As the Globe turns

The Globe and Mail came up with a plan for surviving the newspaper revolution. It didn’t include its editor.

by Anne Kingston on Thursday, July 9, 2009 3:40pm - 12 Comments

As the Globe turnsPhillip Crawley is standing in his downtown Toronto office showing off the Globe and Mail of the future, which looks very much like the Globe and Mail of the present—only smaller and somewhat shinier. This is the 18-inch-wide by 21-inch-deep prototype of a new format slated for rollout in the fall of 2010. The Globe’s CEO and publisher is particularly stoked about the new capacity to run colour on coated stock where desired, reflected by the many mocked-up high-end ads, among them a full page for the jeweller Tiffany & Co., whose serene blue background portends a lucrative oasis in the parched advertising landscape. Finally, he says, the Globe will be able to offer advertisers heat-set colour with the timeliness of a daily 24-hour deadline, rather than the weeks required by magazines: “That’s a significant advantage.”

So captivated was Crawley by the technology that he signed an 18-year, $1.7-billion printing deal with Transcontinental Inc. in August 2008, minutes before the economic downturn decimated advertising sales and 24-hour news cycles were replaced by Tweets. In the current print media landscape the commitment seems a high-stakes gamble by the self-anointed “Canada’s National Newspaper”—either the 21st-century equivalent of investing in state-of-the-art buggy technology at the turn of the 20th century or a shrewd counterintuitive vision of how people will still want to read news two decades hence.

The news about newspapers of late has been bleak. Earlier this month, the New York Times Co., beset by losses, hired Goldman Sachs to sell the Boston Globe, which it acquired in 1993 for US$1.1 billion. The money-losing San Francisco Chronicle, with whom Transcontinental signed a 15-year printing contract in 2006, is on the brink of being shut down or sold. Respected outlets such as the 146-year-old Seattle Post Intelligencer and 150-year-old Rocky Mountain News have shifted operations completely online. In late May, the Newspaper Association of America gathered top executives in Chicago to share ideas about how to preserve traditions of newsgathering in a digital age. Last week, the association reported that newspapers are increasingly being read online, a platform they have yet to figure out how to monetize: the number of unique visitors to U.S. newspaper websites grew 10 per cent in the first three months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. (Similar statistics aren’t available for Canadian newspapers but anecdotal reports suggest a similar trend.)

In the essay “Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable,” new-media thinker Clay Shirky lays out a compelling rationale for why newspapers as we know them are dying: “It makes increasingly less sense even to talk about a publishing industry, because the core problem publishing solves—the incredible difficulty, complexity, and expense of making something available to the public—has stopped being a problem,” Shirky writes.

Yet the British-born Crawley, a 64-year-old Fleet Street veteran, expresses confidence about the future of print printed on newsprint, even as the Globe looks into other delivery systems such as Kindle and e-editions. “But people don’t want to get it that way,” he says, a fact another industry veteran chalks up to inertia: “Newspapers still have forward momentum partly because baby boomers don’t want to change.” Of Shirky’s thesis, Crawley is dismissive: “There are a million experts out there. But not many models with a track record.”

As Crawley presents it, the Globe, the country’s ruling-class broadsheet of record, differs from many American papers. “I’ve said it to a lot of advertisers: don’t lump us together, we’re not all equal,” he says. What makes the Globe special, he avers, is its ability to deliver an affluent demographic to advertisers. That he attributes to the paper’s strong brand identity, stemming from its respected journalists and the fact it projects a world view through Canadian eyes via a phalanx of foreign correspondents, unlike many U.S. papers which cut back on bureaus and turned to syndicated copy. He boasts of the support of its parent CTVglobemedia, a private company whose stakeholders include BCE Inc. (15 per cent), Torstar Corporation (20 per cent), Ontario Teachers’ Plan Board (25 per cent), and the Woodbridge Company Limited, the private holding company for the billionaire Thomson family (40 per cent). Being partly owned by Canada’s richest clan, who also owns Thomson Reuters, is a strength, says Crawley: “These people have a track record on a global scale over decades.”

The paper’s circulation drop—to some 295,000 average on weekdays, and 369,000 on weekends, as of March 31, down markedly from five years ago—was deliberate, the publisher says, the result of putting an end to giveaway copies to hotels and airlines to boost circulation numbers, a legacy of the battle with the National Post. “We’re making twice as much money,” he says. Combining print and online, readership is larger than it has ever been, at 2.9 million a week. The paper’s fully paid subscription base remains steady, Crawley says: “That’s the gold standard.”

Still, the Globe’s venerable history dating back to 1844 hasn’t insulated it from industry malaise. Revenues have slid in key advertising niches: jobs and careers, real estate and automotive. The paper laid off 30 staff earlier this year, its first job cuts since the 1982 recession. Last weekend, its union almost unanimously rejected a proposed six-year contract that demands wage rollbacks for 30 per cent of staff, a week’s unpaid vacation, extended work hours without additional pay, a pension plan restructuring that would cut benefits by up to 50 per cent for future retirees, and the ability to reclassify jobs. A strike or lockout could take place at midnight June 30.

