Water fights

Much of the world is desperately short of fresh water. Are future water wars inevitable?

by Nancy Macdonald on Monday, July 6, 2009 8:46am - 26 Comments

Water fightsEvery few days, another farmer commits suicide in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin, the agricultural heartland. Many, according to Australian evolutionary biologist Tim Flannery, haven’t had any water in almost four years—in places, the allocation of irrigation water has been cut to zero. Their farms have dried up, leaving a dusty, wind-whipped scrubland. Cattle bellow from hunger through the night. “Despair is an enormous problem,” says Flannery. “There is no sign the situation will ever improve.” Government has compiled a suicide watch list.

The world’s flattest, driest and most vulnerable inhabited continent is gravely low on water. The “Mighty Murray”—Australia’s Mississippi—is on the verge of collapse: in places, children can hop over it. National production of rice has fallen from a million tons annually to 21,000 tons last year, contributing to soaring global food prices. Cotton and citrus are also crashing. The problem is now creeping into the cities. Earlier this year, the national water commissioner announced that, as of 2010, he could no longer guarantee security of supply of water for critical use to Adelaide, says Flannery, author of the acclaimed book The Weather Makers. “That’s Australia’s fifth-largest city.” Two years ago, the prime minister urged Aussies to “pray for rain—literally, and without any irony.”

Running Dry: Part 1 of a seriesAustralians, proudly “sunburnt” according to the hackneyed national myth, have withstood long dry spells before. But the current seven-year drought has come to be known as “the big dry.” It is the longest, hottest and most devastating in the country’s history. To Flannery, Australia, the world’s 15th-biggest economy, is a climate canary, learning first the hard lessons on the limits of water in an era of shifting weather patterns. He reckons the western U.S. may be hit next.

The crisis in Australia is an extreme version of shortages hitting the U.S. Southwest, Israel and North Africa, focusing attention on what may be the most immediate environmental crisis facing the world: shortages of water. Far more than oil, our societies run on water. And unlike oil, there is no substitute for it. Yet an increasing body of evidence suggests there simply isn’t enough to support future population and economic growth, not to mention waste born of years of abundance in places like Canada, one of the world’s biggest water consumers.

From Tofino to Tucson, hydrologists, limnologists and government officials are reporting similar climatic trends: a longer dry season, less snow, more rain and earlier spring melts. “Half the annual flow of the Fraser now occurs nine days early,” says Steve Litke of the Fraser Basin Council, a Vancouver NGO that studies the health of the massive watershed—home to two-thirds of B.C.’s population. These shifting climate patterns are changing “where, when and how” water falls and flows, eroding our ability to manage water for large populations, says Meena Palaniappan, with the San Francisco-based Pacific Institute.

Take California: snowpack from the Sierra Nevada mountain range provides the bulk of its water. But even the most optimistic climate models are showing a 30 to 70 per cent reduction of the Sierra Nevada snowpack by the second half of the century. This year, snowfall in the mountain range was down to about two-thirds of normal. By 2050, California’s population will have grown to 60 million, up from 36 million today. The “exploding” human population in the U.S. Southwest and its shrinking clean water supply are clearly on two “colliding paths,” acknowledges Pat Mulroy, the outspoken head of the Southern Nevada Water Authority. She oversees Las Vegas, the most vulnerable metro area on the continent, still “very much in the throes of an ugly drought” now entering its ninth year.

By contrast, Canada, with 20 per cent of the world’s freshwater resources, and less than one per cent of its population, looks like the Saudi Arabia of water. China, for example, has less than half Canada’s supply and 40 times as many people. Still, scientists warn that Canada is facing a distribution problem: 80 per cent of the country’s water resources are locked in the north, while 80 per cent of the population is packed along the U.S. border. Freshwater is scarce in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, says David Schindler, one of the country’s top water scientists. There, he adds, lakes were retreating even in the 20th century: the wettest century of the past millennium, according to tree-ring fieldwork done by the universities of Arizona and Regina. Schindler predicts a likely mid-century return to ’30s-era, “dust-bowl” conditions—yes, even in Manitoba, land of 100,000 lakes—noting a 30 to 85 per cent reduction in summer river flows in the previous 30 years.

