Dogs and cats in cabins? Oh my!

Air Canada’s new pets on a plane policy is bound to pit passengers against one another

by Kate Lunau on Friday, June 19, 2009 3:56pm - 145 Comments

090619_dogonplaneBefore leaving his home in Smithers, B.C. for Northern Ontario in 2004, Dr. Darren Jakubec felt nervous about taking his dog on the flight with him, “for reasons I can’t entirely explain.” A family doctor, Jakubec was travelling to Wawa, Ont., with his wife, a nurse, to start a six-month work contract. Leaving their black dog Sila behind wasn’t an option, he says. Sila, a black lab mix, was kenneled and placed in the plane’s cargo hold. After deplaning in Winnipeg for a connecting flight, the couple waited anxiously for their dog. When she was finally taken off the plane, they were devastated by what they saw: “Sila was brought out onto the carousel,” he says, “dead.”

Jakubec paid for an autopsy “that showed carbon monoxide poisoning as the probable cause of death,” he says. After a two-year legal battle, the case was settled out of court. Jakubec and his wife eventually made it to Wawa, where they adopted another stray dog, Beck, also a black lab mix. Though he won’t fly with a pet again, Jakubec says “if you absolutely have to, insist they’re in the cabin with you.”

In 2006, Air Canada announced that pets could no longer travel in the passenger cabin, partly due to allergy concerns. This week, they reversed that policy: as of July 1, travellers on Air Canada or Jazz flights will be able to bring some pets into the cabin with them. “We’ve had people asking for this service,” says Air Canada spokesperson Peter Fitzpatrick. “Pet owners are fairly ardent about their creatures.” So, for a fee of $50 per domestic flight ($100 for an international flight), customers can bring cats or small dogs in an approved carrier so long as the animal and carrier weigh no more than 22 pounds combined. The pet, which counts as a piece of carry-on luggage, must be stored under the seat in front of the owner, Fitzpatrick says, “although you can put the carrier on your lap if there’s no turbulence.” Up to four animals will be allowed in the cabin at a time. Jakubec, for one, welcomes the news as “a small step in the right direction.” But others aren’t so sure—asthma and allergy sufferers chief among them (up to 30 per cent of Canadians are affected by dog and cat allergies).

The Canadian Lung Association is calling on the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health to look at the issue of pets on planes. Dr. Peter MacLeod, a semi-retired chest physician and past president of the CLA, says the air inside plane cabins is recycled through air vents, so even small amounts of allergens (like pet hair or dander) can easily spread. “If someone brings a dog or cat onto an airplane and there’s an asthmatic [on board], it can trigger a potentially fatal asthma attack,” says MacLeod. Such attacks would be very rare, he says, but “it would take just one fatal case to have this policy reversed, and it’s a shame if it comes to that.”

The airlines insist that won’t be a problem. WestJet, which has been allowing pets in passenger cabins for at least 10 years, flew more than 14 million people last year and only got “two or three complaints on the pet allergy issue,” says spokesperson Robert Palmer. (In addition to dogs and cats, WestJet also allows rabbits and birds in the cabin.) Like Air Canada, WestJet allows four animals at most in a cabin, but it’s “extraordinarily rare” to have that many animals travelling at once, Palmer says. And when there are pets on the plane, he adds, “most people don’t even know” thanks to an air filtration systems that’s “top of the line.” If passengers identify as allergic, and there’s an animal booked on the same flight, both Air Canada and WestJet will both do their best to seat passengers at different ends of the cabin or reschedule one’s flight at no extra cost.

Beyond allergy concerns, some people just don’t like the idea of sharing cramped quarters with other people’s pets. And what if the animal needs to eat, or—even worse—relieve itself? Vets recommend not feeding pets before a flight, and putting pads inside their kennels. “Most cats and dogs are used to holding it for at least a couple hours,” says Palmer.

Naturally, pet lovers heartily support Air Canada’s new policy. “As a veteran air traveller, I would find [pets] much less objectionable than some of the people who’ve sat next to me on a flight,” says Michael O’Sullivan, executive director of the Humane Society of Canada, who notes that travelling in the cabin is safer for pets, too. People with more exotic animals, though, might be out of luck. “We don’t get very many requests from people travelling with boa constrictors,” Palmer says, although WestJet will allow guinea pigs, hedgehogs and chinchillas in checked baggage. Air Canada’s cargo division has a live animal unit, says Fitzpatrick, specially trained to handle everything from “butterflies to orangoutangs going to the zoo.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Traveller

