Pride goeth before a (ministerial) fall? (UPDATED)

by kadyomalley on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 7:28am - 57 Comments

SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES!

ITQ was somewhat intrigued by this story, which showed up on LifeSite News yesterday (and major thanks to National Newswatch for posting the link, since LifeSite isn’t usually on our must-read morning news list, and to BigCityLiberal, who tipped him off):

Canadian Conservative MP: Party Funding of Gay Pride Parade Came as a Shock to Most of Caucus
Minister Ablonczy likely lost the file over the matter, and review of tourism spending is underway

The revelation of $400,000 in funding from the federal Conservatives for the recent Toronto Gay Pride parade, which is notorious for its inclusion of full frontal nudity and public sex acts by homosexuals, came as a shock to most social conservatives in the nation.

According to Conservative MP Brad Trost, however, the decision to fund the event also came a shock to most of the Conservative caucus, even those inside the Prime Minister’s office. Speaking to LifeSiteNews.com from his riding office in Saskatoon today, the 36-year-old Conservative said, “The pro-life and the pro-family community should know and understand that the tourism funding money that went to the gay pride parade in Toronto was not government policy, was not supported by – I think it’s safe to say by a large majority – of the MPs. This was a very isolated decision.”

Trost also hinted that Minister Diane Ablonczy, who was responsible for the funding, lost the file as a consequence of the embarrassment to the Party. Protesting more than once that there was no “official connection,” he said, however, “it should be noted that the file has been reassigned to a different Cabinet Minister since that announcement was made.” He added, “The whole tourism program and funding for major tourism events is being reviewed.” Trost claimed that “almost the entire Conservative caucus” including “most of the Prime Minister’s Office were taken by surprise at this announcement.” “It shouldn’t be deemed to have been a change in Party policy,” he said, adding, “Most of the caucus is still strongly pro-traditional marriage.”

The MP attributed the move to “sloppiness.” “Canadian taxpayers, even non-social-conservative ones, don’t want their tax dollars to go to events that are polarizing or events that are more political than touristic in nature,” he said.

“Well, that’s — curious,” ITQ thought to herself. She hadn’t heard of any intercabinet file shuffling related to the for-goodness-sakes-don’t-call-it-sponsorship Marquee Event Funding Program, which was set up earlier this year to dole out $100 million in stimulicious funding, and is — or, at least, was — managed by Industry Canada, with Ablonczy taking the lead on the file in her capacity as Minister of State (Small Business and Tourism).

As far as ITQ can tell, Ablonczy is still the minister responsible for tourism – and, by extension, the marquee event program, and she did, indeed, announce that Pride Toronto would be receiving $400,000 in funding last month. But if you check the news releases issued since then, every one appears to have been made by a different MP or minister on her behalf.

During the last two weeks of June, funding for the Cisco Bluesfest was announced by John Baird, for the Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu International Balloon Festival, it was Christian Paradis, and for the TD Bank International Jazz Festival, it was Pierre Poilievre.

On July 2nd, Ablonczy’s name – and ministry – vanishes entirely from the marquee event announcement boilerplate:

On behalf of the Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Industry, the Honourable Peter MacKay, Minister of National Defence and Minister for the Atlantic Gateway, today announced the Government of Canada’s investment of over $460 000 to support the Royal Nova Scotia International Tattoo.

“Today’s announcement is exciting news to all involved in the Royal Nova Scotia International Tattoo,” said Minister MacKay. “The assistance from the Marquee Tourism Events Program highlights the Canadian government’s recognition of the immense impact that the Royal Nova Scotia International Tattoo and other such marquee events have on the visitor economy.”

On this release, Ablonczy’s office is also no longer listed as a contact — instead, calls are directed to Clement’s office, or departmental media relations.

So, is Brad Trost right? Did PMO take a — some might say the — major government tourism program away from Diane Ablonczy because she gave money to Toronto’s gay pride festival? ITQ sent off an email asking that very question earlier today, and will let you know what she finds out. Stay tuned!

SORT-OF-AN-UPDATE (1): According to PMO, Industry is handling calls on this, so ITQ’s questions have been forwarded thither. I’ll post the response as soon as I’ve got it.

UPDATE (2): Well, ITQ is still waiting to hear back from Industry Canada — Darren Cunningham, where are you? — but the intrepid Susan Delacourt tracked down Diane Ablonczy’s chief of staff, Rob Taylor, who says that as far as he knows, she’s still the minister. (Note to Rob Taylor: As long as the car and driver are still showing up, that’s probably a good sign.)

