Champagne wishes

He stole $100 million, and lived like a king. Then it all fell apart.

by Steve Maich on Thursday, July 2, 2009 9:20am - 119 Comments

Initially Champagne was dismissed, not for stealing money, but for approving transactions for which he had no authority. But he knew that as soon as he was out of the building, the audits would turn up trouble. Champagne flew to the Turks to be with his family, and to wait for the mess to hit the fan. It didn’t take long. The RCMP launched a criminal investigation and searched his Ottawa-area home. The government demanded full repayment from Hewlett-Packard of all the fraudulent contracts that had flowed through the company and its predecessors over the past decade. H-P initially balked, saying that it too had been victimized. But soon it gave the government a cheque for $146 million, and launched a series of lawsuits against Champagne and others implicated in the scheme, to recover its losses.

At this point, Champagne faced a fateful decision. He was sitting in a tropical paradise, with no extradition treaty, with millions in his bank account. “I’ve got tons and tons and money, and if worse comes to worst I could have lawyers fight this for me forever,” he remembers thinking. “I can pay the lawyers ’til the day I die and, you know, there’s very little Canada can do about it.” But that is when Champagne’s story takes its final surprising twist: he had an attack of conscience. He knew that, over the years, many innocent bureaucrats at DND had unknowingly attached their signatures to his fraudulent invoices. He knew that as the scandal exploded, those people would be grilled by police. Careers would certainly be destroyed. It was entirely possible, he thought, that innocent people could end up doing jail time for his crimes, even though they had been duped. “Everything kind of fell on me,” he says. “I thought, ‘I can’t do this, I just can’t, and I can’t have this burden over my family.’ Because if I deal with it, it’ll go away eventually. Whatever sentence they give me will eventually end. You can only take so much money away from me, you can only give me so much time. So I came back.”

Then came the difficult conversation with his wife: explaining the extent of his troubles, and the fact that he would likely have to go to jail. “She was devastated at that point . . . stunned,” he admits. Telling his three kids, who were teenagers by then, wasn’t much easier.

By the time he landed back in Ottawa in the summer of 2004, Champagne was a minor media celebrity and his scheme, as he predicted, had become a political scandal. It took until February 2006 before he was charged.

He co-operated with police, took full responsibility, pleaded guilty, and in April of last year was sentenced to seven years in prison. He reached a settlement with H-P, and though the details are confidential, Champagne gave up his homes and the shares he held in various companies. He was left with enough money that his family could move to a modest home in the Ottawa area and live comfortably while Champagne went to prison.

Like most federal prisoners in Ontario, he spent three months at Millhaven maximum security penitentiary outside Kingston, being assessed and processed. There, he learned to keep to himself, mind his own business, and laugh off the jokes at his expense.

Last summer he was transferred to the minimum security Pittsburgh Institution, where prisoners live in townhouses and cook their own meals. Across the parking lot looms the hulking, medium-security Joyceville Institution. Champagne rose by six o’clock each morning to get to his job in the prison grocery store (he was manager of dry goods) by 6:30. He was paid $6.35 per day. The toughest part, he says, was knowing that his family was suffering more than he.

“I missed my [twin] children’s 18th birthday; I missed their high school graduation; I missed my son’s 21st birthday. My father-in-law broke his hip; he’s now had to be put into a nursing home. My mother-in-law was diagnosed with cancer. I missed my 50th birthday, my wife’s birthday, my 25th anniversary, and my mother died—all within this year,” he says. “I’m in a place where they feed you, they take care of you, you’re warm. My wife’s had to deal with all this by herself.” Still, she stuck by him, and on June 3, 14 months after entering prison, he was granted early release after serving one-sixth of his sentence. Currently, he’s at an Ottawa-area halfway house pondering the big question: what now?

In his optimistic moments, Champagne imagines he might create a happy ending for himself, like Frank Abagnale Jr., the former con man who became an expert on investigating fraud. Leonardo DiCaprio played him in the biopic Catch Me If You Can. But mostly, his hopes are modest and largely undefined. “I’m 51 years old, and I’m high profile,” he says. “But I gotta get back working.” He never misses a chance to remind you that he’s sorry. Sorry for what he did, and sorry for what he lost too.

“I certainly miss the job, and I miss the respect that came with that job,” he says. “Is it a lot better being rich than not rich? Oh, absolutely. Whoever says it isn’t, is probably rich. And I have to realize I’ll always be seen in a different light. I certainly have extreme guilt over the other people who were affected . . . and my family.”

And, because he knows the world will always wonder, he states categorically that there is “no pot of gold waiting out there,” no secret stash of money to be scooped up when no one is looking. On that point, like so many others, you just have to take Paul Champagne’s word for it.

Bookmark and Share
  • Deep in thought

    I am very interested in all that is getting dragged into this debate. I admittedly have some strong feelings here.

    There is not much to defend here about this guy – He is a criminal. He stole money. He admit it. There is nothing noble about crime – regardless of how much money you save people along the way. Interestingly enough, i'll bet a few of these angry posters don't hate robin hood they way they hate this fellow.

