If you’re smart, you’ll marry money

‘A man is not a financial plan,’ say these subversive experts, ‘but he can be part of one’

by Anne Kingston on Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:20am - 53 Comments

If you’re smart, you’ll marry moneyAt first glance, the new book Smart Girls Marry Money: How Women Have Been Duped into the Romantic Dream—and How They’re Paying for It by Elizabeth Ford and Daniela Drake appears to be a throwback to a paleolithic era in which women, smart or not, didn’t make their own money. (Its chick-lit hot-pink cover has Cupid’s arrow bisecting the “s” in “Girls,” lest anyone miss the avaricious point.) Indeed, its retrograde title seems calculated to repel actual “smart girls”—women who sail by the “self-help” aisle and who would kneecap anyone who called them “girls.”

But skim more deeply—through the real-life anecdotes and beyond lines like “Mr. Rich can be Mr. Right”—and it’s apparent this isn’t a 21st-century How to Marry a Millionaire. Rather, Ford, a 41-year-old Emmy-winning television producer divorced from Harrison Ford’s son, and Drake, a 44-year-old medical doctor with an M.B.A. from Stanford who has been divorced and is remarried, adopt a satiric tone to deliver a surprisingly subversive self-help manifesto: imagine, if you can, Dorothy Parker writing for Cosmo. Many of their observations have been well-aired, to wit—women have a shelf life in terms of fertility and attractiveness; taking time out to raise children reduces women’s workplace value; women have more difficulty bouncing back from divorce. And even after decades of women graduating from professional schools in greater numbers than men, men remain the power players.

Instead of bitching about these inequities, they counsel women to bring about change strategically. Females have bought into a fairy tale, they observe, in which “having it all” has translated into “doing it all.” They decry the modern notion that marriage be based in romantic love—a heady hormonal cocktail destined to fade. Marriage is an economic trade-off, so women should exploit the currency of youth, they write. “A man is not a financial plan,” they allow, adding: “but he can be part of one.” At times, they push it: “Earnings power is a reflection of his values and character. Big blue eyes? Not so much,” they write, ignoring the fact many high earners are shadier than a cyprus grove. Still, many women buy into it, says Jemima Slade, who runs golddiggers.uk.com, a U.K. website with 6,000 members, most of them women. She’s looking for a rich man herself: “It’s about him being powerful and ambitious and opinionated like me.”

But the book’s message, ultimately, is not to mine for gold but to remove the blinkers and take charge. An entire chapter is devoted to the importance of masturbation in building sexual confidence. They also advise women to get a grip on their finances; because they live longer, they need to save, budget and invest even more aggressively than men.

The idea to write the book evolved after Drake and Ford met at their children’s school. Drake was having difficulty re-entering the workforce despite her impressive CV. “We used to joke: ‘We thought we were the smart ones but the smart ones married money.’” The thesis would have been outrageous to her 10 years ago, Drake admits. “I would have been: ‘Of course I’m going to be making my own money. I don’t have to choose a guy based on money.’ But I never expected a non-linear career path.”

Financial counsellor Gail Vaz-Oxlade, host of the TV show Til Debt Do Us Part, applauds the message. “They’re telling women: ‘Wake up. Anything you exchange your independence for, you need to negotiate a price on.’ ” But she’s skeptical: “Good luck convincing people of that. All of life is based on romantic dreams.” People can overstate their wealth during courtship, she notes, citing a couple she’s working with. “Her expectation of what life would be like after marriage is based on his courtship of her. And his courtship of her was based on knowing she’d never accept him if she knew what he was about.”

Neither Drake nor Ford married for money: “Never, never, never, to my great regret,” Drake laughs. Yet they’ve been called immoral gold diggers by critics, a charge she deflects. “Isn’t the better moral choice to have a friendship where love can evolve and your family are going to be taken care of in case he decides to walk? Or he gets hit by a bus?” She describes her own not-monied husband with affection: “He’s an incredible father and great husband. I’m really, really lucky.” But she’s not starry-eyed. “I’m not checking my texts every second to make sure he texted me. It has evolved into something more stable and luxurious.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Robert

    duhhhh…of course it nature, and human behaviour…what else do you think it is….and yes all men are animals…as are all women…when are you women going to grow up and learn how it really is…of course we men are doing it…we are doing it because thats the way it is in human nature.

  • Kat

    I assure you, Artemis… it isn't every woman who marries for money, and this article is insulting for insinuating that we should. I am educated, I work… why should I forsake my happiness (gained through a loving relationship) for material things? If I want something, I buy it myself. I agree that money is an important part of life… but as long as my spouse isn't lazy, I am happy.

