or a Navigator says definitively, "I have a small penis and/or low self esteem and need to drive around in a flashy but useless vehicle that makes people think that I am powerful and well endowed.". As well as being an environmental idiot!

    Methinks the lady doth protest too much — it's more a reflection of her own personal bias and her underlying need to be seen in a big flashy car. As the writer above noted, show up in a Miata and I would definitely get in! Mini, no problem.

    Glad to hear that you are okay and are still able to keep us engaged and informed!

  • Cooter from Alberta!

    aye new Coine was a lousy bims&w's drivin, frappsthechino swillin, ayetalian shoo wearzin, collidge edsamactionaled learn'd, i wash my hands after a peepee elitist (just likes Chantelles Herbet froms that commie paper). Theyee tooksarejaaaabs and ya cants drives a Dadge! were's Harper 1996 ta teach ya a lessin!

  • Drivesafe

    That is quite sad being bashed by a cop.

    If the car was totalled, try an Acura next time – all the bling and low maintenance. I have a 2nd hand beamer 2003 330i (20K) and now the trunk opener doesn't work. Trade-in time. It is a nice drive, but I found my former Acura to be more fun and loved my dealership. After warranty, owning a beamer is not fun, as one becomes a prisoner of the limited number of service people!

    The problem with ALL car makers is that they won't put nice bling in their 4-cylinders. This is the green answer! I want my leather seats, nice dashboard, amazing stereo, good looks and other options. What is the point of all the Hp if we have speed limits?

    Just so you know, girls of a certain age also have the image angst too. Like, who could buy a Volvo?

  • http://mailsasktel.net rbrooks

    "My shallowness…..they left spread-eagled on the road." Precisely! Your parents and grandparents generation saved Western civilization from Germany twice in the 20th century. Of course they drove Fords. Your article reveals more about Toronto attitudes than you probably intended.

  • http://economics.about.com Mike Moffatt

    Wow.. glad to hear you're alright!

    I'm used to reading you channel your inner Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Milton Friedman and Alfred Marshall. Must admit, I never thought I'd see a Thorstein Veblen-esque article from you.

From Macleans