    Having had this experience, the allergy sufferer is offered some uncomfortable middle seat at the back of the plane as if you were the entire problem. As for the pet being kept under the seat in its container? rubbish! on one flight the cat fanciers had the cat sitting on their laps looking around and then later did a big production of bringing out the kitty litter container on their middle seat so the cat could pee – the flight attendants just walked by all this performance even after they were told the cat was not being contained and it was causing an allergic reaction. Moving the cat owner to the uncomfortable seat was never considered – the allergy sufferer became the problem instead. Put the pets in a safe area of the cargo hold or sorry, not allow them at all. And, by the way, pets are not allowed in business class on AC so if you pay enough $$ for your seat you are ok but in cattle class it can literally be a zoo.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mrgenier mrgenier

    Wheezy,

    Youre comparing yourself….an asthmatic to a disabled person in a wheelchair???
    As someone who has several family members in wheelchairs for a variety of reasons, and i take great offense to your ridiculous comparison.

    As a person with allergies (non-dander) and pets I find myself thinking that if youre going to go into a public place (even if you pay for it), you are subjected to other people's freedoms.

    As others have said, no one wants a dead dog coming out on the carousel at your local airport and no ones wants a plane to land for an emergency because of a asthmatic in crisis.

    The conclusion is that you choose to go out in public, you choose to be subjected to other people's freedoms. Thats at the bottom of a freedom/law & order society. And by that token, you choose once again to take precautions or not (allergy meds, proper dog training)

    Maybe TransPort Canada should come out with a PetsFly licence that people can apply for and get their pets evaluated in order to be permitted to go on an airplane.

    • No Pets on Planes

      That is one of the stupidest comments I have ever read.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Douglass Douglass

      I would be less upset to hear that an animal died in the cargo hold than watching a person die infront of me. But hey, to each their own.

      "The conclusion is that you choose to go out in public, you choose to be subjected to other people's freedoms. Thats at the bottom of a freedom/law & order society. And by that token, you choose once again to take precautions or not (allergy meds, proper dog training)"

      I didn't realise our freedom of movement was also a freedom of movement with pet. I'll have to go back and check my copy of the Charter of rights and freedoms. I must have missed that paragraph.

    • Angry

      So the conclusion is that you choose to smoke because you choose to be subjected to other people's freedom to smoke. You choose to stay up all night because you choose to live with a neighbor loving to have loud-noise parties every night.. And your kid allergic to peanuts? It is not our school's problem. Do you guys know freedom is above everything else?!

  • Traveller

    How incredibly selfish to see the pet people posting such unsympathic, angry comments about those who suffer allergies or even worse asthma. Why would the transport of your cat or dog in the airplane cabin somehow be so much more important than a person's health? Some person should suffer breathing difficulty to accommodate your cat!? give your head a shake. As for the faulty logic that pets in the cabin is justified because other passengers wear perfume or otherwise smell – too bad the airline won't make an effort to make flights as scent free as possible for everyone's benefit but there is an easy solution to the pet problem – the cargo hold or stay at home. The only reason the airlines are reversing their policies on pets in the cabin is to make an extra buck and they will do absolutely nothing to assist the people whose health is adversely affected by animals in the cabin. Nor will the airline do anything to deal with the pet owners who will not follow the few rules set out around having your pet in the cabin. Pets at the expense of someone's health is just flat out wrong.

  • Jill Ambler

    I applaud Air Canada's move. I am sympathetic to those with allergies as I am allergic to cats and dogs, but to those who oppose the policy, I would like to point out that there is no way to have control over dog or cat hair that may adhere to pet-owning passengers' clothing. If someone is very allergic to pet hair/dander, that is probably even a bigger risk than an animal in a small carrier in the cabin.

    • No Pets on Planes

      Wow Jill, glad to know how "sympathetic" you are. That should help people when they go into anaphylaxic shock because of your dog or cat!

  • Mike Mason

    Allowing pets on flights is pure self-indulgent insanity. Taking your cat or dog on a flight is a choice–being allergic to cats and dogs is not a choice. It can be a life-threatening situation. This will end up in court one day, and pets will be removed from airplanes. My only hope is that someone won't have to die, first.

  • Traveller

    Hey Macleans – please take these comments back to Air Canada and Westjet so they know that this issue is controversial. Not that the airlines have been listening to anything much about client comfort lately but they should at least know that if they thought catering to the pet owners would just go by unnoticed, well, it hasn't. When someone selling a product or service blatantly decides to risk the health of any customer when there is a known risk that spells liability.

