Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

Your tax dollars on the move

by Paul Wells on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:09pm - 51 Comments

CBC correspondents move all around the circle. I’ve been a fan of Evan Solomon’s since Shift magazine. He will do well here if both he and the network see his show as a chance to dig deeply into all the ways Canadians are actually governed, or could be, and not — as too many people saw his Sunday show — as an excuse to cover something, anything, please God anything, except Ottawa politics. The CBC sometimes has a hard time with this, so: You have a lot of other shows that don’t cover Ottawa politics. Your Ottawa politics show should probably cover Ottawa politics.

Terry Milewski, in the meantime, is a blessing. He cannot be bullied by Conservative or Liberal — ask Peter Donolo — and one underappreciated thing he has done again and again and again in Vancouver is to jump onto the back of a complex, significant story; sink his teeth in up to the gums; and cover the damned thing with passion, humour, and a sense of justice, for years. I would say, as a parallel to Evan’s case, that Terry will do well here if his bosses let him follow stories here in the same way, but I do believe they couldn’t stop him if they tried.

And hey, David Common: Get in one last dinner at Le Procope before they haul you out of there.

Bookmark and Share
  • Northern PoV

    Well, imho Terry Milewski is very much a MIXED blessing.
    for example:
    His coverage of STV in the recent BC election was beyond abysmal … he simply repeated the anti-STV "too complicated" story line, couldn't even defend his contempt with a coherent analysis.

  • Anon

    Man, what a demotion for Keith Boag! From Senior Political Corr to covering celebrity plastic surgeries. Yikes.

    • jarrid

      And richly deserved.

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      Well, I don't know, I think there might be a sense in which one could see a move from Ottawa to Los Angeles as something other than a demotion. I'd be surprised if Boag spent a lot of his time in Southern California pining away for Ottawa. Particularly in February.

  • Dee

    Many good moves by CBC except for maybe sending Keith Boag to L.A. Any of: Boag, Susan Bonner or Chris Hall would have been a far more reasonable choice for the Ottawa politics show than Evan Solomon, who (to my eyes) frankly comes across as a lightweight. His interviewing and broadcasting skills are still very much a work in progress, and he simply doesn't have the depth or gravitas to pull off a show about national politics (unless CBC's idea to compete with CTV's QP is to create another Taber-esque dimwitted festival of "What's Hot and Not").

    Solomon would be great for a popular culture program (that was Shift magazine's real strength). But for a serious political discussion show? I'm not optimistic he can pull it off.

    • Mulletaur

      Strombo would be a better choice, at least he can do an indepth interview.

      • Orson Bean

        Agreed on all points. And Dee, I give anyone who slags Jane Taber a thumbs-up. Speaking of Jane Taber, now THERE'S someone who belongs in LA doing vapid celebrity bits.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/SirJohn_Eh SirJohn_Eh

        Would totally kill the spirit of Strombo though, he would never do it.

        • Mulletaur

          Sadly.

    • Terren

      What? Why in the world is Keith Boag going to LA?? There is nothing to cover there!!!

      • Mulletaur

        Who cares ?

    • PolJunkie

      "His interviewing and broadcasting skills are still very much a work in progress, and he simply doesn't have the depth or gravitas to pull off a show about national politics "

      Complete and utter nonsense.

  • Mulletaur

    Evan Solomon to take over from Newman ? You've got to be joking. And Milewski's talents will be totally wasted covering Ottawa. The Corpse should give him a budget, a camera operator, a half a dozen researchers and tell him to go dig crap up wherever he thinks he can find it.

    • Paul Wells

      I can’t confirm this, but I’m given to understand there may be crap in Ottawa.

      • Stewart

        checked the bottom of my shoe… confirmed

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/WDM WDM

        However, partisan insiders on all side claim it's not theirs that stinks.

      • Mulletaur

        Milewski wouldn't be restricted to Ottawa, nor would he be prohibited from Ottawa. But the vast majority of what goes on in federal politics in Ottawa is of minimal interest to average Canadians. CBC would do Canada and Canadians a greater service by allowing Milewski to get into stories that matter to people. People were already worried about tasers and the competence or otherwise of the RCMP – what happened to Dziekanski could happen to any one of us. Milewski covered it like no other journo in Canada that I can think of is capable of. That is precious.

