'Common Sense' by Glenn Beck

Fox News personality brings his Obama Socialism rants to print—with a dash of Thomas Paine

by Jaime Weinman on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:54pm - 16 Comments

Glenn Beck’s new book Common Sense is literally two books for the price of one. Sure, it’s a diatribe of Beck’s conservative rants, but almost half of the short volume is given over to a re-print of Thomas Paine’s famous Revolutionary pamphlet of the same name. This is meant to bolster Beck’s argument that his crusade against Obama Socialism is just like the American Revolution; he’s already made the argument on his Fox News show, The Glenn Beck Program, by having a guy dressed up as Paine (apparently Ben Franklin impersonators cost too much) as a recurring character. And, as an added benefits, it pads a very short book out with material that you can find for free on the Internet.

Most of the book is based on the standard theme of any Fox News show, not just Beck’s. Anything he doesn’t like is “tyranny.” Anything he likes is an example of “freedom.” Among the threats to freedom are government debt, Social Security (“a legal Ponzi scheme”), medicare, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. To restore freedom, he demands term limits for all politicians, and a recognition that “Capitalism isn’t only about money, it’s about freedom.” And the book is full of his trademark nostalgia for the day after September 11, 2001, when for one brief shining moment everybody was terrified and jingoistic: “we began to remember our heritage and the power of sacrifice.”

The idea of the book, and it’s one that is clearly shared by many people, is that government services interfere with freedom to a greater extent than anything else in the world. (You will not, for example, find Beck considering the notion that universal health care promotes freedom by increasing mobility and personal security.) And all attempts to provide services through government are anti-freedom and slightly scary: “The environment is just a vehicle toward the Progressive ideal of total government rule.”

The blogger “Digby” recently summed up the message being delivered to Fox News viewers: “the tangible, real life benefits they receive for their tax dollars in the form of social security and food safety and roads and schools and health care are called ‘entitlements’ or ‘government waste’ and they believe that their tax dollars go into a black hole of special interests in ‘the fleecing of America.’ ” Add in a dash of religiosity, in the form of Beck’s lament that we now “have plenty of room for everything—except God,” and it’s a book whose vision of an ideal society is a Megachurch.

Still, the book is less over-the-top and hysterical than you would expect if you’ve watched Beck’s show. Instead he tries to appeal to history to give weight to his argument; that’s part of the point of linking his text to Tom Paine’s. Over and over again, Beck invokes history as a way of backing up whatever he’s saying, or drawing a straight line from the bad things in the past to the—we’re led to assume—equally bad things in the present. He reminds us that “in 1913 the income tax was applied only to the wealthiest 1 percent,” and uses this as proof that tax increases on the rich will surely be applied to his non-rich readers as well. The public school system is comparable to Robespierre and Hitler, who “wanted all children to be nurtured and taught by the state.” He even draws an overwrought parallel between those who are inconvenienced by gun-control laws and “the victims of Presidential Executive Order 9066, which authorized the forcible relocation of 150,000 Japanese-Americans from their homes to internment camps.”

So after informing us that every tyrannical act in the history of the world is exactly the same as gun control, health-care programs and deficit spending, Beck doesn’t even attempt to explain why British colonialism and American democracy are exactly the same. They just are. We can read Paine’s famous pamphlet in the right/Beck frame of mind: as a warning against carbon offsets, “class warfare,” and the martyrdom of Joe the Plumber.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer!"

    Thomas Paine, Common Sense

    "considering the notion that universal health care promotes freedom by increasing mobility and personal security."

    By this, do you mean poor and middle classes being stuck in Canada with whatever half-assed doctor they are assigned while the rich go to America for proper treatments?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      Are you suggesting that we have relatively poor quality doctors in Canada?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/JustinWordswrth JustinWordswrth

        Personally, I do not know what quality of doctors we have in Canada… I can't get an appointment!

        • ohbother

          That's because you don't live in Canada, nice try though

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    "we have relatively poor quality doctors in Canada?"

    Yes, that's been my experience and many others I know as well. But we are all supposed to be grateful for shoddy treatment because it is 'free' or 'universal'.

    I have no idea where Canadian doctors stand in world-rankings but I do know that my best friend's father is going to die any day now because Canadian doctors did not recognize cancer when they saw it. And I also know another friend's father is going to live because his kids put together money to pay for treatment at Johns Hopkins after years of being treated by quacks in Canada.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      I'm very sorry about your friend's father, Jolyon.