    What I really don't understand is the fixation with punishment in our society. Sorry folks, but it is VERY old news that punishment has very little effect on behaviour. If you spank your kid they will probably not act out until you leave the room.
    'positive reinforcement' is what changes behaviour. Pull people over and give them scratch and win tickets if you see them wearing seatbelts, and suddenly the whole town is wearing seatbelts all the time – 20 years later, 19 after the scratch and win tickets are no longer being given out and people are still religiously wearing seatbelts….

    More next paragraph

  • Deep in thought

    I think there is really somthing sadly archaic and perhaps even beastly about human nature that seems to have us 'enjoy' watching others suffer. we know that this person did something very wrong, and for that we want them to endure suffering. Nothing good comes of it. They will not learn any lesson, as we know (basic entrly level psychology classes teach that. In addition basic entry level criminology level classes teach that stricter consequences do not influence behaviour. For example, the year after Canada stopped giving the death penalty, murder rates dropped… People were terrified suddenly everyone and their grandmother would go on killing sprees because of the absence of mega punishments – but that clearly didn't happen. Why? because when someone commits crimes they are not thinking about the negative consequences) it does not influence behaviour.
    Thefore, the only real benefit to punishing people is the pleasure others experience in watching the individual being punished suffer.
    Keep in mind, A) Strict consequences do not influence behaviour {Ask any criminologist). B) Punishment is a very ineffective method of changing behaviour (ask any psychologist).
    more next paragraph

  • Deep in thought

    So why is it people are crying the blues about our justice system?

    Now, i am not in a million years going to stand up for this guy. He agreed to his salary when he took the job. If he was to be making a commission on $ saved, that should have been discussed when he is hired. As far as i am concerned, saving the government that much money was him doing his job.
    The big issue to me, that i see very little discussion on, is the budget spending. I was very taken back by the comment that underspending is about as horrible as over spending because it means budget cuts. This notion causes a horrifying amount of wasteful spending, and indeed, led to this absurd scam. That issue needs some serious attention.
    Just my thoughts.

    • observer

      The entire "problem" started and was "allowed" to continue in order to make budget. Spend it or lose it still persists.

  • http://www.eternityweddingbands.com gold wedding rings

    I really don't get it. How could that happen?

  • Anonymous

    Way to go Paul, or should I say Reggie. Always knew you could do it. Just wished I was around when the money began to roll in. Pisses me off I missed out on the parties, the Sens games, the trips, golf,and all the fun. I chose to live honestly and to think how I could have lived had I followed in your foot steps. You know who I am. Look at the sig. There is only one person knows what that means. We all admired what we thought you had done, but at the same time we knew it couldn’t be true. The real story is actually what we should have expected. You were always a thief. Remember your poker line, “I play to win”, while stealing from your best friends at cards. Nice. I should have figured it out long before anyone else did. I knew just from looking you in the face in the summer of ’98 something was up. Fact is I know you too well and your comments to Macleans are just more of the same old shenanigans. C’mon, Paul like your wife thought that you bought her a half million in jewelery and homes in Turks and Caicos and Florida on govt bonuses and it was all gotten legally. Lets see, couple million govt employees, and consultants out there and your the only one cashing those kind of cheques. Give me a break. Paul, send me some of that cash you’ve got stashed and we’ll call it even. You can find me if you look hard enough. I’ll be waiting. Thanks (remember index finger on side of nose when we make our meet)

  • Just an average Joe

    Get off the band wagon.

    Champagne and others have bought into this notion that Champagne saved DND millions of dollars under his stewardship. The fact is that Champagne occupied a desk at DND during a period when everyone in the world was realizing that is was cheaper to replace a computer or laptop than have a technician repair it.

    Maintenance contracts were cancelled and replaced with the purchasing of fancy new laptops, let's face it every employee was happy to receive the latest and greatest new gadget.

    That left a spending void that Champagne filled with phony invoices.

    Giving yourself credit for the sun coming up every morning is The God complex Champagne refers to.

  • Sad Taxpayer

    I am sorry, but something is not right here. He was able to make a deal with HP to keep, from what I understand is a nice house and have the family expenses paid for while in jail as JDK mentioned. How is this possible, and the Macleans reporter did not clue into this. He steal $100 million and he only spents 16 months and walks to a home and happy family. I have to agree that there is more to this then the great reporting we get from the PR man. Sad, but this is Canada.

  • yodelayeehoo

    Strange response…… are you referring to me? I thought you were a government employee critical of the theft? My posting was for Champagne or Viking or maninthemirror or whatever he's calling himself. I think maybe we have ferreted out the truth here. How many different names are you using here Champagne? As for meeting up….when and where?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/imagefine imagefine

    I apologize. I mixed your e-mail up with maninthemirror. I am definitely a government employee critical of the theft. And I have a lot of friends over at DND who are appalled by what Champagne did and how long it took to catch him.

From Macleans