New rules of engagement

How can Obama pursue diplomacy with Iran if its leader is illegitimate?

by Luiza Ch. Savage on Sunday, July 12, 2009 1:25pm - 5 Comments

But if the turmoil in Iran has made Obama’s policy of engagement less promising, it may have made a potential Plan B of multilateral sanctions more potent. “Whatever reluctance there was in European capitals will have been mitigated by violence after the elections,” notes Maloney. Russia and China, who are key to any successful sanctions, have long been reticent to confront Iran. But Obama seemed to make some headway with Moscow this week, when Russia and the U.S. agreed to jointly produce an assessment of the threats that Iran’s nuclear capabilities could pose to their countries. “We will be conducting a review of that and making assessments to find ways that the United States and Russia can co-operate more effectively,” Obama said. “That’s going to be very important.”

The two sides also discussed a global nuclear summit that could be hosted by Russia. And without mentioning Iran by name, Medvedev indicated he shared Washington’s concerns about Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. “It’s our common, joint responsibility, and we should do our utmost to prevent any negative trends there,” he said. “And we are ready to do that. Our negotiations with President Obama have demonstrated that we share the same attitude toward this problem.”

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Western nations that if they “meddle” in Iranian politics, Iranians would “unite against their enemies into one fist.” That seems unlikely, given the rifts within Iran’s ruling elite. On July 4, while meeting with relatives of those detained after the election, former president Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who supported Mousavi, said the post-election events had caused “bitterness.” Though Rafsanjani denied there was a power struggle, the influential cleric, who heads the Assembly of Experts that appoints and removes the supreme leader, couldn’t hide his criticism of the government: “I don’t think that [anybody with a] vigilant conscience is satisfied with the current situation.” And the next day, a group of high-level clerics criticized the election results, even as some hard-liners called for Mousavi to be tried as a traitor and foreign agent. Tellingly, in a speech on state radio, Khamenei called for national unity while appearing to ignore such calls. “Friends should not be treated like enemies for the sake of a mistake,” the supreme leader said.

True to form, Obama remained hopeful. Iran’s “governing elites are going through a struggle that has been mirrored painfully and powerfully on the streets,” he said, after meeting Medvedev. “The fact that we have both said we are willing to work with Iran, at the same time as we have been very clear about our grave deep concerns with respect to not just the violence, has created a space where the international community can potentially join and pressure Iran more effectively.”

But the President said it will take time to see whether diplomacy can achieve anything. “Ultimately, we’re going to have to see whether a country like Russia, for example, is willing to work with us to apply pressure on Iran to take a path toward international respectability, as opposed to the path they’re on,” Obama said. “That’s not something we’re going to know the results of for several more months as we continue to do the hard diplomatic work of putting this coalition together to tell Iran: ‘Make the better choice.’ ”

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/janicemaerose janicemaerose

    Obama and his media machine are pretty masterful in choosing their words on this one.

    He seems to be on the right track in his talks with Putin, I mean Medvedev.

  • JimD

    If anyone's an illegitimate leader, its Barry Soetoro/Obama.

  • Nick

    So no western country should ever deal with an authoritarian state? That idea is dangerously backwards. Isolating authoritarian states helps their repressive policies rather than hurting them. Closing them off from global discussion only helps to keep their citizens in the dark. No sanction has ever brought down an authoritarian regime (with the possible exception of Apartheid South Africa: even then, the state was partially democratic [whites could vote] and therefore easier to manipulate). Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Zimbabwe…all states that have not been affected by sanctions of any kind. In fact, bringing them into the global community, opening up discussion and slowly liberalizing trade is the way to do it. Making the general populous suffer doesn't make them revolt against their government. Giving them wealth does. When they can finally focus on something other than feeding their family or keeping themselves alive, they'll have a great deal more time to worry about their liberty.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/DanielShays DanielShays

    Legitimacy means the same to Obama as it does to Chavez,Assad,Castro or the Mullahs.A leadership,kept in place by force, that regurgitates discredited left wing drivel laced with third world nationalist hokum.He will have no trouble dealing with any ruling clique so long as it shares his world view of American perfidity and third world nobility.Thank goodness his poll numbers are crashing,eight years of this vacuous dilettante would probably be more than the US and the rest of the civilized world would be able to recover from

  • Harry Balsagnia

    keep your noses in your country's affairs

From Macleans