Ranking Mike Duffy on the Scale of Dubiousness™

Wherry linked to this article yesterday, but I didn’t get a chance to give…

by Scott Feschuk on Wednesday, June 24, 2009 8:39am - 44 Comments

Wherry linked to this article yesterday, but I didn’t get a chance to give it a read until this morning. Classic. Just classic. I haven’t seen this many suspect assertions come together since Larry King last recited his marriage vows.

In the interests of science, let’s rank Senator Mike Duffy’s statements on the Scale of Dubiousness™ – with 1.0 being a straightforward claim easily supported by abundant factual evidence and 10.0 being Bill Clinton denying having tapped that.

1.2 “I’m still learning about those secret handshakes, and the wink wink, nudge nudge,” Duffy said. The experience [of becoming a senator] can be surreal at times, he said. “There are games within games and you’re never really sure who your friends are,” he said.

This all makes sense. Becoming a senator is like joining a club – not a cool club like the Friars Club or even a useful club like the Hair Club for Men, but a club whose proceedings go almost entirely unnoticed by society at large. Think of it as Fight Club but with naps instead of punches.

5.7 Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Dean Del Mastro [the area’s MP] are working day and night, Duffy said, leaving no stone unturned or even taking summer vacations.

Although it scores only modestly high on the scale of dubiousness, this statement single-handedly shattered my Sycophant-o-Meter® – and that thing had survived a dozen Barbara Walters interviews and the last three years of L. Ian MacDonald’s columns.

You have to appreciate Duffy’s over-the-topness here: Working day and night! No stone unturned! No vacation! Rest assured that if that doesn’t do the trick, Harper is prepared to give 110 per cent, take this one recession at a time and the good Lord willing, things will work out.

9.998 At first he said he wasn’t interested in the Senate, he said. But he had watched a round of layoffs take place at CTV, he said, and knew more were on the way. “I thought, do I want to be around the office when it happens again?” Duffy said.

Not interested in the Senate? Mike Duffy? Please. Mike Duffy was not interested in the Senate the way Kirstie Alley is not interested in whether you’re going to finish that Twinkie.

I’m not saying the last three years of Mike Duffy’s broadcast career were a blatant audition for the Senate but, well, let’s just say that when Duffy’s lips file their tax return they list Stephen Harper’s ass as their common-law spouse.

9.999 He also said he wanted to sit as an independent, because he wasn’t a Conservative. “I was always a journalist,” Duffy said.

A journalist… riiiiiiiiight. Mike Duffy is a journalist the way that Velveeta is cheese, in that he kind of resembles one but then on closer inspection, uhh, no. Actual journalists don’t habitually read stuff directly to their TV audience from their BlackBerry without corroborating the information in any way whatsoever. “This just in: A Nigerian widow has made me a millionaire – so long, suckers!” Also, most journalists don’t stare lovingly into Jim Flaherty’s eyes and ask, “Would you like a backrub?” (I may be paraphrasing here.)

The best part, however, may be the line that comes next: Conservative senators were in the minority, he said, and Prime Minister Harper told him he needed him to sit as one. “And I thought, well, OK,” Duffy said.

Boy, you sure can tell how much he wanted to serve as an independent! I am adamant that I must protect my hard-won integrity as a journalist by sitting in the Senate as one whose lack of bias and partisanship defines him as – oh, you’d LIKE me to sit as a Conservative. Fine then.

Bookmark and Share
  • Rif

    Duffy is one of the most despicable people in Ottawa. The few times ive been to Hy's I see him stuffing his fat face with multiple orders of escargot and licking his bratwurst sized fingers in order to consumed every last drip of garlic butter.

    Duffy is a walking characiture of everything people hate about politics– something out of a Ralph Steadman drawing from the mid 1970s.

  • William

    Some advice for Feschuk:——-First of all you`re developing a bit of a potty mouth—-ask your editor to help you with that.
    Now, you of all people should know when someone is having a little fun with you—-Duffy is probably hoping you and Wherry and Don Martin and the members of the Broadcast Standards Council analyze his speech to prove that he is a traitor—-imagine a journalist that admits he is a Conservative. Duffy loves it—he says something outrageous knowing you guys will get upset and write something vulgar or insulting and further prove his point that political journalists are quickly becoming irrelevant to the people who vote in gov`ts.