Case closed? Well, not exactly. Remember, in his interview with LifeSite News, Brad Trost claimed that the file had been taken away from her, and given to another, unnamed minister to manage, and in the most recent funding announcement, Ablonczy is no longer mentioned as the responsible minister, nor is her office listed as a contact. We’ll just have to wait to hear from Industry Canada before we know for sure whether the tourism minister is, indeed, still in charge of the Marquee Event Funding Program.

—-

UPDATE (3): CP’s Karine Fortin reports the following:

A spokesperson for Industry Minister Tony Clement confirmed on Tuesday that his boss had been put in charge of allocating funds for the Marquee Tourism Events Program.

Clement’s spokesperson explained that the suspension of parliamentary work for the summer means he’s got enough free time to take over for Ablonczy. He added that the program was part of the stimulus measures included in last January’s budget and was therefore not part of Ablonczy’s responsibilities.

The minister’s office refused to draw a direct link between the change in direction and the funds handed out to the festival, the 29th edition of which took place this past June 19-28 in Toronto. The $400,000 allocation went to improving the event’s lineup and to facilitate access to the site for people with reduced mobility.

The team that approved the grant for Gay Pride remains in place to evaluate requests, said the spokesperson.

A Conservative caucus member who didn’t want to be identified told Canadian Press the sponsorship of the festival didn’t make waves at the last party meeting and that only five MPs objected to it.

The MP said Trost was making things up when he said there had been a caucus revolt.

For more, check out the followup post here.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wascally_Wabbit Wascally_Wabbit

    Let's face it Kady – one thing that Harper is – is consistent – consistent in his narrow minded view of the world!

    I don't think he ever had the GLBT vote – but this basically will put an emphatic block on him getting it anytime soon!

  • http://liberalvideodepot.blogspot.com Ted

    Seems remarkably vindictive on Ablonczy just to make a point with the base.

    Along with the many silly "tough on criminals" policiettes and saying the Bloc support pedophiles, it leads one to believe that they really are quite worried about their social conservative base, the ones who automatically send them millions and millions of dollars, organize for elections and actually get out and vote.

    Any word on when the full quarterly fundraising numbers will be out (with apologies to Kady: http://preview.tinyurl.com/Show-Me-The-Donors-Mon…

  • Anon

    How could they demote Diane Ablonczy any more?

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      LOL,

      Honestly though, I feel bad for her. I certainly don't agree with her on much policy-wise, and (ironically, given this story) she's much too conservative for my tastes, but I've often thought she was too good for the cretins she works with, and didn't get the prestige due her. This just reinforces that feeling.

  • http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com bigcitylib

    The Tories use Lifesite to speak to their base, often to tell them things that they really don't want the MSM picking up on. (Kenney on the politics of Morgentaler, for example). Very handy to keep an eye on, I find, although difficult to actually read at times (Is Obama the Anti-Christ? and etc.)

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

      With a big, juicy, teaser like that (Is Obama the Anti-Christ? ) I immediately visited the Lifesite website to check out the insanity. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered that it was only a Letter to the Editor, authored by some loopy Catholic novelist who answered his own question ("No").

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

      With a big, juicy, teaser like that (Is Obama the Anti-Christ?) I immediately visited the Lifesite website to check out the insanity. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered that it was only a Letter to the Editor, authored by some loopy Catholic novelist who answered his own question ("No").

      • Blues Clair

        True, author only claimed Obama "is of the spirit of Antichrist (perhaps without knowing it),".

        • Canuckistanian

          seems like a ("Yes") to me

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

            If you actually read the letter, he says "No." Still, as I pointed out, the letter writer seems loopy.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

        Kudos. Someone who checks the source before believing the report is a rare find.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

          Thanks.

  • John D

    Oh noes guys, we accidentally did something progressive!

  • Lord Kitchener's Own

    Between this move by Ablonczy and Jim Flaherty's blatant support of the "homosexual agenda", what's a neanderthal to think?

    Also, I love the headline.

  • http://liberal-arts-and-minds.blogspot.com/ libartsandminds

    What's odd is the fact that the caucus and PMO had no knowledge of this.

    It doesn't fit.

    • Kerry

      Bingo. I was under the impression that not a single public dollar could be spent without the approval of the president of the treasury board, and that nothing can happen without the approval of the PMO. Something is fishy.

