Mark Steyn on why the fascists are winning in Europe

In bad times, if the political culture forbids respectable politicians from raising certain issues, voters will turn to unrespectable ones

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:00am - 182 Comments

Why the fascists are winning in EuropeTo promote a greater sense of Euro-harmony, the European Parliament—actually, make that the European “Parliament”—is organized into ideological blocs, ensuring that French liberals sit with Slovene liberals, and Belgian greens sit with Latvian greens, rather than hunkering down in their ethnic ghettoes. The largest bloc is the “centre-right,” the second-largest are the socialists, and the third is now the “non-inscrits,” the bloc for people who don’t want to belong to blocs. As a result of this month’s election, this Groucho Marxist grouping of “Others” tripled in size to just under a hundred seats. So, if they’re not liberals, socialists, greens, “European democrats” or the “Nordic Green Left,” what the hell are they?

Okay, here goes. The members of the non-bloc bloc include: one member of the “True Finns” party; one member of the Slovak National Party; two members of the British National Party; two members of the Austrian Freedom Party; two members of the Vlaams Belang, the “Flemish Interest” party; two members of the Civic Union, which sounds like a gay marriage in Vermont but is in fact an offshoot of the Latvian nationalist For Fatherland And Freedom Party; three members of France’s National Front; three members of Jobbik, the Hungarian nationalist party; three members of the Greater Romania Party . . .

Well, you get the picture. The European Parliament isn’t exactly working out as Lord Tennyson foresaw:

“. . . the war-drum throbb’d no longer, and the battle-flags were furl’d / In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world.

“There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe / And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law.”

A Federation of Euro-harmony filled by ultra-nationalist xenophobes is almost too droll a jest. My favourite of these new national parties is Ataka, which is a Bulgarian word meaning—oh, go on, take a wild guess. That’s right: “Attack.” What a splendidly butch name. The Attack party was formed from last year’s merger of the Bulgarian National Patriotic Party, the Union of Patriotic Forces and the National Movement for the Salvation of the Fatherland, and in nothing flat managed to get 13 per cent of the vote.

Like Attack, many of these lively additions to the political scene favour party emblems that slyly evoke swastikas while bending the prongs in different directions just enough to maintain deniability. Other than that, they don’t have a lot in common with their colleagues in the no-bloc bloc. I don’t just mean in the sense that the leader of the Slovak National Party said a couple of years back, “Let’s all get in tanks and go and flatten Budapest,” which presumably is not a policy position the Hungarian nationalists in Jobbik would endorse. But there are broader differences, too. The SNP is antipathetic to homosexuals, whereas Krisztina Morvai, the attractive blonde Jobbik member just elected to the Euro-parliament, is a former winner of the Freddie Mercury Prize for raising AIDS awareness. I can’t be the only political analyst who wishes that, instead of a victory speech last Sunday, Doktor Morvai had stood on the table in black tights and bellowed out, “We Are The Champions.”

Like our chums at Canada’s “human rights” commissions, Doktor Morvai is a “human rights” activist—and, indeed, a former delegate to the UN Women’s Rights Committee. One thing a woman has a right to is an uncircumcised penis. In the course of her successful election campaign, the good doctor told Hungarian Jews to “go back to playing with their tiny little circumcised tails.” I don’t know what Krisztina has against circumcised penises, but it’s probably not her pelvis.

It’s unclear whether any member of the Austrian Freedom Party has won the Freddie Mercury Prize, but its late leader, Jörg Haider, wound up pushing up edelweiss eight months ago when he flipped his Volkswagen limo after leaving a gay bar in Klagenfurt somewhat the worse for wear. “He never helped his family man image by turning up at rallies and local events with an entourage of young blond men,” reported the Daily Mail. “Newspapers in his homeland said they were reluctant to publish ‘full details’ of his homosexuality fearing an outburst of hate toward the gay community would overtake hatred towards foreigners.”

Er, if you say so. So hard to know who to hate first, isn’t it? And you’ve gotta be able to prioritize.

Bookmark and Share
  • art

    The usual astute and artful pice of Steyn journalism.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mordenm mordenm

    A rare voice for truth and freedom, cutting through the oppressive orthodoxy. Too bad I have to read him in this illegal underground E-zine. If only the PC thought police weren't as pervasive and all-powerful as they are. Then maybe this Steyn guy would get a lead columnist gig with a major national news magazine. But that's a pipe dream. We're living in Soviet Canuckistan, where the Right is kept out. At least, that's what I keep reading.

    Steyn: I can only imagine you in some basement in Ottawa, getting waterboarded by human rights-oriented public servants. To you I say: strength! One day, somehow, likely years after your death, your words will find publishment.

    • Anon

      "Publishment"? Them lefties shore have them some right good edumacation!