  • An airline employee

    From these Boeing articles:
    http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cabinair/index.h…
    http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cabinair/facts.h…
    It can be seen that pet dander would need to be smaller than 0.3 microns (about one hundredth of the diameter of a human hair) to circulate throughout the cabin.

    Also, the cabin has exhaust vents that exit to the hold, to equalise pressure throughout the fuselage, before the outflow air exits through a valve in the fuselage.

  • http://www.bachelor-in-the-city.blogspot.com No Pets on Planes

    Dear Airline Employee,

    How do you explain this: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2009/…

    Who cares what Boeing "says" — this woman had a severe reaction. Public health must take precedence.

  • Traveller

    Email Air Canada and Westjet if you want to raise your opinion on this topic – otherwise the airlines will claim that they never heard from anyone so it must be ok. I note that in one article AC claimed that being on a plane was "just like any other public place" to justify their policy on allowing pets back on board. OK what other "public" place is a crowded tube at 30,000 feet with no possiblity of exit and limited access to immediate medical assistance? Cat in a restaurant (not that this would be allowed) but you could get up and walk out or, if the asthma attack was severe, call 911 for an ambulance. Cat at Safeway (not that this would be allowed either) but you could just walk out. Cat on a train you could move to another car completely. Cat on a bus, get off at the next stop. Cat on a plane, oh well, the airline is making a few extra bucks and the cat owner is happy so who cares about anyone else and their health problem, right? The cat has to be more important than someone or their child having difficulty breathing – what kind of backward universe do some people live in.

  • An airline employee

    To quantify the risk of pets in the cabin, there is a study that looked at approximately 20% of all flights in the US over a 1 year period between 1996 and 1997 (when most US airlines accepted pets in the cabin at no charge):
    http://www.hf.faa.gov/docs/508/docs/cami/00_13.pd…

    Although it doesn't specifically break-out pet allergic reactions from all others, there were 27 allergic reaction events with no deaths and 1 of those requiring a flight diversion over this period.

    In terms of rational analysis versus conjecture of what could or is likely to happen by allowing allergens in the cabin (pets, peanuts, perfume, etc), this report is a good place to start, if you have the time to read it (albeit this is definitely not a light read).

    • Traveller

      So when are the peanuts coming back on the menu or was that a proactive measure in response to the risk of allergy attacks. Or did the airlines wait until there was a significant number of severe incidents so as to have enough stats to make a decision? This would suggest that unless there is a significant number of allergy or asthma sufferers pushed to the point of an emergency then having pets in the cabin causing discomfort to passengers is meaningless as far as the airlines are concerned. Admit it, in the end this is just a chance to make a few extra bucks and adding one more unnecessary misery (or potential risk) for passengers is irrelevant. Pets do not need to be in the cabin. Their presence is ill-received by other passengers. So why, other than money and disregard, would this occur? Perhaps then we should just all wait for that asthma sufferer out there on a flight to die and then the concern won't be dismissed as "conjecture" any more.

  • Robert from Victoria

    Will that be pet or non pet? I thought we went through this nonsense 10 or 20 years ago with smoking and non smoking zones in restaurants and the like.

    Back then, I did not see any posts of any sort, suggesting that non-smokers go to doctors to build up their immunity to tobacco products!

  • R.H.

    Allergies aside (although a serious issue), who cleans up after the pets make a mess? Be prepared to scrape off your shoe or dry the seat of your pants when you sit in pet urine. And what about the smell? You think the flight attendants are going to scrub the carpet? You think pet owners will clean up after their pet? What will your pet eat or drink? What if your rotweiler decides to take a bite at me? This is ridiculous. I love dogs but this is absurd. Leave your pets in a kennel.

  • http://www.uptownpetshop.net/ online pet shop

    Well that's a good one. I think pets should get registered by the authorities in order to board such flights. And such flights shall be told to all the other passengers of this flight. That's really not a big deal. But i am amazed how people with allergy to pets can adjust themselves with such pets.

    Anyways…..Catch me !

  • wheezy

    In today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards airline security I'm surprised no-one has brought up the obvious security risks. I would argue that an angry chihuahua would be more threatening than a nail clipper. If it ever escaped from its cage….

  • katherine covell

    I too am one of the many animal lovers who has severe asthma attacks if exposed to any level of cat dander. The lack of empathy expresssed by those who believe their pets should take priority of a human is amazing and depressing. I wonder if peanut lovers will soon demand peanuts and take the same attitude – oh the person next to me just died — to bad, they were great peanuts! Oh Canada – where is the compassion for which our population used to be known?