  • tired of gaybashing

    Amazing how the focus remains on full frontal nudity – there were about ten elderly men in the parade of around 7,000 people that were naked and they passed by with hardly anyone noticing them or commenting on them… Hardly constitutes gratuitous offensiveness.

    • Bionic Borden

      How many does?

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      It should be pointed out that the grant wasn't for the parade, per se, but for Pride Week as an event in total. The money was spent making venues accessible for disabled visitors and hiring performers for the week's festivities. Maybe some of the money went toward the parade, maybe not, but most certainly the money didn't all go to the parade, and I don't think more than 50% (if that) did.

  • Two Hats

    Is anyone else upset that this site is confusing federal government funding with money coming from the Conservative Party? I had to read far more closely than I would have like to understand that "funding from the federal Conservatives" didn't mean that the CPC was donating to the parade. It is important that the government be fair and broadly representative with its distribution of ("taxpayer's") money when administering programs like the tourism funding one. The pride parade in Toronto is a major public event; the gov't can't reasonably deny funds to it once they set up a public event funding program.

    Indeed, I am far more concerned with the casual conflating of government with party in this publication, than with it's predicable, farcical bigotry.

    • Matty

      I agree, especially with BigCityLib's mention of the Obama as Anti-Christ story… why are Conservative MPs even DEALING with this publication???

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

        I just checked out the website: the only reference to Obama as Antichrist comes from a Letter To the Editor written by a "Catholic novelist", Michael O' Brian. It was hardly a story. (Generally speaking, Canadian "social conservatives" are nicer and much more sane than their US counterparts, so it's rare to see crap like that north of the border).

        • http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com bigcitylib

          That was just an example that stood out for me. Lifesite also at one time (but not now) linked to an advert for "The Pink Swastika". Wanna guess what that's about?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

            If you visit that site regularly, I'm surprised that you don't have better examples of how wacky those Lifesite dudes are. A letter to the editor? An auto-generated ad you claim once appeared on their site? Pretty thin gruel, it seems.

          • http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com bigcitylib

            Actual title from The LifeSite: Ronald McDonald Cozies Up To Homosexual Movement.

            We could go on like this all day.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

            LOL. A headline like that one belongs in the Onion.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/ottawasteph ottawasteph

        I'm just grateful that NN subscribes to Lifesite, so we don't have to!

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      I've been running around pointing out that the other thing being confused is funding for Pride Week, versus funding for the Pride Parade. It should be pointed out that the grant wasn't for the parade, per se, but for Pride Week as an event in total. My understanding is that the money was spent making venues accessible for disabled visitors and hiring performers for the week's festivities. Maybe some of the money went toward the parade, maybe not, but most certainly the money didn't all go to the parade, and I don't think more than 50% (if that) did.

  • an online reader

    Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
    Matthew (ch. VII, v. 12)

    Verily , verily I say unto you , no more cons. meeting in Airport washrooms . We are the same as you ! ( in of the closet that is )

    • an online reader

      " The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision.
      Author: Doug Macleod
      "

      • http://runesmith.blogspot.com runesmith

        Hee hee hee! I'm totally stealing that.

  • Mr. Michael

    egads – a working Journalist! A-W-E-S-O-M-E!

    Waiting for the answer from he PMO….

  • Dave

    Love these ReformaTories. The turnip never falls far from the truck.

  • John D

    If this is the worse thing to come of Sponsorship Scandal II, then Ablonczy should get a medal

  • Ken S from Ramara

    The redneckedness of the CPC agenda scares the hell out of me! The private, religious views of their caucus be of concern to all Canadians. It appears the CPC agenda is to see Canada turned into a fundamentalist christian theocracy.

  • Canuckistanian

    "don’t want their tax dollars to go to events that are polarizing or events that are more political than touristic in nature,” he said."

    "polarizing"? isn't pride about bringing people together in harmony; breaking down artificial barriers like sexual orientaion and celebrating humanity in all its diversity. the only things polarizing are these regressive theocrats; they live to polarize…its their crack.

    as for the lifesite article, can you say: 'dog whistle politics'?

  • Bill

    I watched the entire Pride parade on-line and although I did enjoy it, I did not see a single "public sex act" by homosexuals. Damn!

    • Darrell

      * Your opinion of what constitutes a 'sex act' may differ from that of Gwen Landolt.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

        In more ways than one.