As aquifers under Beijing, Delhi, San Antonio and dozens more cities with mushrooming populations dry up, some experts suggest the era of cheap, easy access to water is coming to an end. Palaniappan calls it “peak water”: the point when demand outstrips renewable supply, and resources trend ominously downward. Humans, she says, are extracting and polluting it faster than it can be replenished. “In the developing world, more than 90 per cent of all sewage, and 70 per cent of industrial waste, is dumped untreated into surface water,” says Robert Sandford, Canadian chair of the UN Water for Life initiative, noting that 75 per cent of the river water flowing through China’s cities is unfit for drinking or fishing. This summer, Lake Mead, the largest reservoir in the U.S., which supplies nearly all the water for Las Vegas, fell to 43 per cent capacity. The Scripps Institute of Oceanography has given it 50-50 odds of surviving to 2021. Levels on the Sea of Galilee, the largest freshwater source in Israel—locked into year five of a devastating drought—have fallen to within inches of the “danger line.” Last year, Atlanta came within 90 days of running out of water.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Great article, and I look forward to the whole series.

    There doesn't seem any way around this paradox: the world has too many people, and yet our prosperity is premised on continuous growth, including growth in population. Worse, there is a short-term competitive advantage in having a growing population, at least until you hit Chinese or Indian levels of overpopulation. We're living in the latter days of the Roman Empire, and the Fall will be no easier this time around.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

      I take it you're a "glass half empty" kind of guy. :) Personally, I have a certain naive optimism about the potential for human progress and technological progress to ultimately overcome these challenges. Still, it's bound to be a rocky road along the way.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Be_rad Be_rad

    In order to avoid trendy jargon and facile scare language, the whole 'peak-____' thing ought to be eschewed. Nonetheless, a good article and an example of the one indictment of human kind – can we think in decades, centuries, milennia instead of living just for today?

    Can we look upon our fellow man as our neighbour in the biblical sense, or must we always be self-referential and only think about the lowest common denominator of neighbour?

    Why is it that a certain brand of partisan can look at a problem and see the need for a solution if you can declare war on it but see no problem if it means self sacrifice and sharing?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/freshlysqueezed freshlysqueezed

    Even scarier is the prospect of Canadians depending on the U.S., in the long term, to help us protect this abundance of fresh water. Unfortunately, how do you think we'll be re-paying them? We'll be the Georgia to their Russia.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Be_rad Be_rad

      Resisting temptation to use fox-and-henhouse…still resisting…

      Aaargghhhh – FOX and HENHOUSE!

      Really, though, Dr. Halter's remarks below underline our shortsighted tendencies. In a rush to pay part of the rent now, we risk giving away the entire farm at ridiculously low prices that will look crimnally stupid in the future. (OK for get the rosy altruism of my post above, I can also be greedy). But think Churchill Falls. Will we be Nfld/Lab to Quebec to the rest of the world?

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Be_rad Be_rad

      Resisting temptation to use fox-and-henhouse…still resisting…

      Aaargghhhh – FOX and HENHOUSE!

      Really, though, Dr. Halter's remarks below underline our shortsighted tendencies. In a rush to pay part of the rent now, we risk giving away the entire farm at ridiculously low prices that will look criminally stupid in the future. (OK forget the rosy altruism of my post above, I can also be greedy). But think Churchill Falls. Will we be Nfld/Lab to Quebec to the rest of the world?

  • Dr Reese Halter

    Here in California we too are very dry. Our Governor turned off the tap to the tune of $3B for some farmers and water restrictions and huge rate increases have begun as of 1 July 2009 in southern California.
    It was odd and perplexing that BC Premier attempted to sell hundreds of water rights on crown land. There is no question that with 60 glaciers retreating in BC and a deep drought in California, Australia and parts of China that fresh water is of paramount importance. It is NOT acceptable that the Albertan tar sands are toxifying any freshwater ways whatsoever because that pollution is entering the Arctic Ocean and eventually circulating the globe.

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/california-dro…
    Dr Reese
    http://DrReese.wordpress.com

    • Peimac

      The water used in Ft. McMurray can hardly be considered fresh. Chunky, diseased and unhealthy but not fresh. The Athabasca River is hopefully far removed from peoples idea of drinking water.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/gridlockjaw gridlockjaw

      I have been watching our Premier dance to the Big Oil tune with growing outrage. Our local newspapers will not rock the boat as Big Oil has kept us out of economic woes, but at a very, very high price. Everyone in Calgary drives a big truck and Hummers are as common as bottled water. We definitely have our heads stuck in the tar sands. We need a national intervention as this will effect all of Canada. Clearly, no one in Alberta is willing to sacrifice our cash cow even if it is foaming at the mouth and staggering around like Klein at a BBQ.