      • cwe

        Pub´lish`ment
        n. 1. The act or process of making publicly known; publication.
        2. A public notice of intended marriage, required by the laws of some States.

        Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, published 1913 by C. & G. Merriam Co.

        Yes, "publishment."
        Good point about the "right good edumacation" that encourages lefties to acquire and use a deep and varied vocabulary.
        Better still, however, is your sly skewering of those whose first impulse, even before checking to see whether they're actually correct, is toward belligerent mockery. What a bunch of sad, pathetic creeps, eh?

    • Aunty M

      Mark Steyn lives in New Hampshire, as far as I know!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mike00107 mike00107

    I'm going to have to agree with Janis. A lot of the parties Steyn listed are no where near fascism. Race realists and anti-immigration? Sure. Fascist? Hell no.

  • Pingback: Steynian 365 « Free Canuckistan!

  • Pingback: News Briefs June 14-20/2009 | www.new-right.org

  • JTaverner

    Note that Mr. Steyn is only concerned with political correctness insofar as it shifts politics to the right. He has no sympathy for the growing demands of sovereignty by those victimized by government-enforced diversity. To him, a best case scenario would be if the peoples of Europe disappeared silently in an immigration induced genocide.

    It’s only the noise of our holocaust he objects to.

  • Pingback: Mark Steyn: Whoa, Racist! Crime! Racist! Welfare! Racist! Islam! Racistracistdoubleracist!! « Centurean2’s Weblog

  • Pingback: Britain’s Unravelling… « Centurean2’s Weblog

  • SP_Immortal

    "Hilarious watching Steyn try to not celebrate the success of the anti-immigrant European right. He's a cheerleader for these people, so all he can figure out to say is that if Europe doesn't accede to the demands of Steynian xenophobes, it risks electing Steynian xenophobes. Oooh, that really burnishes Steyn's anti-fascist credentials."

    Steyn writes an article concerning the destructive nature of a political culture where people are reflexively called bigots and their view marginalized when they air concerns on "verboten" topics. Jack responds by reflexively calling Steyn a bigot.

    Good work on the self ownage.

    Last sentence again: "The problem in Europe is not a lunatic fringe but a lunatic mainstream ever more estranged from its voters."

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

      Are you denying that Steyn is anti-Muslim?

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

      Are you denying that Steyn is anti-Muslim? Isn't that why you read & love him?

      • Wakefield Tolbert

        I do believe a better term, if more of a mouthful, might be "he is anti-flooding of immigrants pulled primarily from those cultures and societies that are in more than one way opposed to our very existential being and have little appreciation for the modern world"

        Doing a critique about why merely more books on the raising of hydrangeas have been translated into Spanish and Swahili than ANY books translated into Arabic is a reflection on Islam's halting feature on modernity. But it is not racism (Islam is not a race) or "xenophobia."

        It is candor. Candor about the differences in cultures. And there are many. And it is about damn time we recognize those differences rather than having the celebration on beheadings and dimmitude go forth much longer.

        Call Steyn a "culturalist" if you like.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Sean_C Sean_C

    Steyn's chief point here is exactly right. The absence of true free speech and healthy conservative movement in Europe is what is driving some voters to the extremes. Canada should be warned and Americans should take careful note as well. (However, that was a little too hard a knock on ol' Woody Guthrie if you ask me, as a "singing Commie" — Woody wasn't perfect, but he was no Pete Seeger either.)

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Sean_C Sean_C

    Steyn's chief point here is exactly right. The absence of true free speech and a healthy conservative movement in Europe is what is driving some voters to the extremes. Canada should be warned and Americans should take careful note as well. (However, that was a little too hard a knock on ol' Woody Guthrie if you ask me, as a "singing Commie" — Woody wasn't perfect, but he was no Pete Seeger either.)

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Spinoneone Spinoneone

    O.K., so Hitler was a fascist. That is, he was for government control of telecommunications, media, major industry, large land holdings, and politics. He allowed small business and small farmers. Total control of the people and what they thought, as is the wont of all good dictators. He was also phobically anti-Semitic. However, the racism, per se, had nothing to do with his political/economic policies. Racism does not equal fascism, nor vice-versa. They may happen to coincide, but they don't necessarily have to. Additionally, being an anti-Muslim and/or anti-immigration party, or having that as an important party plank, does not make the party "fascist." "Fascism" is simply the paint the left uses on any non-left party which does not cleave to the left's PC line on immigration.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/janicemaerose janicemaerose

      Uh sorry Spononeone, but fascism usually goes with racism; when you're extremely pro-nationalism, you're usually against people of other nations living in your nation.