  • Charlie G

    On a recent 8-hour long flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, a woman brought her cat into the passenger cabin. The poor animal was absolutely terrified and did not stop yowling the whole time. I explained to the Northwest agent in Amsterdam that I have a terrible allergy to cat dander and couldn't possibly sit near the animal. I was moved 15 rows forward of the woman and her cat. Still, the dander was in the air circulating in the cabin. By the time we were half way through the flight, I had developed a sinus migraine and could no longer breathe through my nose. 3 days later and I am still suffering from the migraine and congestion. I take Zyrtec daily, use my puffer when needed and I have been receiving allergy injections for about 15 years. I love being with my dog, but I respect his quality of life enough to leave him in a posh kennel , where he is very well cared for and receives lots of attention. To take him on a plane with me would be nothing but selfishness on my part. I would never subject him to the trauma of traveling on a plane, nor would I want to subject other passengers to my beloved Herman, if they happened to have allergies to dogs. What is wrong with you friggin people anyway?!

  • Bright

    Human life is more important than anything else, please. If airlines want to provide services to pet owners, they should have their planes redesigned – at least having something like the smoke free cabins. I believe that airlines should be sued if someone's health is affected by the policy.

    • Kristy

      'human life is more important than anything else'

      Are you kidding me? What do you think human life depends on? Do you have any idea how fragile the human race is? Without the animals and environment you dismiss so callously we would cease to exist so I would educate yourself and think again before making such an egregious statement.

  • JJillian

    Though a fair amount of research has shown that the risk of death from an asthma attack is quite low, nevertheless, as someone who suffers from allergies, the effects of exposure to animal dander extend way past the actual flight. When I am around an animal, I become ill for days following exposure to the animal. So if I'm flying for business purposes, then I will become too ill to conduct my business. If I'm flying for vacation purposes, well that's going to be a ruined vacation. It's a no win situation for the allergy sufferer which is not necessarily related to the risk of death. This is what the airlines and pet owners don't seem to get!

  • CAR

    I know… lets smoke, let the animals roam the plane, make clothing optional, and schedule food fights onboard flights as well! exciting trip guaranteed!

  • http://www.lookyoungatlanta.com botox Atlanta

    Poor dog. Never knew what hit him.

  • bisleshan

    I don't think I would ever be able to take my dog on a plane after hearing that Sad story. I think most of the luggage section in which dogs are kept are not pressurized for high altitude

    Natural supplement for dogs

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    The excuse of allergy sufferers is crap with pets in the cabin. These pets are confined to an enclosed kennel and placed UNDER the seat. People are either allergic to hair, salivia, or dander all of which are NOT present due to the enclosed kennel. Pet allergy suffers are far more liely to the guy sitting beside him that has a pet at jome and has traces of that pet on their person. Perfumes and smokers are no doubt the cause of far more allergies than pets in an enclosed kennel which is kept uner the seat, will ever be. I say limit the number of screaming kids on a flight!

  • Anonymous

    This was a great article. I have loved this great website and I really do think that this is awesome. I really do think this is so very cool. Thanks

    stamped concrete patios

  • Terry

    I would rather fly with a pet in the airplane cabin anyday.  It will not spritz itself with perfume like a lot of passengers do.  I am allergic to a lot of perfume smells and chemicals and I can barely breathe after the people who feel that they need to smell pretty.  The airlines should ban the use of perfunes on airplanes like they do smoking.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    What if it was a kid that ‘relieved; themselves?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    It is this type of mentality that befuddles me. A dog (maximum 22 pounds) under the seat in front of you, in an enclosed kennel – how the hell is that anywhere near the same as a horse or cow?? Get real. I hate flying with kids on the flight. Should all kids stay home – and if the parents can’t travel without them – stay home as well?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    It is this type of mentality that befuddles me. A dog (maximum 22 pounds) under the seat in front of you, in an enclosed kennel – how the hell is that anywhere near the same as a horse or cow?? Get real. I hate flying with kids on the flight. Should all kids stay home – and if the parents can’t travel without them – stay home as well?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    Allergy suffers can have allergies to peanuts for example. What do you suggest we do with them? What about cigarette smoke? Perfume? The dog hair on the guy next to you that left his pet at home?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    Allergy suffers can have allergies to peanuts for example. What do you suggest we do with them? What about cigarette smoke? Perfume? The dog hair on the guy next to you that left his pet at home?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    Will your big dogs fir UNDER the seat in front of you?? If not that is no different than sitting next to a fat person that takes up their seat and half of yours!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001478366681 Coree Brown

    Will your big dogs fir UNDER the seat in front of you?? If not that is no different than sitting next to a fat person that takes up their seat and half of yours!

From Macleans