UPDATED: ListeriosisReportWatch: Wait, hang on a second here.

by kadyomalley on Monday, July 20, 2009 4:09pm - 41 Comments

SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES

Okay, so you know how usually, when the gallery sends out a revised media advisory and ITQ gets all excited, only to find that it was just to correct a spelling mistake or translation error? Well, it’s safe to say that isn’t the case here.

Below the jump, the two releases — original, and updated. See if you can spot the difference!

(Hint: You can. Seriously, you can’t miss it.)

Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:09:48 -0400
Subject: OTTAWA / JULY 21 JUILLET / 11:00

Statement to the Media

MESSAGE FROM THE INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATOR

July 20, 2009 (Ottawa) – Today, I submitted my final report on the August 2008 Listeriosis outbreak to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food.  This report concludes a six-month-long investigation into a tragedy that cost 22 Canadians their lives.

I was appointed by Prime Minister Harper in January 2009, to conduct an investigation into the outbreak and assess how well federal organizations and their food safety partners responded to the event. Ensuring the safety of our food supply is one of the government’s most important responsibilities and as the Independent Investigator, I felt a strong obligation to find out the circumstances and factors contributing to this preventable incident.

As part of my investigation, I interviewed key members of the industry as well as affected family members.  I also met with experienced individuals from all levels of government – local, provincial and federal, to better understand how and why the outbreak occurred.

I have been able to conduct my investigation independently and impartially. There has been no interference from any party whatsoever. Overall my experience was positive in that people wanted to help and be part of the solution.  All those who were asked to participate agreed to be interviewed and were open with their information and advice.

I received millions of pages of documentation to assist me in my investigation. In addition to my interviews, I was the recipient of more than 400 comments from Canadians who shared their views on the tragedy through the federal government’s website.

At the request of the Minister, I will publicly release my report tomorrow at a news conference. The report will also be posted to the Listeriosis Investigation website for public viewing at: http://www.listeriosis-listeriose.investigation-enquete.gc.ca/

Sheila Weatherill

Independent Investigator

And the updated version, which came out just a few minutes ago:

Please find enclosed the corrected version of the English statementStatement to the Media

*REVISED*

July 20, 2009 (Ottawa) – Today, I submitted my final report on the August 2008 Listeriosis outbreak to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food. This report concludes a six-month-long investigation into a tragedy that cost 22 Canadians their lives.

I was appointed by the Prime Minister in January 2009, to conduct an investigation into the outbreak and assess how well federal organizations and their food safety partners responded to the event. Ensuring the safety of our food supply is one of the government’s most important responsibilities and as the Independent Investigator, I felt a strong obligation to find out the circumstances and factors contributing to this outbreak.

As part of my investigation, I interviewed or met 100 key individuals, including affected family members, representatives of industry, labour and officials from all levels of government.

The investigation received more than 400 comments from Canadians through the Investigation’s website and reviewed million of pages of documentation. The investigation also received the advice from a group of experts made up of respected Canadian and US food safety and public health advisors.

I will publicly release my report tomorrow at a news conference. The report will also be posted to the Listeriosis Investigation website for public viewing at: http://www.listeriosis-listeriose.investigation-enquete.gc.ca/

Sheila Weatherill

Independent Investigator

UPDATE: The  Toronto Star’s Susan Delacourt has an explanation, courtesy of National Public Relations, the communications firm handling the release of the report:

Her spokesperson David Rodier of the outside firm National Public Relations said it was a “true statement” but was removed for “brevity”. He said she had planned to address the issue at the press conference tomorrow.

You know when the best time is to remove “true statements” for reasons of brevity? Before you send out your release to the entire press gallery. At that point, it would seem that the moment for re-reflection on wording had passed, and only a truly egregious error should be corrected.

Bookmark and Share
  • Stephen

    a "preventable incident" has become an "outbreak."

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

      It goes a lot deeper than that. In the original, Weatherill expounds at length about how very, very independent she was, and how "no party" interfered with her work; she was also releasing her report at the request of the minister, neither of which makes it into the final version. I have no idea why the changes would have been made.

  • zamprelli

    Hey you! We don't like the part about you being "able to conduct my investigation independently and impartially" with "no interference from any party whatsoever." Take it out !

  • officerfarva

    I bet the Liberals are responsible for this tinkering.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    It is a puzzle. I assume the initial description as preventable would have huge implications if there is still an active court case. My understanding is that the case was settled (Are there holdouts?)
    However, now the new wording at least implicitly defines the outbreak as not preventable. If that was so, then logically we cannot prevent it from happening again. Is that really the message they want to send?

  • http://www.ontario.ca civil servant

    "100 key individuals"

    • zamprelli

      locksmiths?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

    Positive experiences and a lack of interference are assumed. It is gauche to refer to them explicitly.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

      It did sound a little bit defensive, didn't it? But honestly, once it was sent out, there's no upside to retracting, because — as I have told and re-told my flack friends — the best way to guarantee that reporters will read your news releases is to hastily issue a correction.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/john_g2708 john g

        Indeed. You'd think by this time the various departmental press secretaries would have learned to embed errors in their positive news releases.

      • Chet Champion

        Whose staffing these clowns?

      • Greg

        Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

          The speech is short. But it's the most rousing speech I've ever read. It's been worked on, here and in Russia, on and off, for over eight years

          • Greg

            Message received.

  • ScienceJournalist

    That's so … weird.
    They deliberately took out the part about the report being impartial and unaffected by any of the parties.