  • bill Thomas

    The "lunatic mainstream"–brilliant. The Left, whenever it gets power, not only turns off most taxpaying voters it turns many of them against it in extreme ways. As it loses authority in country after country, it's the Left that's resorting to fascist measures, not the Right.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

      Yeah, because if people aren't allowed to express their inner racist and march around with Swastikas then naturally we're on a slippery slope to . . . racism and Swastika marches. The logic is intense.

  • Pingback: It is vented, or it explodes | Cold Fury

  • Cybernaught

    Takes a fascist to know one.

  • Michael

    "culturally protectionist" There is nothing wrong when the majority begin to stand up to protect their culture. Minorities have been doing it for years, at the expense of the majorities culture (like here in Canada)

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SophiaGeffros SophiaGeffros

    I was going to make a point about the sheer amount of fallacies in this column and the sensationalism, but fortunately for me, a <a hrf="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/19/the-feeble-%E2%80%98march%E2%80%99-of-euro-fascism/">much better writer than I has already done so. I bow before his superior intelligence and writing skills.
    It does seem a tad hypocritical for Steyn to SHRIEK about ZOMGFASCISM when he often seems to be the biggest proponent of the fear mongering anti-immigrant sentiments in Canadian society. 4. A century ago, the arrival of Irish 'papists' was cause for great concern. In fifty years, the anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiments will seem as absurd as the anti-Catholic sentiments of a century past. I

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/SophiaGeffros SophiaGeffros

    I was going to make a point about the sheer amount of fallacies in this column and the sensationalism, but fortunately for me, <A HRF="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/19/the-feeble-%E2%80%98march%E2%80%99-of-euro-fascism/">much better writer than I has already done so. I bow before his superior intelligence and writing skills.
    It does seem a tad hypocritical for Steyn to SHRIEK about ZOMGFASCISM when he often seems to be the biggest proponent of the fear mongering anti-immigrant sentiments in Canadian society. 4. A century ago, the arrival of Irish 'papists' was cause for great concern. In fifty years, the anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiments will seem as absurd as the anti-Catholic sentiments of a century past. I

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/SophiaGeffros SophiaGeffros

    I was going to make a point about the sheer amount of fallacies in this column and the sensationalism, but fortunately for me, much better writer than I has already done so. I bow before his superior intelligence and writing skills.
    It does seem a tad hypocritical for Steyn to SHRIEK about ZOMGFASCISM when he often seems to be the biggest proponent of the fear mongering anti-immigrant sentiments in Canadian society. 4. A century ago, the arrival of Irish 'papists' was cause for great concern. In fifty years, the anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiments will seem as absurd as the anti-Catholic sentiments of a century past. I

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SophiaGeffros SophiaGeffros

    Would it be incredibaly naive to suggest we all just get along and eat our curry with tzatziki and naan- and for dessert, pudding and a peach, washed down with milk and a nightcap of whiskey?
    Yes?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SophiaGeffros SophiaGeffros

      I'll answer myself. Yes, yes it is. Albeit delicious.
      Also, I am intrigued by just how broad the concept of 'fascism' seems to be. Historically, it is taught that the fascist governments in Italy, the USSR, and Germany were in part responsible for WW2. Those are the exact words used, referring to all three governments collectively as fascist. Yet you have completely opposite ends of the ideological spectrum, with the only common denominator extreme nationalism. Is this what constitutes fascism? If so, how is it that it always seems to be extreme-right wing groups that get the label 'fascist'? Surely there are extremely nationalist, anti-immigrant leftists. Has the term simply been corrupted?

  • KSM

    Just a comment from someone who voted for one of the non-bloc block parties identified in your list. It is certainly not fascist or xenophobic party so lumping all these parties together just shows ignorance. However, as you correctly point out, any discussion of multi-culturalism (and say, the inherent violence advocated by one major religion and its incompatibility with European freedom) is forbidden topic in Europe. The party probably got votes from "fascists" (far-left & far-right) too, but mostly from middle-class people who are skeptical of EU/Euro-Elite/Establishment Parties and oppose mass-immigration and the privileged treatment of immigrant (say, separate swimming pool time slots for muslims).

  • Not Important

    What is the big surprise? It's only going to get worse. All of Western Civilization is dying and those of us who want to reverse this have been abandoned by so called "conservatives". The state of most advanced Western nations in many ways mirror Weimar Germany in the 20s. Buckle up. It's going to be a very bumpy ride.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jim_SE_Texas Jim_SE_Texas

    I just flat don't worry about being called any kind of -IST any more. They are worn out. It's the first and last comeback of any special interest group.

    Water off a duck's back.

    Now, if the politicians would just grow a spine at least as strong as a duck…

  • Pingback: Ataka Lapt | ninme

  • Marcus Starr

    Fascism works! A Liberal Democracy always fails! Too much freedom Too much liberty always causes disorder! God Bless America marcustarr2000@gmail.com SE Asia

From Macleans