  • greg

    guys shouldn't marry period. The inequities of Canadian divorce laws make it a path to financial ruin.

    • Lee

      And you think women don't get financially ruined by divorce??? Try raising 3 kids by yourself, paying childcare, trying to have enough time and energy to give them the guidance and attention they need and deserve. Fighting with the ex to get the small amount of monthly support the courts award. (not nearly what it costs you to raise the kids). Most single parents live at or below the poverty line. The non-custodial parent usually has enough to buy toys… Most men are secretly thankful they don't end up with custody of the kids. It would interfere with their opportunities to get banged!

  • Thor

    Marriying a man or woman for money is wrong. This is only business matters or making a good deal and is a fake marriage. A true love is not being an hipocript. Real love is showing affection, care for, being faithful, honest, sincere, excellent comunication and respect. But I will tell you money is very important matter but you can not buy or sell love. That's why a strong recommend educate more yourself or make some money so you can own your own bussiness, if you have a good idea about something do a lot reseach and execute your idea and you can suceed. What you really need is motivation, iniciative, a great idea and find your other half soul and then you will find happiness and real love that wii help understand and help you to become rich. TRUST ME.

  • to old smart

    Just my two cents, Women shouldn't marry. I married a man and help him make millions only to find that in the divorce (he had hidden the money and lied to the court) I got nothing but a pittance to finish raising our 5 children with and for myself. Since getting the divorce I have met many woman in my same position. Canadian law is not on the woman's side or there wouldn' be so many of us left below the poverty line. My advice to every woman is forget it. Men just play with your head and make promises they don't remember the next day. Make your own money, live your own life, don't get married because he will take it. Men are the gold diggers. Every man I have met since my divorce only wants to know how much I got in the divorce (nothing) and how much I make now. Once you are are past 40, all men want is a nurse with a purse. you can count on it. Don't think I'm bitter, both my children and myself have just been educated, the hard way.

  • DatingWealthy

    I think the majority of woman on this site are idiots and bitter. Haven't any of you noticed that most rich men have young gorgeous woman, flocking to their side, trying there hardest to win over there affections and there money. He's not talking about buying love. He's talking about not wanting a woman who wants him only for his money, he wants someone who will share in the finances and not use him. Investing for him is important, unlike mid to lower class people, he has a lot at stake by marrying just anyone, even if there were a prenup. However for Mr.G. Galland. There are pros and cons to your method. A wealthy, daddy's girl, is going to have money, yes but she is also going to no exactly how to spend hers and yours. You would be wise to invest in a woman who is independently wealthy. Beauty,can also come with a price unfortunately. The beautiful tend to be very self involved, high maintenance and cocky, many lack the ability to enjoy life without material items. Good luck to all of you bitter and sad woman and good luck to all of you bitter woman hating men.

  • Son

    What if.

    What if my mother had married for financial reasons, and more, and that the majority of her surviving side of the family's lives depended on the marriage? Was it wrong of her to marry in order to raft her loved ones to safety? Is it so denouncing of her, that even divorced now of my father, whom I still see constantly, to do what it took to survive a war?

    I have read here these talks of happiness and unhappiness, equalities and unfairness, and a void of life and death wager. But it is the generalizations in the article and some posted comments that insult the ordeals of BOTH my parents.

  • Prince Pauper

    Guys/gals, hide your money…Never, ever flaunt it. Thats the ONLY way to meet the people who love you for what you are, not your bank account. Yes, they're few and far inbetween but they're worth their weight in gold. I rent, take the bus and pack my own lunch. Gold diggers naturally keep away.

  • Tom

    True Bonnie but the writer is speaking about marrying money and it happens all the time. To me this article is about prostitution and nothing to do with love, marriage, etc. “Isn’t the better moral choice to have a friendship where love can evolve and your family are going to be taken care of in case he decides to walk? Or he gets hit by a bus?” I thought with the feminist movement and equality and everything else that this statement should be appalling.

  • Dbur

    seriously people its only money, yeah it helps make life easier but it cant not gaurentee anything. I would never marry anyone unless i truely wanted to mary him regardless of the amount of money involved. I need my pride cause after the money is gone thats all i haveleft!!

  • nigswander

    I had hoped Barbara Amiel wrote this when I saw the title.

  • http://www.efbf.org/jobs/ dream_job

    I know of great guys out there — journalists, teachers, non-profit dudes — who will probably make great dads. But I personally wouldn't pair up with them because, realistically, our two salaries together just wouldn't be enough to cut it for what I want out of life. But, but, but, "Bank accounts shouldn't matter at all!" And while I agree with that in theory, sorry, a man who can provide for me and our children is just much more attractive to me. The Frisky: How engagements are a crash course in marriage

From Macleans