      Alberta Girl

  • Robyn

    Where did you get your statistics re. every few days a farmer committing suicide in the Murray Darling Basin ? I can't seem to find any official record of that online or in Australian media reports. Seems exaggerated on the face of it.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SirJohn_Eh SirJohn_Eh

    Lets not forget the advances in de-salinization. Ocean water can and is currently being treated at facilities that are continually becoming more efficient at doing the job. California, Australia, China etc. all have access to salt water that can be made potable. Of course the infrastructure needed to make this water AND carry it to where it is needed will be huge. Surely, this option would be fully exploited before war – I would hope anyways. Actually I think Australia is starting some de-sal projects.

    • Andrew

      The de-sal projects in Australia are for urban supply only – Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Brisbane. The Murray-Darling Basin, as an inland system, does not currently have a plan for de-sal. To get the water across the ranges – salt or other – will simply be cost-prohibitive. In any event, de-sal uses enormous amounts of energy. That's fine if you have access to non-polluting sources – but Australia runs on coal…

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/SirJohn_Eh SirJohn_Eh

        The energy demands are indeed large, but the newer membrane technologies are significantly better. This is one very worthwhile use for energy I would say. I just read an Aussie press release on their new project and at least they are buying green energy credits to offset it.

        Australia definitely has access to non-polluting sources – they just havent tapped them. Solar and Wind are massive resources they have mostly eschewed due to their history of burning easy to scoop coal.

        Your right that it doesn thelp much with the problem in-land from lack of rain. Sadly they will have a lot of pain as they necessarily adjust to the realities of their (permanently changed?) climate – or agree to pay billions to prop up farming there. But as far as the potential for use of force over water supplies worldwide, I think we have to realise this isnt as likely as we have been lead to believe over the last decade or so.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    History has clearly shown that we solve water shortages through trade and international agreements, and not by picking up a gun.

    Actually, history has shown that the battle over scarce essential resources has almost always been violent. RECENT history is the anomaly.

    • André

      Recently, US corporations were trying to privatise water in El Salvador. People had to pay to collect rain water. The people revolted against their government for allowing this to happen and the government protected the corporation's interests… going as far as armed conflicts.

  • wayne moores

    I'm just wondering how the war between Canada and Australia is going to be conducted and how they plan to secund all our water back to Oz. Ironically it's been raining here for about three weeks. I'm sure billions if not trillions of liters of water have just run out every river and stream and on into the Atlantic. Anyone wanna buy some? One of the biggest problems in places like Oz and our Praries where settled during periods of relative heavier than normal rain. Early explorers to Western Canada advised that no settlement be undertaken there as it was a dry wasteland. Then mass settlement was allowed to happen in the mid 1800's, a wet period. People were then stunned when the dust bowl happened in the dirty 30's. Like it had many times over the previous 1000 years. But everyone was shocked. Mother nature runs on her own time line, not human time line. Remember when it was getting really hot in the 80's, wow this gotta be global warming. Well if people can look past the alarmists we are now into our second decade of global cooling(.19 of a degree actually. I'm sure the fanatics will want my head now. Cheers.

    • http://twitter.com/ResilientMichae @ResilientMichae

      Well said Wayne. Nature runs on 100, 1000, 100,000 1,00,000 ++ year cycles. To quote a former geology professor of mine.
      Cripes Ballard humans are so stupid. They build whole subdivisions on 100 and 1000 yr flood plains, government buildings on fault lines and then are surprised when something bad happens.

  • Justin

    This article perpetuates a myth that i've seen again and again..

    Canada has only about 6-7 % of the world's renewable fresh water. Not 20%

  • Maurier

    The answer is no.

    Learn some science people.

    google water cycle if you didn't finish your undergrad degree or return to your local community college to become slightly less retarded.

    • wayne moores

      Sir, you might need to be reminded, when you start ranting and name calling you have already lost the arguement. Cheers.

  • Eugene

    In the ex-USSR in Schevchenko city (modern Aktau, Kazakhstan) we have had a desalination nuclear power plant BN-350 to supply fresh water from Caspian Sea to the city (120,000 m³ fresh water/day).

  • http://twitter.com/xlldo @xlldo

    New article on world-wide water shortages:
    http://www.orato.com/health-science/water-shortag…

  • lawrence

    i read thiss article i think it is saying about the happenings which will be happening in the past

  • http://www.premieresapconsultants.com top SAP Consultant

    The question would be if the supply of water in the near future is drinkable or not. There's no question of supply, it's the cleanliness that could be an issue.

  • http://www.spartanmoving.com/ San Francisco Movers

    I always admired and very much wondered with nature. I think the fight between human may sole but water?

  • http://howtosellgoldforcash.com Where to Sell Gold

    These people need to understand that there are wet and dry cycles to places like this. Like Michae said nature runs on 100, 1000, 100,000, and even 1,00,000 or more year cycles. It amazes me that people still fail to understand this simple concept.

From Macleans