The case against having kids

They can hurt your career, your marriage, your social life, your bank book. Why bother?

by Anne Kingston on Friday, July 24, 2009 12:20pm - 655 Comments

The case against having kidsElaine Lui was 29 years old and had been married for a year when she and her husband, Jacek Szenowicz, decided that they didn’t want children. “Before that, we didn’t give it a lot of thought,” says the Vancouver-based eTalk reporter who writes the popular celebrity gossip blog LaineyGossip.com. “It was just an assumption, ‘You get married, you have kids.’ ” Front-line exposure to a close relative’s three young children and the work they required provided a wake-up call, Lui says. “That killed it for us. We just looked at each other and said, ‘We don’t want them.’ ”

In the ensuing six years, the couple has been barraged with reasons why they should change their minds, from “Your life will have no value if you don’t” to “You’ll be so lonely when you get old” to Lui’s favourite: “Don’t you want to know what your children would look like?” “Any baby we’d have would be of mixed race,” she says. “So everyone says, ‘Oh, it would be so gorgeous!’ ” She laughs. “And I’m like, ‘Wow, that’s really going to make me want to change my whole life.’ ” It’s a life the couple enjoys: they work together on her website (he handles the business side), golf together, engage in community volunteer work, and dote on their dog, Marcus.

As baby refuseniks, Lui and Szenowicz belong to a tiny but growing minority challenging the final frontier of reproductive freedom: the right to say no to children without being labelled social misfits or selfish for something they don’t want.

“Are you planning to have children?” is a question Statistics Canada has asked since 1990. In 2006, 17.1 per cent of women aged 30 to 34 said “no,” as did 18.3 per cent of men in the same category. The U.S. National Center of Health Statistics reports that the number of American women of childbearing age who define themselves as “child-free” rose sharply in the past generation: 6.2 per cent of women in 2002 between the ages of 15 and 44 reported that they don’t expect to have children in their lifetime, up from 4.9 per cent in 1982.

Still, in a pro-natalist culture that celebrates the “yummy mummy,” and obsessively monitors baby bumps and the mini Jolie-Pitt entourage in magazines, saying “I don’t want kids” is akin to “There’s a bomb on the plane.” In the past, those who chose not to have children did so quietly, observes Toronto-based poet Molly Peacock, whose 1998 memoir Paradise, Piece by Piece was acclaimed a breakthrough for its candid recounting of her decision not to have children. “It has been an intense and underground conversation,” Peacock says, noting many childless women contacted her to say, “At last, someone is talking about what I’ve been living silently.”

Increasingly, though, the childless by choice are vocal about it. Laura and Vincent Ciaccio are spokespeople for No Kidding!, a social club for non-parents founded in Vancouver in 1984 that now boasts more than 40 chapters in five countries. Laura, a 31-year-old attorney in New York City, refers to children as a “calling,” one that she and Vincent, a Ph.D. candidate in social psychology at Rutgers University, have decided isn’t for them. “I didn’t want to make such a major lifestyle change just because it was something society expected of me,” she says. “Children should be something people have because they really want them.”

Speaking up on the subject can elicit a smackdown. Last February, the 37-year-old British journalist Polly Vernon wrote a defiant column in the Guardian enumerating the reasons she didn’t want children: “I’m appalled by the idea,” she wrote. “Both instinctually (‘Euuuw! You think I should do what to my body?’) and intellectually (‘And also to my career, my finances, my lifestyle and my independence?’).” The response was terrifying, she reports: “Emails and letters arrived, condemning me, expressing disgust. I was denounced as bitter, selfish, un-sisterly, unnatural, evil. I’m now routinely referred to as ‘baby-hating journalist Polly Vernon.’ ”

Lui, who observes celebrity for a living, rejects what she sees as a pernicious retrograde swing back to the ’50s in which motherhood was celebrated as women’s highest calling. She points to actress Jennifer Garner remaining relevant in the celebrity press simply by being photographed with her two young daughters, and to Tori Spelling reclaiming her reputation after breaking up her current husband’s marriage by churning out bestsellers about motherhood. “Motherhood is the ultimate whitewash,” she says. “Steal someone’s husband, or be a drug addict, then become a mother and you’re redeemed.”