    • Anon

      *yawn*

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      "you`re developing a bit of a potty mouth"

      Yes, but as offensive as the phrase "Mike Duffy" is, it's difficult to write an article about him without employing it.

      • Wotcher?

        Exactly! If we were to banish this offensive phrase from the jounalistic lexicon, there would be no more articles about M*** D***y.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

          Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

          • Wotcher?

            You said it first, potty mouth.

          • Wotcher?

            My mildly amusing and inoffensive reply has been deleted twice. You'll have to use your imagination.

      • baldygirl

        Oh, SNAP!

    • John W.

      You don't really have to defend Duffy as part of your mission, do you?

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      I think William's nailed it.

      Sure Duffy's comments are shockingly dubious, and make one want to laugh out loud at the utter absurdity of the man, but THAT'S THE POINT. Duffy doesn't really MEAN any of the tripe he's spewing, he's just talking crazy to get a rise out of Feschuk, Wherry and Martin.

      Feshuk's just upset that Duffy was smart enough to realize how irrelevant journalists are becoming to the voters, so he went on a campaign to kowtow to the Tories in order to get APPOINTED to government over their heads. Duffy knew no one cares what journalists think, so he decided to stop pretending to be one and to become a Senator ('cause people REALLY care what Senators think).

      Here's the only place I think William misses the mark "imagine a journalist that admits he is a Conservative". I WILL have to imagine that, 'cause while he was a "journalist" you could NEVER get Duffy to admit that he was a Conservative. The mere SUGGESTION that he was a Conservative was treated like some horrible slur; some attack on his character by the left-leaning media elite. I don't have a problem, necessarily, with the concept of a journalist who "admits he's a Conservative". The idea that Mike Duffy is such a man is utterly laughable though. Heck, even now he's pretending he's not really a Conservative, and would have preferred to sit as an Independent, and that he only backed down from that principled stance when the PM asked him (I mean, OUT LOUD!) if he'd sit as a Conservative. What was Duffy supposed to do? Say no? To the Prime Minister?!?!?

      Do you have any idea how difficult it is to say no to someone with your lips still attached to their butt?

      • William

        No LKO, I have no idea how difficult that is and I`m truly shocked that you would know !
        Duffy is like a lot of us—-we voted for Trudeau when we were younger—now we actually think about our vote and are appalled at the thought of some day having to vote for his son.
        Is there another Senator out there who can draw a crowd to a fundraiser—-well maybe Sharon Carstairs !
        —am eagerly awaiting Feschuk and Wherry`s report on what the 3 other Senators ( Liberal ) from PEI have been up to. Can anyone name them ? —didn`t think so.

        • Lord Kitchener's Own

          You and Duffy are "appalled at the thought of some day having to vote for [Trudeau's] son"??? Why would Duffy "have" to vote for Justin? He already has a Senate seat, is there something else he's angling for that Trudeau can help him get? Is he waiting for the Liberals to return to office so he can exchange a vote for Trudeau and a floor crossing for a spot in Cabinet? Is he still ticked about not being appointed to the Order of Canada, and thinking that somehow Trudeau can help? I just don't understand this future you see wherein you and Duffy will be forced to vote for Justin Trudeau.

          As for Duffy's ability to draw a crowd to a fundraiser, granted. It's good to see that you think the Tories have abandoned eliminating or reforming the Senate for a much higher purpose. Using it for partisan fund raising. Now I see the light. Sober second thought is SO yesterday. Partisan rabble rousing and party fund raising? THAT's the future of the Senate.

          • William

            Settle down LKO—-I simply brought up JUstin`s name to show that many Canadians continue to vote Liberal for reasons that may be decades if not generations old. Those of us that no longer vote Liberal have decided to actually think about our vote and not just vote Liberal because that`s what the family has always done. Those of you that continue to vote Liberal will have to hold your nose when JUstin becomes the leader.

            By the way the 2 main draws at Liberal fundraisers are a retired parliamentarian pensioner named Chretien and a future MP pensioner named Trudeau.

