True North Strong and Free, but only until the man upstairs decides otherwise

I was feeling pretty good there for a moment while watching Stephen Harper’s Canada…

by Scott Feschuk on Thursday, July 2, 2009 7:30am - 117 Comments

I was feeling pretty good there for a moment while watching Stephen Harper’s Canada Day greeting.

There he was, our Prime Minister, praising “the wisdom of our ancestors who built this great land,” which is nice, and giving “thanks to those brave Canadians who risk their lives to defend us,” which is also nice. Plus, Harper did the video at his residence at Harrington Lake, which allowed us to watch the water for signs of an innertubing Mike Duffy.

To recap then: Ancestors? Build this land. Troops? Defended it. As for the current crop of Canadians, we are apparently “strong and resilient” and “committed to common values.” A little generic, but fine. We’ll take it. Beats being called “weak-willed and majorly fruity.”

But then a curious thing happened – Harper concluded his brief remarks not with a tried and true farewell, like “Long live Canada” or “Seacrest out,” but instead by stating: “May God continue to keep our land glorious and free.”

Whoawhoawhoa. Whoa. I thought our ancestors made us glorious and free. I thought our troops defended our glory and our freedom. But no, turns out our glory and freedom are all the work of an omnipotent deity who squeezes us in between determining the outcome of professional sporting events and hearing the prayers of potentially pregnant teenagers.

Now I wish Harper’s speech had gotten more into the details. How exactly does God keep us free? Does He put up some invisible “God shield” that keeps out terrorists? Does He conduct a semi-annual smiting of aspiring despots? Is it He who each winter keeps back from our cities the packs of ravaging yeti?

And what does God do to “continue to keep our land glorious?” Is that Him creating the northern lights and Elisha Cuthbert’s cleavage?

I’m sure we’ll get the answers to these and other important questions at some point other than during the next election campaign, when Harper will by complete coincidence stop mentioning God.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

    Geez. I leave you guys alone for a day…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Youz guys are getting all theological? With FESCHUK? Over a line riffed from the national anthem? Good God… I mean holy mol– no, that won't do… For Pete's sa– uh, scratch that… What in the name of Jes– oh, never mind…

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/AxeGrrl AxeGrrl

    When at an event that involves singing the anthem, I sing:

    "Let's keep our land, glorious and free…."

    am I a bad Canadian? :)

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/AxeGrrl AxeGrrl

    When at an event that involves singing the anthem, I sing:

    "Let's keep our land, glorious and free…."

    am I a bad Canadian? :)

    • jarrid

      No, merely an ungrateful one.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/AxeGrrl AxeGrrl

        it makes me 'ungrateful' because……?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/PhilCP PhilCP

      Or maybe a role model…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/OntarioTown OntarioTown

    Christian bashing? Good grief. A good Christian would realize that Christ believed in the separation of church and state (those money making Chrisitian right wing clerical people never bring that up) -

    Paying Taxes & Separation of Church & State: Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the
    things that are God's. [Matthew 22:21]

  • VelisEtRemis

    Meaningless comment. "Separation of Church and state" need have nothing to do with invocations of God. So God is the Canadian constitution, but Canada has separation of church and state. Martin Luther King talked about God nonstop, but he wasn't against the separation of Church and state. And so on.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Feschuk's point was not that Harper invoked God but that he did so in an unintentionally comic fashion. "Continue to keep our land glorious and free" implies that God has been working overtime to keep us glorious and free and that we hope he'll keep up the good work. It is not pious to patronise your deity.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Feschuk's point was not that Harper invoked God but that he did so in an unintentionally comic fashion. "Continue to keep our land glorious and free" implies that God has been working overtime to keep us glorious and free and that we hope he'll keep up the good work. It is not pious to patronise your deity. But then again I keep forgetting that our Christian brothers & sisters tend to view God as a lapel pin.

  • VelisEtRemis

    The only kinds of people who could seriously think that that's the only thing which Harper's comment imply are people who have simply never thought seriously about religious questions in the first place. Basically, God is invoked as a necessary but insufficient condition. There's a lot more to be said about that, which could be said to people who were more seriousness than snarky.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    "Snark" is exactly how I'd characterise contemporary Christianity.

From Macleans