Bookmark and Share
  • http://www.ypsee.com/implants_dentaires_etranger.html implant dentaire

    so cute, by the way couples who dont want to have kids they are sick and afraid of life and not my type .
    implant dentaire

  • Steve

    It's a good thing for Elaine that her mother didn't share her thoughts 29 years ago.

  • Pandora_360

    I am 34 and I thought I wanted kids but I really don't think I want one or two or three. I enjoy my friends kids and then they go home lol. There is nothing wrong with this and I am within my rights to just say "NO". Just because I have ovaries and a vagina doesn't mean I should run out and have children.

  • Bev. Cooke

    What bothers me is that in order to justify the choice not to have children, the article, and some of the authors of the child-free books seem to want to demonize having children. What's wrong with making a personal choice and being respected for it, regardless of whether it is to have, or not have, children?

    I also protest that this is the "first generation" that is childless by choice – a minority is NOT a full generation, and two of my aunts, who died eight and ten years ago at 87 and 94, were single and childless by choice. They were courted, they had the opportunity to marry and have children and chose instead not to (Well, actually one of them did marry – at 75!). Two of my four cousins have chosen to remain single and childless as well – and they're now in their 70s. Several members of the generation just below mine are also childless by choice – so it's been going on very quietly for a while.

  • Ede

    I think it is great if you choose not to have kids. It is your choice and being the mother of 4, I loved being a " mom" But it is not for everyone and with the restrictions on what authority adults have over children is a scary prospect. I see so many children out of control because the parents are afraid to assert themselves. The kids suffer because they have not learned boundaries. Teachers can no longer discipline kids at school and the kids know it. They run over what authority the adults should possess. So, DO NOT judge anyone for not wanting kids. If I had to do it again in this day and age I would opt not to have children.

  • theintellectual

    i have a perfectly good case that stands well on its own. kids are loud and annoying. why anyone would want to saddle themselves with the snot nosed little buggers to the rest of their lives is beyond me.

  • Mizzumi

    Great article, I completely agree.

  • Daily Grind

    I have 2 children, and did so half-heartedly, believing the LIES that: 1-babies are a "bundle of joy", 2-so much fun and experiencing life to the fullest and 3-we will regret not having them when we get older. Now, I regret having them, for all the reasons stated in this book. I hope that books and resources on the benefits of NOT having kids, and the data that REAPEATEDLY show that childless couples are HAPPIER, become accepted, and HEARD in our culture. Heard just as loud, or louder, than the "motherhood is joy/fulfillment" messages.

  • Marc Soubliere

    Most Canadians would more than agree children are a matter of choice. Why agonize over minority opinion? Population is fragile thing, careful what we wish for.

  • Jean

    I feel that the childfree people are not selfish and are helping the planet by not contributing to overpopulation. They will not have to worry about descendants inheriting the grim future that the human race will experience. The world has more and more problems all the time. Most kids are spoiled, whiny, lazy, irritating, expensive and more trouble than they are worth. Get a dog instead. Dogs are much more enjoyable than kids.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Robert-Brozewicz/1422577987 Robert Brozewicz

     Actually the developed countries are geared towards limiting number of children. The horrendous property prices, the incredibly hard ways to get a decent job (you need experience and without experience you will not get the job and hence experience) the promoting of women to the point that not only men have harder times to impress them, but women are more focused on themselves and limit chances of having children. It is amazing that despite that we still have great deal of new born babies. Finally, there is another thing. While the “developed” countries have less and less babies, the “developing” ones have good number of them. The end result will be not the extinction of human race but of European race. The winners will be Africans and Asians. Well, I am not sure if the winners, but the Earth will be populated anyway. Humans of recent strand may be just 100-250 000 years old, but in the past what is little known there were many other streaks of human species with often highly advanced culture and technology, even as many as millions of years ago. True, though that this strand of humans is nearly slated for extinction anyway, at it is done on a high level. 

  • JorgeMA

    This is a great article! Although I do want kids i don’t think people should be condemned for not wanting any. Can you direct me to any links about this topic? Such as the realities of having children, instead of the fairytale fluff that gets fed to you if you have kids or the “your a totally selfish ass” if you don’t? I want intelligent arguments for both sides as well as real life examples, but haven’t found anything relevant so far… 

From Macleans