      On the flip side, a very close family member of mine has lived two years past her likely survival point from a serious cancer, thanks largely to the skill and strategies of her doctors.

      My sense has been that we have growing systemic problems with access and timely interventions in this country, but that the quality of our health professionals is as good, or as poor, as any nation's.

  • RonGee

    I watch Glenn Beck everyday and he has converted me to his side with facts and logic. I found the MacLeans review of his book, "Common Sense" and the general tone of the references in the review to his show and FoxNews in general to be misleading. Yes what the reviewer said is true, but out of context, disingenuous and misleading. Did the reviewer have a hate on for Glenn and FoxNews before it was written? I thinks so. Comments?

    • Concerned

      Given that Glenn Beck has said that the US needs to be attacked by Osama Bin Laden again to further his [Beck's] conservative agenda, I'd say any positions contrary to his are good ones.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auQJVhNH99c

      Feel free to watch him spew some more crazy rhetoric as usual.

      • RonGee

        Thank you for your respectful reply. I direct you to my original comment about Beck's comments being taken out of context. For instance, I am overweight and constantly joke about needing a mild heart attack to scare me into eating right and exercising. I do not really want to have a heart attack.

        I watch Glenn Beck every day and his comment is similarly tongue in cheek. But there is some truth to the fact that a mild heart attack frequently does make people healthier in the long run. A terrorist attack is "minor" compared to losing in the long run. Losing what? Ask any veteran from WW2. They understood. They did not risk their lives to further a conservative agenda. We stand on their shoulders. Glenn understands that, and understands that many today don't realize this. Hence the need for a relatively minor attack because those who don't know history do know current events. You are framing his comments in a way that makes him hateful to the USA. Nothing could be further from the truth. But what you say is right out of the Alinsky playbook (see below) even if you don't realize it. …Cnt'd.

      • RonGee

        Cont'd….

        If you have a reply, please give something original and with actual facts. That was pretty old rhetoric you sent. May I ask some sincere questions? How well do you know Glenn Beck? Are you aware of "Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals"? Do you know why I am asking? Would you want to be told if there was a chance the media is not giving you the truth?

        You had no hate in your reply to me and I hope you see none in mine to you. We should be able to discuss this with each other if we are both sincere. Alinsky's book will explain why the criticism of Conservatives is not always sincere.

  • ohbother

    Being a hater of guns, what if I was to say to you that I hope someone you know gets shot in hopes that that would make you feel the same way as I do. How would that make me sound? Crazy? Terrible? That's what hoping for a terrorist attack in hopes that it will make people more conservative sounds; absolutely insane!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Edgonzal Edgonzal

    COMMON SENSE____If your intent in giving a review on a person's literary work is to presents a balanced view of the work, do so. If your intent is to propound your own slanted views, say so. That way we won't be wasting up bile when we wonder what the intention of your article is.__Does'st Glenn have the same right as Hitler to write "My Strugle" or Cervantes "Don Quijote"? suerely, yes. If you have no intention to write any balanced paper, it is your prerogative, but you would do better to promote views that promote your own point of views. That way your time would be better served.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Edgonzal Edgonzal

    Cont'd-Common Sense __Glenn has something to say just like Jesus or Nostradamus, they were all riduculed when they spoke of what they saw it was comming to pass. You could report his book in a more serious tone instead of making it sound as the work of a disgruntled child or a religious fanatic. __About the book, things have changed very drastically since the end of the cold war, and a false sense of security has slolwly been draped in front of us. And can you asssure us that things are what they seem to be, no. Today signs of the times are confusing and misleading. You can be blinded of the real state of affairs, if you are bottled up in your own life affairs. Good luck to all.

  • Tom

    The bottom line in plain language is that obama is destructive, uninformed, uncaring, misrepresentative and evil to the core. He must be impeached if we the people are to save our nation.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    So the most cuckoo right-wing news personality of the 21st century (thusfar!) climbs into bed with the 18th century's most hardcore leftist (anglophone division). What a joke.

  • PETE624

    I find it sad that people don't see or want to open there eyes to what Obama is doing.Glen Beck might be a little bit strange but most of what he says on his program is true just look at the people who surround Obama.Didn't he say tell us you'll know me by the people who are around me.And please if you sit in church for 20 years and don't know what your Pastor is saying either your a lier or stupid. Or now when he would come out in May for the Day of Prayer but comes out for his Gay issues.I wonder maybe he is stupid because he must not of read the BiBLE.lOVE THE SINNER BUT NOT THE SIN.

From Macleans