UPDATED: Langevin, we have a problem

by kadyomalley on Friday, July 10, 2009 10:51am - 137 Comments

Seriously, y’all, for the last few days, I’ve been saying that the latest round of prime ministerial embarrassments — Ablonczy/Pride, specifically the almost unbelievably hamhanded handling thereof, and the extended remix screwups surrounding the LeBlanc funeral, from failing to keep the PM briefed on protocol, to arguing about what exactly was depicted on that now-removed Youtube video –  have revealed a serious staffing problem at PMO. As far as I can tell, this latest debacle proves it. (Sorry, Dimitri.):

PM’s aide apologizes after wrongly attributing quote to Liberals’ Ignatieff

July 10, 2009 – 10:42

THE CANADIAN PRESS

L’AQUILA, Italy – An aide to Stephen Harper has offered an abject apology after the prime minister took a sharp shot at Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff for comments he never made.

Dimitri Soudas said he mistakenly informed Harper that comments by an academic about Canada’s irrelevance in the G8 were actually Ignatieff’s.

The academic said Canada is at risk of being shut out of such international councils.

Harper took those comments and ran with them in both official languages during his closing news conference at the Group of Eight summit.

He accused Ignatieff of being “irresponsible,” saying the Liberal leader “is supposed to be a Canadian.”

Shortly after the 45-minute news conference ended, Soudas rushed to inform Canadian media that he’d misread an email, wrongly attributed a quote to Ignatieff and then advised the prime minister to comment publicly on the matter.

Soudas said he owes a personal apology to both Ignatieff and Harper.


UPDATE: Colleague Wherry rounds up the reaction from media on the ground, and has more from Dimitri via the Toronto Star. Apparently, at the time that he was explaining his mistake to reporters, he hadn’t yet offered his resignation, but acknowledged that he his boss was “very upset,” and angry and his boss was “clearly, clearly not happy”. [See update at bottom of post for explanation for edit]

Yikes. That’s going to be one tense flight home from Italy — if he lasts til the end of the trip, that is.

EVEN MORE OF AN UPDATE: After going out of his way to lambaste Michael Ignatieff for something that, as it turned out, he never actually said, the PM has apologized to the Liberal leader directly. Aww, that’s nice — and yes, possibly a first. But as some commenters have already pointed out, would it really have been terribly appropriate to attack an opposition politician while attending an international summit? It just seems a little — unseemly.  On the other hand, Canada? Backer than ever!

URGENT UPDATE: PM “very bothered”, not “upset”, according to latest version of the Toronto Star story:

Soudas said “No, I am upset,” and he added later that the prime minister was “clearly, clearly not happy with the fact that he was put in that situation by one of his advisors.

“The prime minister is very bothered by the fact that his press secretary mis-informed him, and mis-briefed him and hence he obviously made an accusation.”

Noted, with some sympathy, is his use of the phrase “his press secretary” rather than, say, the personal pronoun. He also made the following somewhat poignant observation:

“[I]n politics you do have exchanges between political opponents but you have to make sure those exchanged happen within a certain reality of things that people actually say.”

.
So true, Dimtri. So true.

YET ANOTHER UPDATE: Blogger (and macleans.ca commenter) BigCityLib reveals the actual source of the not-Ignatieff quote – Gordon Smith, of the Center for Global Studies.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ERH ERH

    We should be very thankful for our current PM, at least he is not an embarresment on the world stage, a problem we had in the past, such as our representative rambling in a third language.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hollinm hollinm

    hollinm continued

    The Count has not participated in the life of Canada for 34 years and now wants to come back and be PM. Thats the difference. He can live outside the country for as long as he likes. His citizenship is still Canadian I assume. However, coming back and saying I understand the country despite being away for 34 years just doesn't cut it.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_A_N M_A_N

    "you have to make sure those exchanged happen within a certain reality of things that people actually say.”

    Wow. Just, wow.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/motor motor

      This New Government ™ has a hard time knowing what reality is.

  • James from Vancouver

    Unemployment, up. Trade Deficit, record high. Isotopes – losing these as the US plans it's own reactors.

    And at a G-8 summit Harper decides this is the best place to ad an attack on Ignatieff about something else entirely. And then the information that Harper tried to levy comes out as not something Ignatieff said. Such shame.

    And if you read CBC apparently Harper is now willing to run deficits indefinitely. So on top of this embarassment (plus Leblanc's funeral and being late AGAIN for his photo op w/ the G-8 leaders) he has no plan.

  • James from Vancouver

    In other news Solberg is admitting that the "gay" issue is a no-winner for the party.

    LMAO ~ and these people are supposed to be running the country? A bunch of baboons could do a better job!

  • wml

    An erroneous statement? Or a contrived one? Wouldn't surprise me if it were contrived….make the point, apologize, recoup some points, add some push to the current poll..this would not be beyond their political thinking or morals.

    What does one call a government that wants to get rid of the opposition to further their political agenda(s) in a minority position? I leave it up to you to decide!

  • CheckUrFacts!

    Assuming the statement had been accurate, it was the type of comment that Harper would have had to comment on.
    It was an unfortunate ambush whose origin needs investigating, and Harper proferred a sincere apology to Ignatieff .

  • Yeah, Hoo.

    Ignatieff is the KING of partisan shots at International events, IMHO.

  • Sim

    Says Yeah, Hoo. as he casually drives his face into a pile of Harper's excrement, slurps out the peanuts and starts chewing thoughtfully.

  • Sim

    There has never been a government that lied so shamelessly, performed so incompetently, and wreaked so much destruction in such a short period of time as the Cons under Harper. What is the most remarkable thing is that the Con MPs are so willing to highlight themselves as gutless, castrated, worthless individuals willing to stay silent and never speak up. Muzzled like sad, ineffectual pieces of garbage, happy to slurp up their fat pay cheques and pensions and contribute nothing as the megalomaniacal freak Harper has his sneering, corrupt 15 minutes in the sun. These freaks talk a big game but will be remembered as the biggest screw-ups and the most gutless individuals to ever soil the H of C. Just like their self-righteous Reform scum cousins who claimed they would be purer than the driven snow, with that self-serving hog Deb Grey saying she would never take a pension and then got her corpulent, excrement caked sow of a face up to the trough as soon as she had the opportunity.

From Macleans