Coming to terms with the reality of China

China’s ruling classes are not interested in Western values. They see theirs as superior.

by The Editors on Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:40am - 19 Comments

Coming to terms with the reality of ChinaAlmost a year ago, Maclean’s published an essay by controversial former Canadian diplomat and entrepreneur Maurice Strong in which he passionately defended his adopted home, China, from those who would criticize its authoritarian regime. He lauded the government’s move toward a “socialist market economy” and said that Western engagement and understanding would inevitably lead to more openness and respect for human rights in the Middle Kingdom. “The Chinese will be much more influenced by our example than by the uninformed and hypocritical content of so much of our criticism,” Strong wrote. And in so doing, he summarized the prevailing sentiments among much of Canada’s political and business class: more support for China will inevitably make them more like us.

This week, Martin Jacques, a journalist, academic and author of the new book When China Rules the World, provides some sober (and sobering) second thought. In recent years, it has become accepted as a given that China’s rapid economic growth will allow it to eventually eclipse the United States as the world’s pre-eminent financial power. But Jacques says this shift in influence will certainly go far beyond commercial heft. It will bring profound and, in many respects, unwelcome changes to Western culture. The ruling classes in China are not interested in adopting foreign values like racial equality, human rights and political openness. Rather, they are dismissive—and in some cases outright hostile—to many of the political and cultural touchstones that we take for granted. They view the world as a hierarchy, with China at the top and the rest of the world representing various degrees of inferiority.

This reality was on display this week, with Beijing’s ruthless suppression of a protest in its western Xingjiang region, home to most of the country’s eight million Muslim Uighurs. Protesters reportedly took to the streets after a mob of Han Chinese attacked several Uighurs at a toy factory in Guangdong, injuring almost a dozen and killing two. What started as a protest devolved into a riot and left 150 dead and more than 800 injured after China’s paramilitary police force moved in.

As Jacques’ book makes clear, this is not an aberration. This is how the Chinese authorities (with broad public support) consistently deal with threats to the country’s political and economic interests. Xingjiang is a critically important region, dotted with oil and gas deposits. The Uighurs’ long-standing struggle for an independent homeland is now a nettlesome threat to Beijing’s global ambitions, and the regime’s response has been predictably brutal.

It would be nice to think that simply through trade and encouragement, China will come to resemble a friend and ally. But the prevailing belief that Beijing’s authoritarian impulses will simply disappear with time is looking increasingly naive.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    As we're in a symbiotic trade relationship, and both sides are well stocked with nukes, it doesn't seem to matter what either thinks of the other. But I think non-Chinese nations might get together and make it very clear that we won't allow China to bully any particular other country economically. That will keep relations on a firm basis of Realpolitik. China may be full of arrogance and racism, as it always used to be, but I couldn't care less if they think they're God's Anointed; all they achieve with that way of thinking is to isolate themselves intellectually from the rest of the civilised world. Which apparently they're cool with.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    As we're in a symbiotic trade relationship, and both sides are well stocked with nukes, it doesn't seem to matter what either thinks of the other. But I think non-Chinese nations might get together and make it very clear that we won't allow China to bully any particular other country economically. That will keep relations on a firm basis of Realpolitik, and prevent China from overreacting to ordinary criticism. China may be full of arrogance and racism, as it always used to be, but I couldn't care less if they think they're God's Anointed; all they achieve with that way of thinking is to isolate themselves intellectually from the rest of the civilised world. Which apparently they're cool with.

    Further, I don't see why democracy always needs to be expanding; that's a habit of thought carried over from economics. As long as there is no internal threat to Western liberty, such as the Germans and Russians posed, what does it matter to us if the poor Tibetans and Uighurs, along with China's dissidents, are oppressed by a ruthless authoritarian regime? One feels very bad for the victims, but from a selfish point of view it's not a threat like the West's self-generated authoritarianism was.

    • Jianping Xu

      To Jack,

      Who has the most nuclear weapons and advanced weapons systems? NATO and USA!

      Aren't all the developed countries already ganging up against China? At least the majority of Chinese think so!

      Don't you know China doesn't believe in GOD? We need to be thankful for this as the major conflicts in the world right now are over who own the right GOD.

  • Jianping Xu

    Your editorial this week is a disgrace to journalism. If you couldn't afford sending a reporter to Xingjiang to find out what went on there, at least you can read/watch reports filed by other "Western" journalists before making false accusations.

  • Rob H

    No news here. China has seen itself as superior to any other culture for at least two thousand years. Communism didn't change that, neither did it change the Chinese method of top-down, ruthless rule and a willingness to slaughter its citizens in order to maintain "order".
    Maurice Strong, a man who has done nothing of value in his life and yet is still seen as some sort of philosopher/guru of everything, is just another of the fawning westerners who attribute China as being "civilized". It is just another brutal, backward culture that represses the individual for the benefit of the "rulers".

    • Jianping Xu

      Hasn't the West considered itself superior to other civilizations during the last several hundred years?

      Hasn't the West exploited the rest of the world in the last several hundred years, using guns, steels, germs, and more recently trade?

      China has been looking up to the West for the last 30 years. However, what they have gotten are increasingly hostile reactions from the West, especially the media. I believe the Western media's twisted and prejudiced reporting about China is the biggest threat to a friendly relationship between Chinese and Westerners. More than anythings else, they (the Western media) are driving the nationalism in China.