        • Orson Bean

          Although I admire Milewski and generally agree with what's been posted, it's not really true that Milewski carried the frieght all by by himself on all of those Vancouver-based stories. For example, Kim Bolan of the Vancouver Sun did a lot of digging and good work on Air India. There are some other print journalists who did some good work on the Dziekanski story, and while I often find the Globe's Vancouver people (Mark Hume and Gary Mason) to be one-sided Drama Queens in their reporting, they did go after the RCMP hard on that and related stories involving RCMP wrongdoing (e.g., the Ian Bush shooting).

        • Lord Kitchener's Own

          "the vast majority of what goes on in federal politics in Ottawa is of minimal interest to average Canadians"

          Yes, but you see, that's the PROBLEM. If our news rooms are going to base their editorial and staffing decisions on covering what's of interest to "average Canadians" they might as well shut down all of the news rooms and shift their budgets to E-Talk Daily, Entertainment Tonight Canada, and Canadian Idol. Focusing news coverage on what average Canadians are interested in sounds, to me, like a euphemism for no longer covering the news.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ottawasteph ottawasteph

    Are we talking about Ottawa the city/region or Ottawa the federal government?

    Either way, I'm very please that Evan's coming to town. He will be able to continue Don's job: "The spin stops here." I hope that he also brings the wife and kids with him. It will be a breath of fresh air (literally and figuratively) living in my beautiful, award-winning hometown.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hardmouth hardmouth

    Terry Milewski is fantastic, I'm so pleased someone of his calibre will be covering the Hill.

    I don't know how to feel about Evan Solomon… the Sunday show was pretty brutal, so maybe it's not his fault. In any case, here he is getting owned interviewing Richard Dawkins and Noam Chomsky:

    [youtube -NSk_ZeAH_I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NSk_ZeAH_I youtube]

    [youtube 10rTPSSmOFw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10rTPSSmOFw youtube]

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hardmouth hardmouth

    Terry Milewski is fantastic, I'm so pleased someone of his calibre will be covering the Hill.

    I don't know how to feel about Evan Solomon… the Sunday show was pretty brutal, so maybe it's not his fault. In any case, here he is getting owned interviewing Richard Dawkins and Noam Chomsky:

    [youtube -NSk_ZeAH_I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NSk_ZeAH_I youtube]

    [youtube 10rTPSSmOFw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10rTPSSmOFw youtube]

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jasonhickman jasonhickman

    I think Milewski is a good choice.

    I'm not nearly as enthused as you are by Solomon (and heaven help me, I *did* watch enough of his Sunday gig *and* "Hot Type" to form an opinion). Part of that may be an unfair comparison between him and Newman, but even if I leave that aside, I just never got into how he covered things on "CBC News: Sunday". Still, I'll give it a shot and I'd be happy to be proven wrong.

    What's more important is that assuming the "Politics" format is either left alone or improved (ie, the new show has more substantive comment, and doesn't become a 2-hour copycat of "The Hour"), credit where it's due should be given to CBC for keeping it, rather than killing it off as rumoured.

    • Sigh

      Like you, I've seen enough of Solomon not to be enthused by him. For the most part, his interviews seem to be more about him than about the person he's interviewing, and he doesn't strike me as the intellectual heavyweight he seems to think he is. I suppose he'll do all right as long as he stays away from the real heavyweights (I don't think Dawkins considered that a "debate").

      On the other hand, Susan Bonner has been filling in admirably for Newman and I think she deserved the spot. Terry Milewski is a good choice, but I would prefer to see him doing in-depth investigative coverage.

      One person I would love to see in Newman's or Boag's former spot is Neil Macdonald. The gloves would be off.

      • Orson Bean

        I have mixed feelings about Neil Macdonald. First of all, he's Norm Macdonald's brother, which automatically makes him cool in my books. Ok but seriously . . . although NM is clearly intelligent and capable, I've always had some problems with him in the objectivity/bias area. When he was covering Israeli-Palestinian stuff, there was sometimes just a little bit too much slant against the Israelis for my blood (and I'm not Jewish nor am I particularly pro-Israel — I am solidly opposed to their settlement policy). Then in his Washington coverage, again I find he has way too much of that irritating habit that some urban-liberal Canadians have of looking down their noses at Americans. As a journalist, you can do that all you want when and if you're editorializing, but that's not what a good reporter should be doing when reporting.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/SirJohn_Eh SirJohn_Eh

          Some urban liberal Canadians sure, but in my eyes they definitely do not form a clear majority of Canadians that tend to be ignorant about Americans.

        • Sigh

          My impression of Neil Macdonald is that he doesn't suffer fools gladly. He would probably find a few in Ottawa.