        • Lord Kitchener's Own

          Oh, and as for the 3 Senators from PEI that no one can name, I'll take the Senators no one ever hears from or knows about over the Senator everyone knows because he's constantly spewing dubious inanities in public any day. The fact that I know what Duffy's up to isn't a point in his favour. I seem to somehow know what Jon And Kate are up to too, but I don't want either of them anywhere near the levers of power.

          • William

            You may be content with the anonymous entitlements of the appointed Senate but I like my law-makers out in the open where I can see them and get rid of them if they are useless.

            Did you ever think that maybe Duffy is just getting ready for the campaign trail when PM Harper reforms the Senate and these entitled anonymous Senators will have to tell us how they have earned their pay cheque the past 30 odd years.

          • Lord Kitchener's Own

            "Did you ever think that maybe Duffy is just getting ready for the campaign trail when PM Harper reforms the Senate"

            No, I never thought that. I also never thought that Duffy's just warming a seat until Harper can appoint a unicorn, but that's just as likely.

            I view reforming the Senate the way I view most things the Tories (OK, almost ANY politicians) talk about. Sure, it SOUNDS good, but they're never going to actually DO IT. I put "We're going to reform the Senate" right about where I put "We're not going to tax income trusts" and "We're not going to appoint Senators" and "We're going to legislate fixed election dates" and "We're going to appoint an independent officer of Parliament to keep the budgeting process open and accountable" and "We're never going to go back in to deficit". These are things politicians say, not things they'll ever do.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Fish_30 Al O'Wishes

            I also never thought that Duffy's just warming a seat until Harper can appoint a unicorn, but that's just as likely

            Oh please! Everyone knows that unicorns can't sit in the Senate. Besides, they play too important a role in Flaherty's plan to get us out of deficit to be senators!

          • William

            In an ideal world, the Liberals in the Senate would vote for their antiquated home to be reformed, but they won`t so they have to be out-numbered for change to happen. And ideally, large corporations would pay their taxes rather then create dubious tax-loopholes, and ideally all the political parties would agree to elections every 4 years rather then forcing the gov`t to the polls when they choose. And as for your last 2 points I believe all parties agree on those and we are well under way to spending that stimulus money—-80%, I believe I heard on the radio.

          • Andrew (not P or C)

            You're suggesting that Harper didn't dissolve Parliament in the Fall. He called that election, breaking his own law.

        • Wotcher?

          There is a distinction to be made between famous and infamous.

        • Alex

          "Is there another Senator out there who can draw a crowd to a fundraiser…"

          Roméo Dallaire. He sold out the Rebecca Cohn auditorium at Dalhousie a few months ago, and it was just him with a powerpoint presentation. No dinner, no "interview" with the PM. I'd like to see Mike Duffy do that.

          There. That was easy.

      • Jonathan

        That's awesome -I didn't realize that "I was trying to get a rise out of journalists" was a good excuse for saying nonsensical tripe.

        I'd submit that Duffy's motives are irrelevant here; if he's saying stupid things, than he's saying stupid things.

      • http://www.canadianrosebud.blogspot.com rockfish

        You read it more closely you understand Duffy's got a hearing problem. Harper approached Duffy to see if he'd SIT ON a senator for him…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/OntarioTown OntarioTown

      really? Duffy is sure trying to save face here – his credibility is ziltch

      • Andrew (not P or C)

        I think he realised too late that his quest for a seat in the respected senate cost him all of his remaining credibility. He got the job, but no one will take him seriously.

  • knick

    Good to learn that his time in the Senate hasn't dulled Duffy's remarkable powers of observation, insight, and noteworthy comment.

  • Anon

    MIke Duffy. Brazeau. Del Mastro. Polievre. Baird. Khan (remember him).

    Gotta give it to Harper.

    He knows how to pick people just like him.

  • catherine

    Gee, some people don't see to have a sense of humor. What else is there to do with the topic of Duffy trying to come across as a principled non-partisan while doing Harper's shady bidding on our dime? And talking about potty mouth – take it up with Harper and his minions. I'd rather read some humor with rough language on a blog, than hear it used by our PM and his gang for the sole purpose of partisan gain.