Crawley is known to thrive on such combat. When he arrived in Canada in 1998 as the Globe’s president and COO, his first task was to stave off the upstart Conrad Black-backed National Post. Named publisher and CEO in 1999, he travelled to the U.K. to recruit Fleet Street journalists to tart up the “Grey Lady of Front Street.” With him was then- editor-in-chief William Thorsell, unaware he was selecting his successor in Richard Addis. That skirmish is now long over, the Brits returned home, and the Post’s current owner, CanWest Global Communications, is scrambling to restructure its massive debt to avoid bankruptcy protection.

Bookmark and Share
  • Terren

    Don't change the globe and mail, I love it just how it is.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      Too late.

  • Dot

    I'd be interested to hear Ken Whyte's take on the G&M makeover – 1/2 way through his book on Pulitzer and the newspaper wars/redesigns.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    There are people (e.g. me) who avidly read blogs and Macleans to get a spectrum of news analysis, but won't touch the Globe because we view it as severely biased – not just in viewpoint but more importantly in news filtering.

    For example, the Dhalla/nanny business: this piece says the Globe downplayed it because it was uncovered by a competitor. I believe they downplayed it because it reflected poorly on a star Liberal MP. The subscription is peanuts, but why spend time reading a publication if I think they're only providing a blinkered view?

    • Bailey

      "I believe they downplayed it because it reflected poorly on a star Liberal MP."

      Yes, because the Globe didn't do a lot of the investigation on the Sponsorship Scandal.

      Anyways, as Paul mentions in his blog post that linked to this, I was thinking about the difference in the coverage of politics this week as I was reading about the AFN stories. Personally, I would have liked to have seen a longer article on Phil Fontaine because I find him interesting and influential but perhaps a feature will be written on him closer to election date for the new head of the AFN.

  • war-or-bust

    The Globe has many internal problems, especially a distinct lack of leadership and vision when it comes to an attempt at understanding and expanding to the saving grace that is the Internet.

    They have an understanding that the Internet is a necessity for survival, but the bureaucracy and internal strife… and maybe the Fleet Street mentality (wake up Phil, you're on Front Street), need to be cut so that the news and analysis provider can actually rise again.

    It is a stale newsroom that needs to realize that their print edition and circulation numbers are now secondary to online content. They desperately need some young blood who have grown up on digital formats to figure out the latter… Except young blood doesn't necessarily like to wear the white collar.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jasonhickman jasonhickman

    From the article:

    The old competitive Fleet Street newspaper model is archaic in the digital age, MacPhail says, citing the unwillingness of newspaper websites to link to one another’s stories. “That’s heartbreakingly stupid, so opposite the ethic and spirit of the Web.”

    Funny thing: Canwest does link to competitors' stories. Check out this column by Macleans's own Andrew Potter: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/John/178477…

    When I look at that column, or other stories posted on CanWest papers' sites, I see, on the right-hand side, links to "Related Stories From Around The Web", which will send you to some very un-CanWest websites.

    This isn't a criticism of either the Macleans article or MacPhail – I just found it interesting that somebody's already doing this sort of thing. Anyone know of any other media outlets doing likewise?

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/jasonhickman jasonhickman

    From the article:

    The old competitive Fleet Street newspaper model is archaic in the digital age, MacPhail says, citing the unwillingness of newspaper websites to link to one another’s stories. “That’s heartbreakingly stupid, so opposite the ethic and spirit of the Web.”

    Funny thing: Canwest does link to competitors' stories. Check out this column by Macleans's own Andrew Potter: ” target=”_blank”>http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/John/178477…

    When I look at that column, or other stories posted on CanWest papers' sites, I see, on the right-hand side, links to "Related Stories From Around The Web", which will send you to some very un-CanWest websites.

    This isn't a criticism of either the Macleans article or MacPhail – I just found it interesting that somebody's already doing this sort of thing. Anyone know of any other media outlets doing likewise?

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/jasonhickman jasonhickman

    From the article:

    The old competitive Fleet Street newspaper model is archaic in the digital age, MacPhail says, citing the unwillingness of newspaper websites to link to one another’s stories. “That’s heartbreakingly stupid, so opposite the ethic and spirit of the Web.”

    Funny thing: CanWest does link to competitors' stories. Check out this column by Macleans's own Andrew Potter: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/lbty7c” target=”_blank”>http://tinyurl.com/lbty7c

    When I look at that column, or other stories posted on CanWest papers' sites, I see, on the right-hand side, links to "Related Stories From Around The Web", which will send you to some very un-CanWest websites. Sometimes the link between the CanWest article and the "Related" story is tenuous at best, but usually the links do have something to do with the CanWest story.

    This isn't a criticism of either the Macleans article or MacPhail – I just found it interesting that somebody's already doing this sort of thing. Anyone know of any other media outlets doing likewise?

  • JamesHalifax

    The Globe had no choice but to report on the Sponsorship Scandal…..that was BIG news, and others' would have had a hay-day with it.

    As well….I believe it was a Globe Reporter who broke the story wasn't it? I can't imagine an editor telling one of his reporters NOT to write about the biggest scandal in Canadian history….that reporter would probably quit and go elsewhere with his scoop….and the paper who let him go would pay the costs for the perceived cover-up. It would prove every comment about Liberal Bias at the Globe was true.

    which it is by the way…

  • Oscar de la Tour

    Who reads Maclone's anymore?

  • http://www.premieretreeservices.com/ tree pruning

    I think many will oppose this idea. Many still stick with the conventional way.

From Macleans