      Don't do it to others if you don't want others to do it to you.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kumarright123 Kumarright123

    JIANPING XU:

    China WILL NOT rule the world.

    It is big, but other big countries will gang up to prevent its dominance.

    An anti-China alliance of the US plus Japan plus India plus Vietnam plus Korea plus Indonesia plus Russia plus the European countries, is more than enough to keep China down.

    China has too many enemies.

    • Jianping Xu

      Kumarright:

      China does NOT want to rule the world. It will not want to be intimidated either, as it has shown for thousands of years. All it wants is internal peace and prosperity through hardwork.

      Who has been sending warships all overall the world, including the waters around China?

      • Krmarright

        JIANPING XU:

        I am an Indian who was long disposed to think well of China. Unfortunately, like most Indians, I realized that China is bitterly anti-Indian. It proves this by protecting Pakistan which is encouraging Muslim terririst attacks in India. Thus, I have come to see China as a great danger.

        Other countries like Vietnam have come to the same conclusion as Indians.

        We – India, the US, Russia, Vietnam, Korea, Japan, Indonesia – will all join hands to keep China under control.

        As for Western warships – these are free countries where people can say what they like. China is a totalitarian dictatorship allied to Muslim expansionist countries.

        • Jianping Xu

          I am really shocked!

          Please send me evidence that China is supporting Muslim terrorism against India or any other country. If any country is or has been doing it, it's the US. If you have issues with Muslims, find the right outlet to do it.

          I despise any form of action that Incite hatred and violence against any ethnic group or country. Any country, including India, is free to pursuit its diplomatic goal as long as it doesn't impinge other country's souveingty.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kumarright123 Kumarright123

    JIANPING XU:

    More bad news for China: the Han Chinese numbers are going to fall drastically in the next couple of generations, because of the one-child policy.

    The Han will soon become a population of the old, with relatively few young people.

    China's Muslim minority, by contrast, will expand hugely in proportion to the Han, because they have never been subject to the one-child policy.

    So China will be tied down trying to control an increasingly big and angry Muslim minority.

    • Jianping Xu

      Kumarright:

      The world should be thankful for China's one-child policy over the last 30 years! Otherwise we would have seen much bigger shortages of food and other materials.

      Though it would be extremely foolish, it won't be difficult for China to rapidly increase its population. If you want to know anything about China, it's the fundamentally different family structure from those in the West. In China, the whole extended family help raise children, relieving much of the pressure for young parents.

      I certainly wish India and all the Muslim countries the best in dealing with their rapidly growing populations.

      • Krmarright

        JIANPING XU:

      • Krmarright

        JIANPING XU:

        China's policy of encouraging Muslim terrorism against India is extremely cynical.

        China has become known around the globe as a country which cannot be trusted.

        That is why it will NEVER succeed in becoming the world's dominant power.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Dogbert_Catbert Dogbert_Catbert

          Correction, 'trust' doesn't have anything to do with 'power', but everything to do with 'leader'. China is becoming one of world's dominant power, no matter you admit it or not. But yes, China is not ready to be the leader now, nor will it be in the near future. On the other hand, don't think everything will be un-changed in the future. Did people 'trust' quality in Japanese cars 20 years ago?

          • Krmarright

            DOGBERT -CATBERT:

            I am an Indian, and I can assure you you massively underestimate the incredible bitterness and anger Indians have towards China.

            We will in a few decades become the world's largest nation and WILL NEVER LET CHINA TAKE OVER. Period.

            We will do all we can with other nations which loathe China like the US, Japan, Vietnam, Korea, Indonesia, to keep China down.

            You ain't seen anything yet.

          • Jianping Xu

            Kumarright:

            I don't know which group of people you represent and how many people you represent when you say "We".

            I work closely with several Indian students and colleagues. We know the real and potential problems facing both China and India. We also have tremendous respect for each other country's history, culture and civilization.

            China and India are different. Both China and India have responsibility to their own citizens and, increasingly to the rest of the world. You need to step out of your box, do not incite hatred against China or any other country, and promote harmony among ethnic groups and countries.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Dogbert_Catbert Dogbert_Catbert

    'This reality was on display this week, with Beijing’s ruthless suppression of a protest in its western Xingjiang region, home to most of the country’s eight million Muslim Uighurs. Protesters reportedly took to the streets after a mob of Han Chinese attacked several Uighurs at a toy factory in Guangdong, injuring almost a dozen and killing two. What started as a protest devolved into a riot and left 150 dead and more than 800 injured after China’s paramilitary police force moved in.'

    The above portion of the editorial bothered me as this its NOT fact based. I was in China in the last couple of weeks, the people were killed mostly were Han civilian among them many women and kids, they were killed by Uighurs. I am sympathic of Tibetans as their protests were towards government but killing civilian women and children just made these Uighurs terrorists.

    Our media needs to learn how to stay fact-based, no matter how attempting it is by just twisting the truth to support your points (which still could be true and correct). Unlike news in the Western world, while correctness of information is constantly monitored by the pubic. News about China hardly receives feedback from its subject – Chinese public.

    I would concur Jianping Xu's previous comment that a large population of Chinese who previously admire western democracy and media had turned around recently, mainly due to these fact-twisted news. To avoid this happening again, check your journalism practice 101.

  • http://ChinaSecret.org ChinaSecret.org

    Hello.

    I would like to put a link to your site on my blog roll if you want to do the same for mine. It would be a good way to build up both of our readerships.

    thank you.

From Macleans