    Anyway….thanks for some great laughs, Mr. Feschuk, on what is a pretty sad topic.

    • William

      Catherine, Would you be so kind to point out the specific example when anyone in the CPC made reference to the connection of a facial appendage of ___________ ( insert any number of CBC, CTV, Globe, Star, MacLean`s employees ) and the posterior of Master Iggy.

      • Lord Kitchener's Own

        I'll get right on that on Catherine's behalf.

        Right now though, I'm still looking for an example of a Liberal Cabinet Minister telling the elected representatives of a major Canadian city that they should F__ Off! (Or, for that matter, an example of Ignatieff appointing a clearly biased journalist to his well deserved reward in the Senate…).

        It's one thing to compare, say, Wherry to Duffy pre-appointment. Duffy getting appointed to the Senate for all his hard partisan work seems to change things in my mind. "Arguably biased journalist" is one thing. "Arguably biased journalist being rewarded for his bias with a Senate appointment by a party that claims to hold the appointed Senate as anathema" is quite another.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/DerekPearce DerekPearce

    The image of Duffy I'll always remember is him going out of his way to make Margaret Trudeau cry when he interviewed her on the Hill when PET was lying in state. Duff pointed out to her that it was the anniversary of her son's avalanche death this particular day, and she kind of appeared startled for a sec and broke down. So classy of him.

    • MJ Patchouli

      I'll never forget it either, but even though I acknowledge Puffy is a big blowhard biased senator, who was clearly biased as a journalist, I have always accepted that he didn't mean to hurt her. Your version sounds more pointedly cruel. It has gone down as the most insensitive comment I've ever heard a Canadian journalist make, given that Mrs Trudeau is not a politician, and was at the funeral of her children's father.

      • Dee

        Regardless of whether Duffy was intentionally being a prick or not to Maggie (I believe he did later apologize to her due to the public uproar), his comment still stands as one of the most boneheaded things every to come out of a journalist's mouth. That to me is Duffy: a bonehead without peer.

    • J Summers

      The word is CLASSLESS this fatass's Does not have an ounce of respect …Thus he is not respected

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

    I think it was Michel's birthday. I remember because This Hour Has 22 Minutes noted it with a two second joke: "Coming up next, celebrity birthdays with Mike Duffy!" (No video or picture, just a quick jab for anyone paying attention.).

  • Dee

    Hilarious posting, Scott. And dead on.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_A_N M_A_N

    Best part of all of this?
    Duffy made his remarks at a meeting of the "Peterborough Naval Association"…
    Spelling aside, it's just funny. Go on, say it out loud, then imagine Mike Duddy.

  • Matt

    Fun activity at home: calling Dean Del Mastro's office and asking when he goes on vacation.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/lgeubank lgeubank

    "Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Dean Del Mastro are . . . leaving no stone unturned."

    And when they paint a boat, they leave no stern untoned.

    When they throw rocks at sea birds, they leave no tern unstoned.

    That's from Ogden Nash, and it sounds right to me.

  • oppo guy

    Remember when Duffy went on live tv to tell his CTV NewsNertz audience that Lucien Bouchard was dead? The only thing that interupted the "exclusive" was Bouchard's assistant calling to say he had just came back from lunch.

    The only thing less useful than the Senate is the Senate with Mike Duffy in it. $95 million a year for a joke that no one is laughing at.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I hope Mike Duffy will leave his body to science. Either that or his morals.

    • richard

      That's a lot of science. I don't think our government has the budget for it. Then again, he might single-handedly disprove evolution, so the Tories would probably foot the bill for that.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

    If we could somehow harness the energy generated by hatred/disgust/contempt for D***y, we'd pretty much have our fossil fuel problems licked! Potter alone would provide enough for a few major cities.

    The man proves that everything our Moms taught is wrong. Honour, humility, competence, decency and values do not necessarily ensure a good outcome in this life, and sometimes completely ignoring those pays dividends. Sometimes Eddie Haskell ends up getting the last laugh. Assuming respect is of no importance. I think we can all rest easy knowing his acheivements must feel a bit empty without respect.

From Macleans