          And I have to admit that being Norm's brother is kinda cool, too.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hellomike hellomike

    Terry Milewski! He is excellent. This is good news.

    It'll be interesting to see how the dynamics of things shift like this.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JeffJohnston JeffJohnston

    Terry Milewski is a pitbull no doubt. The Glen Clark fiasco in the late '90's however , in my eyes, called into question his credibility. I've never really trusted his sensationalist style reporting since that episode.
    Soloman is the real talent here. I look forward his observations on the hill….I'm sure he will make more friends

    • Orson Bean

      That's a good point about Milewski. He's dogged, thorough, aggressive, skilled and intelligent. But sometimes his enthusiasm for being the crusading reporter gets the better of him. Another example of what you're talking about happened in connection with the APEC meeting in Vancouver when Chretien was PM, the so-called "Peppergate" affair. I'm doing this from memorty, but what I recall is that Milewski was basically busted when an email between him and an anti-APEC activist came to light in which Milewski referred to the federal government as something like "the forces of evil". I suppose, in the most charitable light, you might chalk that up to a reporter sucking up to his source — but it seriously undermined his credibility and claim to any objectivity on the story.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_to_the_T M_to_the_T

    count me in the nay sayers on the ass-kissing schmooze-fest that Politics will likely become.

    I'd like to give benefit of the doubt but really no one with good taste can honestly defend Solomon's record as the broad-minded person necessary for this sort of work – he is entirely narrow and a bit of a god-botherer it would appear.

  • John W.

    I hope Solomon will insist that the program pick the guests and panels, not the parties picking their own spin doctors. And forget about managing the time. Let's just be interesting.

  • Terren

    Question: Where is Keith Bogue going?
    Why in the world are they picking Evan Solomon? Why?????

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_to_the_T M_to_the_T

    terren – ass-kissing brown-nosing buddy (Solomon) of the wife of Stursberg, NEPOTISM! Plus Solomon is approved by the politically correct god-botherers at the CBC.

    Richard Stursberg – Executive Vice-President, English Services

  • Maureen

    ARRRGFGGH – I find Solomon to the most annoying person on TV – he can't wait to answer his own questions.

  • Orson Bean

    . . . or maybe it was "the forces of darkness." Something like that.

  • Tom

    Watched the Dawkins interview — Solomon doesn't belong in the same room with him. Painful!

  • Andrew

    Personally, when I saw Evan Solomon do his interview with the Chair of the 9/11 commission (who he badgered for nearly an hour with every 9/11 conspiracy theory under the sun) I was embarrassed to be a Canadian. There is a difference between tough but fair and a Liberal or Conservative slant. There is a difference between a Liberal or Conservative slant and complete insanity.

    http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911hamilton.html

  • matt

    I was going to post about how funny it was when Ayyan Hirsi Ali totally pwned Evan in an interview about freedom. But that was Avi Lewis who got totally humiliated. Now, we all love a good train wreck, as long as no one gets hurt so, for entertainment value why don't they give Avi Lewis the Politics show?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/WDM WDM

    Good choices all around. Hopefully the CBC doesn't try to do anything too gimmicky with Politics and leave it with the same substantive format it had under Newman. Although dropping the MP panels wouldn't be the worst idea in the world.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hardmouth hardmouth

    Terry Milewski is fantastic, I'm so pleased someone of his calibre will be covering the Hill.

    I don't know how to feel about Evan Solomon… the Sunday show was pretty brutal, so maybe it's not his fault. In any case, here he is getting owned interviewing Richard Dawkins and Noam Chomsky:
    [youtube -NSk_ZeAH_I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NSk_ZeAH_I youtube]

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hardmouth hardmouth
  • scf

    Solomon is an idiot in this interview. It is not hard to imagine doing a better job.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hardmouth hardmouth

    Chomsky:

    [youtube 10rTPSSmOFw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10rTPSSmOFw youtube]

  • scf

    Why is it that so many CBC people on TV and radio have nasal voices? Should I shove something up my nose if I go to CBC for an interview?

  • Mulletaur

    I can't believe you made me watch that. Useless in every respect on both sides.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Neat trick, hardmouth! How did you get Mulletaur to watch that? Did your hypnotic vibes make it through the bandwith throttling?

  • Anon

    "Should I shove something up my nose if I go to CBC for an interview?"

    Yes.

  • tobyornottoby

    Maybe because instead of hiring people with voices and hair that make themsound and look like TV reporters, they hire people who can report and write?

  • Sigh

    Something large.

  • scf

    A nasal voice is required to read and write?

From Macleans