  • TrueNorth

    The 'file' means the Pride file. So it goes from Tourism to where? Arts & Culture? Heritage? Multiculturalism? I say give it Bev Oda, she needs something to do.

    • Darrell

      Promote Ed Fast to: Secretary of State (not that there's anything wrong with that)

  • James Halifax

    The Pride parade in T.O is far more tame than the display in San Francisco. I've seen what goes on in San Fran, and let me tell you, no matter how "Progressive" you think you are…….some of the things done in public during THAT spectacle, are enough to turn your stomach.

    If in doubt….go visit the "zombietime" homepage for photo's.

    Truly depraved and disgusting.

    As for tax-dollars going to the parade………….I imagine the Feds make that back in the taxes they collect from the festivities.

    • Sea Otter

      Indeed. Why do so many people in the pride parades insist on walking down the street virtually naked? (Gay or straight, many of them do not have the body to pull it off either.) I'm all for parades, but I am quite certain it is possible to be gay, proud and clothed all at the same time.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

        And to be virtually naked and straight at the same time.

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      The grant wasn't for the parade, but for all of Pride Week. My understanding is that the money was spent making venues accessible for disabled visitors and hiring performers for the week's festivities. Maybe some of the money went toward the parade, maybe not, but most certainly the money didn't all go to the parade, if any did.

  • James Halifax

    If in doubt…check this out.

    http://www.zombietime.com/

    • Darrell

      Wow, and I thought I regretted visiting lifesite…

      Also, I couldn't find the photos you mentioned.

      • James Halifax

        Darrell, click on the box labelled "Zombie Time Hall of Shame" in the top left corner. Truly disgusting photo's….but a very real look at what those on the Left are truly like.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wascally_Wabbit Wascally_Wabbit

    OK. someone had to say it…when is someone going to ask John Baird his personal opinion on this tempest in a teapot?

    • John D

      I am wondering if the various gay or straight-but-left-their-wife-because-they-were-banging-their-assistant members of cabinet are considered part of the "pro-life and the pro-family community."

    • Matty

      He attends.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/drgmobile drgmobile

    Well to correct one of the commenters, the Conservative Party does get some LGBT votes and one of them is pretty hefty at the cabinet table.

    So far, this all seems to be coming from that vile Lifesitenews site, so I am waiting to see some confirmation before passing judgment. Philosophically, I am not sure he government ought to be funding ANY tourism related events since the successful ones should be self-sustaining. But the issue here is consistency and equality.

    For the sake of the party and the country I do hope this turns out to be the exaggerated ravings of a handful of people nobody should be paying any attention to in the first place.

  • farmer fred

    Clement’s spokesperson explained that the suspension of parliamentary work for the summer means he’s got enough free time to take over for Ablonczy. He added that the program was part of the stimulus measures included in last January’s budget and was therefore not part of Ablonczy’s responsibilities.

    Now I've seen a few lame excuses in my time- but this comes close to taking the cake. Next up – Health Minister has free time on her hands – given responsibility for handing out firearms certificates. Agriculture Minister not busy – sent to manners school.

    Please do the Conservatives really think we are that dumb. Oh wait I guess they do.

    • –dB

      I'm not sure what would be more alarming — our tourism minister losing responsibilities because she approved funding for an LGBT event, or our industry minister just having tons of time on his hands right now.

  • farmer fred

    By the way – Tony if you have that much free time on your hands take up a hobby, read a book, get in a canoe and out on to a Muskoka Lake, or write a comeback hit for April Wine.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/tdotlib tdotlib

    I had mixed emotions about the fact that NN linked to the story – on one hand I was glad to have read of this complete pandering to the base – on the other, I was disappointed to have given a unique visitor stat to LSN.

    Has the federal government not been sponsoring pride week for several years? Does it not generate millions of much-needed tourist dollars for the city and consequently taxes for the feds?

    The fact that intolerance is being encouraged by the CPC is reason enough in my mind that they should never be anywhere near a majority government.

    At the very least this story has strengthened my resolve to work to ensure that my riding never goes blue.

  • James Halifax

    Hey…just be glad that the TO Pride parade hasn't "evolved" to become as progressive as San Francisco's. Which can be seen in all of it's glory by clicking the following link. It comes with a warning…but I don't recommend you check it out while at work.

    http://www.zombietime.com/up_your_alley_2008/

From Macleans