    • tobyornottoby

      And the monkey in the picture in the second release isn't wearing a bow tie.

  • cam

    That the minister requested she release the report was all a dream.

  • http://twitter.com/larrylarry @larrylarry

    Harper's name is also no longer mentioned in the revised release. This is fun.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

    THIRD VERSION REVISED REVISED
    July 20, 2009 (Ottawa): Today, I submitted.
    Sheila Weatherill

    • http://www.ontario.ca civil servant

      Is Ms. Weatherill a MMA fighter in addition to a listeriosisis investigator?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      I am quite partial to Wells's PR effort with revision 3.

      The job's done, and I will talk about it tomorrow. See ya.

      Was that so hard?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    perhaps a coup d'état then
    Is Gerry Ritz now PM?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/WDM WDM

      Watch your back Wayne Easter

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/john_g2708 john g

    Sometime between the first and second versions she also found time to receive advice from a group of experts made up of respected Canadian and US food safety and public health advisors.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/john_g2708 john g

    You know when the best time is to remove “true statements” for reasons of brevity? Before you send out your release to the entire press gallery. At that point, it would seem that the moment for re-reflection on wording had passed, and only a truly egregious error should be corrected.

    Agreed completely. That's utter nonsense.

    My best guess…they reissued it to get rid of "preventable", and they decided to clean up a few other things along the way. But even taking their explanation at face value…you're completely right. After having issued it once, I can't believe a company that does this sort of thing for a living doesn't understand the optics of what they just did. Mind boggling incompetence at best.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/futurepm matthew

      Think about this particular government for a moment: what about this (probably minor, and definitely soon to be forgotten) debacle makes you think that it was an outside firm that was responsible for making the Conservatives shoot themselves in the foot? I'm no fan of them — I'll shout my Liberal affiliation from the rooftops — but really, every problem they've had has been of their own making. Hastily issuing a corrected press release pretty much fits in with every mistake they've made over the past year or so…

  • Chet Champion

    Uhhhh, SPONSORSHIP SCANDAL!

  • A Reader

    And how many angels dancing on the head of this pin are the Conservatives responsible for?..
    ROTFL!
    More misrepresentational, sensationalist hogswallop from the daughter of Ed Broadbent's perennial fart-catcher.
    Get a life!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hollinm hollinm

    Once again all the tinfoil hats appear in full force. The fact is the report is going to be released at a press conference and the media can ask all the questions they want. Is this not the real issue or are we looking for boogey men in every corner?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

      That will definitely be one of the issues tomorrow, which is why ITQ will be there to liveblog it all. Oh, although on that subject, I do have another gripe: Why no lockup, or at least a delay between when the release will be made available, and the news conference? It's hard to ask insightful, substantial questions on a report that is likely to be dense and complex without a little bit of time to read through it first. I know, I know. Whine, whine, whine. But it's in the public interest this time, at least!

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

        I guess you will have to resort to asking revisionist questions about the nuances and details of the announcement. Three suggestions:
        1) Was this a preventable occurrence?
        2) Did the Minister retract his request to make this report public?
        3) Who are all these people around me with tinfoil on there heads?

  • knick

    Given past allegations of her conflict of interest, and today's quick reshuffle, the government seems to be expecting some blowback from her 'independent investigation' press conference tomorrow.

  • knick

    Oh well, that's a relief…Harper has promised not to 'tinker' with the report before it's released. I guess we can all rest easy now and wait patiently for tomorrow's report that will doubtless reassure us that we have nothing to worry about when it comes to this government's commitment to food safety
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/list…

  • Anon

    Has Dimitri Soudas apologized yet?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Harbles Harbles

    "Ms. Weatherill is delivering her report four months past the original March 15 deadline set when Mr. Harper promised an “arm's-length” investigation on Sept. 6, a day before last year's election was called."

    Say no more. Know what I Mean? Bob's ur Unkle.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Harbles Harbles

    "Ms. Weatherill is delivering her report four months past the original March 15 deadline set when Mr. Harper promised an “arm's-length” investigation on Sept. 6, a day before last year's election was called."

    Say no more. Know what I Mean? Bob's ur Unkle.

    Tin Foil no good. Need lead to protect from bremsstrahlung.

  • wilson

    here's the explaination, not that it will satisfy some:

    ''National Public Relations, which is handling media duties for the listeriosis investigation, said the quote came from an earlier draft and nothing should be read into its removal.

    “It's true, it's just that we took it out for brevity,” spokesman David Rodier said. “It's just a mistake. We sent out the wrong [statement].”

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Harbles Harbles

      " “It's true, it's just that we took it out for brevity,” spokesman David Rodier said. “It's just a mistake. We sent out the wrong [statement].”
      "

      It's true. that's all there is to see here. Move along mind your business
      We are incompetent.
      We screw up at least 50% of the time.

      Whew.

      Are you relieved?

      .

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Harbles Harbles

      “It's true, it's just that we took it out for brevity,” spokesman David Rodier said. “It's just a mistake. We sent out the wrong [statement].”

      It's true. that's all there is to see here. Move along mind your business
      We are incompetent.
      We screw up at least 50% of the time.

      Whew.

      Are you relieved?

      .

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

    The fate of "At the request of the Minister, …" reeks of pissing contest.

    someone's reached their limit.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_A_N M_A_N

    Wow, that's some top notch media crafting there.

    Might as well have sent the second one with a legal notice asking reporters to agree to not read the first one…

    You'd almost think "preventable" was some sort of foreshadowing….dun dun DUNNNNNNN…

From Macleans